Skip to main content

Modification of Threonine-1050 of SlBRI1 regulates BR Signalling and increases fruit yield of tomato



Appropriate brassinosteroid (BR) signal strength caused by exogenous application or endogenous regulation of BR-related genes can increase crop yield. However, precise control of BR signals is difficult and can cause unstable effects and failure to reach full potential. Phosphorylated BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1), the rate-limiting receptor in BR signalling, transduces BR signals, and we recently demonstrated that modifying BRI1 phosphorylation sites alters BR signal strength and botanical characteristics in Arabidopsis. However, the functions of such phosphorylation sites in agronomic characteristics of crops remain unclear.


In this work, we investigated the roles of tomato SlBRI1 threonine-1050 (Thr-1050). SlBRI1 mutant cu3-abs1 plants expressing SlBRI1 with a non-phosphorylatable Thr-1050 (T1050A), with a wild-type SlBRI1 transformant used as a control, were examined. The results showed enhanced autophosphorylation of SlBRI1 and BR signal strength for cu3-abs1 harbouring T1050A, which promoted yield through increased plant expansion, leaf area, fruit weight and fruit number per cluster but reduced nutrient contents, including ascorbic acid and soluble sugar levels. Moreover, plant height, stem diameter, and internodal distance were similar between the transgenic plants.


Our results reveal the biological role of Thr-1050 in tomato and provide a molecular basis for establishing high-yield crops by precisely controlling BR signal strength via phosphorylation site modification.


Brassinosteroids (BRs), endogenous plant hormones with physiological activity at nanomolar concentrations, promote plant growth through involvement in processes such as germination, leaf morphogenesis, plant architecture, flowering, male fertility and senescence [1,2,3]. As a specific BR receptor, BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1) functions indispensably in BR signal transduction in plants [4]. BRI1 is a leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase comprising an extracellular domain, transmembrane domain, and cytoplasmic domain [5]; the cytoplasmic domain contains the juxtamembrane region (JM), the serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase domain (KD), and the C-terminal (CT) domain [6]. In the BR signal transduction pathway, BRs bind to the extracellular domain of BRI1, promoting heterodimerization between BRI1 and its coreceptor BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE1 (BAK1), which in turn activates sequential transphosphorylation of the KD domain of both proteins [7]. This process ultimately results in activation of BRASSINAZOLERESISTANT1 (BZR1) and BRI1-EMS SUPPRESSOR1 (BES1) [8,9,10], both of which function as transcription factors to regulate the expression of BR-responsive genes [11,12,13].

Biochemical and genetic studies in Arabidopsis have demonstrated that BRI1 plays a critical role in plant growth and development. In Arabidopsis, most of mutant bri1 alleles are BR insensitive and display a dwarf phenotype consisting of curled leaves, delayed growth, and male sterility [14]. Overexpression of BRI1 causes increased petiole length and sensitivity to BRs [15]. In addition, site-directed mutagenesis of BRI1 phosphorylation sites differentially affects both plant growth and BR signalling. Most of the phosphorylation sites of BRI1 are located in the KD domain, such as Tyr-956, Thr-1039, Thr-1049, Ser-1044, and Thr-1045, and exhibit strong functions in BR signalling and plant growth. Indeed, preventing phosphorylation of these residues attenuates BR signalling and disturbs plant growth. However, unphosphorylated Ser-1168 and Ser-1172 mutants (CT domain) exhibit only slightly inhibited leaf growth but greatly reduced seed yields. In the JM domain, Tyr-831 is involved in the regulation of leaf growth and flowering time. Ser-891 is associated with deactivation mechanisms, as transformants harbouring unphosphorylated Ser-891 present enhanced BR signalling and are larger than those harbouring wild-type BRI1 [16,17,18]. Notably, a mutant with non-phosphorylatable Ser-1042 shows dramatically decreased kinase activity and a semi-dwarf phenotype but has normal seed yields, resulting in enormous potential for increasing crop production. All these findings substantiate a novel approach for regulating economic yields precisely via modification of specific phosphorylation sites of BRI1 in crop species.

Accordingly, numerous biological functional analyses of BRI1 orthologues among different plant species have been performed. In rice, OsBRI1 (d61) loss-of-function mutants display relatively shorter plant height and erect leaves, with had little effect on fertility; because of the greater photosynthetic capacity and leaf area index of OsBRI1 mutants under dense planting conditions, OsBRI1 is a promising factor for increasing yields [19]. ZmBRI1-RNAi transgenic maize plants also display a dwarf stature, shortened internodes, and twisted leaves, and BR signalling is compromised [20]. The barley mutant uzu, which is caused by suppression of HvBRI, presents a semi-dwarf stature and pathogen resistance, which is beneficial for high yields [21,22,23]. Additionally, heterologous expression of TaBRI1 in Arabidopsis may promote plant germination, flowering and seed yield [24]. In strawberry, the level of FaBRI1 mRNA expression was found to increase rapidly during the ripening stage, whereas suppressing FaBRI1 in de-greening fruit significantly slowed the development of red colouring [25]. Overall, these studies highlight the valuable potential of BRI1 in agricultural production, and controlling BR signal strength via BRI1 may be an effective approach to increase yield.

Tomato is a major horticultural crop and a model plant among berry-producing plants in plant molecular biology research. Tomato SlBRI1 was first characterized in the curl-3 mutant, which showed a phenotype similar to that of the Arabidopsis bri1 mutant. Overexpression of SlBRI1 in tomato enhanced the endogenous BR signal intensity and improved major agricultural traits such as fruit yield and quality [26]. Protein sequence alignments have revealed that the KD domains as well as the phosphorylation sites are highly conserved between SlBRI1 and BRI1 [27], though heterologous expression of SlBRI1 in Arabidopsis bri1 mutants did not fully rescue the mutation [14, 28]. These results suggest that different regulatory mechanisms may exist between SlBRI1 and BRI1. The cu3-abs1 mutant is a weak SlBRI1 mutant with a missense mutation in the kinase domain. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis of SlBRI1 Thr-1054 in the cu3-abs1 background failed to rescue the dwarf mutation and caused an even more severe dwarf phenotype, revealing the critical role of this phosphorylation site in BR signal transduction and biological characteristics in tomato [29]. However, functional analyses of SlBRI1 phosphorylation sites have been restricted to only Thr-1054, without considering important agronomic values, and the roles of other phosphorylation sites in BR signalling and agronomic characteristics remain unclear.

