Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic and genotypic diversity measurements

From: Evolution of almond genetic diversity and farmer practices in Lebanon: impacts of the diffusion of a graft-propagated cultivar in a traditional system based on seed-propagation

Pop

Genotypic Diversity

% LD(G)

Genetic diversity

N

G

R

PI (N)

Ar+

Pa+

Ho (N)

He (N)

Fis (N)

Fis (G)#

Halwani

284

195

0.69

1.20E-13

95

4.80 (0.36)

2.01 (0.31)

0.67 (0.07)

0.66 (0.04)

−0.03

0

HB_Bi

23

8

0.32

4.40E-11

42

3.60 (0.25)

0.02 (0.01)

0.70 (0.08)

0.62 (0.03)

−0.12*

–

HB_Fe

33

14

0.41

7.60E-08

77

2.89 (0.20)

0.10 (0.07)

0.62 (0.12)

0.47 (0.06)

−0.34*

–

HB_NA

30

19

0.62

2.20E-12

83

3.93 (0.25)

0.04 (0.02)

0.74 (0.08)

0.64 (0.05)

−0.15

−0.08*

HB_Ze

16

7

0.4

1.50E-06

14

2.12 (0.18)

0.00 (0.00)

0.54 (0.12)

0.42 (0.06)

−0.28*

–

HM_Am

29

27

0.93

2.60E-08

20

2.86 (0.29)

0.12 (0.08)

0.63 (0.09)

0.49 (0.06)

−0.33*

−0.30*

HM_Ma

30

21

0.69

6.10E-09

21

2.96 (0.24)

0.05 (0.03)

0.75 (0.09)

0.52 (0.05)

−0.45*

−0.39*

HM_Je

30

29

0.97

1.60E-17

52

6.10 (0.40)

0.21 (0.06)

0.66 (0.04)

0.76 (0.03)

0.13*

0.14*

HN_Bc

32

22

0.68

6.80E-11

70

3.65 (0.32)

0.03 (0.01)

0.75 (0.08)

0.59 (0.05)

−0.28

−0.21*

HN_Bt

23

23

1

7.70E-12

43

3.91 (0.51)

0.20 (0.09)

0.62 (0.08)

0.60 (0.07)

−0.03

−0.03

HS_DQ

23

14

0.59

6.30E-08

50

2.93 (0.25)

0.02 (0.02)

0.73 (0.11)

0.48 (0.06)

−0.56*

–

HS_T a

15

10

0.64

7.90E-09

18

3.10 (0.24)

0.07 (0.03)

0.52 (0.08)

0.51 (0.06)

−0.06*

–

Khachabi

331

314

0.95

1.80E-25

74

8.28 (0.50)

5.48 (0.45)

0.68 (0.05)

0.86 (0.03)

0.20

0.20*

KB_Ba

26

26

1

2.30E-21

3

7.23 (0.47)

0.23 (0.07)

0.64 (0.05)

0.84 (0.03)

0.24

0.24*

KB_Bi

20

20

1

4.40E-16

21

6.08 (0.41)

0.29 (0.08)

0.70 (0.06)

0.74 (0.03)

0.05

0.05*

KB_EM

30

30

1

2.80E-21

13

7.47 (0.49)

0.22 (0.06)

0.73 (0.05)

0.82 (0.03)

0.12

0.12*

KB_Ir

15

15

1

3.70E-18

33

6.31 (0.47)

0.41 (0.14)

0.72 (0.06)

0.79 (0.04)

0.10*

0.10*

KB_KL

30

29

0.97

1.50E-20

13

7.01 (0.46)

0.26 (0.07)

0.70 (0.05)

0.83 (0.02)

0.15

0.15*

KB_Lu

30

30

1

1.10E-20

14

6.92 (0.43)

0.31 (0.06)

0.73 (0.05)

0.83 (0.03)

0.13

0.13*

KB_Sh

18

18

1

1.40E-17

37

6.19 (0.37)

0.23 (0.11)

0.63 (0.06)

0.78 (0.04)

0.18

0.18*

KN_As

16

16

1

3.10E-19

20

6.92 (0.53)

0.41 (0.12)

0.62 (0.07)

0.80 (0.04)

0.22

0.22*

KN_EQ

16

16

1

8.20E-19

14

6.83 (0.52)

0.56 (0.13)

0.62 (0.06)

0.79 (0.05)

0.22*

0.22*

KS_Ba

30

30

1

7.20E-21

22

7.20 (0.48)

0.32 (0.08)

0.71 (0.06)

0.82 (0.03)

0.12

0.12*

KS_Bl

29

29

1

2.40E-19

18

6.71 (0.42)

0.18 (0.06)

0.67 (0.05)

0.80 (0.03)

0.16

0.16*

KS_Ch

23

21

0.91

1.30E-20

25

7.14 (0.47)

0.37 (0.12)

0.71 (0.05)

0.83 (0.03)

0.14

0.15*

KS_MJ

18

17

0.94

2.90E-17

19

5.91 (0.40)

0.12 (0.05)

0.71 (0.06)

0.77 (0.04)

0.08

0.07*

KS_T a

30

18

0.59

1.80E-15

52

5.32 (0.30)

0.13 (0.04)

0.65 (0.08)

0.73 (0.03)

0.11*

0.15*

  1. N, Number of samples; G, Number of distinct genotypes; R, Proportion of distinct genotypes = (G-1)/(N-1); PI, probability of identity of two genotypes; %LD: percentage of genotypic linkage disequilibrium based on a single MLG copy; Ar+, average number of alleles per locus; Pa+, mean number of private alleles per locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, unbiased expected heterozygosity; Fis, inbreeding coefficient
  2. +Standardized population at G = 15 using rarefaction method
  3. #Fis calculated for sample size over 15 individuals
  4. *Significant departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P ≥ 0.05)
  5. X(N) Values calculated based on N matrix
  6. X(G) Values calculated based on G matrix
  7. Standard errors are in brackets
Back to article page

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us