LGa | Genetic Positionb | Physical Positionc | SNP Marker | LODd | LOD thresholde | 95% Bayes intervalf | LOD intervalg | Additive effecth | PVEi | % j |
---|
A08 | 15.2 | 5.03 | AX-147229403 | 4.31 | 2.04 | 0–71.72 | 0–18.78 | 0.12 | 17.52 | 40.87 |
A02/B02 | 4 | 3.56 | AX-147212854 | 2.31 | 1.15 | 0–17.28 | 0–17.28 | 0.105 | 9.06 | 32.07 |
- Resistance to peanut smut is estimated for the level of square root transformed smut incidence; aLinkage group. bGenetic position in Kosambi cM for each LG. cPhysical position (Mbp) based on A. hypogaea cv. Tifrunner pseudomolecules [2] (https://peanutbase.org). dLOD score at QTL peak. eLOD threshold based on 1000 permutations at 1% level of significance. f95% Bayes credible intervals. gLOD support interval. hAdditive effect values, positive values indicate that alleles come from one of the wild diploid species (2n = 2x = 20) (A. correntina, A. cardenasii or A. batizocoi) and negative values indicate that alleles come from the A. hypogaea experimental elite line JS17304-7-B (2n = 4x = 40). iProportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL. jPercentage (%) of decrease in peanut smut incidence