- Research article
- Open Access
The cell morphogenesis ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN) gene, a plant homolog of CtBP/BARS, is involved in abiotic and biotic stress response in higher plants
© Gachomo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 30 August 2012
- Accepted: 10 May 2013
- Published: 14 May 2013
ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN), one of the CtBP family proteins, plays a major role in microtubule-dependent cell morphogenesis. Microarray analysis of mammalian AN homologs suggests that AN might function as a transcriptional activator and regulator of a wide range of genes. Genetic characterization of AN mutants suggests that AN might be involved in multiple biological processes beyond cell morphology regulation.
Using a reverse genetic approach, we provide in this paper the genetic, biochemical, and physiological evidence for ANGUSTIFOLIA’s role in other new biological functions such as abiotic and biotic stress response in higher plants. The T-DNA knockout an-t1 mutant exhibits not only all the phenotypes of previously described angustifolia null mutants, but also copes better than wild type under dehydration and pathogen attack. The stress tolerance is accompanied by a steady-state modulation of cellular H2O2 content, malondialdehyde (MDA) derived from cellular lipid peroxidation, and over-expression of stress responsive genes. Our results indicate that ANGUSTIFOLIA functions beyond cell morphology control through direct or indirect functional protein interaction networks mediating other biological processes such as drought and pathogen attacks.
Our results indicate that the ANGUSTIFOLIA gene participates in several biochemical pathways controlling cell morphogenesis, abiotic, and biotic stress responses in higher plants. Our results suggest that the in vivo function of plant ANGUSTIFOLIA has been overlooked and it needs to be further studied beyond microtubule-dependent cell morphogenesis.
- Cell morphogenesis
- Arabidopsis thaliana
- Abiotic stress
- Biotic stress
- T-DNA knockout mutant
In plant cells, the overall developmental fate, whether it be height, fitness, perception of light, the efficiency of gas exchange or the response to both abiotic and biotic stress conditions, depends ultimately on well programmed cellular morphology, size, expansion, number of cellular constituents and a proper coordination of the cells. The overall rate of cell division, elongation, and cell communication contributes to the final shape of the cells [1, 2]. In order to understand plant growth development and improve plant response to a wide range of environmental stresses it is imperative to uncover the genetic interactions and biochemical mechanisms that govern biological processes of cell shape/morphology at different stages of development. Although progress has been made in defining genetic interactions controlling the morphology of specific cell types such as trichomes (leaf hairs) and root hairs [3, 4], the cellular mechanisms controlling plant response to a wide range of stress conditions remain elusive.
Recent genetic studies of Arabidopsis MICROTUBULE associated mutants including ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN) and ZWICHEL (ZWI) revealed widespread cell morphological defects [5–7]. Several mutations of the genes affecting leaf morphology have been reported. However, the mutation affecting the ANGUSTIFOLIA gene was shown to result in narrow cotyledons, narrow rosette leaves, twisted seed pods (siliques) , and less-branched trichomes , suggesting that the AN gene might play a role in leaf blade development. The narrow-leaf mutant, angustifolia (an), was originally isolated from irradiated seeds  and this mutation was later used as a visible marker for genetic mapping of ANGUSTIFOLIA. To understand the functions of the AN gene, AN orthologs from various plant species including Arabidopsis, Japanese morning glory, rice, moss, and liverwort, have been recently studied [10, 11]. Previous sequence comparison studies demonstrated that the plant AN gene encodes a protein related to C-terminal binding protein/brefeldin A ADP-ribosylated substrate (CtBP/BARS) with an important role in animal development [12, 13], and an encoded protein thought to repress transcription in a manner similar to that of animal CtBPs [6, 10]. However, its function has been confirmed to be distinct from that of animal CtBP . All plant AN proteins have LxCxE/D and NLS motifs that are not found in animal CtBPs [6, 10]. Moreover, no region corresponding to the long C-terminus of the plant AN genes has been detected in animal CtBPs; therefore, the C-terminal region is thought to be related to a plant-specific function of AN genes . This suggests that the plant AN proteins may share some evolutionarily conserved functions with invertebrate and vertebrate CtBPs but also possess some unique functions.
