Skip to main content

Table 3 A. euteiches DNA amounts in roots in single-QTL NIL experiments

From: Single and multiple resistance QTL delay symptom appearance and slow down root colonization by Aphanomyces euteiches in pea near isogenic lines

Experiment (Strain)

Crossa

Genotype

QTLb

Day after inoculationc

2

3

4d

5

6

7

10

1

DSP * RIL 847.50

NIL4-0b

-

NA

3,0 ± 0,5

44,9 ± 4,3

201,8 ± 21,7

387,0 ± 35,0

576,8 ± 46,8

1110,8 ± 69,2

(RB84)

 

NIL4-5.1b

Ae-Ps5.1

NA

2,5 ± 0,5

11,2 ± 4,3***

117,8 ± 21,7***

325,4 ± 33,5*

425,7 ± 45,7***

839,4 ± 69,2***

  

NIL4-7.6a

Ae-Ps7.6

NA

2,0 ± 0,5

15,5 ± 4,3***

81,6 ± 22,6***

155,4 ± 35,0***

351,9 ± 45,3***

699,5 ± 70,6***

  

90-2131

-

NA

5,3 ± 0,4

31,6 ± 4,3*

162,0 ± 21,7*

297,7 ± 34,8**

348,5 ± 45,3***

858,8 ± 69,2**

 

Baccara * RIL BAP8.70

NIL7-0b

-

NA

5,3 ± 0,3

43,9 ± 4,0

294,9 ± 16,6

523,2 ± 17,1

679,7 ± 29,1

1721,5 ± 80,9

  

NIL7-4.1a

Ae-Ps4.1

NA

6,0 ± 0,3

67,4 ± 4,0

260,0 ± 16,6

421,9 ± 17,1**

650,2 ± 29,1

1478,2 ± 80,9

  

NIL7-7.6a

Ae-Ps7.6

NA

1,6 ± 0,6***

17,0 ± 4,0***

58,8 ± 16,6***

251,0 ± 17,1***

437,4 ± 26,1***

882,4 ± 80,9***

  

PI180693

-

NA

2,0 ± 0,5***

17,3 ± 4,0***

53,7 ± 16,6***

81,6 ± 26,4***

167,5 ± 26,1***

401,7 ± 80,9***

 

Baccara * RIL BAP8.195

NIL7-0b

-

NA

5,3 ± 0,8

43,9 ± 12,3

294,9 ± 22,5

523,2 ± 23,8

652,1 ± 73,9

1721,5 ± 127,2

  

NIL10-1.2a

Ae-Ps1.2

NA

4,4 ± 0,8

43,3 ± 12,3

180,9 ± 22,5***

362,0 ± 23,8***

827,9 ± 67,0

1450,7 ± 127,2

  

NIL10-2.2c

Ae-Ps2.2

NA

3,3 ± 0,9*

48,1 ± 12,3

229,4 ± 22,5**

407,7 ± 23,8**

527,7 ± 73,9

1360,2 ± 127,2*

  

NIL10-3.1b

Ae-Ps3.1

NA

5,6 ± 0,8

47,8 ± 12,3

177,5 ± 22,5***

377,2 ± 27,6***

652,5 ± 73,9

1478,4 ± 127,2

  

PI180693

-

NA

0,9 ± 1,0***

17,3 ± 12,3***

53,7 ± 22,5***

88,1 ± 33,8***

167,5 ± 67,0***

401,7 ± 127,2***

 

Baccara * 552

NIL7-0b

-

NA

5,3 ± 0,6

43,9 ± 7,0

294,9 ± 19,6

523,2 ± 21,4

694,8 ± 36,6

1721,5 ± 116,2

  

NIL13-2.2a

Ae-Ps2.2

NA

6,0 ± 0,6

77,5 ± 7,0

186,8 ± 21,5***

344,9 ± 21,4***

549,2 ± 32,9**

1117,6 ± 143,0**

  

NIL13-3.1a

Ae-Ps3.1

NA

5,1 ± 0,6

43,7 ± 7,0

168,4 ± 19,6***

247,7 ± 21,4***

451,5 ± 32,9***

991,5 ± 116,2***

  

NIL13-7.6b

Ae-Ps7.6

NA

1,7 ± 0,6***

19,9 ± 7,0*

76,9 ± 19,6***

178,9 ± 29,7***

341,5 ± 38,1***

681,7 ± 116,2***

  

552

-

NA

NA

4,2 ± 8,3***

14,0 ± 19,6***

82,8 ± 21,4***

177,0 ± 32,9***

428,6 ± 116,2***

2

Puget * RIL 831 .08

NIL1-0b

-

NA

2,6 ± 0,4

32,6 ± 7,7

91,8 ± 26,3

293,5 ± 7,9

535,0 ± 35,0

1349,9 ± 158,7

(Ae109)

 

NIL1-4.5b

Ae-Ps4.5

NA

NA

NA

NA

7,3 ± 7,6***

27,8 ± 35,0***

88,2 ± 158,7***

  

RIL 831.08

-

NA

NA

NA

30,6 ± 27,1**

26,4 ± 9,1***

92,1 ± 39,6***

304,5 ± 166,6***

  1. a“Recipient x donor” cross lines from which each NIL was produced in the previous MAB scheme [25]. bQTL introgressed in each NIL from the previous MAB scheme [25]. cPathogen DNA amount were obtained on each genotype and scoring day from the LMM analysis of each set of lines in experiments #1 and #2. LSMeans and standard errors of pathogen DNA amount are presented in thousand DNA copies (10^3). In each set of lines, significant differences of LSMeans DNA amount between the single-QTL NILs or the resistant control, and the control- NIL without QTL are indicated by *(0.01 < P < 0.05), **(0.001 < P < 0.01) and ***(P < 0.001). dIn experiments #1 and #2, LSMeans DNA amount were estimated from data obtained in one biological replicate at the fourth day. NA: Not Available data due to copy number <103