Accordingly, we investigated the biological function of threonine-1050 (Thr-1050) in the KD domain of tomato SlBRI1, which is equivalent to BRI1 Thr-1045. We generated a T1050A mutant of SlBRI1 via threonine-1050 to alanine substitution, developed transgenic cu3-abs1 plants expressing either T1050A or wild-type SlBRI1, and compared the degree of mutant phenotype restoration. Our results show that compared with SlBRI1, expression of T1050A resulted in stronger BR signal strength, higher autophosphorylation levels, more vigorous vegetative development, higher yields, and lower fruit nutrient content. These results demonstrate a unique negative regulatory function of Thr-1050 phosphorylation in tomato growth and development, which will be valuable for revealing the mechanisms involved in tomato BR signalling and for improving crop performance via precise modification of specific phosphorylation sites.


SlBRI1 Thr-1050-Ala promotes plant vegetative growth

To determine how Thr-1050 phosphorylation extensively affects plant growth and development, transgenic tomato plants expressing SlBRI1 or T1050A under the control of the native promoter were generated. Transgenic line PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-green fluorescent protein (GFP)-1 (SlBRI1–1 hereafter), which showed a similar SlBRI1 expression level and phenotype with other PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP lines, as well as cu3-abs1, was selected as the control (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The phenotype of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was evaluated and compared with that of cu3-abs1 and SlBRI1–1. To reduce experimental error and determine the physiological significance of Thr-1050, transgenic lines PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP-1, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP-7, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP-10 (T1050A-1, T1050A-7, and T1050A-10), which presented SlBRI1 expression levels similar to those of SlBRI1–1, were selected; the transcript levels of SlBRI1 in these transgenic lines were more than 2-fold greater than those in cu3-abs1 (Fig. 1a, b).

Fig. 1

Dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 improves plant vegetative growth. a Top, western blot analysis of transgenic protein expression using anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) antibodies. CBB, Coomassie brilliant blue. Bottom, phenotypes of plants at the germination stage (8 days after sowing), seedling stage (40 days after sowing), and maturation stage (120 days after sowing). b Relative transcript levels of SlBRI1 by qRT-PCR. c Plant height of plants at the maturation stage. d Internodal length and (e) stem diameters of the second flower node. f Plant expansion at the maturation stage. g Stem-leaf angle, (h) ultrastructure by scanning electron microscopic under a 1500x-magnified visual field, and (i) leaf area of the sixth leaf. j Cell number per unit of the sixth leaf under a 300x-magnified visual field. Data are the means ± SDs of at least 5 independent biological samples. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Student’s t-test)

During the vegetative growth stage, the growth trend of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was better than that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and cu3-abs1 (Fig. 1a). Plant height, internodal length, and stem diameter were similar between PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP and PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP; however, the values were 2.3-, 1.5-, and 1.2-fold greater than those of cu3-abs1, respectively (Fig. 1c, d, e). Overall, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP exhibited the greatest degree of plant expansion and largest stem-leaf angle: plant expansion was 1.2- and 2.1-fold that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and cu3-abs1, respectively, and the stem-leaf angle was 1.1- and 1.2-fold that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and cu3-abs1, respectively (Fig. 1f, g). To compare differences in leaf development, the leaf area and CO2 assimilation rates were analysed. The leaf area of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was 1.6-fold greater than that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP; this difference was mostly due to the larger cell size, as the cell number of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was 70% that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP (Fig. 1h, i, j). However, CO2 assimilation rates of all plants were the same (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Taken together, these results indicate that dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 can rescue the functions of SlBRI1 in terms of plant height and photosynthesis and even promote plant expansion and leaf cell expansion during the vegetative growth stage.

Dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 improves tomato yields

To assess the effects of Thr-1050 on fruit yield, we investigated correlating factors, including flowering time, fruit weight, fruit number per cluster, pericarp thickness, seed number, and thousand-seed weight. For example, plants expressing T1050A flowered 1 week earlier than did PSlBRI1::SlBRI1 plants and 2 weeks earlier than did cu3-abs1 plants. The yield per plant for PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was 1.8- and 3.4-fold that for PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and cu3-abs1, respectively, and these differences were due mainly to the different fruit number per cluster (Fig. 2 a, b). In addition, the fruit weight for PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was 9% heavier than that for PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP because the pericarp of the former was 10% thicker (Fig. 2 c, d). Regarding seeds per fruit, those expressing T1050A contained 1.8-fold more than those of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP; however, the thousand-seed weight for PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was only slightly lower than that for PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP (Fig. 2 e, f). Thus, Thr-1050 appears to play a role in tomato yield.

Fig. 2

Dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 promotes tomato yield. a Top, fruits from the first to the fourth fruit node. Middle, phenotypes of the third inflorescence. Bottom, phenotypes of the third cluster. b Fruit yield per plant. c Individual fruit weight at the red ripening (RR) stage. d Pericarp thickness of the fruit at the yellow ripening stage. e Seed number per fruit. f Thousand-seed weight. Data are the means ± SDs of 15 independent biological samples. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Student’s t-test)

SlBRI1 Thr-1050-Ala alters fruit quality

We also investigated the role of Thr-1050 in fruit quality. Both SlBRI1 and T1050A were able to rescue the fruit quality of cu3-abs1. Compared with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP, the fruits of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP presented a greater shape index but were less firm during the ripening stage (Fig. 3 a, b). The total ascorbic acid (AsA) content in fruits were 66% of those of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP fruits at the yellow ripening (YR) stage and 75% of those in the same fruits at the red ripening (RR) stage. AsA contents were 56 and 74% lower than those of the fruits of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP at the YR and RR stages, respectively (Fig. 3 c, d). Additionally, contents of soluble sugars such as fructose and glucose were measured. The fructose content in the fruits of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP were decreased by 27 and 17% at the YR and RR stages, respectively, and the glucose content also decreased by 41 and 22%, respectively (Fig. 3 e, f). Furthermore, the contents of organic acids such as malic acid and citric acid were analysed. The results showed that the malic acid contents in the fruits of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP were 37 and 48% lower than those in the fruits of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP at the YR and RR stages, respectively; however, citric acid contents were 27 and 36% higher (Fig. 3 g, h). No significant differences in soluble solid contents among the transgenic lines were observed (Additional file 3: Figure S3).

