Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Expression of two barley proteinase inhibitors in tomato promotes endogenous defensive response and enhances resistance to Tuta absoluta

  • Rim Hamza1,
  • Meritxell Pérez-Hedo2, 3,
  • Alberto Urbaneja3,
  • José L. Rambla1,
  • Antonio Granell1,
  • Kamel Gaddour4,
  • José P. Beltrán1 and
  • Luis A. Cañas1Email author
BMC Plant BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1240-6

Received: 18 July 2017

Accepted: 17 January 2018

Published: 25 January 2018

Abstract

Background

Plants and insects have coexisted for million years and evolved a set of interactions which affect both organisms at different levels. Plants have developed various morphological and biochemical adaptations to cope with herbivores attacks. However, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) has become the major pest threatening tomato crops worldwide and without the appropriated management it can cause production losses between 80 to 100%.

Results

The aim of this study was to investigate the in vivo effect of a serine proteinase inhibitor (BTI-CMe) and a cysteine proteinase inhibitor (Hv-CPI2) from barley on this insect and to examine the effect their expression has on tomato defensive responses. We found that larvae fed on tomato transgenic plants co-expressing both proteinase inhibitors showed a notable reduction in weight. Moreover, only 56% of these larvae reached the adult stage. The emerged adults showed wings deformities and reduced fertility. We also investigated the effect of proteinase inhibitors ingestion on the insect digestive enzymes. Our results showed a decrease in larval trypsin activity. Transgenes expression had no harmful effect on Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Heteroptera: Miridae), a predator of Tuta absoluta, despite transgenic tomato plants attracted the mirid. We also found that barley cystatin expression promoted plant defense by inducing the expression of the tomato endogenous wound inducible Proteinase inhibitor 2 (Pin2) gene, increasing the production of glandular trichomes and altering the emission of volatile organic compounds.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate the usefulness of the co-expression of different proteinase inhibitors for the enhancement of plant resistance to Tuta absoluta.

Keywords

Proteinase inhibitors Tuta absoluta Enhanced resistanceInduced plant defense

Background

Since the beginning of plants domestication, thousands of years ago, pests have been the major threat for agriculture. Nowadays, around 40% of worldwide crop production is destroyed by pests and pathogens, with 13% due to insect attacks [1].

To cope with the broad variety of phytophagous insects, we need to strengthen plant defense arsenal. Plant genetic engineering provides access to a countless number of genes with the potential to improve resistance toward pests. Currently, the most used insecticidal genes are Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry coding Bt toxins. However, efficiency of Bt toxins is limited to a narrow range of insects. Indeed, many Bt pro-toxin molecules require proteolytic activation after solubilization in the gut of the susceptible insect. The use of plant defensive secondary metabolites, like proteinase inhibitors (PIs), is probably the most promising alternative [2, 3]. Plant PIs are small proteins, mostly found in seeds, that are expressed in vegetative tissues in response to wounding, enhancing plant resistance to insects [4, 5].They affect the growth and development of a wide range of insects. Plant PIs have previously been introduced into different plant species conferring efficient pest resistance [68]. However, in a co-evolving system, insects adapt to the host plant PIs by synthesizing enzymes of other families which are insensitive to the host PIs [9, 10]. This enzymatic response has been observed within the proteinase classes, showing that one serine proteinase can be substituted by another [11, 12].The combined use of serine and cysteine PIs in artificial diets has shown a synergistic effect on Tribolium castanum (Herbst.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [13]. To avoid insect adaptation, it has been suggested to select PIs from non-host plants. Indeed, it has been shown that insects feeding on dicots cannot adapt to PIs from monocots and vice versa [14, 15].

Cereals are known for their high content in PIs. In barley, different serine and cysteine proteinase inhibitors have been identified. The serine proteinase inhibitor BTI-CMe shows a high inhibition of trypsin-like activity and it has been successfully used to improve resistance toward different pests [16, 17]. On the other hand, the cysteine proteinase inhibitor Hv-CPI2 shows a high inhibition of papain and cathepsin-L-like activity in vitro [18]. We selected both PIs as candidates for the improvement of tomato plants resistance against Tuta absoluta.

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) represents, currently, the second most important vegetable crop [19]. Its production reaches 100 million tons of fresh fruit cultivated on 3.7 million hectares. The availability of its genome sequence [20], together with the efficient genetic and genomic resources, allows the development of new genotypes to give response to the customer, producer and processor needs. Different transformation protocols mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, using leaves or cotyledons, have been developed [2124]. Micro-Tom is a miniature cherry tomato cultivar characterised by a short life cycle. Its dwarf genotype is primarily conferred by two recessive genes [25]. Micro-Tom has some interesting traits such as its reduced size, short life cycle (70–90 days from sowing to fruit-ripening) and small genome (950 Mb). Therefore it is currently considered a model cultivar for tomato functional genomics and genetics.

When facing abiotic or biotic stress, tomato plants activate a series of defensive mechanisms. Phytophagous attack or mechanic wounding activates a 18 amino acid peptide called systemin [26]. This protein induces the octadecanoid pathway leading to the synthesis of jasmonic acid, hormone that is responsible of the activation of different direct and indirect defensive mechanisms. Jasmonic acid induces both local and systemic accumulation of proteinase inhibitors [27], volatile organic compounds synthesis [28, 29] and glandular trichomes differentiation [3032]. The most studied proteinase inhibitor in tomato is PIN2, a trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor [33]. PIN2 expression in tobacco and poplar reduced respectively Manduca sexta (L.) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) growth [34] and Plagiodera versicolora Laicharting (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) weight and development [35]. Pest challenged tomato plants also alter their volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in order to repel attackers or attract natural enemies [36, 37]. Some of these compounds are synthesized in glandular trichomes. These hairy structures act as chemical and mechanical barrier against pests [38, 39]. Insect damage has been negatively associated with trichomes production [4042], while other studies have shown that foliage consumption by insects was reduced in plants with high trichomes density [43, 44].

One of the most harmful tomato pests is the South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae). This tomato borer was first described in South America and, in the last decade, has invaded to most of Europe, Africa and Asia [45]. If no control measures are taken, this insect might cause up to a total crop loss [46]. The larval instars are harmful. Indeed, after hatching, young larvae penetrate leaves, fruit and stems and spend the major part of the four instars growing and feeding inside the plant, and therefore hindering the access of insecticides. Currently, the control strategies against this pest are mainly based on chemical treatments and biological control using zoophytophagous mirids such as Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) and Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae), which feed both on Tuta absoluta eggs and young larvae [47, 48].

In the last two decades, different reports have paid attention to the effect of genetically engineered plants harboring PIs genes on insects. However, none has investigated the effect that the expression of these PIs could have on the host plant endogenous defensive mechanisms. In this study we examined the effect of the expression of two proteinase inhibitors, belonging to different families, against T. absoluta and its impact on the endogenous defensive response in tomato plants. We report that the co-expression of both proteinase inhibitors had an additive effect and enhanced tomato plants resistance against T. absoluta. Moreover, Hv-CPI2 induced the endogenous defensive mechanisms of the tomato plants.

Methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Rihane) seeds were germinated in the dark on vermiculite substrate at 25–30 °C (day) and 18–20 °C (night) and were irrigated daily with Hoagland’s solution [49].

Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom; IBMCP seed collection, Spain), were grown in pots with coconut fiber at 25–30 °C (day) and 18–20 °C (night) and were irrigated daily with Hoagland’s solution [49]. Osram lamps (Powerstar HQI-BT, 400 W) were used to supplement natural light in order to get a 16 h light photoperiod.

