Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Overexpression of PvCO1, a bamboo CONSTANS-LIKE gene, delays flowering by reducing expression of the FT gene in transgenic Arabidopsis

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 3Email author
BMC Plant Biology201818:232

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1469-0

  • Received: 18 September 2017
  • Accepted: 4 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

In Arabidopsis, a long day flowering plant, CONSTANS (CO) acts as a transcriptional activator of flowering under long day (LD) condition. In rice, a short day flowering plant, Hd1, the ortholog of CO, plays dual functions in respond to day-length, activates flowering in short days and represses flowering in long days. In addition, alleles of Hd1 account for ~ 44% of the variation in flowering time observed in cultivated rice and sorghum. How does it work in bamboo? The function of CO in bamboo is similar to that in Arabidopsis?

Results

Two CO homologous genes, PvCO1 and PvCO2, in Phyllostachys violascens were identified. Alignment analysis showed that the two PvCOLs had the highest sequence similarity to rice Hd1. Both PvCO1 and PvCO2 expressed in specific tissues, mainly in leaf. The PvCO1 gene had low expression before flowering, high expression during the flowering stage, and then declined to low expression again after flowering. In contrast, expression of PvCO2 was low during the flowering stage, but rapidly increased to a high level after flowering. The mRNA levels of both PvCOs exhibited a diurnal rhythm. Both PvCO1 and PvCO2 proteins were localized in nucleus of cells. PvCO1 could interact with PvGF14c protein which belonged to 14–3-3 gene family through B-box domain. Overexpression of PvCO1 in Arabidopsis significantly caused late flowering by reducing the expression of AtFT, whereas, transgenic plants overexpressing PvCO2 showed a similar flowering time with WT under LD conditions. Taken together, these results suggested that PvCO1 was involved in the flowering regulation, and PvCO2 may either not have a role in regulating flowering or act redundantly with other flowering regulators in Arabidopsis. Our data also indicated regulatory divergence between PvCOLs in Ph. violascens and CO in Arabidopsis as well as Hd1 in Oryza sativa. Our results will provide useful information for elucidating the regulatory mechanism of COLs involved in the flowering.

Conclusions

Unlike to the CO gene in Arabidopsis, PvCO1 was a negative regulator of flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis under LD condition. It was likely that long period of vegetative growth of this bamboo species was related with the regulation of PvCO1.

Keywords

  • CONSTANS (CO)
  • Flowering time
  • Functional divergence
  • Flowering regulation
  • Bamboo
  • Phyllostachys violascens

Background

The transition from a vegetative phase to a reproductive phase is an important developmental switch in plants. This transition is controlled by several environmental and endogenous conditions [1, 2]. Different plant species have various mechanisms to regulate this process [3] and many, such as grasses, have distinct flowering habits.

Bamboo is one of the most important non-timber forests and belongs to the Poaceae. Unlike other plants in this family, such as rice, maize, and wheat, the flowering time of bamboo appears to be random. Some species have prolonged vegetative growth lasting decades before flowering and death. One such species is Phyllostachys heterocycla, a woody bamboo that has ecological, economic and cultural value [4]. Another economically important species, Ph. violascens, belongs to the same genus and has very similar genetic background with Ph. heterocycla. In this species, those elder plants at the age of 6 years would usually be harvested for gain yield of bamboo shoots. However, compared with Ph. heterocycla, the flowering pattern of Ph. violascens is variable. Its different individuals can flower at different times during the year. Some plants flower twice and more, some only once, some never flower even when they were harvested [5, 6]. Some young plants without leaves grow poorly but still flower and then die. There are some individual plants flower every year. Flowering duration can be 60 to 90 d. Many researchers have attempted to explain the factors controlling flowering. These factors include nutrition, climate, stress, and molecular mechanisms [7, 8]. Currently, studies on the molecular mechanism of bamboo flowering have focused on transcriptome sequencing and expression of genes involved in the developmental stages of flowering [4, 5, 914], while reports on the genes involved in floral induction are rare [6, 1518]. Peng et al., [4] reported that repeat insertions in the regulatory region of most homologs encoding CONSTANS (CO), might result in low gene expression in Ph. heterocycla. And the CONSTANS (CO) gene was originally isolated as a photoperiodic floral promoter.

The CO gene in Arabidopsis plays a critical role in control of flowering time by directly activating the expression of target genes including FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) which encodes a florigenic protein [19]. Overexpression of the CO gene accelerates Arabidopsis flowering regardless of photoperiod [20]. CO gene mutation results in delayed flowering under long-day (LD) conditions, but has no effect on flowering time under short-day (SD) [21]. CO encodes a B-box-type zinc-finger transcriptional factor with two B-box domains near the N-terminus and a CCT (CO, CO-like, and TOC1) domain near the C-terminus [2123]. The B-box domain of CO is likely involved in protein-protein interactions and the CCT domain binds DNA [2426]. The CO protein can bind to specific cis-elements in the FT promoter either by itself [24] or in a complex with CCAAT-binding factors [19, 26, 27] to regulate FT transcription. CO protein can also interact with specific 14–3-3 isoforms, 14–3-3 μ and ν proteins which belong to the family representing nodes of signal integration and cross talk, affecting photoperiodic flowering [28]. In rice, a SD plant, the Hd1 gene, orthologous to CO, promotes flowering under SD conditions, but delays flowering in LD conditions [29, 30]. In addition, the mutant of Se1, allelic to Hd1, controlling photoperiod sensitivity, is also slightly later than its progenitor variety in heading date [29]. The wheat TaHd-1 gene, also homologous to CO, can complement the function of rice Hd1: it also promotes heading under SD conditions, but delays it under LD conditions [31]. Overexpression of LpCO (from Lolium perenne) leads to early flowering in Arabidopsis [32]. The PnCO gene from Pharbitis nil can complement the co mutant of Arabidopsis [33]. Overexpression of GmCOL1a, GmCOL1b, GmCOL2a and GmCOL2b from soybean rescued the late flowering phenotype of Arabidopsis co mutant [34]. The alleles of Hd1 account for ~ 44% of the variation in flowering time in cultivated rice and sorghum, suggesting Hd1 plays an important role in flowering. Differences of CO gene expression are responsible for differences in flowering times [23]. CO is important to many plant species including poplar (Populus spp) [35], but its function remains unknown in non-model systems such as woody perennial bamboo species.

Whether the COL genes in bamboo have the influence on the flowering time are unclear and it is unknown if COL gene functions in bamboo are similar to those in Arabidopsis. In the present study, two homologous CO genes, PvCO1 and PvCO2, were identified from Ph. violascens. Their expression patterns were analyzed and primary functions were characterized. The results give new insights into the understanding of the COLs genes involved in floral transition.

