Skip to main content

Table 5 QTLs detected for pear architectural and precocity traits for predicted (bivariate analysis), non-normally distributed data

From: Genetic control of pear rootstock-induced dwarfing and precocity is linked to a chromosomal region syntenic to the apple Dw1 loci

Parent

LG

Trait

Marker with highest LOD

Marker position (cM)

K value

P-value

OH

5

Size_year3

ss475878225

4.0

24.6

0.0001

OH

5

Height_year1

ss527788221

1.6

25.1

0.0001

OH

5

Height_year2

ss527788221

1.6

32.2

0.0001

OH

5

Suckers_year3

ss527788221

1.6

20.9

0.0001

OH

5

Inflorescence_year3

ss527789278

0.7

46.6

0.0001

OH

5

Height_year4

ss527789704

1.1

37.4

0.0001

OH

5

Inflorescence_year5

ss527789704

1.1

60.8

0.0001

OH

5

LNG_year2

ss527789704

1.1

22.2

0.0001

OH

5

LNG_year3

ss527789704

1.1

47.7

0.0001

OH

5

Nodes_year2

ss527789704

1.1

22.0

0.0001

OH

5

Spurs_year3

ss527789704

1.1

38.4

0.0001

OH

6

Height_year1

ss527789305

49.0

19.2

0.0001

OH

6

Height_year2

ss527789305

49.0

17.6

0.0001

OH

6

Height_year4

ss527789305

49.0

16.4

0.0001

OH

6

Size_year3

ss527789305

49.0

16.1

0.0001

LBJ

1

Height_year2

ss475876925

54.0

11.5

0.001

LBJ

1

Height_year4

ss527789822

32.1

9.4

0.005

LBJ

6

TCA_year2

ss475876015

37.3

12.5

0.0005

LBJ

6

Height_year4

ss475878560

12.8

13.0

0.0005

LBJ

6

LNG_year2

ss527787800

41.7

16.2

0.0001

LBJ

6

Spurs_year3

ss527787800

41.7

17.6

0.0001

LBJ

6

Height_year2

ss527787860

0.0

12.0

0.001

LBJ

6

LNG_year3

ss527788212

27.8

8.4

0.005

LBJ

6

Nodes_year2

ss527788579

41.7

14.0

0.0005

LBJ

6

Height_year1

ss527789592

9.3

12.1

0.001

LBJ

7

LNG_year3

ss527789852

35.5

13.2

0.0005

LBJ

7

Suckers_year3

ss527789852

35.5

11.0

0.001

LBJ

10

Size_year3

ss527788181

48.4

14.7

0.0005

  1. Displayed QTLs, derived from ‘Old Home’ (OH) and ‘Louise Bonne de Jersey’ (LBJ), show the closest marker and its position on the linkage group (LG). Significance was calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis (K value) analysis. See Table 1 for an explanation of the variables