Bacterial strains and media

Escherichia coli strains DH5α and DH10B were used for gene cloning. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 was used for tomato Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Both strains were grown on LB medium at 37 °C and 28 °C respectively under agitation (200 rpm). Agrobacterium growth media was supplemented with 100 mg/l spectinomycin and 100 mg/l rifampicin (final concentration in media). Spectinomycin at 100 mg/l was used for DH10B strain, and ampicilin 100 mg/l (final concentration in media) for DH5α strain. X-Gal at 20 mg/l (final concentration in media) was used for both E. coli strains.

RNA extraction and gene isolation

Barley 12 days old etiolated leaves were collected and used for RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. Total RNA was extracted using the EZNA Plant RNA Kit (OMEGA bio-tek) and the genomic DNA was eliminated by the Turbo DNase (Ambion) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Reverse-transcription was realized using the Primer Script RT reagent kit (TaKaRa). The coding sequences for the BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2 mature proteins were amplified by PCR with the primer couples: CMeS /CMeAS and CPI2S/CPI2AS respectively. The obtained fragments were cloned in the pGem -T -easy vector (Promega) and sequenced to confirm their identity. All the primers used are presented in Additional file 1.

Genetic constructs

Itr1 and Icy2 genes coding respectively for BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2 were both cloned in the binary vector pK2GW7.0 [50], downstream of the CaMV 35S promoter by the Gateway cloning technology (Invitrogen). To generate the double transgene expression cassette, the coding region of Itr1 and Icy2 genes, as well as the 35S promoter and the 35S terminator were first cloned separately in the pGem-T-easy vector (Promega), then, combined in the pCR8/GW/TOPO vector (Thermo Fisher). The cassette was later on transferred to the plant transformation vector pK2GW7.0. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 was transformed with the three obtained constructs.

Tomato genetic transformation

To generate transgenic tomato plants in the Micro-Tom cultivar, we followed the method previously described by Ellul et al. [21]. In this protocol, cotyledons from germinated seeds (10 days) are used as starting material, followed by co-culture with Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain LBA4404) and using the neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) marker gene to carry out selection of transformants in a kanamycin medium. Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom) were transformed with the three constructs previously generated. Ten days old cotyledons were sectioned at its edges and incubated with the recombinant Agrobacterium strain in presence of 200 μM acetosyringone to promote bacteria virulence, during two days in the dark at 24 ± 2 °C. Explants were then washed with medium supplemented with 300 mg/l cefotaxime to eliminate Agrobacterium excess, and placed on organogenesis medium without antibiotic. Two days later, the explants were transferred to a selective medium containing 100 mg/l kanamycin. Explants first produced calli that differentiated to shoots. About 6–8 weeks later regenerated plantlets were transferred to the rooting medium containing 100 mg/l of kanamycin. When roots reached about 1 cm in length, the plantlets were transferred to soil conditions and acclimated. The selective pressure was maintained during the whole in vitro process to avoid false positives. After acclimation, the ploidy level of the plants was checked by flux cytometry, and the presence of the expression cassette verified by PCR of the nptII gene (primers Kan-dir and Kan-rev, Additional file 1). The primary transformants were self-fertilized to produce the T1 generation. Heterozygous lines with a single copy of the transgene were selected by segregating seeds on kanamycin added medium. Homozygous lines were obtained by germination of T2 seeds on selective medium.

Analysis of gene expression levels

Semi-quantitative PCR was achieved using the CMe-S and CMe-AS primers for the Itr1 gene and CPI2-S and CPI2-AS primers for Icy2 (Additional file 1).

Quantitative Real Time PCR (qPCR) was carried out using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems) and the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) on 1 μg of cDNA. Data analysis was performed using System Sequence Detection Software v1.2 (Applied Biosystem). Each sample was processed in triplicate. Relative expression levels were determined using the housekeeping gene SlActin8 [51] as a reference gene using the ΔΔCt method (Applied Biosystems). The primers used in the qRT-PCR are qItr1-F and qITR1-R for Itr1 gene, qIcy2-F and qIcy2-R for Icy2 gene and qPIN2-F and qPIN2-R for Tomato Pin2 gene (Additional file 1).

Tuta absoluta feeding trials

The experiments were conducted on T. absoluta from the colony reared in the department of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, at the Valencian Institute for Agriculture Research (IVIA, Valencia). Three T. absoluta couples were placed with wild type tomato plants. Two days later, eggs were collected. Twenty individual leaves from each transgenic line and a wild type control, were placed in petri dishes on 2% agar. One single T. absoluta egg was deposited on each leave, and the development of the hatched larvae was followed daily. Leaves were renewed every two days. Plates were incubated at 24 ± 2 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h of light/ 8 h darkness. Larvae were also weighted, twenty four hours after each molting. The duration of the larval instars, as well as the entire developmental cycle, were registered for each insect.

Oviposition assays

The adults emerged from the larvae fed on either transgenic or control plants, were collected and sexed according to the abdomen shape and color. Male adults present a thinner and darker abdomen [52]. Five couples were randomly formed from the emerged adults of each plant type. They were, then, transferred to plastic cups (370 cm3) carrying a fresh tomato apical flush. According to the methodology described by Mollá et al. [53], the plastic cups were placed into small ones (230 cm3) containing water. The tomato flush reached the water through a hole made in the inner cup. The bigger cup was covered with a fine muslin cloth and fixed with a rubber band. Forty eight hours later, the tomato flush was removed and the number of deposited eggs was counted under a steromicroscope.

Overall toxicity evaluation

To estimate the combined effect of mortality and oviposition reduction on T. absoluta population, we calculated the reduction coefficient E based on the corresponding reduction values (RV) using the Abbot formula [54]. The Reduction coefficient can only be calculated when there is a statistically significant difference. Therefore it was only estimated for CMe-CPI.3.
$$ \mathrm{Rv}\ \mathrm{survival}=\frac{\% Control Survival-\% Experiment Survival}{\% Control Survival\ } $$
$$ \mathrm{Rv}\ \mathrm{fecundity}=\frac{\left(\mathrm{Eggs}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{Female}\right)\ \mathrm{Control}-\left(\mathrm{Eggs}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{Female}\right)\ \mathrm{Experiment}}{\left(\mathrm{Eggs}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{Female}\right)\ \mathrm{Control}} $$
$$ \boldsymbol{E}=100\mathrm{x}\ \left[1-\left(\mathrm{RVsurvival}\ \mathrm{x}\ \mathrm{RVfecundity}\right)\right] $$

Enzymatic assays

Approximately 40 mg of larvae of the four instars from each treatment were pooled and ground in liquid nitrogen. The powder was mixed with 200 μl of ice cold extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris pH 7, 0.1% ascorbic acid, 0.1% L-cysteine, 0.5 M sucrose and 10 mg/ml PVP). The tubes were centrifuged at high speed for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatant recovered and mixed with two volumes of ice cold 90% acetone. The mixture was then incubated for 2 h at − 20 °C, and centrifuged at high speed at 4 °C during 10 min. The pellet was washed twice by 90% acetone, dried and re-suspended in 100 μl of 0.5 M Tris buffer pH 8. The obtained crude extract was used to determine both trypsin and papain activity. Nα-benzoyl-L-arginine 4-nitroanilide hydrochloride (BapNa, Sigma) was used as a chromogenic substrate for trypsin and pGlu-Phe-Leu p-nitroanilide (PFLNA, Sigma) as a substrate for papain. The trypsin-like and papain-like activity in the sample was determined by using a gradient of a commercial trypsin (bovine trypsin, Sigma) and papain (Sigma) as standards.