Methods

Plant materials

Phyllostachys violascens (Carriere) Riviere in this study were grown in the field under natural conditions on the campus of Zhejiang A&F University (30°14′N, 119°42′E). The mean annual temperature is 15.6 °C, with maximum and minimum temperatures of 41.7 °C and − 13.3 °C, respectively. The average length of sunshine in Lin’an is approximately 1,847 h per year. We chose those plants which flowered last year for sampling. Some of these plants flowered again from mid-March to mid-May and flowering lasts for 60 to 90 d.

To study expression of PvCOLs before, during, and after flowering, firstly, we sampled fully expanded, mature leaves from ten flowered plants at 5:00 pm on March 2, 2012. Ten days later, on March 12, we sampled leaves again from these ten flowered plants also at 5:00 pm. And then, we found 4 individual plants displayed flower bud and flowered again between on March 12 and 22, among which 3 were targeted for sampling. Thereafter, we collected leaves from these 3 flowering plants every 10 d until to May 31 at 5:00 pm because these three plants died between on May 31 and June 3. Day length increased from 11.5 h light on March 2 to 14 h light on May 31. Meanwhile, we immediately determined expression of target genes after collecting the leaf samples. Once the target gene was expressed, we also collected fully expanded, mature leaves from the same three flowering plants 8 times at 3 h intervals on March 30 (LD 12.5:11.5 h) and determined expression of target genes for diurnal expression analysis. The maximum and minimum temperatures were 15.7 °C and 13.3 °C on this day, respectively. We also sampled mature leaves, immature leaves, roots, stems and flower buds for determining the tissue-specific expression from 5 pm to 6 pm on April 13 (LD 13:11 h). The maximum and minimum temperatures on April 13 were 17.3 °C and 13.9 °C, respectively. All plant samples were stored at − 80 °C prior to further experiments.

Wild type (WT) and transgenic plants of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) were cultured in a room under ≈22 °C with LD (16 h light: 8 h dark) conditions. The light intensities is 200 umol/m .s.

DNA and RNA procedures

Total genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of Ph. violascens by the CTAB method and total RNAs were extracted from the collected samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, US). To remove any residual genomic DNA from the preparation, the RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase I according to manufacturer instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, US). The first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the Super Script III kit (Invitrogen, US), according to the manufacturer manual.

A pair of degenerate primers (TOHLF1/TOHLR2) was designed according to the conserved sequence of CO homologous genes from rice, maize and wheat, and used to amplify the partial DNA and cDNA of PvCOL. Based on the partial DNA sequence of PvCOL, the primers 5SP1, 5SP2, 5SP3, 3SP1, 3SP2 and 3SP3 used for genome walking amplification and the primers GSP1, GSP2, GSP3 and GSP4 used for rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) were designed in order to obtain the 5’ and 3’ terminal sequences of the PvCOL genes. The PvCOL DNA sequence containing the encoding region was assembled by a combination of the conserved sequence and the 5’ and 3’ terminal sequences. To obtain the full-length cDNA and genomic DNA sequence of PvCOL, two pairs of specific primers, PvCO1F and PvCO1R for PvCO1, PvCO2F and PvCO2R for PvCO2, were designed based on the assembled sequence and used for amplification. Detailed information on all primers used is listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. All of the amplified fragments were gel purified, ligated into the pMD18-T vector, transformed into the DH5a competent cells, and sequenced.

Real-time PCRs were performed according to the procedures of Guo et al., [6] and semi-quantitative PCR according to Putterill et al., [21]. Annealing temperature and the cycles of PCR were adjusted according to the primers and target genes. Primers used (PvCO1qexpF and PvCO1qexpR for PvCO1, PvCO2qexpF and PvCO2qexpR for PvCO2, PvActinqexpF and PvActinqexpR for PvActin, AtFTF and AtFTR for AtFT, AtActinF and AtActinR for AtActin) in real-time PCR experiments and primers used (PvCO1expF and PvCO1expR for PvCO1, PvCO2expF and PvCO2expR for PvCO2, ActinF and ActinR for PvActin) in semi-quantitative PCR. PCR primers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. When PCR analyses were conducted using plasmid DNA harboring complete PvCO1 and PvCO2 cDNA as templates, no cross-amplification was detected. In this study, PvActin and AtActin genes were used as reference genes for normalization because they have stable expression pattern [36].

Bioinformatic analysis

The open reading frame (ORF) of PvCOL cDNA was determined using the ORF Finder (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/orffinder/) and translated into the corresponding amino acid sequence. The conserved domain was predicted using CD search (http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi). The predicted protein sequence alignments were performed via Clustalw, and the results of multiple sequence alignments were displayed by GENEDOC (http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/soft/molbio/ibmpc/genedoc-readme.html). Phylogenetic analysis and statistical neighbor-joining bootstrap tests of the phylogenies were performed by MEGA version 5.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net/). Bootstraps with 1000 replicates for Poisson correction model were performed to assess node support. The information on 17 COL gene family members in Arabidopsis and 17 in rice was from Griffiths et al. [37] and Cockram et al. [38], respectively. The accession numbers for all these genes were listed in Additional file 2: Table S2.

To identify the COL genes in moso bamboo (Ph. heterocycla), we downloaded the genomic DNA sequence, predicted genes and protein sequences from Peng et al., [4] (http://202.127.18.221/bamboo/down.php), constructed local blast database using BioEdit software, and then used rice COL protein sequences as queries to perform BLASTp search with the expectation (e)-value threshold of 1.0e− 30. The candidate proteins containing B-box domains and CCT domains were predicted via the NCBI-CDD (http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi). To ensure that these candidate proteins actually belong to the COL gene family, we deleted the proteins lacking the B-box domain or the CCT domain.

Subcellular localization

The amplicons of the PvCO1 and PvCO2 CDS regions were inserted at the 5end of a GFP gene driven by the CaMV35S promoter. The region corresponding to the PvCO1 C-terminal (Met269-Phe384) containing the CCT domain was amplified from the plasmid harboring complete PvCO1 cDNA via PCR and fused to the 5end of GFP. This fusion was called PvCO1 (Cterm). Transient expression of the GFP fusions in onion epidermal cells were performed as previously described [39]. Then the onion epidermal cells were observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope.

Transformation of Arabidopsis

The ORF of PvCO1 and PvCO2 amplified from the plasmids harboring complete PvCO1 cDNA and complete PvCO2 cDNA were purified and inserted into the pCAMBIA 1301 vectors, respectively, in which the target genes were under the control of CaMV35s promoter. Then the recombinant vectors were transformed into the Agrobacterium strain GV3101, respectively. The transformed Agrobacterium strain was used to infect the WT Arabidopsis thaliana plants using floral dipping method [40]. Transgenic Arabidopsis were screened on 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar media containing kanamycin. Flowering time was measured in the T3 generation using lines homozygous from several independent transformation events.

Yeast two-hybrid assay (Y2H)

Both full-length ORF of PvCO1 and PvGF14c were cloned into the pGBKT7 BD vector and pGADT7 AD vector for the swapping experiment. The truncated PvCO1 fragments encoding the N-terminus region containing the two B-box domain (Met1-Leu150) was cloned into the pGBKT7 BD vector, and the other truncated PvCO1 encoding the C-terminal (Met269-Phe384), was also cloned into the pGBKT7 BD vector. Both pGBKT7 BD vector and pGADT7 AD vectors were co-transformed into the yeast strain AH109. The positive transformants were selected on SD- Leu-Trp agar medium and then transferred to SD-Trp-Leu-His-Ade agar medium to identify the interaction in yeast. The positive and negative controls were from the kits cited below. The Y2H was performed according to the BD Matchmaker Library Construction & Screening Kits instructions (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, US).

Pull down

The full-length ORF of PvCO1, the truncated PvCO1 fragments encoding the N-terminus region containing the two B-box domain (Met1-Leu150) and the other truncated PvCO1 encoding the C-terminal (Met269-Phe384) were cloned into pET28a vectors (His tag), respectively. PvGF14c was cloned into pGEX-4 T-1 vector (GST tag). GST- PvGF14c and His-PvCO1 proteins were expressed in E. coli strain Rosseta and purified with glutathione sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare). Equal amounts of GST- PvGF14c protein coupled to glutathione sepharose 4B and His-PvCO1 proteins were incubated in PBS Buffer. The beads were then washed with PBS buffer. Bound proteins were eluted in elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM reduced glutathione, pH 8.0), separated by 12% SDS–PAGE, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (BIO-RAD, USA), and immunoblotted with anti-His antibody or anti- GST (Abmart, China). After washing the membranes with PBS buffer containing 0.2% Tween (PBST), the membranes were incubated for 1 h with anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Proteintech, USA). Detection was performed using Clarity Western Chemiluminescence (ECL) Substrate (BIO-RAD, USA) and visualized using a ChemiDoc MP system (BIO-RAD, USA).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, US). The data from independent assays are analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, GLM procedure) and presented as the mean ± SD. Differences at P < 0.01 were considered highly significant.

Results

Cloning and sequence analysis of two PvCOLs in Ph. violascens

To identify the CO homologous gene in the bamboo species, Ph. violascens, we performed a local blastn and blastp search of rice COL sequences against the Moso Bamboo Genome Annotation database (http://202.127.18.221/bamboo/down.php). Fifteen COL genes belonging to the COL gene family were obtained in this 31,987 functional annotation database. However, another two genomic DNA sequences very similar to Hd1 were screened only in draft genome sequence, and these two cDNA or protein sequences were not found in 31,987 functional annotation database. Therefore, we designed a pair of primers TOHLF1/TOHLR2 based on the conserved sequence of CO genes from rice, maize and wheat to generate these two CO homologous with genomic DNA as template from the bamboo species, Ph. violascens, using PCR amplification. Two DNA fragments (1,433 bp and 1,273 bp, respectively) were obtained with the pair of primers. Sequence analysis indicated that the two fragments showed high identity with rice Hd1 (orthologous to CO), named PvCO1 and PvCO2. We also performed blastn against the NCBI database, and obtained one COL (referred as COL1) sequence from Ph. heterocycla that had 98% identity with PvCO1 fragment sequence using PvCO1 as the query and another COL (named COL2) sequence from Dendrocalamus xishuangbannaensis that showed 92% identity with the PvCO2 fragment sequence using PvCO2 as the query.

To obtain the complete PvCO1 gene, we designed primers for genome walking and RACE based on the COL1 sequence. Two fragments (850 bp and 550 bp-long, respectively) were amplified from the 5′ end and 3′ end, respectively. After analysis of the obtained sequences, we obtained a 2,535 bp DNA sequence by assembling the three fragments. Finally, a 1,942 bp fragment from genomic DNA and a 1,241 bp fragment from cDNA were amplified with primer PvCO1F and PvCO1R by end-to-end PCR. To obtain the full length sequence of PvCO2 gene, we also designed a pair of primers PvCO2F and PvCO2R based on the COL2 sequence. An 1,825 bp DNA sequence and a 1,260 bp cDNA sequence were amplified using the primers PvCO2F and PvCO2R, respectively. Analysis of the DNA and cDNA sequences suggested that both PvCO1 and PvCO2 genes had two exons and one intron (Fig. 1a). All of exon-intron junction followed the GT-AG rule. The ORFs of PvCO1 (accession number: MH459145) and PvCO2 (accession number: MH459146) were 1,155 bp and 1,128 bp-long and encoded 384 and 375 amino acids, respectively. Both PvCO1 and PvCO2 contained the conserved domain: two B-box domains, and a CCT domain (Fig. 1b). The PvCO1 protein showed 79.4% identity with Hd1 and 40.0% identity with CO, the PvCO2 protein 61.7% identity with Hd1 and 38.7% identity with CO. PvCO1 protein shared 70.9% identity with PvCO2. The alignment of PvCO1, PvCO2, Hd1 and CO indicated that besides the B-box and CCT conserved domains, three other small conserved regions, M1, M2 and M3, were identified although the other regions diverged (Fig. 1b). Phylogenetic analysis also showed that both PvCO1 and PvCO2 shared high identities with Hd1 (Fig. 2). The two PvCOL proteins clearly belonged to the COL gene family.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Bioinformatic analysis of PvCO1 and PvCO2. a Genomic structures of PvCO1 and PvCO2. The filled boxes indicated the exons, the black lines indicated introns, and the open boxes indicated upstream sequence or downstream sequence. Numbers represented the sizes of each region in base pairs. b Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of PvCO1, PvCO2, Hd1 (rice) and CO (Arabidopsis). The conserved B-box and CCT domains of CO homologs are boxed. In red M1, M2, and M3 are additional conserved regions between the four CO homologs. Amino acids which are 100% conserved are shaded in black and partially conserved are shaded in gray

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of COL proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Ph.violascens and Ph. heterocycla. Bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates) was performed to assess the support of each branch. Accession numbers of the CO proteins used to construct the phylogenetic tree are listed in Additional file 3: Table S3