So far, there is no other reported biological function of ANGUSTIFOLIA beyond the microtubule cytoskeleton mediated cell morphogenesis in plants. Meanwhile, a transcriptional role of ANGUSTIFOLIA similar to that of the invertebrate and vertebrate CtBP family proteins has been suggested on the basis of microarray analysis of transcription in angustifolia mutant background . This analysis suggests that the AN gene might regulate gene expression as a transcriptional repressor. In addition, the microarray analysis has indicated that several genes were expressed at higher levels in angustifolia mutant plants than in wild type , suggesting that ANGUSTIFOLIA may regulate leaf morphogenesis and other biological processes (i.e., association with microtubule cytoskeleton and by transcriptional regulation). In contrast, recent findings suggest that ANGUSTIFOLIA functions outside the nucleus to control cell morphogenesis . This intriguing finding  and previously reported data could co-exist if ANGUSTIFOLIA employs two different molecular mechanisms: one to control cell morphology and the other, biological functions, respectively. We therefore checked this work for other possible biological functions of ANGUSTIFOLIA that have not been reported in plants so far. ANGUSTIFOLIA is an evolutionarily conserved protein representing a perfect model to study functional regulatory network across species.
In this work, we used a reverse genetics approach to examine and characterize a SALK_T-DNA knockout angustifolia mutant (an-t1) with respect to a wide range of biological phenotypes. Particular attention was paid to newly identified phenotypes. Our data reveal for the first time, new biological functions for ANGUSTIFOLIA in plant response to both abiotic and biotic stress conditions. The newly identified phenotypes associated with ANGUSTIFOLIA knockout mutation is involved in ROS (H2O2) and stress responsive gene regulation mediating environmental stress response in higher plants. This phenotypic observation suggests reconsidering the role of ANGUSTIFOLIA beyond cell morphogenesis control.
Molecular characterization of an-t1 knockout mutant
We next assessed the degree of sequence conservation of AN across monocot and dicot plants including the newly sequenced plant genomes. Our data revealed a high amino acid sequence identity of AN proteins across monocot and dicot plants (Additional file 1: Figure S1), indicating a functional conservation of AN across plant species.
Novel morphological phenotype of angustifolia null mutant
Dark-grown hypocotyl and petiole phenotype of WT and angustifolia mutants
Hypocotyl length (mm)
22.5 ± 0.5 (n = 24) a
21.6 ± 0.3 (n = 18) a
16.5 ± 0.6 (n = 36) b
18.2 ± 0.3 (n = 32) b
The cotyledon petiole and root phenotype of the an-t1 mutant under dark grown conditions resembles the phenotype of wave mutants, which are associated with actin cytoskeleton defects . We therefore hypothesized that ANGUSTIFOLIA might regulate petiole shape and root elongation through actin cytoskeleton networks. To test our hypothesis, we analyzed the growth of wild type and an-t1 mutants under latrunculin B (LatB), an actin filament depolymerization drug. Both wild type (n = 26 seedlings) and an-t1mutants (n = 30 seedlings) are significantly affected by Lat B treatment. However, we did not observe any differences in the effect of Lat B between wild type and mutant seedlings (Additional file 2: Figure S2, AB), suggesting that ANGUSTIFOLIA does not regulate root elongation and cell shape through actin cytoskeleton networks. Treatment of wild type (n = 22 seedlings) and an-t1 mutants (n = 25 seedlings) with Taxol, a microtubule stabilizing drug, significantly affected both cytoskeleton and root elongation in an-t1 background compared to wild type (Additional file 3: Figure S3, A-C), suggesting that ANGUSTIFOLIA controls root length and cell morphology through microtubule cytoskeleton.