Fig. 3

Dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 alters fruit quality. a Fruit shape index at the breaker stage. b Fruit firmness at yellow ripening (YR) and red ripening (RR) stages. c and (d) Contents of total ascorbic acid (AsA) (c) and reduced AsA (d). e, (f), (g) and (h) Contents of fructose (e), glucose (f), malic acid (g), and citric acid (h) measured using HPLC. Date for (a) and (b) are the means ± SDs of 15 independent biological samples; data for (c) to (h) are the means ± SDs of 3 independent biological samples. FW = fresh weight. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Student’s t-test)

Phosphorylation of SlBRI1 Thr-1050 affects BR Signalling

As a BR receptor, SlBRI1 plays a key role in BR signalling. To determine whether Thr-1050 phosphorylation regulates tomato development by affecting BR signalling, BR biosynthesis, hypocotyl elongation in the dark, and BR sensitivity of seedlings were evaluated to compare BR signal intensities among cu3-abs1, PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP, and PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP. The expression levels of tomato BR biosynthesis genes SlCPD and SlDWARF were assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Although the expression levels of SlCPD and SlDWARF were higher in cu3-abs1 than in the transgenic lines, there were no clear differences between PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP (Fig. 4 a, b). Figure 4 c showed that BR contents in the transgenic lines were similar but were approximately 18% lower than those of cu3-abs1. In addition, BR sensitivity of tomato plants was examined under four increasing concentrations of exogenous 24-epibrassinolide (epi-BL). As shown in Fig. 4 e, cu3-abs1 was insensitive to epi-BL; in contrast, hypocotyl length in PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was similarly reduced by epi-BL. When treated with 500 nM epi-BL, hypocotyl length in PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP and PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP decreased by 16 and 19%, respectively. Thus, analogous to SlBRI1, Thr-1050 was able to rescue BR signalling in plants. However, the result of hypocotyl elongation in the dark showed that PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP exhibited the longest hypocotyl length, which was approximately 71 and 24% longer than that of cu3-abs1 and PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP (Fig. 4 d). This result demonstrate that BR signalling in PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was stronger than that in PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP.

Fig. 4

Dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 affects BR signalling. a and (b) Relative transcript levels of BR signalling marker genes SlCPD and SlDWARF were tested by qRT-PCR. c BR content in the third leaf measured using a BR ELISA Kit. Data are the means ± SDs of 3 independent biological samples. d Hypocotyl length of seedlings grown in the dark for 9 days on the surface of the medium. e Dose-response curves of relative hypocotyl length of seedlings grown in the dark for 9 days on the surface of media supplemented with increasing concentrations of epibrassinolide (epi-BL). Data for (d) and (e) are the means ± SDs of 15 independent biological samples. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Student’s t-test)

Phosphorylation of SlBRI1 Thr-1050 influences autophosphorylation of SlBRI1

With a function similar to that of a receptor-like kinase, autophosphorylation plays a vital role in BR signal transduction and the biological function of SlBRI1. To further determine whether Thr-1050 phosphorylation influences SlBRI1 autophosphorylation, SlBRI1, T1050A, and T1050D (threonine-1050-aspartic acid) autophosphorylation levels were compared both in vivo and in vitro. The pFLAG-MAC vector containing the cytoplasmic domains of SlBRI1, T1050A, and T1050D was used for the in vitro analysis. The results showed that mutating Thr-1050-D negatively influenced SlBRI1 autophosphorylation, as FLAG-T1050A showed the strongest intensity of phosphorylation band, phosphorylation level of which was 2.5- and 2.2-fold that of FLAG-T1050D and FLAG-SlBRI1, respectively (Fig. 5 a, b).

Fig. 5

Dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 influences SlBRI1 autophosphorylation. a Autophosphorylation level of SlBRI1 in vitro. Autophosphorylation activity of recombinant FLAG-SlBRI1, FLAG-T1050A, FLAG-T1050D, and FLAG-K916E proteins was detected using anti-pThr antibodies, and aliquots of the recombinant proteins were detected using anti-FLAG antibodies and western blotting. Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining shows loading. b The relative autophosphorylation levels of FLAG-SlBRI1, FLAG-T1050A, FLAG-T1050D, and FLAG-K916E proteins in vitro. The autophosphorylation level of FLAG-SlBRI1 was defined as “1”. Data are the means ± SDs of 3 independent measurements. c Autophosphorylation level of SlBRI1 in vivo. Autophosphorylation activity of SlBRI1-green fluorescent protein (GFP), T1050A-GFP, T1050D-GFP, and K916E-GFP proteins was detected using anti-pThr antibodies; anti-GFP antibodies were used to show the loading levels for western blotting. d The relative autophosphorylation levels of SlBRI1-GFP, T1050A-GFP, T1050D-GFP, and K916E-GFP proteins in vivo. The autophosphorylation level of SlBRI1-GFP was defined as “1”. Data are the means ± SDs of 3 independent measurements

To further compare autophosphorylation in vivo, proteins from Nicotiana benthamiana leaves expressing SlBRI1-GFP, T1050A-GFP, and T1050D-GFP were extracted and examined. As shown in Fig. 5 c and Fig. 5 d, the phosphorylation levels of T1050A-GFP and SlBRI1-GFP were 48 and 23% stronger than that of T1050D-GFP, respectively. Collectively, in vitro and in vivo autophosphorylation assays both suggested a negative role for Thr-1050 phosphorylation in SlBRI1 autophosphorylation.