The protein concentration of the crude extract was measured by the Bradford method [55]. Briefly, 5 μg of proteins of the crude extract were mixed with 5 μl of the corresponding substrate (10 mg/ml) and up to 100 μl Sodium phosphate buffer 67 mM pH 7.6 with 20 mM CaCl2 for trypsin assays or 5 mM L-cysteine for papain assays. Each sample was incubated in duplicate at 37 °C for 30 min, and absorbance measured at 405 nm. As standards, we used commercial trypsin and papain at six known concentrations (0.125 μg, 0.25 μg, 0.5 μg, 0.75 μg, 1 μg and 1.5 μg). Trypsin and papain activity was expressed as the percentage of trypsin-like or papain-like proteins from the sample’s total protein content.

Enzyme histochemistry

The fluorescent substrate Nα-benzoyl-L-arginine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride (BAAMC, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), specific to trypsin and papain was used to localize the targeted proteases in the insect. Larvae of the third instar, fed with wild type plant leaves, were sacrificed by freezing in liquid nitrogen, then included in the cry-protector gel NEG-50 (Richard-Allan Scientific) and frozen at − 27 °C. Cryo-sections of 16 μm were realized with the cryostat (HM520 Microm). Sections were recovered on a poly-lysine coated slide and washed with 10% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in PBS 67 mM pH 7.6 to avoid macromolecules diffusion. Then, 50 μl of substrate solution (10% PVA, 0.5 μl BAAMC 20 mg/ml, 2 mM CaCl2 in PBS 67 mM pH 7.6) was applied to the section. The slide was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min and then washed 5 times for 1 min in 5% PVA in PBS 67 mM pH 7.6 and once with PBS 67 mM pH 7.6. Sections treated with BAAMC were examined for fluorescence using ultraviolet light with a Leica DM5000 microscope.

Nesidiocoris tenuis Feeding assay

Five plants of the CMe-CPI.3 transgenic line and wild type Micro-Tom tomato were placed in individual cages (bugdorm) with three couples of N. tenuis each. Nesidiocoris tenuis individuals were provided by Koppert Biological Systems, S.L. (Águilas, Murcia, Spain). The colony of N. tenuis was maintained in climatic chamber at 25 ± 2 °C, 60–80% RH and 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod 25 ± 2 °C, 60–80% RH and 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod at IVIA. This colony was caged on tomato plants with access to Ephestia kuehniella Zeller eggs (Entofood®; Koppert B.S.) as supplemented food until used in bioassays. Five day old adults of N. tenuis were used in all the experiments.

In the feeding assay, N. tenuis were provided, as alternative food, E. kuehniella eggs ad libitum. The different plants were checked every two days, from eggs hatching to adults’ emergence. Nymphal developmental time and the number of adults emerged were recorded.

Olfactory response

The behavioral response of T. absoluta and N. tenuis adults to the transgenic plants CMe-CPI.3 volatiles was investigated according to the protocol described by Pérez-Hedo et al. [48] in a Y- shaped tube. The base of the tube was connected to an air pump providing a unidirectional airflow. The side arms were connected to two glass jars each one containing a different odor source: transgenic or wild type plant. Each container was connected to a flow meter and a water filter. For each experiment, 40 adults for both species; 20 females and 20 males were tested. Each insect was observed until it reached at least 3 cm up one of the side arms of the tube or until 10 min have passed [48]. The insects that had not chosen any arm after 10 min were considered as “non responders” and were discarded from the analysis. After five individuals were tested, the olfactometer tube was reverted to minimize spatial effect of arm choice, and after each 10 insects, the odor source was changed.

Volatile organic compounds analysis

Volatiles organic compounds (VOCs) collection was performed according to the protocol described by Bouagga et al. [56]. VOCs were captured on a headspace solid-phase micro extraction (HS-SPME). Separation and detection were performed by means of gas chromatography coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC/MS). Fibers were mounted on a SPME fiber holder and injected trough the first septum of the sample container. The fiber was extended by pushing the plunger of the SPM filter holder and exposed to plant volatiles. For each plant, volatiles adsorption was performed during 3 h. Each treatment had 6 replicates. After volatiles adsorption, the fiber is drawn back into the needle and the SPME device removed. Desorption was performed in a 6890 N gas chromatograph coupled to a 5975B mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies). Chromatograms were processed using the Enhanced ChemStation E.02.02 software (Agilent Technologies).

Comparison of both retention time and mass spectrum with those of pure standards allowed the identification of the compounds. All the standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. For quantitation, one specific ion was selected for each compound, followed by the integration of the corresponding peak area from the extracted ion chromatogram. Ions were selected for the highest signal-to-noise ratio and the specificity in that chromatogram particular region in order to provide accurate peak integration.

Trichomes density determination

The fourth and the fifth leaves of young tomato plants were collected. Both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces were examined under an optical microscope (Leica 5000) and glandular trichomes counted.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was realized with the Graph Pad Prism 6 software. Duration of developmental instars were analyzed by ANOVA test, while larval weight and oviposition, for each transgenic line, were compared to wild type plants by t test. Chi-square tests of independence were applied to compare survival percentage and olfactory response.

Results

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato plants and transgene expression analyses

Tomato explants were cocultured with A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 carrying the three constructs containing the BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2 transgenes (Fig. 1a). After co-cultivation, callus started to be formed at the cut ends of about 60% of the explants. Six transgenic independent lines (T0) were obtained from plants expressing Itr1 and Icy2, and another eight plant lines expressing both transgenes were isolated. All these transgenic plants were diploid.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Genetic constructs and relative expression of Icy2 and Itr1 genes in the different transgenic lines. a Genetic constructs used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato. b Relative expression of Icy2. c Relative expression of Itr1. CMe-CPI.3 shows the highest expression level of both transgenes. CMe.1 and CPI.1 have the highest expression level of Itr1 and Icy2, respectively

Five homozygous transgenic lines expressing Itr1, three expressing Icy2 and six lines expressing both transgenes were retained for further characterization. Transgenic plants expressing Itr1 were named “CMe”, plants expressing Icy2 were named “CPI” and plants co-expressing both proteinase inhibitors were named “CMe-CPI”.

With the aim to select the transgenic lines expressing the highest levels of the transgenes, we first performed a semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Additional file 2). Lines showing the highest transgene expression level were submitted to a qRT-PCR assay for more sensitive analyses. qRT-PCR amplification measurements indicated that there are no endogenous Itr1 or Icy2 genes in tomato, therefore proving the expression of the transgenes had no internal interferences in the analyzed plants. According to the qRT-PCR measurements, among the transgenic lines expressing Icy2 individually, CPI.1 showed the highest transgene expression level. Among plants expressing Itr1, CMe.1 was the line with highest expression of the transgene. CMe-CPI.3 was the double transgenic line showing the highest expression level for both transgenes, Itr1 and Icy2. CMe-CPI.3 expressed the Itr1 gene 2.9 times more than CMe.1 line and the gene Icy2 2.5 times more than CPI.1 line (Fig. 1b-c). These three transgenic lines, CPI.1; CMe.1, and CMe-CPI.3 were selected to carry out insect feeding trials.