ANGUSTIFOLIA controls other new biological processes
ANGUSTIFOLIA regulates plant stress response through altered stress inducible gene expression
Malondialdehyde (MDA) derived from lipid peroxidation in WT and angustifolia mutant background under control and stress conditions
MDA (nmol/mg FW)
21.8 ± 2.5 (n = 16) a
70.5 ± 5.3 (n = 16) b
20.5 ± 1.8 (n = 22) a
32.6 ± 2.5 (n = 22) c
18.9 ± 2.2 (n = 16) a
35.2 ± 3.8 (n = 16) c
ANGUSTIFOLIA regulates a wide range of protein networks
ANGUSTIFOLIA has been postulated to function by transcriptional repression . These studies raised the possibility that ANGUSTIFOLIA might also have other unrelated microtubule-associated cytoplasmic functions. Recently, ANGUSTIFOLIA has been reported to function outside the nucleus, and exclusively through membrane trafficking pathways, localizing on punctuate structures around the Golgi . To further understand the function of the AN gene beyond microtubule-associated cell morphogenesis regulation, we used the latest high throughput integrated knowledge base Arabidopsis protein interaction network analysis (ANAP) tool  to bring insights into the functional interaction protein network of ANGUSTIFOLIA at the cellular level.
ANAP provides a far more detailed, reliable, and extensive knowledge of protein interaction networks than those produced from any single protein interaction database. Additional file 4: Figure S4 (A) shows the resulting network of 10 nodes and 11 edges, based on direct protein interactions. The ANGUSTIFOLIA query protein is marked in red in the center (Additional file 4: Figure S4, A), and each associated protein is linked by a uniquely colored line, based on the interaction detection method, and the rendering rules for the interaction detection methods (Additional file 4: Figure S4, Additional file 5: Table S1).
A more comprehensive interaction analysis using each of the 10 modes (Additional file 4: Figure S4, A) revealed an extended interaction network of 144 nodes and 234 edges (Additional file 4: Figure S4, B), where the initial 10 nodes are marked in red in the centers of the extended interactions (Additional file 4: Figure S4, B). Each associated protein is linked by a uniquely colored line, based on the interaction detection method and the rendering rules from the complete list of all interaction detection methods (Additional file 4: Figure S4, B). This interaction network (Additional file 4: Figure S4, B), which has never been reported before, sheds light into the probable role of ANGUSTIFOLIA beyond microtubule-associated cell morphogenesis control, and argues in favor of ANGUSTIFOLIA functioning in a wide range of biological processes.
ANGUSTIFOLIA is here shown to be important not only for cell shape, trichome, and branching phenotype but also for various other biological functions including environmental stress response in plants. Our data reveals that mutations in the AN gene results in delayed flowering, senescence, and reduced seed productivity. Some of these phenotypes are new and the mechanism by which ANGUSTIFOLIA regulates transition processes from the vegetative to the reproductive phase is still unknown. The role of plant ANGUSTIFOLIA at the transcriptional level is still controversial. ANGUSTIFOLIA encodes a protein with a sequence similar to CTBPs/BARS that are expressed in all organs [6, 15]. CtBP family proteins predominantly function as transcriptional factors. We postulate that ANGUSTIFOLIA might primarily function as a transcription factor modulating the expression of a wide range of genes involved in different biological processes in plants. CTBPs in Drosophila have been shown to bind transcriptional repressors such as zinc-finger transcription factors . Although, plant ANGUSTIFOLIA failed to complement Drosophila CtBP mutation,  uur ANAP database analysis suggested that ANGUSTIFOLIA might still act at the transcription level to control a wide range of biological processes in plants. Microarray analyses showed that transcript levels of ~10 genes in an-mutant plants were three time higher than those in the WT plants. As mentioned above, the function of ANGUSTIFOLIA has been associated only with polarized cellular growth and cell morphogenesis through microtubule cytoskeleton accessory proteins . To our knowledge, this is the first time that ANGUSTIFOLIA has been shown to control environmental stress response in higher plants.