Many studies have demonstrated the conserved role of BRI1 in plant growth. Loss-of-function bri1 mutants exhibit general characteristics, such as a dwarf phenotype, dark-green leaves, and infertility [6, 30]. Conversely, overexpression of BRI1 promotes plant germination, flowering and seed yield and accelerates ripening [24]. Our research aims to examine the effects of SlBRI1 phosphorylation sites on tomato agronomic traits. To explore conservation of Thr-1050 in SlBRI1, the protein sequences of BRI1 homologues from six plant species, SlBRI1 (accession No. NP_001296180.1), StBRI1 (Solanum tuberosum, accession No. XP_006357355.1), BRI1 (Arabidopsis thaliana, accession No. NP_195650.1), OsBRI1 (Oryza sativa, accession No. NP_001044077.1), TaBRI1 (Triticum aestivum, accession No. DQ_655711.1), and ZmBRI1 (Zea mays, accession No. XP_008656807.1), were selected for comparison. Multiple sequence alignment revealed Thr-1050 to be highly conserved among these plant species, suggesting important roles in BR signalling and plant growth (Additional file 4: Figure S4). In Arabidopsis, Thr-1045 is equivalent to Thr-1050 in the tomato protein. Previous studies have suggested that BRI1 Thr-1045 is likely to positively regulate BR signalling and plant growth, as unphosphorylated Ser-1044 or Thr-1045 result in a dwarf phenotype and reduced BR signal transduction [31]. We generated transgenic tomato lines expressing SlBRI1 or T1050A, and the results revealed that Thr1050 acts as a negative regulator of growth in this crop. Compare with cu3-abs1 and cu3-abs1 plants harbouring SlBRI1, plants in which Thr-1050 was dephosphorylated exhibited greater plant expansion, larger leaf area, earlier flowering and ripening and higher yields (Figs. 1, 2). These findings indicate that Thr-1050 functions in opposite manners in tomato and Arabidopsis.

Plant yield is one of the most important agronomic traits in tomato production, and BRs are considered growth promoters that can increase agricultural yields. Our results showed that the yield of individual PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants was 1.8-fold that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants and 3.4-fold that of cu3-abs1 plants. This increased yield resulted from greater flower numbers per cluster and greater fruit weight (Fig. 2). However, as the physiological limitation of fruit yield is restricted by the photosynthetic capacity of the plant, a greater number of flowers is usually not necessary to achieve higher yields [32]. Indeed, a similar result has been reported in which overexpression of SlBRI1 promoted individual plant yield by increasing flower numbers, even though fruit weight was reduced [26]. To investigate this phenomenon, we evaluated characteristics related to photosynthesis. PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants exhibited similar plant heights and CO2 assimilation rates but larger leaf areas and greater plant expansion. As the degree of increase in leaf area was greater than that of plant expansion, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants had a larger leaf area index and produced more photosynthate for blossoming and fruiting. Furthermore, research in Arabidopsis has shown that by regulating the number of branches and effective siliques, BRI1 residues Ser-1042, Ser-1168, Ser-1172, Ser-1179, and Thr-1180 can influence individual plant yield [33]. Therefore, we conclude that the regulatory role of Thr-1050 in individual plant yield differs from that of SlBRI1, as Thr-1050 controls both inflorescence architecture and also fruit expansion via the leaf area index.

Crop yield depends not only on individual plant yield but also on plant density. Previous studies have reported that partially suppressing expression of OsBRI1 increases yields by 30% because of the relatively more compact plant architecture and higher planting density [19]. Similarly, Ser-1042 in BRI1 also affects seed yield, as S1042A mutants present normal seed yield but relatively more compact plant architecture [33]. In our research, expansion in PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was 1.2-fold that in PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP; thus, the planting density of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP was 83% of that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP. However, the individual yield of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants was 1.8-fold that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants (Figs. 1, 2). These two parameters functioned together to increase the yield of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP to approximately 150% of that of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP per area, suggesting high yield potential for Thr-1050 in crop breeding.

Tomato fruit quality can also be regulated by BR signals. Previous studies have revealed that overexpressing SlBRI1 accelerates fruit ripening and increases the contents of carotenoids, soluble solids, AsA, and soluble sugars by promoting ethylene production [26]. Moreover, the transcription factor BZR1, which is involved in the BR response, was found to regulate fruit quality, whereby heterologous expression of BZR1 in tomato resulted in increased levels of carotenoids, soluble solids, AsA and soluble sugars in fruits [34]. In our research, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP fruits ripened earlier when compared with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP fruits and presented similar levels of ethylene production, soluble solid contents and carotenoid contents (data not shown) but lower contents of AsA, soluble sugars, and malic acid and less firmness. In contrast, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP fruits presented greater levels of citric acid and a higher shape index (Fig. 3). Therefore, we can conclude that the regulatory role of Thr-1050 in fruit quality differs from that of SlBRI1. The promotion of SlBRI1 during tomato ripening was due mostly to increased ethylene evolution; however, because the endogenous ethylene content was unchanged, lack of phosphorylation at Thr1050 affected fruit quality independently of ethylene. These functional differences between Thr-1050 and SlBRI1 in terms of fruit quality may result from their own differences. Moreover, we used the SlBRI1 native promoter in our research, whereas the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter was used in previous research, which also may have contributed to these differences.

Previous studies have demonstrated that BR signals play regulatory roles in BR biosynthesis and BR sensitivity and that BR mutants in BR signal show BR insensitivity and higher levels of BR biosynthesis gene expression [27, 35,36,37,38]. As a BR receptor, SlBRI1 affects plant growth by regulating BR signal transduction in tomato; transgenic plants overexpressing SlBRI1 exhibited increased BR signalling and consequently had longer hypocotyls and reduced transcription of BR biosynthesis genes SlCPD and SlDWARF [26]. Consistent with previous findings, the PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants in our study showed stronger BR signal intensity on the basis of the following evidence. First, the expression levels of SlCPD and SlDWARF, which should be feedback-inhibited by BR signals [37, 38], were similar between PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP and PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants and lower than those of cu3-abs1. Second, the BR contents of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants were equal to those of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants and lower than those of cu3-abs1. Third, the hypocotyls of PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP were longer than those of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP under dark culture conditions. Finally, PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP plants were more sensitive to BR because their relative hypocotyl lengths were longer than those of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP under dark culture conditions with epi-BL treatment. Thus, we can conclude that the recovery capability of T1050A was stronger than that of SlBRI1 with respect to BR signal intensity, which may partly explain the different phenotypes between PSlBRI1::T1050A-GFP and PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP (Fig. 4).

BRI1 has been shown to function as a serine/threonine/tyrosine protein kinase that transduces BR signals via phosphorylation sites [5]. Previous studies in Arabidopsis have shown that Thr-1045 of BRI1, which is analogous to Thr-1050 of SlBRI1, might be essential for BRI1 kinase function because the mutation either S1044A or T1045A nearly abolished BR signalling and exhibited a dwarf phenotype with respect to autophosphorylation levels in vitro [31]. In contrast, our results showed a higher level of T1050A autophosphorylation compared to SlBRI1 both in vivo and in vitro (Fig. 5). A previous study also reported that compared with SlBRI1, T1050A retained full kinase activity in vitro [29]. Thus, we demonstrate that Thr-1050 might regulate plant growth by actively affecting the kinase function of SlBRI1, and this pattern is opposite to that of BRI1 Thr-1045 in Arabidopsis.

In addition, structural changes in the SlBRI1 protein resulting from the substitution of Thr-1050 to Ala-1050 may also affect kinase function. To investigate this phenomenon, three-dimensional (3D) protein folding structure prediction and subcellular localization of T1050A and SlBRI1 were explored. The results showed that dephosphorylation of Thr-1050 did not alter the protein structure or subcellular localization of SlBRI1, which was consistent with the localization of SlBRI1 to the plasma membrane (Additional files 5, 6: Figures. S5, S6). Additional studies to identify the related interacting proteins and downstream target genes are still needed to understand the regulatory mechanisms of Thr-1050.


BRs compose a group of phytohormones that regulate various biological processes at low concentrations. However, it is difficult to precisely control BR signal strength, and attempts at BR signal manipulation can cause unstable effects and result in the failure to reach full BR potential. BRI1 correlated with the levels of both expression and phosphorylation of components involved in BR signal transduction, and the functions of the specific serine/threonine/tyrosine residues within BRI1 vary with Arabidopsis growth. However, the associated agronomic traits and molecular mechanisms of SlBRI1 phosphorylation sites remain unclear in tomato. Our results reveal the biological function of Thr-1050 in tomato. Transgenic tomato plants harbouring T1050A exhibited stronger BR signal strength, higher autophosphorylation levels, more vigorous vegetative development, higher yields, and lower fruit nutrient contents. These results highlight the potential of SlBRI1 phosphorylation sites in tomato breeding and provide a molecular basis for establishing high-yielding tomato varieties via the precise control of BR signalling.


Site-directed mutagenesis and vector construction

To construct the plant expression vector expressing wild-type SlBRI1 (PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP-pBI121), the full-length SlBRI1 gene (Solyc04g051510) without its stop codon and its promoter from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Moneymaker) were amplified. The native promoter of SlBRI1 (2989 bp) was first cloned into the Hind III and Xba I sites of the binary pBI121 vector (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) to replace the 35S promoter. The amplified SlBRI1 was then recombined into pBI121 with a GFP-encoding sequence followed by its CT region. To obtain plant expression vectors expressing the T1050A (in which Thr-1050 was replaced with alanine) or T1050D (in which Thr-1050 was replaced with aspartic acid) mutation of SlBRI1, PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP-pBI121 was used as a template, and site mutations of T1050A and T1050D were generated by overlapping PCR amplification. After sequencing verification, all constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 for tomato transformation.

The full-length wild-type SlBRI1, T1050A, and T1050D sequences were amplified from plant expression vectors and cloned into the CaM35S-GFP vector for phosphorylation analysis in vivo [39]. The cytoplasmic domains (815 aa to 1196 aa) of SlBRI1, T1050A, and T1050D were also amplified from plant expression vectors and cloned into the pFLAG-MAC vector (Sigma-Aldrich Saint Louis, MO, USA) for phosphorylation analysis in vitro. A kinase-inactive mutant generated by a lysine-916-glutamic acid (K916E) substitution of the invariant residue was designed as described above and used as a negative control in the phosphorylation analysis [29]; the conserved Lys residues of this mutant lacks kinase activity both in vitro and in vivo. All of the primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1 (Additional file 7).

Tomato transformation

With respect to tomato transformation, cu3-abs1 was used as a transgenic acceptor in accordance with the cotyledon transformation method. Three independent homozygous PSlBRI1::T1050A lines (PSlBRI1::T1050A-1, PSlBRI1::T1050A-7, and PSlBRI1::T1050A-10) and one dependent homozygous PSlBRI1::SlBRI1–1 line were used in this study. All transgenic lines were advanced to the T2 generation.

Response of hypocotyl elongation to exogenous BL

Seeds of the cu3-abs1 and transgenic lines were sterilized and then inoculated in culture bottles containing 1/2 MS medium (1/2 strength Murashige and Skoog medium containing 0.75% agar and 2% sucrose, pH 5.8) containing 0 nM, 5 nM, 50 nM, or 500 nM epi-BL; the bottles were placed in the dark for 9 days at 25 °C. Hypocotyl lengths were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm; the relative hypocotyl length was the relative change of hypocotyl length at different concentrations of epi-BL. A minimum of 15 seedlings from each treatment were randomly examined.

Agronomic trait characterization

For agronomic trait investigation, all tomato plants, including those of transgenic lines and cu3-abs1 lines, were grown in a glasshouse under natural daylight and temperature conditions. Agronomic traits involved in vegetative development were measured at the fruit-ripening stage (120 days after sowing) in accordance with the following rules: plant height was considered the distance from the ground to the top of the plant; stem diameter and internodal distance were considered the diameter and length of the second flower node, respectively; plant expansion was considered the maximum diameter of the plant; leaf area and stem-leaf angle were measured on the sixth leaf; leaf area was measured by scanning followed by calculations using Image J software; and the stem-leaf angle referred to the angle between the leaf and stem. At least 5 plants per transgenic and cu3-abs1 line were used for each characteristic.

Agronomic traits involved in reproductive development were measured in accordance with the following rules: fruit weight was considered the individual fruit weight at the RR stage; the fruit number per cluster was considered the number of the third cluster; the fruit shape index was the ratio of the longitudinal diameter to the transverse diameter at the fruit breaker stage; the yield per plant was considered the total weight of the first to the fourth fruit nodes; the pericarp thickness at the fruit yellow ripening stage was measured using Vernier callipers; fruit firmness was measured using a hand-held penetrometer (FHM-1, Japan); and the seed number was considered the number of seeds per fruit. At least 15 independent biological replicates were used for each characteristic.

Scanning Electron microscope observation

At least 9 sections of the sixth leaf from both transgenic and cu3-abs1 plants were isolated to observe the cell size and cell number via scanning electron microscopy. Sample preparation was performed as previously described, and the samples were photomicrographed using an S-4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) [40]. Cell size was compared under a 1500x-magnified visual field with the scanning electron microscope, and the numbers of cells per unit leaf area were counted under a 300x-magnified visual field.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA from various tissues of transgenic and cu3-abs1 plants was extracted using an RNAiso Plus kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and transcribed to cDNA with Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qRT-PCR was performed using a SYBR Green Master Mix kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), as previously described [41]. The tomato UBI3 gene was used as an internal control, and all primers are listed in Table S1 [26, 42] (Additional file 7). The amplification efficiency of each primer combination was checked by standard-curve analysis. Each sample was represented by 3 biological replicates and technical replications.

Western blot analysis

Total proteins were extracted from 25-day-old tomato seedlings (0.2 g) expressing wild-type SlBRI1, Thr1050A, T1050D, or K916E and mixed with 2x SDS gel loading buffer. The procedure was performed as previously described [31].

Analysis of CO2 assimilation rates

The sixth leaf from both transgenic and cu3-abs1 plants was selected to measure the CO2 assimilation rate (Pn) using an infrared gas analyser-based portable photosynthesis system (LI-6800; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). The CO2 concentration and PPFD used for measurement were 400 μmol mol− 1 and 800 μmol m− 2 s− 1, respectively.

Determination of BR contents

The third leaf (0.5 g) from both transgenic and cu3-abs1 plants was harvested to measure BR using a BR ELISA Kit (MyBiosource, San Diego, USA, Cat. #MBS9364120) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results for each line were quantified with 3 independent biological samples.

Determination of ascorbic acid, soluble sugars, organic acids, and soluble solid contents

Fruits at the YR and RR stages were harvested for analysis. AsA extraction and analyses were performed as previously described [43]. Soluble sugars were extracted from 0.5 g of fruit pericarp tissue, mixed with 15 ml of distilled water and subsequently heated in a boiling water bath for 20 min. The solution was cooled to room temperature and centrifuged at 4000×g for 10 min. Afterward, the supernatant was diluted to 25 ml and then subjected to HPLC analysis (1100 RID, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using an Agilent Zorbax chromatogram column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA, PN. 843,300–908). Organic acid extractions were performed as previously described [44], and detection was performed by HPLC (1260 RID, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 chromatogram column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA, PN. 883,975–902). The soluble solid content of fresh fruit juice was detected using a hand-held refractometer (Chengdu Optical Instrument Factory, Chengdu, China). The results for each line were quantified via external calibration, with 3 independent biological samples and 3 technical replications.

Autophosphorylation analysis

For autophosphorylation analyses in vitro, constructs expressing the cytoplasmic domain of wild-type SlBRI1, T1050A, T1050D, and K916E were subcloned into a pFLAG-MAC vector, which were then transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS (Transgene, Beijing, China). The methods of protein purification and autophosphorylation assays as previously described [31, 45]. Autophosphorylation activity of recombinant proteins was detected using anti-pThr antibodies (CST, Danvers, MA, USA, Cat. #93815), and aliquots of the recombinant proteins were detected using anti-FLAG antibodies (Transgene, Beijing, China). The experiments were repeated 3 times and the results were consistent. Intensities of unsaturated bands were quantified using ImageJ software and presented as relative values compared with the FLAG-SlBRI1.

For autophosphorylation analyses in vivo, strain GV3101 containing the indicated construct (wild-type SlBRI1-GFP, T1050A-GFP, T1050D-GFP, or K916E-GFP) was grown overnight in liquid LB medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. The cultures were centrifuged, and the cells were resuspended in 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES-KOH, and 200 μM AS to a final OD600 = 0.3–0.5. The indicated cultures were infiltrated into 3-week-old N. benthamiana leaves using a syringe. N. benthamiana leaves without the main vein were subsequently harvested at 48 h after infection. The leaves were ground to fine powder in liquid nitrogen, after which 5 ml of 2x extraction buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 150 mM NaCl; 10% glycerol; 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 20 mM NaF; 1 mM PMSF; 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100; 1% (w/v) PVPP; and 2% (m/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)] was added. The samples were clarified by centrifugation at 13000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, after which the protein concentration was adjusted to 2 mg ml− 1 with 0.8x extraction buffer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using 1.5 ml of total protein by adding 10 μl of anti-GFP (1 μg μl− 1) (Transgene, Beijing, China) followed by incubation at 4 °C for 3–4 h. Afterward, 40 μl of protein G magnetic beads (NEB) was added, and the sample was incubated at 4 °C for 1–2 h. The beads were subsequently washed 4 times with TBS, immunoprecipitated, eluted with 40 μl of 2x SDS loading buffer and boiled for 5 min. Anti-GFP was used to show the loading levels, while anti-pThr was used to determine the autophosphorylation level in vivo. The experiments were repeated 3 times and the results were consistent. Intensities of unsaturated bands were quantified using ImageJ software and presented as relative values compared with the SlBRI1-GFP.

Statistical analysis

The data in this study were analysed with SPSS version 17.0 and Student’s t-tests. Mean and standard error values were calculated, and P < 0.05 or 0.01 was considered statistically significant in comparisons with PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP plants.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files. All plant materials were obtained from Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.



Constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter


Ascorbic acid












Coomassie brilliant blue




C-terminal domain




Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay




Fresh weight


Green fluorescent protein


High-performance liquid chromatography


Juxtamembrane region


Lysine-916-Glutamic acid


Kinase domain


Murashige and Skoog medium


Phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride


Net photosynthetic rate


Crosslinking polyvinylpyrrolidone


Quantitative real-time PCR


Red ripening


Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis






Threonine-1050-aspartic acid


Tris-buffered saline




Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane






Yellow ripening


  1. 1.

    Clouse SD, Sasse JM. BRASSINOSTEROIDS: essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998;49:427–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Altmann T. Molecular physiology of brassinosteroids revealed by the analysis of mutants. Planta. 1999;208(1):1–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Clouse S. Brassinosteroids. Curr Biol. 2001;11(22):R904.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Haubrick LL, Assmann SM. Brassinosteroids and plant function: some clues, more puzzles. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29(3):446–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Friedrichsen DM, Joazeiro CA, Li J, Hunter T, Chory J. Brassinosteroid-insensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich repeat receptor serine/threonine kinase. Plant Physiol. 2000;123(4):1247–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Li J, Chory J. A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell. 1997;90(5):929–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang X, Kota U, He K, Blackburn K, Li J, Goshe MB, Huber SC, Clouse SD. Sequential transphosphorylation of the BRI1/BAK1 receptor kinase complex impacts early events in brassinosteroid signaling. Dev Cell. 2008;15(2):220–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vert G, Nemhauser JL, Geldner N, Hong F, Chory J. Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone signaling in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:177–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang Z, Nakano T, Gendron J, He J, Chen M, Vafeados D, Yang Y, Fujioka S, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J. Nuclear-localized BZR1 mediates brassinosteroid-induced growth and feedback suppression of brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Dev Cell. 2002;2(4):505–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Goda H, Shimada Y, Asami T, Fujioka S, Yoshida S. Microarray analysis of brassinosteroid-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002;130(3):1319–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Clouse SD. Brassinosteroid signal transduction: from receptor kinase activation to transcriptional networks regulating plant development. Plant Cell. 2011;23(4):1219–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sun Y, Fan X, Cao D, Tang W, He K, Zhu JY, He JX, Bai M, Zhu S, Oh E, Patil S, Kim TW, Ji H, Wong W, Rhee SY, Wang Z. Integration of brassinosteroid signal transduction with the transcription network for plant growth regulation in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2010;19(5):765–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yu X, Li L, Zola J, Aluru M, Ye H, Foudree A, Guo H, Anderson S, Aluru S, Liu P, Rodermel S, Yin Y. A brassinosteroid transcriptional network revealed by genome-wide identification of BESI target genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2011;65(4):634–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Koka CV, Cerny RE, Gardner RG, Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Clouse SD. A putative role for the tomato genes DUMPY and CURL-3 in brassinosteroid biosynthesis and response. Plant Physiol. 2000;122(1):85–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wang Z, Seto H, Fujioka S, Yoshida S, Chory J. BRI1 is a critical component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plant steroids. Nature. 2001;410(6826):380–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oh MH, Wang X, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Deactivation of the Arabidopsis BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) receptor kinase by autophosphorylation within the glycine-rich loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(1):327–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Oh MH, Wang X, Kota U, Goshe MB, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the BRI1 receptor kinase emerges as a component of brassinosteroid signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(2):658–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Oh MH, Sun J, Oh DH, Zielinski RE, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Enhancing Arabidopsis leaf growth by engineering the BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 receptor kinase. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(1):120–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Morinaka Y, Sakamoto T, Inukai Y, Agetsuma M, Kitano H, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M. Morphological alteration caused by brassinosteroid insensitivity increases the biomass and grain production of rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;141(3):924–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kir G, Ye H, Nelissen H, Neelakandan AK, Kusnandar AS, Luo A, Inze D, Sylvester AW, Yin Y, Becraft PW. RNA interference knockdown of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 in maize reveals novel functions for Brassinosteroid signaling in controlling plant architecture. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(1):826–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chono M, Honda I, Zeniya H, Yoneyama K, Saisho D, Takeda K, Takatsuto S, Hoshino T, Watanabe Y. A semidwarf phenotype of barley uzu results from a nucleotide substitution in the gene encoding a putative brassinosteroid receptor. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(3):1209–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Honda I, Zeniya H, Yoneyama K, Chono M, Kaneko S, Watanabe Y. Uzu mutation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) reduces the leaf unrolling response to brassinolide. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2003;67(5):1194–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ali SS, Gunupuru LR, Kumar GB, Khan M, Scofield S, Nicholson P, Doohan FM. Plant disease resistance is augmented in uzu barley lines modified in the brassinosteroid receptor BRI1. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Singh A, Breja P, Khurana JP, Khurana P. Wheat Brassinosteroid-Insensitive1 (TaBRI1) interacts with members of TaSERK gene family and cause early flowering and seed yield enhancement in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0153273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chai Y, Zhang Q, Tian L, Li C, Xing Y, Qin L, Shen Y. Brassinosteroid is involved in strawberry fruit ripening. Plant Growth Regul. 2012;69(1):63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nie S, Huang S, Wang S, Cheng D, Liu J, Lv S, Li Q, Wang X. Enhancing Brassinosteroid signaling via overexpression of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) SlBRI1 improves major agronomic traits. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Montoya T, Nomura T, Farrar K, Kaneta T, Yokota T, Bishop GJ. Cloning the tomato curl3 gene highlights the putative dual role of the leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase tBRI1/SR160 in plant steroid hormone and peptide hormone signaling. Plant Cell. 2002;14(12):3163–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Holton N, Cano-Delgado A, Harrison K, Montoya T, Chory J, Bishop GJ. Tomato BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 is required for systemin-induced root elongation in Solanum pimpinellifolium but is not essential for wound signaling. Plant Cell. 2007;19(5):1709–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bajwa VS, Wang X, Blackburn RK, Goshe MB, Mitra SK, Williams EL, Bishop GJ, Krasnyanski S, Allen G, Huber SC, Clouse SD. Identification and functional analysis of tomato BRI1 and BAK1 receptor kinase phosphorylation sites. Plant Physiol. 2013;163(1):30–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chory J, Nagpal P, Peto CA. Phenotypic and genetic analysis of det2, a new mutant that affects light-regulated seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1991;3(5):445–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang X, Goshe MB, Soderblom EJ, Phinney BS, Kuchar JA, Li J, Asami T, Yoshida S, Huber SC, Clouse SD. Identification and functional analysis of in vivo phosphorylation sites of the Arabidopsis BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE1 receptor kinase. Plant Cell. 2005;17(6):1685–703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Klee HJ. Genetic control of floral architecture: insights into improving crop yield. Cell. 2017;169(6):983–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang Q, Wang S, Gan S, Wang X, Liu J, Wang X. Role of specific phosphorylation sites of Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid-insensitive 1 receptor kinase in plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul. 2016;35(3):755–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu L, Jia C, Zhang M, Chen D, Chen S, Guo R, Guo D, Wang Q. Ectopic expression of a BZR1-1D transcription factor in brassinosteroid signalling enhances carotenoid accumulation and fruit quality attributes in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(1):105–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    He J, Gendron JM, Sun Y, Gampala SS, Gendron N, Sun C, Wang Z. BZR1 is a transcriptional repressor with dual roles in brassinosteroid homeostasis and growth responses. Science. 2005;307(5715):1634–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Clouse SD, Langford M, McMorris TC. A brassinosteroid-insensitive mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple defects in growth and development. Plant Physiol. 1996;111(3):671–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mathur J, Molnar G, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Sakurai A, Yokota T, Adam G, Voigt B, Nagy F, Maas C, Schell J, Koncz C, Szekeres M. Transcription of the Arabidopsis CPD gene, encoding a steroidogenic cytochrome P450, is negatively controlled by brassinosteroids. Plant J. 1998;14(5):593–602.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Youn JH, Kim TW, Joo SH, Son SH, Roh J, Kim S, Kim TW, Kim SK. Function and molecular regulation of DWARF1 as a C-24 reductase in brassinosteroid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(8):1873–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang M, Yuan F, Hao H, Zhang Y, Zhao H, Guo A, Hu J, Zhou X, Xie CG. BolOST1, an ortholog of open stomata 1 with alternative splicing products in Brassica oleracea, positively modulates drought responses in plants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;442(3–4):214–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yang C, Li H, Zhang J, Luo Z, Gong P, Zhang C, Li J, Wang T, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Ye Z. A regulatory gene induces trichome formation and embryo lethality in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(29):11836–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Huang S, Nie S, Wang S, Liu J, Zhang Y, Wang X. SlBIR3 negatively regulates PAMP responses and cell death in tomato. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(9).

  42. 42.

    Peng H, Kaloshian I. The tomato leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases SlSERK3A and SlSERK3B have overlapping functions in bacterial and nematode innate immunity. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hu T, Ye J, Tao P, Li H, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Ye Z. The tomato HD-zip I transcription factor SlHZ24 modulates ascorbate accumulation through positive regulation of the D-mannose/L-galactose pathway. Plant J. 2016;85(1):16–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ma B, Chen J, Zheng H, Fang T, Ogutu C, Li S, Han Y, Wu B. Comparative assessment of sugar and malic acid composition in cultivated and wild apples. Food Chem. 2015;172:86–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Li J, Wen J, Lease KA, Doke JT, Tax FE, Walker JC. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell. 2002;110(2):213–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This research was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31672142 and 31501771), Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China (nos. 2017JM3019), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (nos. Z109021703).

Author information




WX and WS planned and designed the research. WS, LJ, ZT, DC, NS and ZY performed the experiments. LS and HS analysed the data. WS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Expression of transgenic SlBRI1 proteins and phenotypes of PSlBRI1::SlBRI1-GFP transgenic lines. Top, phenotypes of plants at the maturation stage (120 days after sowing). Bottom, western blot analysis of transgenic SlBRI1 expression using anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) antibodies. CBB, Coomassie brilliant blue. (JPG 604 kb)

Additional file 2:

Figure S2. Thr-1050 did not alter photosynthesis. The leaf CO2 assimilation rate (Pn) of the sixth leaf at the maturation stage. Data are the means ± SDs of 3 independent biological samples. (PDF 1080 kb)

Additional file 3:

Figure S3. Total soluble solids in fruits. (PDF 188 kb)

Additional file 4:

Figure S4. Alignment of the partial kinase domain sequences of SlBRI1, StBRI1, AtBRI1, OsBRI1, TaBRI1 and ZmBRI1. SlBRI1 (Solanum lycopersicum, accession No. NP_001296180.1), StBRI1 (Solanum tuberosum, accession No. XP_006357355.1), BRI1 (Arabidopsis thaliana, accession No. NP_195650.1), OsBRI1 (Oryza sativa, accession No. NP_001044077.1), TaBRI1 (Triticum aestivum, accession No. DQ_655711.1), ZmBRI1 (Zea mays, accession No. XP_008656807.1). (PDF 1162 kb)

Additional file 5

Figure S5. Three-dimensional (3D) folding structure prediction of SlBRI1 and T1050A. The 3D folding structure was predicted using SWISS-MODEL. (PDF 1687 kb)

Additional file 6:

Figure S6. Subcellular localization of SlBRI1 and T1050A. Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation of tobacco epidermal cells. First line, subcellular localization of GFP. Second line, subcellular localization of SlBRI1-GFP. Third line, subcellular localization T1050A-GFP. Left panels: bright-field images. Middle panels: green fluorescence signal under blue light. Right panels: merged images. Scale bars, 50 μm. (JPG 932 kb)

Additional file 7:

Table S1. Primers used in this research. (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Liu, J., Zhao, T. et al. Modification of Threonine-1050 of SlBRI1 regulates BR Signalling and increases fruit yield of tomato. BMC Plant Biol 19, 256 (2019).

Download citation


  • Tomato
  • SlBRI1
  • Phosphorylation site
  • Agronomic trait
  • BR signal