Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Grape CDPK genes

From: Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the CDPK Gene Family in Grape, Vitis spp

Name

Locus IDa

Length (kb)

No. of aa

N-Term. aab

N-Myr.c

N-Pal.d

No. of EFse

Chr.

Group

Homologs in Vp. f

Identityg (%)

VvCDPK1

GSVIVT01019446001

9.175

528

MGNCNGLP

N

Y

4

2

II

VpCDPK1

-

VvCDPK2

GSVIVT01023866001

5.366

561

MGNTCRGS

N

Y

4

3

I

VpCDPK2

99.5

VvCDPK3

GSVIVT01018778001

6.278

558

MGACLSAT

Y

N

4

4

IV

VpCDPK3

99.5

VvCDPK4

GSVIVT01010743001

16.91

554

MGGCISMP

Y

Y

4

5

III

VpCDPK4

-

VvCDPK5

GSVIVT01025249001

6.444

518

MGNCCASP

N

Y

4

6

III

VpCDPK5

97.7

VvCDPK6

GSVIVT01037295001

3.103

534

MGNCCSQG

Y

Y

4

6

II

VpCDPK6

-

VvCDPK7

GSVIVT01000238001

7.807

540

MGMYTSKD

Y

N

4

7

I

VpCDPK7

-

VvCDPK8

GSVIVT01022524001

11.179

568

MGNTCVGP

N

Y

4

8

I

VpCDPK8

-

VvCDPK9

GSVIVT01022606001

3.947

580

MGNNCVGS

N

Y

4

8

I

VpCDPK9

99.3

VvCDPK10

GSVIVT01011167001

18.233

527

MGNCCRSP

N

Y

4

8

III

VpCDPK10

99.8

VvCDPK11

GSVIVT01033306001

5.504

526

MGNCCVTP

N

Y

4

8

III

VpCDPK11

100

VvCDPK12

GSVIVT01012730001

8.352

545

MGCFSSKE

Y

Y

4

10

II

VpCDPK12

-

VvCDPK13

GSVIVT01001931001

6.935

569

MGNTCVGP

N

Y

4

13

I

VpCDPK13

-

VvCDPK14

GSVIVT01008077001

9.065

552

MGNCIACV

Y

Y

4

17

III

VpCDPK14

-

VvCDPK15

GSVIVT01008749001

5.975

523

MGFCFSRP

Y

Y

4

18

II

VpCDPK15

-

VvCDPK16

GSVIVT01034489001

21.654

626

MVIKTKIS

N

N

4

18

I

VpCDPK16

-

VvCDPK17

GSVIVT01037652001

5.084

536

MGICLSKG

Y

Y

4

19

II

VpCDPK17

-

VvCDPK18

GSVIVT01025745001

8.344

575

MGLCQGKP

ND

Y

2

8

IV

VpCDPK18

-

VvCDPK19

GSVIVT01027353001

3.399

520

MGQETRRL

N

N

3

13

IV

VpCDPK19

99.8

  1. a IDs are available in the Grape Genome Browser (12X) (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/GenomeBrowser/Vitis/)
  2. b First eight amino acids at the N-terminal of the corresponding protein. The amino acids underlined indicate putative palmitoylation sites
  3. c The myristoylation sites were predicted by the Myristoylator program (http://web.expasy.org/myristoylator/). ND, not determined
  4. d The palmitoylation sites were predicted by CSS-Palm 3.0 (http://csspalm.biocuckoo.org/)
  5. e Number of EF-hands were predicted by InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/scan.html)
  6. f Homologous CDPK genes in Chinese wild grapevine Vitis pseudoreticulata
  7. g Sequence identity calculated with amino acid sequences using Vector NTI
Back to article page

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us