The an-t1 dark-grown phenotype (enhanced petiole elongation and a premature activation of leaf initiation (Figure 3A-C, Table 1)) is a very new phenotype. In dark-grown WT, petiole elongation and leaf initiation are normally inhibited (Figure 3A-C, Table 1). Other previously distorted mutants that displayed this dark-grown phenotype include brk1, scar1,2,3,4 quadruple, and dis2/arpc2 mutants . The dark-grown phenotype has been also reported in the LEAFY COTYLEDON1 mutant . Mutation of the LEAFY COTYLEDON1, a putative transcription co-activator, causes similar petiole and hypocotyl dark-grown phenotypes  suggesting that this phenotype is under a developmental-dependent regulation pathway [17, 22]. Furthermore, the newly identified dark-grown phenotype indicates that ANGUSTIFOLIA negatively regulates growth in the petiole [16, 17].
In addition, the results presented here demonstrate that plants with a loss of function of ANGUSTIFOLIA were more tolerant to drought and pathogen attack than WT plants (Figure 5A-F). The fact that this knockout mutant line is more tolerant than the WT suggests that the expression of the AN gene co-represses the abiotic and biotic associated genes. In general, no apparent phenotypic difference was observed in an-t1 and WT plants under non-stress conditions, indicating that the activity of ANGUSTIFOLIA is stress inducible.
In order to further ascertain the role of the AN gene in plant stress tolerance, the expression profile of stress-related genes was analyzed in both WT and an-t1 under control and stress conditions (Figure 7A,B). The results from the expression analysis of DREB2 (member of drought responsive element binding subfamily A-2 transcription factor family) and COR15 (cold-regulated 15-A) genes show higher transcript accumulation on an-t1 background under both control and stress conditions (Figure 7A,B). This demonstrates that the AN gene negatively regulates stress-inducible genes and controls the stress response in higher plants. These findings are consistent with the suggestion that the AN gene controls the stress response in plants at the transcriptional level by regulating the expression of a selected-stress-responsive and ROS-relates genes as suggested by the microarray and the interaction protein network data. The role of the AN gene in stress response is further corroborated by the accumulation of higher MDA derived from cellular lipid peroxidation in WT compared to an-t1 and an-1 mutants under stress conditions (Table 2).
Similar to the dehydrogenase protein superfamily, CtBP family proteins, the mammalian ANGUSTIFOLIA homologs, contain a conserved Rossman fold motif required for the binding of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide co-factors . Indeed, CtBP1 and CtBP2 have been shown to bind to NAD+/NADH redox status [24, 25], enhancing the interaction of CtBP with target transcription factors . This redox status on modulating the repression versus activation of transcription by CtBP is an interesting aspect for future investigation. Since CtBP appears to be a redox-sensing transcriptional regulator, its activity may be modulated by the energy status of the cell during development and in diseases or abiotic stress conditions. The An-t1 knockout line displayed an elevated level of ROS (H2O2) under drought and pathogen attack (Figure 5G-I). This is an interesting observation because the generation of ROS and related molecules is common to both abiotic and biotic stress . Both types of stress trigger the increase of H2O2, probably via common mechanisms. The probability of ANGUSTIFOLIA playing a role in pathogen defense and abiotic stress response has not been reported before. The stress-activated ANGUSTIFOLIA could possibly have a second role. Besides the ROS-mediated redox activity, it may catalyze reactions that can be considered as metabolic escape routes providing alternative pathways for NAD(P)H under various environmental stress conditions. Indeed, ANAP database analysis showed that ANGUSTIFOLIA interacts with several oxidation-reduction biological processes and abiotic and biotic stress response processes (Additional file 4: Figure S4, B, Additional file 6: Table S2) supporting the stress response phenotype observed in this study.