Insects feeding trials

Feeding T. absoluta with CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants affected the insect at different levels; larval weight, survival and fecundity. As it can be seen in Table 1, a slight delay in the first larval developmental instar was observed on larvae fed with leaves of the CPI.1 transgenic plant. Insects fed with the other transgenic lines showed no significant differences when compared with the wild type.
Table 1

Larval developmental instars of Tuta absoluta fed with leaves of transgenic and wild type plants

 

1st instar (days)

2nd instar (days)

3rd instar (days)

4th instar (days)

Total development

CMe-CPI.3

3.71 (n = 14, p = 0.053)

3.63 (n = 11, p = 0.630)

2.18 (n = 11, p = 0.302)

3.00 (n = 11, p = 0.997)

12 (n = 10, p = 0.069)

CMe.1

3.62 (n = 13, p = 0.123)

3.33 (n = 12, p > 0.999)

2.08 (n = 12, p = 159)

2.44 (n = 9, p = 0.320)

11.75 (n = 8, p = 0.370)

CPI.1

3.80 (n = 15, p = 0.023)

3.06 (n = 15, p = 0754)

2.00 (n = 14, p = 0.033)

2.27 (n = 11, p = 0.196)

11.27 (n = 11, p = 0.999)

WT

3.07 (n = 14)

3.21 (n = 14)

2.57 (n = 14)

2.83 (n = 14)

11.25 (n = 12)

Few days delay in the first instar is observed on larvae fed with leaves of the CPI.1 transgenic plant. In larvae fed with leaves of the other transgenic lines no significant difference was observed. p values in bold indicate significant differences

Feeding T. absoluta with transgenic plants affected larval weight and size at all larval instars. In the first instar, larval weight of insects feeding on transgenic plants could not be determined with the balance (weights below 0.1 mg). As shown in Fig. 2a, in all the other instars the larvae fed on transgenic leaves presented a lower weight than those fed with the wild type ones.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Tuta absoluta feeding trials. a Larvae weight when fed with the three transgenic plants and the wild type. Larval weight is reduced in all larvae fed with the transgenic leaves. Statistical test: t test, n = 8, significance p < 0.05. b Larval survival decreased with the increasing number of feeding days reaching 56.25% (Chi test, p = 0.018) for the CMe-CPI.3 transgenic line. The first and second instar showed the highest mortality level. c Number of eggs laid after 48 h. Decrease in the number of eggs for adults emerged from larvae fed on the different transgenic lines, mostly CMe-CPI3. (n = 5, t = 2.54, df = 7, p = 0.022). d Morphological alterations. Upper left: L3 larvae fed with transgenic and wild type plants. Larvae fed with the three transgenic plants show reduced size; Upper right: L4 larvae fed with transgenic and wild type plants; larvae fed with the three transgenic plants show reduced size; Bottom left: Adult female emerged from a larva fed with WT plants; Bottom right: Wing deformity observed in a female adult emerged from a larva fed with transgenic plants (arrow). e Trypsin and papain activity in insects’ crude extract. Trypsin-like and papain-like activity decay in larvae fed with the different transgenic plants when compared with wild type. t: refers to trypsin and p: refers to papain

Mortality of larvae was observed during the four instars (Fig. 2b). Larvae survival decreased to 56.2% (Chi square, p = 0.01) when they fed on CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants. The first and second instars showed the highest mortality level.

We counted the deposited eggs of couples previously fed, during larval stages, with leaves of the different transgenic and wild type plants. As shown in Fig. 2c, a reduction in the number of laid eggs was observed when adults emerged from larvae were fed with the different transgenic lines, mostly with the CMe-CPI.3 line (n = 5, t = 2.54, df = 7, p = 0.022) and CPI.1 line (n = 5, t = 2.54, df = 7, p = 0.019). Around 40% of the adults emerged from larvae fed with leaves of CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants showed wings deformities (Fig. 2d) (Chi = 4.8, df = 1, p = 0.02). It is worthy to mention that these individuals were unable to mate, and subsequently to lay eggs. The reduction coefficient (E) obtained after the Abbot correction, reflecting the combined effect of mortality rate and reduced fecundity was 64%.

Feeding T. absoluta with the three types of transgenic plants reduced significantly the trypsin activity of the insect. The protein extracts from larvae of the four instars were tested for cysteine proteinase and trypsin-like activities. The cysteine proteinase activity, in larvae of Tuta absoluta was very low, below 2% of the total proteins compared with trypsin-like activity (12–40%) (Fig. 2e). When the larvae were fed with wild type plants, the trypsin activity was stable during the two first instars (about 15% of total proteins), then showed a considerable increase on the third instar reaching up to 40% before decreasing to about 15% at the fourth instar. The increase of proteolytic activity could be explained by the augment of feeding and the high gain of size and weight of the insect at this instar.

Trypsin activity in larvae fed with leaves from CPI.1 and CMe.1 transgenic plants was relatively high at the first instar (22–23%) then decreased at the second instar (11–15%). This activity increased slightly at the third instar reaching about 18%, but stayed considerably low when compared to the activity in larvae fed with wild type plants. At the fourth instar the trypsin activity continued increasing in larvae fed on CPI.1 plants, while it decreased back in those fed on CMe.1.

Trypsin activity in larvae fed with CMe-CPI.3 leave was about 25% at the first instar and decreased along the increase in the number of feeding days, showing no increment of activity at the third instar (about 17%) (Fig. 2e).

Enzyme histochemistry permitted to localize trypsin-like enzymes in T. absoluta L3 larvae. The fluorescence signal was detected at different anatomical levels: the insect digestive system (esophagus, foregut, midgut, hindgut), the exoskeleton and the secretory system (Malpighi tubules), (Additional file 3).

N. tenuis development and survival were not affected by the transgenic plants. N. tenuis adults were placed on both CMe-CPI.3 and wild type Micro-Tom tomato plants. The development of the laid eggs was followed until the emergence of adults. The duration of the developmental cycle was the same in the presence of transgenic or wild type plants. In both assays, adults started to emerge 21 days after the beginning of the experiment (t = 0.84, df = 6, p = 0.27). They were collected and counted and no significant differences in numbers were observed (t = 0.35, df = 6, p = 0.11), (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Effect of PIs on the development of Nesidiocoris tenuis. a. Developmental cycle duration of Nesidiocoris tenuis on CMe-CPI.3 and wild type plants; the presence of the PIs does not affect the developmental time of Nesidiocoris nymphs (t = 0.84, df = 6, p = 0.27). b Number of Nesidiocoris tenuis adults emerged after developing on CMe-CPI.3 and wild type plants (t = 0.35, df = 6, p = 0.11). No differences were observed between the transgenic and the wild type plants

Tomato endogenous defensive response analyses

CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants showed an activation of the endogenous defensive response at different levels: tomato PI induction; VOCs profile alteration, and an increment of glandular trichome production.

We quantified the expression of the tomato wound-induced proteinase inhibitor PIN2 in the three transgenic lines as well as in the wild type plants. The qRT-PCR measurements revealed that Pin2 expression was increased in plants expressing the transgene Icy2. Indeed, CMe-CPI.3 and CPI.1 plants expressed Pin2 about six times more and twice more, respectively, than the wild type plants. However, the transgenic plants expressing only Itr1 transgene did not show alterations in Pin2 expression level (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Relative expression of Pin2 in the different transgenic lines and the wild type Micro-Tom plants. Pin2 expression was increased in plants expressing Icy2 (CPI.1 and CMe-CPI.3), while no difference between CMe.1 and the wild type plants was observed

The olfactory responses of T. absoluta and N. tenuis to the CMe-CPI.3 and wild type tomato plants were tested. Tuta absoluta adults showed no preference to neither transgenic nor wild type plants (Chi = 4.9, df = 1, n = 40, p = 0.09). However, Nesidiocoris tenuis preferred the CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants to the wild type ones (Chi = 4.9, df = 1, n = 40, p = 0.01). When N. tenuis was allowed to choose between both kinds of tomato plants, over 63% of the individuals were attracted by the transgenic plants, while about only 36% selected the wild type ones (Fig. 5a).
Figure 5
Fig. 5

