BMC Plant Biology

Table 3 Comparison of genetic statistics among the four Quercus. L groups

From: Hybridization and introgression in sympatric and allopatric populations of four oak species

	Value of genetic statistics					Two-sided P-value
	A_R	H_O	H_S	F_ST	group pair	A_R	H_O	H_S	F_ST
Allopatric					BY vs LT	0.642	0.154	0.390	0.708
Group BY	10.7	0.543	0.823	0.085	BY vs ZW	0.205	0.569	0.453	0.331
Group LT	11.2	0.662	0.847	0.067	BY vs ZJ	0.761	0.893	0.537	0.837
Group ZW	9.5	0.490	0.802	0.131	LT vs ZW	0.066	0.033*	0.072	0.152
Group ZJ	11.0	0.533	0.838	0.092	LT vs ZJ	0.794	0.057	0.750	0.518
					ZW vs ZJ	0.041*	0.573	0.099	0.261
Heterogeneous
Group (AV)	10.3	0.497	0.817	0.090
Group (FB)	11.0	0.607	0.842	0.062	AV vs FB	0.223	0.014*	0.139	0.078
Subgroup					A vs V	0.074	0.437	0.097	0.611
Group A	11.2	0.536	0.841	0.07	A vs F	0.892	0.231	0.523	0.609
Group V	9.7	0.471	0.801	0.089	A vs B	0.724	0.635	0.619	0.863
Group F	11.3	0.640	0.859	0.050	V vs F	0.040*	0.014*	0.007**	0.330
Group B	10.9	0.578	0.827	0.062	V vs B	0.127	0.121	0.210	0.286
					F vs B	0.657	0.447	0.211	0.769

A_R allelic richness with rarefaction to a common sample size of 10, H_O observed heterozygosity, H_S genetic diversity within populations, F_ST genetic differentiation index. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. Two-sided P-value was obtained after 10,000 permutations and taken as the proportion of random data sets giving larger statistics than the observed statistics

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com