In conclusion, the present study provides a substantial body of work that demonstrates the potential of ANGUSTIFOLIA to regulate cell morphogenesis and to confer both abiotic and biotic stress tolerance through ROS-mediated redox activity. It would be interesting to investigate the ANGUSTIFOLIA knockout genes in agronomically important crops with the aim of improving crop tolerance to multiple environmental stressors. Further studies at transcriptional and proteomic levels are needed to elucidate the wide range of pleiotropic biological functions of ANGUSTIFOLIA in plants.
Plant material, growth conditions, and stress treatments conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Col-0) and an-t1 knockout mutant (T-DNA SALK_026489) from Arabidopsis Biological Research Center (ABRC) were used throughout this work. Appropriate seeds were sown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar plates or soil and seedlings were allowed to grow under continuous illumination (120–150 μEm−2s−1) at 22°C. Dark-growing conditions were obtained by wrapping the plates with three layers of aluminum foil and the plates were incubated under the same growth conditions. For stress conditions, seedlings were used directly from MS-agar plate and soil-grown seedlings were subjected to cytoskeleton associated drugs (LatB and Taxol) and abiotic/biotic stress treatments respectively. For dehydration stress, 2-week-old soil-grown plants were kept without watering for pre-determine time period and then re-watered according to Kotchoni et al. . For pathogen infection, 2-week-old soil seedlings were infected with Pseudomonas syringae as described by Barth et al.  (See detail, below).
Infection of plants with virulent pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326
For pathogen infection, 2-week-old soil seedlings were infected with Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 as described by Barth et al. . At the indicated time, bacterial growth in leaves was determined in 0.55 cm2 leaf discs that were extracted by macerating the discs in 300 ml of 10 mM MgCl2. Serial dilutions were plated out on agar plates containing 100 mg ml-1 streptomycin. The infection experiment was carried out in three independently replicate experiments.
Mutant characterization and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis
T-DNA insertion in the ANGUSTIFOLIA gene was PCR-confirmed using ANGUSTIFOLIA gene specific primers (For: 5’-TACAACAACCCAAGTGGAAGA-3’; Rev: 5’-TCGAGGGCCTGATTCGTTCTT-3’) and T-DNA left border primer Lb: 5’-CCGTCTCACTGGTGAAAAGAA-3’. The expression of the ANGUSTIFOLIA gene in an-t1 mutant background was analyzed by extracting total RNA from the an-t1 homozygous line using TRIzol reagent (Molecular Research Center) and reverse transcribed as described previously . Thereafter, the cDNA was used as template for PCR using ANGUSTIFOLIA gene specific primers. Actin2 transcripts (Act2-For: 5′-GCGGATCCATGGCTGAGGCTGATGATATTCAACC-3′; Act2-Rev: 5′-CGTCTAGACCATGGAACATTTTCTGTGAACGATTCC-3′) was used as internal control.
Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for stress-responsive gene expression analysis
Number of bases
ANAP database dependent ANGUSTIFOLIA protein interaction network
To fully understand the role of ANGUSTIFOLIA at the molecular and cellular level in various biological processes we used the newly developed protein interaction network database ANAP (http://gmdd.shgmo.org/Computational-Biology/ANAP/ANAP_V1.1) . To construct the protein interaction network, the ANAP database tool utilized data from multiple sources, comprising both predicted interactions and experimentally tested evidence .
Determination of flowering time
Flowering time was assessed by counting the number of rosette leaves when flower bolts were 1 cm in length or when floral buds were visible at the center of the rosette as previously reported .
Measurement of H2O2content
Rosette leaves (approximately 0.1 g) were incubated under rocking condition (250 rpm) in 3 ml reagent [25 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0; containing 0.05% guaiacol (Sigma) and 2.5 units ml-1 horseradish peroxidase (Sigma)] in darkness at 25°C for 2 h. Absorbance of the solution was measured at 450 nm as described . H2O2 concentrations were determined using a H2O2 standard curve, containing 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, or 150 mM H2O2 (Sigma) as previously described .