PhCOL gene family members in Ph. violascens

In our previous study, the identities of homologous genes between Ph. heterocycla and Ph. violascens were found to be > 95%. Using PvCO1 as a query for local BLASTn analyses against the Moso Bamboo Genome DNA database, we obtained several COL genes. Among them, one (named PhCO1) showed 98.25% identity with PvCO1. Another gene (named PhCO2), having 97.99% identity with PvCO2, was obtained using the same method. This suggested that COL corresponding homologous genes in Ph. heterocycla and Ph. violascens had a close relationship. Using rice COL, PvCO1 and PvCO2 as queries, we found 19 COL gene members in the Ph. heterocycla genome. All of them contained B-box domain and CCT domain. Then, according to these sequences, we designed primers (Additional file 2: Table S2) to amplify these 19 corresponding COL gene members from Ph. violascens. The 19 PvCOL proteins (Additional file 3: Table S3) were divided into three groups based on the identities of amino acid sequences similar to Arabidopsis and rice COL proteins (Fig. 2, Additional file 4: Table S4). In addition, based on variations within the B-box region, the 19 COL proteins group into three clusters: the first group (PvCO1, PvCO2, PvCO3, PvCO4, PvCO7, PvCO8, PvCO9, PvCO10, PvCO14, PvCO15, PvCO19) has two B-box domains, the second (PvCO5, PvCO6, PvCO11, PvCO12, PvCO13) has one B-box and a second diverged B-box, the third (PvCO16, PvCO17, PvCO18) has one B-box (Additional file 5: Figure S1). In group one, two homologous pairs, PvCO1/PvCO9 and PvCO2/PvCO3/PvCO10, had the highest sequence similarity to rice OsA/Hd1. Another homologous pair, PvCO14/PvCO19 was highly homologous to rice OsE. The fourth pair, PvCO8/PvCO7, had the closest relationship to the rice OsD. In the second group, there was one pair, PvCO12/PvCO13 with the highest identity to OsP. These data suggest that COL tandem duplication may have occurred in the genome of the bamboo species, Ph. violascens, during species evolution.

Expression of PvCO1 and PvCO2 genes

To study the expression level of the two target genes in different tissues, we conducted Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis and real-time PCR using total RNA isolated from the root, bamboo shoot, mature leaves, immature leaves, and flower buds. These tissues were from plants grown under natural conditions. The temperature and daylength were shown in Fig. 3a. The results showed that both PvCOLs were tissue specific in expression (Fig. 3b and c). PvCO1 expression was detectable in immature leaves, mature leaves, and stems. It had greater abundance in immature leaves and mature leaves than in stems. PvCO2 transcript was detected only in leaves, but not in the roots, stems, and flower buds. These data also demonstrated that transcript accumulation of the two target genes was very low and was mainly in the leaves.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Expression analysis of PvCO1 and PvCO2. a Daily high and low temperatures and daylength in lin’an (China). b, c Tissue-specific expression of PvCO1 and PvCO2 in Ph. violascens. The different tissues were collected from 5 pm to 6 pm on April 13 (LD 13:11 h). The maximum and minimum temperatures on April 13 were 17.3 °C and 13.9 °C, respectively. d, e Temporal expression of PvCO1 and PvCO2 in Ph. violascens. The three plants for samples flowered for the second time. The flower bud of these three plants displayed between on March 12 and 22, and they died between on May 21 and May 31. The period between black solid lines represents flowring time. f, g Daily expression of PvCO1 and PvCO2 in Ph. violascens. Dusk and dawn are at 17:00 and 5:30.Expression of the Actin gene was used as an internal control. Gray areas indicate darkness. Gray shading denotes the dark/night portion of 24 h cycle. Error bar indicates standard deviation. Y axis, relative transcript level of PvCO1 or PvCO2 compared with that of PvActin. A, B indicate highly significant differences

To examine the temporal expression pattern of the two target genes, real-time PCR and RT-PCR analysis was performed using total RNA isolated from field-collected bamboo leaves. Fig. 3d and e showed that expression of both PvCO genes fluctuated. PvCO1 mRNA level increased after March 12, maintained a high level during flowering from March 22 to May 21, and sharply declined to the initial level after May 21. This suggested that the transcript of the PvCO1 gene was present during flowering period. PvCO2 mRNA abundance was detectable at low levels during the entire period from March 2 to May 11, and then quickly increased.

The circadian expression of the PvCO1 and PvCO2 genes was confirmed under natural conditions using total RNA isolated from leaves collected at different times within one day. The samples were taken 3 h apart, starting at 8:00 am and ending at 5:00 am. The PvCO1 gene expression level increased at dusk and maintained a high level throughout the night. However, the transcript accumulation of PvCO2 was higher in the morning than at other times (Fig. 3f and g). These expression pattern results suggested that PvCO1 might be associated with flowering in Ph. violascens.

Overexpression of PvCO1 delays the flowering time under LD conditions in Arabidopsis

To investigate the effect of PvCO1 and PvCO2 genes on flowering time, we overexpressed PvCO1 and PvCO2, under the control of the 35S promoter in WT Arabidopsis by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, respectively. A total of 20 independent PvCO1 transgenic plants and 8 independent PvCO2 transgenic plants exhibiting kanamycin resistance in the T1 were confirmed by PCR. Four PvCO1 transgenic lines and five PvCO2 transgenic lines from the T3 generation were selected to study the flowering time of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. All four PvCO1 transgenic lines flowered significantly later than wild-type Arabidopsis (Fig. 4a). In contrast, the flowering time of five PvCO2 transgenic lines showed no difference with that of WT Arabidopsis (data not shown). At least 15 plants per line from the T3 generation were grown to analyze the flowering time phenotype. The time of flowering was determined by counting the number of rosette leaves when floral buds were first visible.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Phenotypes of 35S::PvCO1 or 35S::PvCO2 transgenic plants. a Flowering phenotypes of wild type and 35S::PvCO1 lines. b Analysis of number of rosette leaves of different genotype plants at blooming. c Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of transcript accumulations of PvCO in different transgenic lines. The total RNAs were isolated from 14 d seedlings at ZT 4 h under LD.Y axis, relative transcript level of PvCO1 or PvCO2 compared with that of AtActin. Error bar indicates standard deviation. a, b indicate highly significant differences. At least 15 plants per line from the T3 generation were grown to analyze the flowering time phenotype

As shown in Fig. 4b, PvCO1 transgenic lines flowered significantly later 10–15 d than WT plants. The PvCO2 transgenic line was similar to WT Arabidopsis. PvCOLs transcript levels were studied in WT Arabidopsis and several independent transgenic lines overexpressing PvCO1 or PvCO2 using the total RNA isolated from 14 d seedlings at ZT 4 h under LD. As expected, compared to WT, expression levels of PvCOLs in different transgenic lines were significantly increased. However, there was no correlation between the PvCOLs mRNA abundance and the flowering time (Fig. 4c and d). These results indicated that PvCO1 repressed flowering times in Arabidopsis under LD conditions and this might suggest the possibility that PvCO1 represses flowering in Ph. violascens.

