Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of the linkage map constructed in this work to previously constructed for some other conifers

From: High-density genetic map construction and quantitative trait loci identification for growth traits in (Taxodium distichum var. distichum × T. mucronatum) × T. mucronatum

Family

Genus

Species

Sample size

No. of mapped markers

Marker type

Genotyping method

No. of linkage groups

Observed map length in cM

Average diatance between markers(cM)

Reference

Taxodiaceae

Cryptomeria

Cryptomeria japonica

147

2560

Genotyping chip

SNP, SSR, EST-SSR, ALP

11

1266.2

0.49

[9]

Taxodium

T. ‘Zhongshanshan 302’ × T. mucronatum

148

179

Electrophoretic separation

SRAP, SSR

34

976.5

7.0

[21]

T. distichum var. distichum × T. mucronatum

157

10,710

SLAF-seq

SNP

11

1137.86

0.18

This study

Pinaceae

Spruce

Picea glauca

1976

8852

Genotyping chip

SLAF-SNP

12

1895

0.28

[8]

 

Picea abies

247

686

Genotyping chips

SNP

12

1889.2

0.97

[10]

Pinus

Pinus taeda

72

2841

Sequence capture

SNP, indel, MNP

12

1637.4

0.58

[12]

 

Pinus pinaster

 

1131

Genotyping chips

SNP

12

1708

0.67

[11]

Cupressaceae

Callitris

Callitris glaucophylla

88

4284

RAD-seq

SNP, SSR

11

1033.5 M

0.24

[13]

  1. MNP, multiple-nucleotide polymorphism