Lipid peroxidation assay
The levels of lipid peroxidation in plant cells were assayed with the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test, which determines the amounts of malondialdehyde (MDA) as end product of lipid peroxidation .
Experiments were performed at least three times. Data were expressed as mean values ± SE. P values were determined by Student’s t test analysis.
We would like to thank Dr. Barth Carina (West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV) for providing us with Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 strain; and Dr. Hirokazu Tsukaya (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) for providing us with the angustifolia mutant seeds (an-1). We thank Kimberlee Moran (Rutgers University, Camden) for technical assistance, proof-reading, and helpful comments on the manuscript. We acknowledged the NSF DBI-0216233 MRI grant “Acquisition of a Scanning Electron Microscope for Collaborative Use at Rutgers, Camden” for the acquisition of the Arabidopsis SEM images in this work. This work was supported by the Rutgers-University start-up funds and the RU-FAIR Mini-Grant # 430074 to SOK.
- Arkebuer TJ, Norman JM: From cell growth to leaf growth: I. Coupling cell division and cell expansion. Agron J. 1995, 87: 99-105. 10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700010018x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maksymowych R: Cell division and cell elongation in leaf development of Xanthium pensylvanicum. Am J Bot. 1963, 50: 891-901. 10.2307/2439776.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotchoni SO, Zakharova T, Mallery EL, El-Din El-Assal S, Le J, Szymanski DB: The association of the Arabidopsis actin-related protein (ARP) 2/3 complex with cell membranes is linked to its assembly status, but not to its activation. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151: 2095-2109. 10.1104/pp.109.143859.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang C, Kotchoni SO, Samuels L, Szymanski DB: SPIKE1 signals originate from and assemble specialized domains of the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr Biol. 2010, 20: 2144-2149. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hülskamp M, Miséra S, Jürgens G: Genetic dissection of trichome cell development in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1994, 76: 555-566. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90118-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Folkers U, Kirik V, Schöbinger U, Falk S, Krishnakumar S, Pollock MA, Oppenheimer DG, Day I, Reddy AR, Jürgens G, Hülskamp M: The cell morphogenesis gene ANGUSTIFOLIA encodes a CtBP/BARS-like protein and is involved in the control of the microtubulecytoskeleton. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1280-1288. 10.1093/emboj/21.6.1280.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chinnadurai G: CtBP family proteins: more than transcriptional corepressors. Bioessays. 2002, 25: 9-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rédei GP: Single locus heterosis. Z Vererbungsl. 1962, 93: 164-170.Google Scholar
- Hauge BM, Hanley SM, Cartinhour S, Cherry JM, Goodmann HM, Koornneef M, Stam P, Chang C, Kempin S, Medrano L, Meyerowitz EM: An integrated genetic/RFLP map of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Plant J. 1993, 3: 745-754. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.00745.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim GT, Shoda K, Tsuge T, Cho KH, Uchimiya H, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K, Tsukaya H: The ANGUSTIFOLIA gene of Arabidopsis, a plant CtBP gene, regulates leaf-cell expansion, the arrangement of cortical microtubules in leaf cells and expression of a gene involved in cell-wall formation. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1267-1279. 10.1093/emboj/21.6.1267.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho K, Shindo T, Kim G, Nitasaka E, Tsukaya H: Characterization of a member of the AN subfamily, IAN, from Ipomoea nil. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46: 250-255. 10.1093/pcp/pci020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schaeper U, Boyd JM, Verma S, Uhlmann E, Subramanian T, Chinnadurai G: Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 10467-10471. 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10467.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nardini M, Spanò S, Cericola C, Pesce A, Massaro A, Millo E, Luini A, Corda D, Bolognesi M: CtBP/BARS: a dual-function protein involved in transcription co-repression and Golgi membrane fission. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 3122-3130. 10.1093/emboj/cdg283.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stern MD, Aihara H, Cho KH, Kim GT, Horiguchi G, Roccaro GA, Guevara E, Sun HH, Neggri D, Tsukaya H, Nibu Y: Structurally related Arabidopsis ANGUSTIFORLIA is functionally distinct from the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. Dev Genes Evol. 2007, 217: 759-769. 10.1007/s00427-007-0186-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Minamisawa N, Sato M, Cho K-H, Ueno H, Takechi K, Kajikawa M, Yamato KT, Ohyama K, Toyooka K, Kim G-T, Horiguchi G, Takano H, Ueda T, Tsukaya H: ANGUSTIFOLIA, a plant homolog of CtBP/BARS, functions outside the nucleus. Plant J. 2011, 68: 788-799. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04731.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uhlrig JF, Mutondo M, Zimmermann I, Deeks MJ, Machesky LM, Thomas P, Uhrig S, Rambke C, Hussey PJ, Hulskamp M: The role of Arabidopsis SCAR genes in ARP2-ARP3-dependent cell morphogenesis. Development. 2007, 134: 967-977. 10.1242/dev.02792.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang C, Mallery EL, Schlueter J, Huang S, Fan Y, Brankle S, Staiger CJ, Szymanski DB: Arabidopsis SCARs function interchangeably to meet actin-related protein 2/3 activation thresholds during morphogenesis. Plant Cell. 2008, 20: 995-1011. 10.1105/tpc.107.055350.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K: Arabidopsis DNA encoding two desiccation-responsive rd29 genes. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101: 1119-1120. 10.1104/pp.101.3.1119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotchoni SO, Kuhns C, Ditzer A, Kirch H-H, Bartels D: Overexpression of different aldehyde dehydrogenase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana confers tolerance to abiotic stress and protects plants against lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29: 1033-1048. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01458.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang C, Marshall A, Zhang D-B, Zoe A, Wilson ZA: ANAP: an integrated knowledge base for Arabidopsis protein interaction network analysis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 158: 1523-1533.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nibu Y, Zhang H, Bajor E, Barolo S, Small S, Levine M: dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Kruppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 7009-7020. 10.1093/emboj/17.23.7009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casson SA, Lindsey K: The turnip mutant of Arabidopsis reveals that LEAFY COTYLEDON1 expression mediates the effects of Auxin and sugars to promote embryonic cell identity. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142: 526-541. 10.1104/pp.106.080895.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rossmann MG, Moras D, Olsen KW: Chemical and biological evolution of nucleotide-binding protein. Nature. 1974, 250: 194-199. 10.1038/250194a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmitz F, Konigstorfer A, Sudhof TC: RIBEYE, a component of synaptic ribbons: a protein’s journey through evolution provides insight into synaptic ribbon function. Neuron. 2000, 28: 857-872. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00159-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Q, Piston DW, Goodman RH: Regulation of corepressor function by nuclear NADH. Science. 2002, 295: 1895-1897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laloi C, Apel K, Danon A: Reactive oxygen signalling: the latest news. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004, 7: 323-328. 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barth C, Moeder W, Klessig DF, Conklin PL: The timing of senescence and response to pathogens is altered in the ascorbate-deficient Arabidopsis mutant vitamin c-1. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134: 1784-1792. 10.1104/pp.103.032185.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotchoni SO, Larrimore KE, Mukherjee M, Kempinski CF, Barth C: Alterations in the endogenous ascorbic acid content affect flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149: 803-815.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- An Y-Q, McDowell JM, Huang S, McKinney EC, Chambliss S, Meagher RB: Strong, constitutive expression of the Arabidopsis ACT2/ACT8 actin subclass in vegetative tissues. Plant J. 1996, 10: 107-121. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10010107.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiedemann AV: Evidence for a primary role of active oxygen species in induction of host cell death during infection of bean leaves with Botrytis cinerea. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1997, 50: 151-166. 10.1006/pmpp.1996.0076.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.