PvCO1 negatively affect AtFT expression

To study the molecular mechanisms by which PvCO1 controls flowering time in Arabidopsis, we analyzed the expression level of AtFT in WT, and transformed lines (P1–19) at three developmental stages (4 leaf, 6-leaf, and bolting). The results showed that AtFT transcript levels in p35S::PvCO1 lines were lower than those in WT in the 6-leaf and bolting stages (Fig. 5). This suggests that PvCO1 can reduce the AtFT expression level and thus delay flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Expression of AtFT in PvCO1 transgenic lines. Leaf were sampled from plants in the 6-leaf and bolting stages under LD, respectively. Y axis, relative transcript level of AtFT compared with that of Arabidopsis actin. Error bars indicate standarddeviations. A, B indicate highly significant differences. The asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference between WT and transgenic line P1–19 (P < 0.01). n = 4 or more

PvCO1 can interact with 14–3-3(PvGF14c) protein

In Arabidopsis, CO protein can interact with 14–3-3 isoforms affecting photoperiod controlled flowering [28]. Our studies confirmed that overexpression of 14–3-3 protein c (PvGF14c), one of 14–3-3 gene family in Ph. violascens, delayed flowering time in Arabidopsis [41]. To verify whether PvCO1 can interact with PvGF14c protein, yeast two-hybrid screening and pull down were performed. Fig. 6a showed that PvCO1 and PvGF14c could not be self-activated. But PvCO1could interact with PvGF14c protein either as bait or as prey. Previous studies indicated that the B-box domain or CCT domain can be involved in protein-protein interactions. To determine which conserved domain was sufficient for the interaction between PvCO1 and PvGF14c, we constructed truncated PvCO1 protein that only possessed two B-box domains (PvCO1(B-box)) or CCT domain (PvCO1(CCT)) to interact with the PvGF14c protein. As shown in Fig. 6a, PvCO1(B-box) and PvCO1(CCT) could not be self-activated. PvGF14c interacted with the PvCO1(B-box) and did not interact with the PvCO1(CCT). These results indicate that two B-box domain of PvCO1 was sufficient for interaction with PvGF14c and CCT domain was not sufficient to interact with PvGF14c. Pull down assays further confirmed a strong binding between PvCO1 and PvGF14c through by B-box domains not by CCT domain (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

The PvCO1-PvGF14c interaction by yeast two-hybrid (a) and pull down (b) assays. a The pGBKT7–53 and pGADT7-T interaction was used as a positive control. The pGBKT7-lam and pGADT7-T interaction was used as a negative control. The PvCO1 and empty interaction was used as self-activation test. PvCO1 indicated full length ORF of PvCO1 gene. PvCO1(B-box) indicated the truncated CO protein containing the two B-box domain. PvCO1(CCT) indicated the truncated CO protein containing the CCT domain. b The addition of GST or GST-PvGF14c is indicated in each line. The antibodies used for Western blotting are abbreviated as WB:α-His and WB:α- GST. Input, the proteins from whole cell extracts; Pull-down, the pull down proteins

Both PvCO1 and PvCO2 localize to nucleus

To assess the molecular function of PvCO1 and PvCO2, we made PvCO1 or PvCO2 protein-linked GFP fusion constructs driven by the CaMV35S promoter and used these to analyze the intracellular localization of PvCO1 and PvCO2. To understand the role of the CCT domain in PvCO1, we constructed the CCT domain peptide-linked GFP fusion vector driven by the CaMV35S promoter to analyze the intracellular localization of the CCT domain. These constructs were introduced into onion epidermal cells for transient expression. The empty GFP signals were ubiquitously distributed throughout the cells (Fig. 7a). Both PvCO1-GFP fusion protein and PvCO2-GFP fusion protein were only present in cell nuclei (Fig. 7b and c). These results confirmed that PvCO1 and PvCO2 are nuclear-localized protein. The PvCO1 (Nterm)-GFP fusion protein that contained the CCT domain of PvCO1 was also observed only in cell nuclei (Fig. 7d). These data suggest that the CCT domain of PvCO1 may act as a nuclear localization signal.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Subcellular localization of PvCO1 and PvCO2. a Control GFP plasmid. b Subcellular localization of PvCO1:GFP fusion protein. c Subcellular localization of PvCO2:GFP fusion protein. d Subcellular localization of PvCO1(Nterm):GFP fusion. The left verticals are green fluorescence images, middle verticals are bright-filed images, and right verticals are merged images of bright field and green fluorescence. Scale bars in this figure are 100 μm

Discussion

Bamboo grown under natural conditions has a wide range of flowering times. Some species have a lengthy vegetative stage that may last more than 120 years while other species flower after only 1 year. Little is known about floral induction in bamboo or the genes involved in the process [6, 1517, 42].

We identified and characterized two genes, PvCO1 and PvCO2 in the bamboo Ph. violascens. These genes are homologs of the CO in Arabidopsis and Hd1 in rice. Both PvCOL genes consisted of two exons and one intron (Fig. 1a). They shared two B-box domains containing typical zinc finger structures near the N-terminal and a conserved CCT domain near the C-terminal (Fig. 1b), suggesting that both encode transcriptional factors. The predicted protein sequences of PvCO1 and PvCO2 had low similarity with CO, but the two B-box domains and the CCT domain were highly conserved and they showed high similarity to Hd1. The identity between PvCO1 and PvCO2 was 70.91%. The alignment of both PvCOLs, Hd1, and CO indicates that the COL protein family has been conserved in bamboo (Fig. 1b, Additional file 5: Figure S1).

CO belongs to a gene family composed of 17 COL genes in Arabidopsis [22]. There are similar numbers of COL genes in the genomes of rice, sorghum and foxtail millet [38]. A total of 19 COL genes were identified in Ph. violascens, indicating that the CO gene family in bamboo also has many members. Based on the number and variation of the B-box, these 19 PvCOL proteins were classified into three groups. Group I contains two B-boxes, group II has a B-box and a second diverged B-box, and group III contains one B-box (Additional file 5: Figure S1). The second diverged B-box lacks C or H residues, or has a substitution of the conserved C or H residue. However, the CCT domain of these COL proteins shows high similarity among rice, sorghum, foxtail millet, and bamboo. Excluding the B-box and CCT regions, the remaining regions had high variation in the COL proteins among the four species. Phylogenetic analysis of the COL gene family in Arabidopsis, rice and bamboo also resulted in three groups (Fig. 2). All of the COL genes in Ph. violascens had corresponding genes in rice. In every group, there was a gene pair in bamboo corresponding to a single gene in rice. For example, PhCO14/ PhCO19 (92.49% identity) had highest homologies to rice OsE. Group I includes most of the genes known to have COL function in other species and contains 11 of the 19 PvCOLs. These results correspond with the multiple genome duplication events that have occurred in bamboo. Analysis of single-copy genes and gene families that contained 2–4 gene members show fewer single-member gene families and more two-member families in the Ph. heterocycla genome than in the rice genome [4]. Collinearity investigation of orthologous genes between bamboo and rice indicated that a whole-genome duplication event occurred in bamboo [4]. Similar to maize, there may have been a tetraploidization event(s) during bamboo evolution [4]. In rice, most of the seventeen COL genes form paralogous gene pairs (OsC-OsD, OsE-OsF, OsK-OsL, OsM-OsN, OsO-OsQ, OsP-OsR) [38]. However, phylogenetic trees showed that COL genes in Ph. violascens had greater homology compared to gene pairs from rice. This may indicate that the divergence of gene pairs of COL predated the bamboo/rice divergence.

In most flowering plants, the activity of CO and its orthologous genes are regulated by photoperiod and shows a circadian rhythm that varies among different species. In Arabidopsis, CO expression, and control of flowering, is regulated by the circadian clock [19, 20]. CO expression was modulated by the circadian clock and day length and it peaked twice (dawn and dusk) under LD conditions [20, 43] and accumulated mostly during the dark period under SD conditions [43]. In rice, the Hd1 mRNA level was low at midday and highest during the night regardless of LD or SD conditions [44]. Tomatoes (Lycopersicum) are a day-neutral species and the effect of day length on peak expression time of the TCOL1 and TCOL3 genes was similar to that of CO in Arabidopsis [45]. In Populus trichocarpa, PtCO2 expressed in a diurnal pattern, peaking at the end of the day under LD conditions and having a low expression peak at night under SD conditions [35]. In Ph. violascens, PvCO1 displayed a diurnal pattern with higher expression during the night than the day under a LD 12.5:11.5 h photoperiod. This diurnal expression pattern was not completely consistent with, but similar to the expression pattern of other CO orthologous genes, suggesting that light and the circadian clock modulated the peak of PvCO1. Our expression studies also show that PvCO1 mRNA abundance accumulated from 5:00 pm to 5:00 am, unlike the high expression of PvFT1 from 2:30 pm to 8:30 pm [6]. The time lag between the expression of PvCO1 and PvFT1 suggests the possibility that the CO/FT regulatory module is not strongly conserved and that there are unidentified mechanisms necessary for PvFT1 induction in Ph. violascence. CO and its orthologous gene regulated flowering time at a low level of expression. They were detected only by RT-PCR and were not found in the libraries screened [21, 29]. Their transcripts were not tissue-specific and were present in most of tissues examined [21, 29, 4650]. Corresponding cDNA sequences of the two PhCOL genes in moso bamboo, PhCO1 and PhCO2, were not found in the 31,987 protein-coding gene database (http://202.127.18.221/bamboo/), and both PvCOL genes were detected only by RT-PCR, demonstrating that their mRNA accumulation was very low. Despite high sequence similarity between PvCO1 and PvCO2 which had highest identity to OsA/Hd1, they showed highly diverse expression patterns. The transcripts of PvCO1 were detected in leaves and stems, exhibited higher expression during the flowering stage, than stages before and after flowering, and showed a daily pattern under natural conditions with higher expression in darkness than in daylight, similar to CO/Hd1 of Arabidopsis and rice. In contrast, PvCO2 was only found in leaves and very low during the flowering stages, its expression levels were higher in the morning than at other times under the same conditions. These data suggested that PvCO1 and PvCO2 genes were functional differentiation and PvCO1 had more relevance to the flowering process while PvCO2 might be a paralog of CO/Hd1.

Based on the amino acid sequence, COLs belong to the zinc finger gene family and act as transcription factors [21, 22, 51, 52]. They are localized in the nucleus and bind the promoter region of downstream target gene FT to activate FT transcription by itself or via complex formation [24, 27]. Either the B-box domain or CCT domain can interact with the other protein and then induce FT transcription [53]. Song et al. [54] reported that through the B-box domain, the CO protein can partially regulate FT transcription by forming a complex with ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 1 (AS1) protein. The B-box domain can also interact with the TGA4 transcription factor [22, 54]. Through the CCT domain, CO interacts with HEME ACTIVATOR PROTEIN (HAP) trimetric transcription factor complex, which regulates FT expression [27], as well as the COP1-SPAs E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, and then stabilizes CO protein [55, 56]. CCT may also function as a nuclear-localization signal for protein transport [21, 22]. In addition, previous reports suggest that the 14–3-3 proteins μ and υ influence the flowering transition and can interact with CO protein in Arabidopsis [28]. Our studies confirmed that PvCO1 was localized in the nucleus via CCT domain, and PvCO2 was also localized in the nucleus. PvCO1 could interact with 14–3-3 protein c (PvGF14c) through the B-box domain but not the CCT domain (Fig. 6). In the plant, 14–3-3 proteins could influence their binding partners at the spatiotemporal and subcellular levels as well as post-translational modification and stability [57]. Whether the interaction between PvCO1 and PvGF14c could affect the PvCO1 stability and nuclear transport need ongoing studies.

In other plant species, the expression and function of CO genes may be less conserved. CO can act as a inducer of floral transition in Arabidopsis, rice, potato, tomato, soybean and sugar beet [29, 34, 43, 5861]. It is unclear the extent to which CO function has been preserved in poplar. Bo¨hlenius et al. [35] reported that the CO2/FT1 regulon controls the onset of reproduction in poplar, whereas, Hsu et al. [62] indicated that overexpression of CO1 and CO2 singly or together did not alter normal reproductive onset of poplar. In long-term field trials, overexpression of CO1 was able to complement the Arabidopsis co-2 mutant under long days. None of the eight MtCOL genes in Medicago truncatula could rescue the late-flowering phenotype of co Arabidopsis [63]. In contrast, the group I genes CO3, OsCO3/OsB and OsCOL4/OsD, group II gene OsCOL10, OsCOL13, OsCOL16, as well as the group III gene AtCOL9 inhibited flowering [6469]. Our data showed that PvCO1, but not PvCO2, regulated the flowering time by reducing the expression of FT in Arabidopsis, because overexpression of PvCO1 caused floral delay, and overexpression of PvCO2 had no influence on the flowering time of Arabidopsis under long day conditions. Phylogenetic analysis showed that PvCO1 and PvCO2 clustered together with Arabidopsis CO and rice Hd1. This suggests the possibility of PvCO2 evolving a novel function, having no role in flowering regulation, or acting redundantly with other flowering regulators in Arabidopsis. The results indicate that the functions of CO in regulating flowering time are complex and diverse. It is likely that the long period of bamboo vegetative growth is related to the flowering inhibition regulator of PvCO1.