Olfactory response of T. absoluta and N. tenuis adults to CMe-CPI.3 and wild type tomato volatiles. Nesiodiocoris tenuis adults are attracted by CMe-CPI.3 volatiles (Chi = 4.9, df = 1, n = 40, p = 0.01), while Tuta absoluta makes no difference between both plants (Chi = 4.9, df = 1, n = 40, p = 0.09)

VOCs emission profile of the transgenic plants CMe-CPI.3 differed from the wild type ones. VOCs from wild type and transgenic CMe-CPI.3 plants were analyzed by GC-MS. Volatile compounds from different chemical families were differentially produced in both plants. When compared with the wild type, CMe-CPI.3 plants showed different levels of benzenoids and terpenes. Benzaldehyde and another unknown benzenoid were emitted twice more in the transgenic plants, while monoterpenes (unknown monoterpene, α-pinene, camphene, β-myrcene, β-pinene) and three unknown sesquiterpenes were reduced to a third part (Table 2).
Table 2

Relative changes of the volatiles emitted by wild type and CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants. Student’s t-test (p < 0.05)

Type

Compound

Kovats RI

Fold change

p value

Monoterpene

Unknown Monoterpene 1

939.2

0.31

0.0289

Monoterpene

α-pinene

948.1

0.28

0.0245

Monoterpene

Camphene

969.0

0.35

0.0428

Monoterpene

β-myrcene

991.3

0.31

0.0225

Monoterpene

β-pinene

996.5

0.30

0.0330

Sesquiterpene

Unknown Sesquiterpene 1

1356.4

0.29

0.0167

Sesquiterpene

Unknown Sesquiterpene 2

1360.4

0.28

0.0105

Sesquiterpene

Unknown Sesquiterpene 3

1417.1

0.42

0.0378

Sesquiterpene

β-caryophyllene

1464.1

0.63

0.0823

Benzenoid

Benzaldehyde

976.9

2.12

0.0004

Benzenoid

Unknown benzenoid 1

1058.0

1.71

0.0030

Benzenoid

Acetophenone

1089.2

3.07

0.0902

CMe-CPI.3 plants emitted less terpenes and higher levels of benzenoids than wild type plants. p values in bold indicate significant differences

The leaves of wild type plants and CMe-CPI.3 transgenic tomato plants were examined under the microscope on both adaxial and abaxial sides. Transgenic leaves showed an increase in glandular trichomes density. The adaxial side of the transgenic leaves presented 1.96 times more glandular trichomes (t = 6.56, df = 4, p = 0.001), and the abaxial side 1.6 times more (t = 3.925, df = 4, p = 0.008) (Fig. 6a-b).
Figure 6
Fig. 6

Trichomes density in transgenic and wild type plants. a Trichomes density is higher in CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants leaves when compared with the wild type ones. b Transgenic CMe-CPI.3 plants (left) showed higher glandular trichomes density in the abaxial side than wild type plants (right)

Discussion

Expression of BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2 enhances tomato resistance to T. absoluta

To induce resistance to Tuta absoluta in tomato plants we followed a general strategy proposed by Duan et al. [14], consisting in the expression of proteinase inhibitors (PIs) isolated from monocots in dicots plants, since insects feeding on dicots would be more sensitive and unable to adapt to PIs from monocots and vice versa. We have shown that the co-expression of two proteinase inhibitors from barley, BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2, in transgenic tomato plants enhances the resistance to the tomato pest T. absoluta while attracting its predator N. tenuis. The protective effect of BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2 was observed when both PIs were expressed together.

Insect feeding experiments showed that T. absoluta larval weight and survival were reduced when feeding with the transgenic tomato plants compared with the wild type ones. Mean weight loss and survival were respectively 34.2% and 56.3% for CMe-CPI.3; 37.2% and 13% for CMe.1 and 37.2% and 11.8% for CPI.1. Weight loss and mortality can be explained by the inhibitory activities of the PIs against T. absoluta digestive enzymes. No previous study has identified T. absoluta digestive proteases. In this work, we detected trypsin activity in all larval instars. Also, we were able to localize these proteases by enzymatic histochemical techniques in the different parts of the digestive system (esophagus, foregut, midgut and hindgut), the excretory system (Malpighi tubules) and the exoskeleton. However, almost no papain activity was detected. These findings are in agreement with previous reports which suggested that Lepidoptera digestion relies mainly on serine proteinases [5759]. Trypsin activity drastically decreased in larvae fed with the three different transgenic tomato plants. The observation that this activity was affected in larvae fed with CPI.1 plants suggests that the detrimental effect observed is not due to cysteine proteinase inhibitory activity of Hv-CPI2.

T. absoluta fecundity was also affected, in addition to the reduction in size and survival of the insect. Around 40% of the adults that emerged from larvae fed with CMe-CPI.3 showed wing deformities and were unable to copulate, producing no offsprings. Most individuals did not present morphological deformities although they showed low fecundity. On the other hand, the number of eggs layed by the females was reduced by 82.3%. Similar results were reported on Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [60, 61] when using non host PI from bitter gourd and Capsicum, respectively. Tomato PI also affected notably the fecundity of H. armigera according to Damle et al. [62]. The fecundity of Lepidoptera adults is an important parameter for determining the effect of larval diet on the adult stage. Also, low fecundity values means less progeny and therefore have a direct impact on the subsequent generation. Considering both insect survival and fecundity data, our experimental approach showed a T. absoluta total population reduction value (E) of 64%.

These results show the potential of both PIs when expressed together to enhance tomato resistance against T. absoluta and to reduce its population. Previous studies have shown that the effect of PIs on other insects is dose dependent so that higher resistance is acquired when PIs are expressed at high levels [63, 64]. Therefore, the use of genetically engineered tomato plants expressing higher levels of Itr1 and Icy2 could inflict stronger harm to T. absoluta and provide a better control of its population.

Expression of BTI-CMe and Hv-CPI2 in tomato had no harmful effects on Nesdiocoris tenuis

To check the compatibility of these transgenic plants with current biocontrol strategies in use, we investigated their effect on a T. absoluta predator: Nesidiocoris tenuis. N. tenuis reared on CMe-CPI.3 tomato plants were not affected by the presence of PIs in the plants. No effect was observed neither on their developmental time nor their viability. Nesidiocoris tenuis needs to feed on plant material to develop, hence our results suggest that its digestive enzymes are not affected by PIs in the plants.

Hv-CPI2 expression induces tomato defensive response

The effect of PIs expression in transgenic plants on phytophagous insects has been largely studied, however the effect on the host plant endogenous defense mechanisms have not been investigated. Our results suggest that the expression of the barley cysteine proteinase inhibitor Hv-CPI2 in tomato activates both endogenous direct and indirect defense mechanisms.

Expression analysis of the tomato proteinase inhibitor Pin2 showed that it is induced in presence of Hv-CPI2. This unexpected induction of the tomato trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor could explain both, the inhibitory effect of CPI.1 plants and the synergetic effect observed in CMe-CPI.3 tomato plants. In fact, CMe-CPI.3 over-expresses three PIs belonging to different mechanistic classes: 2 trypsin inhibitors (BTI-CMe and PIN2), a cystatin (Hv-CPI2) and a chymotrypsin inhibitor (PIN2). The co-expression of these three PIs makes T. absoluta adaptation more difficult and improbable. It has been documented that some insects are able to overcome the presence of trypsin inhibitors in their diet by shifting the biosynthesis of one type of proteases to another one. Oppert et al. [10] have reported that the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), when fed with cystatin supplemented diet, produces serine proteinase digestive enzymes as a compensatory response. The same phenomenon was observed in Helicoverpa zea Boddie (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), where the presence of the soybean trypsin inhibitor was compensated by the production of chymotrypsins inhibitors [9]. It would be difficult for T. absoluta larvae during their short larval development period to achieve a compensatory mechanism toward three PIs of different families.

