Cell wall proteome of sugarcane stems: comparison of a destructive and a non-destructive extraction method showed differences in glycoside hydrolases and peroxidases

Table 2 Most abundant CWPs in the cell wall proteome of sugarcane young stems. Proteins with average amounts between the two biological repeats higher than 100 femtomols using either method are listed (see Table 1)

SUCEST accession number	Functional annotation	Method^a
Proteins acting on carbohydrates
SCCCCL4009F05	GH3	ND
Proteins related to lipid metabolism
SCCCAM2002F12	LTP	DT < < ND
SCBFLR1046E09	LTP	DT < < ND
SCEPLB1044H04	LTP	DT > > ND
SCEZLB1006F09	LTP	DT > ND
SCCCLR1048F06	LTP	DT ~ ND
SCUTST3131G03	LTP	DT > ND
SCRUFL4024B04	LTP	ND
SCCCLR1076D05	LTP	ND
Proteases
SCBGLR1097G03	Asp protease	DT
SCMCLR1123H12	Asp protease	DT > > ND
SCVPLR2012E01	Asp protease	DT ~ ND
Unknown function
SCCCCL4009G04	Expressed protein (DUF642)	DT ~ ND
SCSGLR1084A12	Expressed protein (DUF642)	DT ~ ND
SCEZLB1013B06	Homologous to phloem filament protein 1	DT
SCSFST1066G10	Expressed protein	DT < < ND
SCRUFL4024B08.b	Expressed protein	DT < < ND

^aThe relative amount of proteins quantified using either method is indicated (see Table 1)

ISSN: 1471-2229