Conclusion

Two COL genes, PvCO1 and PvCO2, from Ph. violascens were identified. Both genes had different expression patterns. The expression of PvCO1 was related to floral transition, but expression of PvCO2 was not. Levels of both PvCO1 and PvCO2 mRNA displayed a circadian pattern. Overexpression of PvCO1 delayed flowering in Arabidopsis, while overexpression of PvCO2 has no effect on Arabidopsis flowering time. The long period of vegetative growth of bamboo may be related to an inhibition regulator of PvCO1.

Abbreviations

AP1

APETALA1

CO: 

CONSTANS

FT: 

Flowering locus T

Hd3a: 

Heading date 3a

LD: 

Long day

ORF: 

Open reading frame

RACE: 

Rapid amplification of cDNA end

RT-PCR: 

Reverse transcription PCR

SD: 

Short-day

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. J. Chen for providing meteorological data, Dr. Q.Y. Zeng for his critical reading of the manuscript and L Jin help writing some of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the following grants: National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 30901155, 31270715), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant no. Y307499). The Funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

XQG and GHX designed research; GHX and BJL performed research; HJC, WC and RYG analyzed bioinformatic data; ZYW analyzed interaction data; BZM analyzed intracellular localization data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China
(2)
Institute of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China
(3)
Zhejiang Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Bamboo Resources and High-efficiency Utilization, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China