PIN2 is highly expressed in tomato trichomes both constitutively and in response to herbivores attack [65]. Trichomes production is usually constitutive; however, some plant species increase trichome density in new leaves upon damage [66, 67]. CMe-CPI.3 plants showed higher glandular trichomes density when compared with wild type plants. This finding agrees with previous studies. Luo et al. [68] have shown that the expression of the night shade (Solanum americanum) SaPIN2 gene increased glandular trichomes density in tobacco and enhanced its resistance toward the larvae of the two lepidoptera species pest H. armigera and S. litura [68]. It has been shown that, when fed with induced leaves, insects consumed less foliage and grown less compared to those fed with non-induced ones [69]. Tomato plants have both non glandular and glandular trichomes. While the first ones act as a mechanical barrier against pests, the second type is responsible for the secretion of a variety of metabolites and volatiles which can be harmful or repellent to insects and/or attractant to their natural enemies [70].

As trichomes are responsible for the production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), we investigated plant volatiles production and insect olfactory responses. N. tenuis adults were attracted by CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants volatiles, while T. absoluta had no preference for either of the two plant lines. These results were supported by the VOCs analysis. CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants have shown increased levels of benzenoids and reduced levels of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes when compared with the wild type plants. Benzenoids have previously been described as insect attractants. They have, thus, been reported to attract natural enemies of plant pests. Octyl benzaldehyde was shown to attract Oryus tristicolor (White) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) (a bug predator of Tetranychus urticae Koch. (Acari: Tetranychidae) and thrips (Thysanoptera: Tripidae)) [71]. In addition to the attraction of natural enemies, benzenoids also act as repellents of phytophagous pests. Sesame plant, Sesamum indicum L., which represents a natural refuge for mirids shows a stronger attraction for N. tenuis than tomato. Naselli et al. [72] have associated this attraction to a reduction of the levels of hydrocarbon monoterpenes. These results agree with our findings: the fact that the CMe-CPI.3 plant secretes relatively low concentrations of hydrocarbon monoterpenes (α-pinene, β-mycene, β-pinene) and high levels of benzenoids could explain its attraction for N. tenuis adults.

Terpenoids are synthesized through two pathways: the mevalonic (MVA) and the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways [73]. MEP pathway starts with the condensation of pyruvate and D-glycerldehyde-3-phosphate derived respectively from glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The MVA pathway is initiated by the condensation of three molecules of acetyl-CoA (derived from pyruvate) with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA [74]. Benzenoids synthesis starts by the shikimate pathway which precursors are phosphoenolpyruvate and D-erythrose 4-phosphate, also provided respectively from glycolysis and PPP pathways. Therefore, the same metabolic routes provide precursors for the MEP and MVA pathways, so that they have to compete with the shikimate pathway [75, 76]. This competition for the substrate could explain the VOCs profile observed in CMe-CPI.3 transgenic plants. While benzenoids synthesis is privileged, terpenoids emission is reduced. The rate of a VOC is not only controlled by the amount of the enzymes involved in its formation, but is rather conditioned by the availability of its substrate [7779]. Precursor availability is also known to play a key role in the modulation of VOCs rhythmic emission [8082] as plants emit volatiles with different diurnal and nocturnal patterns [8385].

Conclusions

In this study, we conferred resistance against T. absoluta to tomato plants by expressing two PIs from different mechanistic classes. The two PIs showed additive effect. Better efficiency was achieved when both genes were co-expressed. This direct noxious effect on T. absoluta was complemented by the attraction of its predator, N. tenuis. It is worthy to mention that the obtained transgenic plants had no detrimental effects on the mirid.

Barley cystatin Hv-CPI2 expression in tomato plants induced endogenous defensive response by activating Pin2 gene, increasing glandular trichomes production and modifying VOCs emission. The harm occasioned to T. absoluta could though be caused not only by the direct effect of the foreign PIs, but also by the activation of tomato endogenous defensive response. The mechanism resulting in this activation remains to be elucidated. As far as we know, no previous study has reported the effect of the expression of a foreign cystatin on the host plant endogenous defense.

Abbreviations

BAAMC: 

Nα-Benzoyl-L-arginine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride

BApNa: 

Nα-Benzoyl-L-arginine 4-nitroanilide hydrochloride

CaMV: 

Cauliflower mosaic virus

Cv: 

cultivar

LB: 

left border

MEP: 

Methyl erythritol phosphate

MVA: 

Mevalonic acid

nptII

neomycin phosphotransferase II

P35S: 

Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter

PFLNA: 

pGlu-Phe-Leu p-nitroanilide

PI: 

proteinase inhibitor

PNOS: 

Nopaline synthase promoter

PPP: 

Pentose phosphate pathway

PVA: 

Polyvinyl alcohol

RB: 

right border

Rv: 

reduction value

T35S: 

Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S terminator

TNOS: 

Nopaline synthase terminator

VOCs: 

Volatile organic compounds

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. María Ángeles Marcos (CIBIO, Univ. of Alicante, Spain) for critical reading of the manuscript and valuable comments, to Miquel Alonso Valiente (IVIA) for technical support with Tuta absoluta bioassays and to the Metabolomics facility of the IBMCP for technical support with VOCs analyses. Rim Hamza acknowledges fellowships from the Tunisian Ministry for Higher Education and Scientific Research and from the Erasmus Mundus EMMAG program of the European Union. MP-H was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the MEC (Juan de la Cierva program-FPDI-2013-17968). We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Funding

This work was partly supported by grants BIO2013–40747-R and AGL2014–55616-C3 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

M.P.-H., A.U., A.G, K.G. and L.A.C., conceived the experiments and analyzed the data. R.H., J.L.R., performed the experiments and analyzed the data. J.P.B. and A.U. wrote the grants that funded this work and R.H., L.A.C., M.P.-H., A.U., A.G and J.P.B wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

not applicable.

Consent for publication

not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (CSIC-UPV). Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación Edf, Valencia, Spain
(2)
Universitat Jaume I (UJI). Departament de Ciències Agràries i del Medi Natural, Unitat Associada d’Entomologia UJI-IVIA, Castelló de la Plana, Spain
(3)
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA). Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Unidad Asociada de Entomología UJI-IVIA, Moncada Valencia, Spain
(4)
Research Unit of Genome, Immunodiagnostics and Valorization, ISBM, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia

References

  1. Oerke EC. Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci. 2005;144(01):31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jouanin L, Bonadé-Bottino M, Girard C, Morrot G, Giband M. Transgenic plants for insect resistance. Plant Sci. 1998;131(1):1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Markwick NP, Docherty LC, Phung MM, Lester MT, Murray C, Yao JL, Mitra DS, Cohen D, Beuning LL, Kutty-Amma S, et al. Transgenic tobacco and apple plants expressing biotin-binding proteins are resistant to two cosmopolitan insect pests, potato tuber moth and lightbrown apple moth, respectively. Transgenic Res. 2003;12(6):671–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Koiwa H, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM. Regulation of protease inhibitors and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 1997;2(10):379–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ryan CA. Protease inhibitors in plants: genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1990;28(1):425–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Abdeen A, Virgos A, Olivella E, Villanueva J, Aviles X, Gabarra R, Prat S. Multiple insect resistance in transgenic tomato plants over-expressing two families of plant proteinase inhibitors. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;57(2):189–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Quilis J, López-García B, Meynard D, Guiderdoni E, San Segundo B. Inducible expression of a fusion gene encoding two proteinase inhibitors leads to insect and pathogen resistance in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(3):367–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Smigocki AC, Ivic-Haymes S, Li H, Savic J. Pest protection conferred by a Beta vulgaris serine proteinase inhibitor gene. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57303.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mazumdar-Leighton S, Broadway RM. Transcriptional induction of diverse midgut trypsins in larval Agrotis ipsilon and Helicoverpa zea feeding on the soybean trypsin inhibitor. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;31(6–7):645–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Oppert B, Morgan TD, Hartzer K, Kramer KJ. Compensatory proteolytic responses to dietary proteinase inhibitors in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2005;140(1):53–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Broadway RM. Dietary regulation of serine proteinases that are resistant to serine proteinase inhibitors. J Insect Physiol. 1997;43(9):855–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhu-Salzman K, Koiwa H, Salzman R, Shade R, Ahn JE. Cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus uses a three-component strategy to overcome a plant defensive cysteine protease inhibitor. Insect Mol Biol. 2003;12(2):135–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oppert B, Morgan TD, Hartzer K, Lenarcic B, Galesa K, Brzin J, Turk V, Yoza K, Ohtsubo K, Kramer KJ. Effects of proteinase inhibitors on digestive proteinases and growth of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Comparative biochemistry and physiology Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP. 2003;134(4):481–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Duan X, Li X, Xue Q, Abo-El-Saad M, Xu D, Wu R. Transgenic rice plants harboring an introduced potato proteinase inhibitor II gene are insect resistant. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14(4):494–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pompermayer P, Lopes AR, Terra WR, Parra JRP, Falco MC, Silva-Filho MC. Effects of soybean proteinase inhibitor on development, survival and reproductive potential of the sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2001;99(1):79–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Alfonso-Rubí J, Ortego F, Castañera P, Carbonero P, Díaz I. Transgenic expression of trypsin inhibitor CMe from barley in indica and japonica rice, confers resistance to the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae. Transgenic Res. 2003;12(1):23–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Altpeter F, Diaz I, Mc Auslane H, Gaddour K, Carbonero P, Vasil IK. Increased insect resistance in transgenic wheat stably expressing trypsin inhibitor CMe. Mol Breed. 1999;5(1):53–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Martinez M, Cambra I, Carrillo L, Diaz-Mendoza M, Diaz I. Characterization of the entire cystatin gene family in barley and their target cathepsin L-like cysteine-proteases, partners in the hordein mobilization during seed germination. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(3):1531–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. FAOSTAT: Food and Organization of the United Nations, statistics division. 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Mueller LA, Lankhorst RK, Tanksley SD, Giovannoni JJ, White R, Vrebalov J, Fei Z, van Eck J, Buels R, Mills AA, et al. A snapshot of the emerging tomato genome sequence. The Plant Genome. 2009;2(1):78–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellul P, Garcia-Sogo B, Pineda B, Rios G, Roig L, Moreno V. The ploidy level of transgenic plants in agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato cotyledons (Lycopersicon esculentum L. mill.) is genotype and procedure dependent. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106(2):231–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pino LE, Lombardi-Crestana S, Azevedo MS, Scotton DC, Borgo L, Quecini V, Figueira A, Peres LE. The Rg1 allele as a valuable tool for genetic transformation of the tomato'Micro-Tom'model system. Plant Methods. 2010;6(1):23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma MK, Solanke AU, Jani D, Singh Y, Sharma AK. A simple and efficient agrobacterium-mediated procedure for transformation of tomato. J Biosci. 2009;34(3):423–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. van Eck J, Kirk DD, Walmsley AM. Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Agrobacterium Protocols. 2006:459–74.Google Scholar
  25. Dan Y, Yan H, Munyikwa T, Dong J, Zhang Y, Armstrong CL. MicroTom—a high-throughput model transformation system for functional genomics. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25(5):432–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pearce G, Strydom D, Johnson S, Ryan CA. A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins. Science. 1991;253(5022):895–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Farmer EE, Ryan CA. Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990;87(19):7713–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Bosch M, Wright LP, Gershenzon J, Wasternack C, Hause B, Schaller A, Stintzi A. Jasmonic acid and its precursor 12-oxophytodienoic acid control different aspects of constitutive and induced herbivore defenses in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(1):396–410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Christensen SA, Nemchenko A, Borrego E, Murray I, Sobhy IS, Bosak L, DeBlasio S, Erb M, Robert CA, Vaughn KA. The maize lipoxygenase, ZmLOX10, mediates green leaf volatile, jasmonate and herbivore-induced plant volatile production for defense against insect attack. Plant J. 2013;74(1):59–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Boughton AJ, Hoover K, Felton GW. Methyl jasmonate application induces increased densities of glandular trichomes on tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. J Chem Ecol. 2005;31(9):2211–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Li L, Zhao Y, McCaig BC, Wingerd BA, Wang J, Whalon ME, Pichersky E, Howe GA. The tomato homolog of CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE1 is required for the maternal control of seed maturation, jasmonate-signaled defense responses, and glandular trichome development. Plant Cell. 2004;16(1):126–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Peiffer M, Tooker JF, Luthe DS, Felton GW. Plants on early alert: glandular trichomes as sensors for insect herbivores. New Phytol. 2009;184(3):644–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bryant J, Green TR, Gurusaddaiah T, Ryan CA. Proteinase inhibitor II from potatoes: isolation and characterization of its protomer components. Biochemistry. 1976;15(16):3418–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson R, Narvaez J, An G, Ryan C. Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86(24):9871–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Klopfenstein NB, Allen KK, Avila FJ, Heuchelin SA, Martinez J, Carman RC, Hall RB, Hart ER, McNabb HS. Proteinase inhibitor II gene in transgenic poplar: chemical and biological assays. Biomass Bioenergy. 1997;12(4):299–311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Dicke M, Takabayashi J, Posthumus MA, Schütte C, Krips OE. Plant—Phytoseiid interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: variation in production of cues and in responses of predatory mites. Exp Appl Acarol. 1998;22(6):311–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Turlings T, Loughrin JH, Mccall PJ, Röse U, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH. How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1995;92(10):4169–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Levin DA. The role of trichomes in plant defense. Q Rev Biol. 1973;48(1, Part 1):3–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Traw BM, Dawson TE. Differential induction of trichomes by three herbivores of black mustard. Oecologia. 2002;131(4):526–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Handley R, Ekbom B, Ågren J. Variation in trichome density and resistance against a specialist insect herbivore in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecological Entomology. 2005;30(3):284–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Valverde P, Fornoni J, NÚÑez-Farfán J. Defensive role of leaf trichomes in resistance to herbivorous insects in Datura stramonium. J Evol Biol. 2001;14(3):424–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Elle E, Hare J. Environmentally induced variation in floral traits affects the mating system in Datura wrightii. Funct Ecol. 2002;16(1):79–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Agrawal AA. Benefits and costs of induced plant defense for Lepidium virginicum (Brassicaceae). Ecology. 2000;81(7):1804–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Dalin P, Björkman C. Adult beetle grazing induces willow trichome defence against subsequent larval feeding. Oecologia. 2003;134(1):112–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Campos MR, Biondi A, Adiga A, Guedes RN, Desneux N. From the western Palaearctic region to beyond: Tuta absoluta 10 years after invading Europe. J Pest Sci. 2017:1–10.Google Scholar
  46. Desneux N, Wajnberg E, Wyckhuys KA, Burgio G, Arpaia S, Narváez-Vasquez CA, González-Cabrera J, Ruescas DC, Tabone E, Frandon J. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control. J Pest Sci. 2010;83(3):197–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Urbaneja A, Montón H, Mollá O. Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis. J Appl Entomol. 2009;133(4):292–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Pérez-Hedo M, Urbaneja A. Prospects for predatory mirid bugs as biocontrol agents of aphids in sweet peppers. J Pest Sci. 2015;88(1):65–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Hewitt E. The composition of the nutrient solution. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant Nutrition. 1966:187–246.Google Scholar
  50. Karimi M, Inzé D, Depicker A. GATEWAY™ vectors for agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7(5):193–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Martín-Trillo M, Grandío EG, Serra F, Marcel F, Rodríguez-Buey ML, Schmitz G, Theres K, Bendahmane A, Dopazo H, Cubas P. Role of tomato BRANCHED1-like genes in the control of shoot branching. Plant J. 2011;67(4):701–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vargas C. Observations on the bionomics and natural enemies of the tomato moth, Gnorimoschema absoluta (Meyrick)(Lep. Gelechiidae). Idesia. 1970;1:75–110.Google Scholar
  53. Mollá O, Biondi A, Alonso-Valiente M, Urbaneja A. A comparative life history study of two mirid bugs preying on Tuta absoluta and Ephestia kuehniella eggs on tomato crops: implications for biological control. BioControl. 2014;59(2):175–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Abbot C. Solar variation and the weather. Science (New York, NY). 1925;62(1605):307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Bouagga S, Urbaneja A, Rambla JL, Granell A, Pérez-Hedo M. Orius laevigatus strengthens its role as a biological control agent by inducing plant defenses. J Pest Sci. 2017:1–10.Google Scholar
  57. Hilder VA, Gatehouse AM, Sheerman SE, Barker RF, Boulter D. A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobacco. Nature. 1987;330(6144):160–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Saikia K, Kalita J, Saikia PK. Biology and life cycle generations of common crow–Euploea core core Cramer (Lepidoptera: Danainae) on Hemidesmus indica host plant. Int J NeBIO. 2010;1(3):28–37.Google Scholar
  59. Srinivasan A, Giri AP, Gupta VS. Structural and functional diversities in lepidopteran serine proteases. Cellular & molecular biology letters. 2006;11(1):132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Tamhane VA, Chougule NP, Giri AP, Dixit AR, Sainani MN, Gupta VS. In vivo and in vitro effect of Capsicum annum proteinase inhibitors on Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects. 2005;1722(2):156–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Telang M, Srinivasan A, Patankar A, Harsulkar A, Joshi V, Damle A, Deshpande V, Sainani M, Ranjekar P, Gupta G. Bitter gourd proteinase inhibitors: potential growth inhibitors of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura. Phytochemistry. 2003;63(6):643–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Damle MS, Giri AP, Sainani MN, Gupta VS. Higher accumulation of proteinase inhibitors in flowers than leaves and fruits as a possible basis for differential feeding preference of Helicoverpa armigera on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill, cv. Dhanashree). Phytochemistry. 2005;66(22):2659–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. De Leo F, Bonadé-Bottino MA, Ceci LR, Gallerani R, Jouanin L. Opposite effects on spodoptera littoralis larvae of high expression level of a trypsin proteinase inhibitor in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 1998;118(3):997–1004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Rahbé Y, Ferrasson E, Rabesona H, Quillien L. Toxicity to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum of anti-chymotrypsin isoforms and fragments of Bowman–Birk protease inhibitors from pea seeds. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33(3):299–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Luo M, Ding L-W, Ge Z-J, Wang Z-Y, Hu B-L, Yang X-B, Sun Q-Y, Xu Z-F. The characterization of SaPIN2b, a plant trichome-localized proteinase inhibitor from Solanum americanum. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(11):15162–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Dalin P, Ågren J, Björkman C, Huttunen P, Kärkkäinen K. Leaf trichome formation and plant resistance to herbivory. In: Dordrecht SA, editor. Induced plant resistance to herbivory. Netherlands: Springer; 2008. p. 89–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Gonzáles WL, Negritto MA, Suárez LH, Gianoli E. Induction of glandular and non-glandular trichomes by damage in leaves of Madia sativa under contrasting water regimes. Acta Oecol. 2008;33(1):128–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Luo M, Wang Z, Li H, Xia K-F, Cai Y, Xu Z-F. Overexpression of a weed (Solanum americanum) proteinase inhibitor in transgenic tobacco results in increased glandular trichome density and enhanced resistance to Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(4):1896–910.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Björkman C, Dalin P, Ahrné K. Leaf trichome responses to herbivory in willows: induction, relaxation and costs. New Phytol. 2008;179(1):176–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Duffey S. Plant glandular trichomes: their partial role in defence against insects. Insects and the plant surface. London: Edward Arnold; 1986. p. 151–72.Google Scholar
  71. James DG. Further field evaluation of synthetic herbivore-induced plan volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects. J Chem Ecol. 2005;31(3):481–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Naselli M, Zappalà L, Gugliuzzo A, Garzia GT, Biondi A, Rapisarda C, Cincotta F, Condurso C, Verzera A, Siscaro G. Olfactory response of the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis to tomato and alternative host plants. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2017;11(2):121–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Tholl D. Biosynthesis and biological functions of terpenoids in plants. Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology. 2015;148:63-106.Google Scholar
  74. Lange BM, Rujan T, Martin W, Croteau R. Isoprenoid biosynthesis: the evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97(24):13172–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Dudareva N, Klempien A, Muhlemann JK, Kaplan I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013;198(1):16–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Razal RA, Ellis S, Singh S, Lewis NG, Towers GHN. Nitrogen recycling in phenylpropanoid metabolism. Phytochemistry. 1996;41(1):31–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Effmert U, Große J, Röse US, Ehrig F, Kägi R, Piechulla B. Volatile composition, emission pattern, and localization of floral scent emission in Mirabilis jalapa (Nyctaginaceae). Am J Bot. 2005;92(1):2–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Guterman I, Masci T, Chen X, Negre F, Pichersky E, Dudareva N, Weiss D, Vainstein A. Generation of phenylpropanoid pathway-derived volatiles in transgenic plants: rose alcohol acetyltransferase produces phenylethyl acetate and benzyl acetate in petunia flowers. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;60(4):555–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Vogel JT, Tan B-C, McCarty DR, Klee HJ. The carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 enzyme has broad substrate specificity, cleaving multiple carotenoids at two different bond positions. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(17):11364–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Colquhoun TA, Kim JY, Wedde AE, Levin LA, Schmitt KC, Schuurink RC, Clark DG. PhMYB4 fine-tunes the floral volatile signature of petunia×hybrida through PhC4H. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(3):1133–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Kolosova N, Gorenstein N, Kish CM, Dudareva N. Regulation of circadian methyl benzoate emission in diurnally and nocturnally emitting plants. Plant Cell. 2001;13(10):2333–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Maeda H, Shasany AK, Schnepp J, Orlova I, Taguchi G, Cooper BR, Rhodes D, Pichersky E, Dudareva N. RNAi suppression of arogenate dehydratase1 reveals that phenylalanine is synthesized predominantly via the arogenate pathway in petunia petals. Plant Cell. 2010;22(3):832–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Lerdau M, Gray D. Ecology and evolution of light-dependent and light-independent phytogenic volatile organic carbon. New Phytol. 2003;157(2):199–211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Martin DM, Gershenzon J, Bohlmann J. Induction of volatile terpene biosynthesis and diurnal emission by methyl jasmonate in foliage of Norway spruce. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(3):1586–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. van Doorn WG, Woltering EJ. Physiology and molecular biology of petal senescence. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(3):453–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement