Skip to main content

Table 3 One-way ANOVA or Welch’s test of cytoplasm types with phenotypic scores for agronomic traits

From: Cytoplasmic genome types of European potatoes and their effects on complex agronomic traits

Population

Traita

Cytoplasm type

No. of genotypes

Mean (SD)

Statistics

F ratiob

Levelc

BRUISE

BI

T

104

31.0 (2.05)

F = 6.13**

a

Resistant (0) − highly susceptible (100)

D

69

36.5 (2.51)

 

ab

W/γ

30

46.6 (3.81)

 

b

SCB

T

104

−1.87 (1.469)

F = 1.57

 

Lower value indicates higher resistance

D

69

−0.95 (1.804)

  

W/γ

30

2.63 (2.736)

  

PM

T

104

3.49 (0.102)

F = 5.14**

a

Very early (1) − very late (9)

D

68

3.47 (0.127)

 

a

W/γ

30

4.38 (0.191)

 

b

TS

T

104

3.79 (0.084)

F = 5.64**

a

Completely circular (1) − longitudinal (9)

D

69

3.56 (0.103)

 

a

W/γ

30

3.14 (0.156)

 

b

TSC

T

104

15.0 (0.23)

F = 5.89**

a

% fresh weight

D

69

15.7 (0.29)

 

ab

W/γ

30

16.7 (0.43)

 

b

TY

T

96

489.8 (7.36)

F = 3.63*

a

dt/ha

D

59

512.1 (9.39)

 

ab

W/γ

26

528.0 (14.14)

 

b

CHIPS-ALL

CQA

T

114

6.22 (0.187)

F = 0.24

 

Very dark (1) − very light (9)

D

78

6.03 (0.226)

  

W/β

3

6.27 (1.155)

  

W/γ

32

5.96 (0.354)

  

CQS

T

114

2.36 (0.206)

F = 0.77

 

Very dark (1) − very light (9)

D

78

2.54 (0.249)

  

W/β

3

2.55 (1.269)

  

W/γ

32

3.08 (0.389)

  

TSC

T

114

16.4 (0.29)

F = 3.77*

a

% fresh weight

D

78

16.8 (0.35)

 

a

W/β

3

16.6 (1.79)

 

ab

W/γ

32

18.5 (0.55)

 

b

TY

T

114

660.4 (9.06)

F = 1.71

 

dt/ha

D

78

637.0 (10.95)

  

W/β

3

645.2 (55.85)

  

W/γ

32

622.2 (17.10)

  

TSY

T

114

107.8 (2.21)

F = 0.94

 

=TSC × TY

D

78

106.2 (2.67)

  

W/β

3

106.4 (13.62)

  

W/γ

32

114.4 (4.17)

  

GBC

PM

T

365

4.35 (0.096)

F = 2.70

 

Very late (1) − very early (9)

D

109

4.04 (0.175)

  

A

5

2.80 (0.817)

  

W/β

12

4.00 (0.527)

  

W/γ

32

4.06 (0.323)

  

RLBF

T

317

4.80 (0.093)

F = 8.71***

a

Highly susceptible (0) − highly resistant (9)

D

95

5.76 (0.171)

 

b

A

4

3.25 (0.831)

 

a

W/β

12

5.83 (0.480)

 

b

W/γ

25

5.84 (0.332)

 

b

RLBT

T

287

5.49 (0.100)

F = 1.00

 

Highly susceptible (0) − highly resistant (9)

D

84

5.67 (0.185)

  

A

4

3.25 (0.847)

  

W/β

11

5.18 (0.511)

  

W/γ

23

5.70 (0.353)

  

PIN184

MCR

T

84

0.03 (0.007)

F = 11.94***

a

Lower value indicates higher resistance

D

65

−0.02 (0.008)

 

b

M

4

−0.13 (0.033)

 

c

W/β

4

0.01 (0.033)

 

ab

W/γ

25

0.03 (0.013)

 

a

rAUDPC

T

84

0.42 (0.009)

F = 11.53***

a

Lower value indicates higher resistance

D

65

0.34 (0.010)

 

bc

M

4

0.25 (0.039)

 

c

W/β

4

0.32 (0.039)

 

abc

W/γ

25

0.38 (0.016)

 

ab

PM

T

84

5.82 (0.139)

F = 8.44***

a

Very late (1) − very early (9)

D

65

5.39 (0.158)

 

bc

M

4

6.82 (0.637)

 

ab

W/β

4

3.73 (0.637)

 

d

W/γ

25

5.00 (0.255)

 

b

TSC

T

84

16.0 (0.29)

F = 7.25***

a

% fresh weight

D

65

17.0 (0.33)

 

ab

M

4

15.2 (1.32)

 

ab

W/β

4

21.8 (1.32)

 

c

W/γ

25

17.9 (0.53)

 

bc

SUGAR40

RSC

T

8

1.36 (0.355)

F = 1.39

 

% dry weight

D

22

0.60 (0.214)

  

W/γ

10

0.96 (0.318)

  
  1. aSee Table 1 for abbreviations of traits
  2. b *, **, and ***: Significance levels at 5 %, 1 %, and 0.1 %, respectively. ANOVA test was performed for TY, TSC, TSY, SCB, rAUDPC and MCR and Welch’s test for BI, PM, TS, CQA, CQS, PM, RLBE, RLBT, and RSC
  3. cMeans of each pair were compared using Tukey’s test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Means that are not sharing the same alphabets are significantly different at the 5 % level