References

  1. Amasino R. Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. Plant J. 2010;61:1001–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Baurle I, Dean C. The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell. 2006;125:655–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kazan K, Lyons R. The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:47–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Peng ZH, Lu Y, Li LB, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Gao ZM, et al. The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Nat Genet. 2013;45:456–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin EP, Peng HZ, Jin QY, Deng MJ, Li T, Xiao XC, et al. Identification and characterization of two bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) AP1/SQUA-like MADS-box genes during floral transition. Planta. 2009;231:109–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo XQ, Wang Y, Wang Q, Xu ZE, Lin XC. Molecular characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT )genes from bamboo ( Phyllostachys violascens ). J Plant Biochem Biot. 2016;25:168–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zheng YS, Gao PJ, Chen LG. A study on the physiological and biochemical character of flowering for Dendroclamopsis oldhami. Sci Silvae Sinicae. 2003;39:143–7.Google Scholar
  8. Zhan AJ, Li ZH. The nutrition dynamic of N, P, K in umbrella bamboo (Fargesia murielae) before and after flowering. J Wuhan Bot Res. 2007;25:213–6.Google Scholar
  9. Tian B, Chen Y, Yan Y, Li DZ. Isolation and ectopic expression of a bamboo MADS-box gene. Chin Sci Bull. 2005;50:217–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tian B, Chen Y, Li DZ, Yan Y. Cloning and characterization of a bamboo LEAFY HULL STERILE1 homologous gene. DNA Seq. 2006;17:143–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin XC, Chow TY, Chen HH, Liu CC, Chou SJ, Huang BL, et al. Understanding bamboo flowering based on large-scale analysis of expressed sequence tags. Genet Mol Res. 2010;9:1085–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang XM, Zhao L, Larson-Rabin Z, Li DZ, Guo ZH. De novo sequencing and characterization of the floral transcriptome of Dendrocalamus latiflorus (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). PLoS One. 2012;7:e42082.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shih MC, Chou ML, Yue JJ, Hsu CT, Chang WJ, Ko SS, et al. BeMADS1 is a key to delivery MADSs into nucleus in reproductive tissues-De novo characterization of Bambusa edulis transcriptome and study of MADS genes in bamboo floral development. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:1–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao J, Ge W, Zhang Y, Cheng Z, Li L, Hou D, et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs at different flowering developmental stages in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) by high-throughput sequencing. Mol Gen Genet. 2015:1–19.Google Scholar
  15. Xu H, Chen LJ, Qu LJ, Gu HY, Li DZ. Functional conservation of the plant EMBRYONIC FLOWER2 gene between bamboo and Arabidopsis. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32:1961–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo X, Guan Y, Xiao G, Xu ZE, Yang H, Fang W. Isolation and characterization of an Indeterminate1 gene, BmID1, from bamboo (Bambusa multiplex). J Plant Biochem Biot. 2016;25:30–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zeng HY, Lu YT, Yang XM, Xu YH, Lin XC. Ectopic expression of the BoTFL1-like gene of Bambusa oldhamii delays blossoming in Arabidopsis thaliana and rescues the tfl1 mutant phenotype. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:9306–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu SN, Ma T, Ma L, Lin XC. Ectopic expression of PvSOC1, a homolog of SOC1 from Phyllostachys violascens, promotes flowering in Arabidopsis and rice. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38:166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Shim JS, Kubota A, Imaizumi T. Circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS is a hub for signal integration. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:5–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Suarez-Lopez P, Wheatley K, Robson F, Onouchi H, Valverde F, Coupland G. CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2001;410:1116–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R, Coupland G. The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell. 1995;80:847–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Robson F, Costa MM, Hepworth SR, Vizir I, Pineiro M, Reeves PH. Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. Plant J. 2001;28:619–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosas U, Mei Y, Xie Q, Banta JA, Zhou RW, Seufferheld G, et al. Variation in Arabidopsis flowering time associated with cis-regulatory variation in CONSTANS. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3651.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Tiwari SB, Shen Y, Chang HC, Hou Y, Harris A, Ma SF, et al. The flowering time regulator CONSTANS is recruited to the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter via a unique cis-element. New Phytol. 2010;187:57–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Gangappa SN, Botto JF. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:460–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang CQ, Guthrie C, Sarmast MK, Dehesh K. BBX19 interacts with CONSTANS to repress FLOWERING LOCUS T transcription, defining a flowering time checkpoint in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:3589–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wenkel S, Turck F, Singer K, Gissot L, Gourrierec JL, Samach A, et al. CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2971–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayfield JD, Folta KM, Paul AL, Ferl J. The 14-3-3 proteins μ and υ influence transition to flowering and early phytochrome response. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:1692–702.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell. 2000;12:2473–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Du AP, Tian W, Wei MH, Yan W, He H, Zhou D, et al. The DTH8-Hd1 module mediates day length-dependent regulation of rice flowering. Mol Plant. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.05.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Nemoto Y, Kisaka M, Fuse T, Yano M, Ogihara Y. Characterization and functional analysis of three wheat genes with homology to the CONSTANS flowering time gene in transgenic rice. Plant J. 2003;36:82–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin J, Storgaard M, Andersen CH, Nielsen KK. Photoperiodic regulation of flowering in perennial ryegrass involving a CONSTANS -like homolog. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;56:159–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu J, Yu J, McIntosh L, Kende H, Zeevaart JA. Isolation of a CONSTANS orthologous from Pharbitis nil and its role in flowering. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:1821–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu F, Price BW, Haider W, Seufferheld G, Nelson R, Hanzawa Y. Functional and evolutionary characterization of the CONSTANS gene family in short-day photoperiodic flowering in soybean. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85754.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bohlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, et al. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science. 2006;312:1040–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ye SW, Cai CY, Ren HB, Wang WJ, Xiang MQ, Tang XS, et al. An efficient plant regeneration and transformation system of ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro) started from young shoot as explant. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01298.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffiths S, Dunford RP, Coupland G, Laurie DA. The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, Rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1855–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cockram J, Thiel T, Steuernagel B, Stein N, Taudien S, Bailey PC, et al. Genome dynamics explain the evolution of flowering time CCT domain gene families in the Poaceae. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Collings DA, Carter CN, Rink JC, Scott AC, Wyatt SE, Allen NS. Plant nuclei can contain extensive grooves and invaginations. Plant Cell. 2000;12:2425–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Li BJ, Xiao GH, Luo KS, Wang ZY, Mao BZ, Lin XC, et al. Overexpression of PvGF14c from Phyllostachys violascens delays flowering time in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Zheng ZG, Yang XM, Fu YP, Zhu LF, Wei H, Lin XC. Overexpression of PvPin1, a bamboo homolog of PIN1-Type Parvulin 1, delays flowering time in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. Front Plant Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01526.
  43. Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2002;419:308–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hayama R, Yokoi S, Tamaki S, Yano M, Shimamoto K. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature. 2003;422:719–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ben-Naim O, Eshed R, Parnis A, Teper-Bamnolker P, Shalit A, Coupland G, et al. The CCAAT binding factor can mediate interactions between CONSTANS-like proteins and DNA. Plant J. 2006;46:462–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ledger S, Strayer CF, Kay SA, Putterill J. Analysis of the function of two circadian-regulated CONSTANS-LIKE genes. Plant J. 2001;26:15–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Almada R, Cabrera N, Casaretto JA, Ruiz-Lara S, Villanueva EG. VvCO and VvCOL1, two CONSTANS homologous genes, are regulated during flower induction and dormancy in grapevine buds. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28:1193–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Takase T, Kakikubo Y, Nakasone A, Nishiyama Y, Yasuhara M, Tokioka-Ono Y, et al. Characterization and transgenic study of CONSTANS-LIKE8 (COL8) gene in Arabidopsis thaliana : expression of 35S:COL8 delays flowering under long-day conditions. Plant Biotechnol. 2011;28:439–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang JX, Wu KL, Tian LN, Zeng SJ, Duan J. Cloning and characterization of a novel CONSTANS-like gene from Phalaenopsis hybrida. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33:409–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang X, An L, Nguyen TH, Liang H, Wang R, Liu X, et al. The cloning and functional characterization of peach CONSTANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T homologous genes PpCO and PpFT. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, et al. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science. 2005;309:1052–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, et al. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science. 2007;316:1030–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Tripathi P, Carvallo M, Hamilton EE, Preuss S, Kay SA. Arabidopsis B-BOX32 interacts with CONSTANS-LIKE3 to regulate flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;3:114,172–7.Google Scholar
  54. Song YH, Song NY, Shin SY, Kim HJ, Yun DJ, Lim CO, et al. Isolation of CONSTANS as a TGA4/OBF4 interacting protein. Mol Cells. 2008;25:559–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Laubinger S, Marchal V, Le Gourrierec J, Gentilhomme J, Wenkel S, Adrian J, et al. Arabidopsis SPA proteins regulate photoperiodic flowering and interact with the floral inducer CONSTANS to regulate its stability. Development. 2006;133:3213–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Jang S, Marchal V, Panigrahi KCS, Wenkel S, Soppe W, Deng X-W, et al. Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response. EMBO J. 2008;27:1277–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson RS, Swatek KN, Thelen JJ. Regulation of the regulators: post-translational modifications, subcellular, and spatiotemporal distribution of plant 14-3-3 proteins. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00611.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Chia TY, Muller A, Jung C, Mutasa-Gottgens ES. Sugar beet contains a large CONSTANS-LIKE gene family including a CO homologue that is independent of the early-bolting (B) gene locus. J Exp Bot. 2008;59:2735–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. González-Schain N, Díaz-Mendoza M, Zurczak M, Suárez-López P. Potato CONSTANS is involved in photoperiodic tuberization in a graft-transmissible manner. Plant J. 2012;70:678–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Fan C, Hu R, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhang Q, et al. Conserved CO-FT regulons contribute to the photoperiod flowering control in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Onouchi H, Igeno MI, Perilleux C, Graves K, Coupland G. Mutagenesis of plants overexpressing CONSTANS demonstrates novel interactions among Arabidopsis flowering-time genes. Plant Cell. 2000;12:885–900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Hsu CY, Adams JP, No K, Liang HY, Meilan R, Pechanova O, et al. Overexpression of CONSTANS homologs CO1 and CO2 fails to alter normal reproductive onset and fall bud set in woody perennial poplar. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Wong ACS, Hecht VFG, Picard K, Diwadkar P, Laurie RE, Wen J, et al. Isolation and functional analysis of CONSTANS-LIKE genes suggests that a central role for CONSTANS in flowering time control is not evolutionarily conserved in Medicago truncatula. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Cheng X, Wang Z. Overexpression of COL9, a CONSTANS-LIKE gene, delays flowering by reducing expression of CO and FT in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005;43:758–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Datta S, Hettiarachchi GHCM, Deng X-W, Holm M. Arabidopsis CONSTANS-LIKE3 is a positive regulator of red light signaling and root growth. Plant Cell. 2006;18:70–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Kim SK, Yun CH, Lee JH, Jang YH, Park HY, Kim JK. OsCO3, a CONSTANS-LIKE gene, controls flowering by negatively regulating the expression of FT-like genes under SD conditions in rice. Planta. 2008;228:355–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Lee YS, Jeong DH, Lee DY, Yi J, Ryu CH, Kim SL, et al. OsCOL4 is a constitutive flowering repressor upstream of Ehd1 and downstream of OsphyB. Plant J. 2010;63:18–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sheng PK, Wu FQ, Tan JJ, Zhang H, Ma WW, Chen LP, et al. A CONSTANS-like transcriptional activator, OsCOL13, functions as a negative regulator of flowering downstream of OsphyB and upstream of Ehd1 in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2016;92:209–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Wu WX, Zheng XM, Chen DB, Zhang YX, Ma WW, Zhang H, et al. OsCOL16, encoding a CONSTANS-like protein, represses flowering by up-regulating Ghd7 expression in rice. Plant Sci. 2017;260:60–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement