Skip to main content

A pan-genomic approach to genome databases using maize as a model system


Research in the past decade has demonstrated that a single reference genome is not representative of a species’ diversity. MaizeGDB introduces a pan-genomic approach to hosting genomic data, leveraging the large number of diverse maize genomes and their associated datasets to quickly and efficiently connect genomes, gene models, expression, epigenome, sequence variation, structural variation, transposable elements, and diversity data across genomes so that researchers can easily track the structural and functional differences of a locus and its orthologs across maize. We believe our framework is unique and provides a template for any genomic database poised to host large-scale pan-genomic data.


Zea mays ssp. mays (maize, corn) is a unique model organism as its broad importance as a food, feed, and fiber product has driven its domestication over thousands of years by the traditional breeding practices of indigenous people [1,2,3], followed by decades of directed breeding since the green revolution and the molecular era [4, 5]. Over the last 100 years, research on maize has also been instrumental in understanding plant biology, evolution, domestication, development, and genetics [6,7,8,9,10]. For over a decade, maize has been the world’s top production grain crop (, primarily for livestock feed and more recently for biofuels [11].

Collection and sharing of maize research data, such as compiling gene lists, composite genetic maps, and breeding information, has been ongoing since the early twentieth century [9, 12]. Curated maize research data was formally moved into a database in 1991 (MaizeDB) [13]. The database expanded to include sequence data in 2003 [14] and genomic data in 2008, and by 2015, had evolved into the present Maize Genetics and Genomics Database (MaizeGDB – [15]. MaizeGDB is the maize community database, providing data curation and informatics resources to support maize genetics, genomics, and breeding research for maize scientists. MaizeGDB is also the maize research community’s hub, providing support, outreach, and training to facilitate collaboration and data sharing, and serves as the clearing house for maize genetic and genomic nomenclature.

By 2019, MaizeGDB hosted the genomes of six maize inbred lines and one teosinte [16]. Since then, MaizeGDB has brought in 39 additional reference-quality genomes, including important individual inbred lines (PH207 [17], Mo17 [18, 19], and W22 [20]), a set of European lines [21], a sweet corn [22], and the set of 26 high-quality PacBio genome assemblies of the Nested Associated Mapping (NAM) population founder lines [23]. The NAM founder lines represent a large swath of maize’s considerable diversity [24] and the resulting NAM populations have been used extensively by researchers to study maize flowering time [25], leaf architecture [26], disease resistance [27], and other important agronomic traits [28]. The sequencing, assembly, gene model annotation, RNA-seq expression data, structural variation, transposable element annotation, and methylome data of the NAM founder genomes were all performed using the same protocols in the same laboratories. Since comparisons between genome assemblies have been hampered by the difficulty of teasing out true biological differences from differences in assembly and annotation quality or techniques, the NAM founder genome assemblies and their associated data provide a unique opportunity to explore biologically relevant genome diversity within a single species. In hosting the NAM founder genomes and their data, MaizeGDB achieved in a single database update 26 new genome project/metadata pages; over 1 million new gene model pages; hundreds of new downloadable datasets; 134 additional BLAST targets; and 26 new JBrowse genome browsers with over 1,000 total tracks of data across the browsers. We use this massive gold-standard data set to develop new approaches to host and connect these genomes and their datasets to each other in a way that is useful and biologically meaningful to the maize community.

Research in the past decade has clearly demonstrated that a single reference genome is not truly representative of a species’ diversity (reviewed in [29] ). Individual human genomes can vary by up to 10 % [30], and in maize, only 60 % of genes are found in all the NAM lines [23]. Now that many cultivars of species with complex genomes can be sequenced and analyzed as groups, pan-genome datasets are becoming more available (for example in rice [31, 32] and tomato [33]). These pan-genome sets are valuable for understanding diversity in phenotypes such as disease and drought resistance. However, the issue of effective pan-genome display and interaction by scientific users who may not be command-line savvy has been an ongoing challenge which we have attempted to rectify.

Here, MaizeGDB introduces a pan-genomic approach to hosting a genomic database, leveraging the large number of diverse maize genomes and their associated datasets to quickly and efficiently connect genomes, gene models, expression, methylome, sequence variation, structural variation, transposable elements, and diversity data across genomes so that researchers can easily track the structural and functional differences of a locus and its syntenic orthologs across maize. MaizeGDB provides tools and resources that offer three perspectives to each hosted genome: (1) genomes can be used independently with associated genome-specific data; (2) genomes are associated to the “representative” B73 reference genome and the large sets of accompanying data; and (3) genomes are presented in a pan-genomic framework where gene annotations and sequence variation are interlinked between the various genome assemblies. We believe our cross-genome, pan-genomic framework is unique among databases, but it can be a template for any genomic database poised to host large-scale pan-genomic data.

Construction and content

The data in MaizeGDB is subdivided into different categories, as described in [16]. Briefly, MaizeGDB is organized based on data or tool type (for example, genomes, SNP diversity, BLAST). Maize genomes are listed on a Genomes page, with links to metadata and downloads; each annotated gene model has its own gene model page. MaizeGDB currently hosts 48 maize genomes in our database, including the 25 NAM founder lines and the most recent version (version 5) of the reference maize genome B73 (Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM_5.0, referred to in this article as B73v5). Below we describe how we re-formatted MaizeGDB to become a pan-genomic resource for maize, and how this new format assists users in connecting genomic to functional data.

Utility and discussion

Grouping genome assemblies by project

To facilitate access to the 25 NAM founder genomes, we have reorganized the user interface so that all the NAM founder lines can be found on a single page (, subdivided into three tabs (Fig. 1). The tab “Project Details” (Fig. 1A) lists all the NAM founder genomes together, along with links to their stock accessions and download pages to access data related to these genomes, and contains a description of the NAM project that is germane to all NAM lines. The data on this tab is common to all 25 genomes in this genome set. The tab “Metadata” (Fig. 1B) describes the sequencing, assembly, annotation, and other data specific to a given genome (in this example, B97). The third tab, “Browser”, takes the user to a browser instance of that genome (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1

The NAM Genomes pages organized for the NAM founder project ( A The “Project Details” page describing the NAM Genome project and listing the genomes associated with the project. B The “Metadata” tab for the genome B97 (formally Zm-B97-REFERENCE-NAM-1.0). B The “Browser” tab for the genome B97

The pan-genome JBrowse

One of the challenges of pan-genome visualization is viewing and navigating across multiple genomes, independent of a reference genome. Normally, pan-genome visualization in tools such as IGV or JBrowse is dependent on aligning data from other genomes onto a reference genome, then generating tracks from the reference genomic coordinates of these aligned data. One drawback of this technique is that it is difficult to represent data present in other genomes but absent in the reference genome. However, pan-genomic visualization schemes independent of a reference-genome coordinate system, such as graphical visualization with nodes and edges, can be difficult for users to interpret [34]. One solution we implemented is linking gene models, SNPs, or markers shared between two or more genomes across their JBrowse instances. Until 2020, MaizeGDB presented genome assemblies using GBrowse, a server-side browser software package introduced in 2002 [35]. In 2020, MaizeGDB upgraded to the faster, more modern client-side JBrowse browser software [36]. The NAM founder genomes and B73v5 are now on JBrowse.

In Fig. 2, we demonstrate our JBrowse cross-genome functionality by linking gene models across the NAM founder lines and B73v5. Using the annotation liftover tool Liftoff [37], we lifted every NAM and B73v5 gene model annotation set to each other (for a total of 676 cross-lifted annotation sets), and generated JBrowse tracks out of the results. Unlike other annotation-lifting tools, Liftoff allows for lifting of gene model annotations across different genome accessions as it takes into consideration structural differences such as inversions between assemblies. In any NAM or B73v5 JBrowse instance, a user can select a track of a lifted over gene model annotation from any other genome to determine if an annotation on the current browser is present in the other genome. If so, the user can click on the lifted gene model annotation feature, which opens a pop-up window containing a link that will take the user to that same gene model located in the JBrowse genome instance corresponding to the lifted annotation track (Fig. 2A). These Liftoff-generated tracks are also useful for identifying regions annotated in other genomes that might have been missed or truncated in the target genome. A region missing an annotation, if coupled with other functional data such as RNA-seq expression and hypomethylation, can suggest that region is likely functional, which is important if the region happens to have a mutational insertion or a SNP that is of interest to the user. The example in Fig. 2 demonstrates an annotation within the non-stiff-stalk temperate line B97 that is truncated in the reference B73v5 genome. Comparing RNA-seq between both genomes demonstrates that there is functional support for the B97 annotation in root, but less functional support for a full annotation at the corresponding B73 locus. Prior to this new cross-browser functionality, a user would have needed to deduce the syntenic relationships between the B73 and B97 gene models, then separately search for these gene models on their respective browser pages in order to compare the differences in expression between these loci.

Fig. 2

MaizeGDB JBrowse pan-genome optimization. A Cross-referencing gene model annotations across the NAM Founders and B73v5. The panel on the left is the B73v5 JBrowse instance, demonstrating that a gene model annotation is truncated in the reference genome (1), but complete in the lifted over tracks (2) for Ms71 and B97, both of which are non-stiff-stalk temperate lines; Il14H, a sweet corn line, has all of the exons present but not the UTRs. HP301 (popcorn), CML247, and CML322 (tropical lines) are also truncated. (3) demonstrates that there is little RNA-seq expression at this locus in B73, and none in root tissue (red box). If a user clicks on the B97 gene model Zm00018ab410740 (4), a pop-up box opens; clicking on the link (5) it will take the user to the location of Zm00018ab410740 in the B97 browser (6). B97 Zm00018ab410740 RNA-seq (7) demonstrates robust expression in root tissue (red box), supporting the B97 gene model annotation, in contrast to the associated B73 locus, which has less RNA-seq support, particularly in root. The Ms71 locus shows similar root expression patterns but Il14H has no root expression (not shown). B Large-scale structural variants (SVs) (red = deletions, green = insertions) relative to B73v5 for two lines, B97, and tropical line CML103, and unmethylated regions (UMRs, blue) and ATAC-seq peaks (orange) for B73v5, B97, and CML103. All data are aligned against the reference B73v5 genome. (1) Deletions (red) relative to B73 that are only in B97 (the red spaces represent the regions in B73 missing in B97); these regions are not deleted in CML103, as indicated by the absence of the red spaces in that genome. (2) Deletion shared between B97 and CML103 relative to B73. (3) UMRs present at the same loci in B73, B97, and CML103. (4) UMRs present only in B73

This cross-genome functionality is also enabled for NAM phenotypic traits which we extracted from [28] and which we have mapped to all the NAM founder lines and B73 (Supplemental Information), and enabled the pan-genome markers which were used to assemble the NAM founder genome superscaffolds into pseudomolecules. In this way, we can link markers and important phenotypic traits across all the NAM genomes and the reference genome. Equally important is that we can identify instances where markers underlying a particular phenotypic trait are missing in a given NAM line.

This cross-browser linkage is a useful way for a researcher to quickly compare the RNA-seq, gene model structure, methylome, transposable element annotation, structural variation, and trait marker information between the loci of two or more genomes to understand the differences in the structure and function of orthologous regions.

Expanding epigenetic and structural relationships across maize

MaizeGDB had expanded the number of tracks in the reference genome B73v5 JBrowse to include an epigenetic atlas [38] that contains ChIP-seq (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing), ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin), methyl-seq, as well as DNA-binding sites to further enhance the reference genome’s functional landscape. Epigenetic data can indicate regions of open chromatin and functional gene space, or conversely can identify regions likely to be epigenetically silenced. Such information, along with the RNA-seq data, is crucial to helping researchers determine if a locus of interest is likely to be functional.

MaizeGDB also includes epigenetic data generated by the NAM Consortium [23] including DNA methylation, UMRs (unmethylated regions), and ATAC-seq data mapped to all the NAM founders and B73v5. Additionally, the NAM founder data is mapped onto B73v5 itself, so as to compare differences in the epigenetic landscape across all NAM founders against the reference genome at once (Fig. 2B).

Structural variant (SV) data such as knobs, centromeres, large-scale deletions, and other features for each NAM founder genome generated by the NAM Consortium [23] is displayed as tracks on the NAM founder and B73v5 JBrowse instances. Similar to the epigenetic data, SV data from the other NAM founders have also been projected by the NAM Consortium onto B73v5 (Fig. 2B), enabling researchers to compare differences in large-scale structural variants across all NAM founders against the reference genome.

Gene models under one pan-gene tab

Across all genomes, each gene model in an annotated genome has a page at MaizeGDB where information such as genomic location, genetic map position, gene model structure, transcript and protein sequence, function, expression values, mutational information, and other data (where available) is described (Fig. 3). Before we migrated to the pan-genome approach, this information was subdivided into three tabs: one tab for gene model and expression information, one tab for sequence information of the gene model, and one tab for the genetic information associated with the gene model. With the implementation of the pan-genome approach, we added a new tab that includes pan-gene relationships between a given gene model and syntenic gene models in other maize genomes. Our definition of a pan-gene is a locus in maize that includes all the syntenic orthologs across two or more genomes. The pan-genes for MaizeGDB (Fig. 3 A) were generated by aligning the primary CDS transcripts of all genomes to the primary CDS transcripts of all other genomes with blastn [39], followed by DagChainer [40] on each pairwise blastn output, and then uniting the whole using the Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL [41], Methods). The pan-gene tab shows all members of the resulting pan-gene set associated with the gene model of interest.

Fig. 3

Pan-genome and tandem array information on the gene model pages. Featured is information for the reference B73v5 gene model Zm00001eb360200. A The pan-gene tab (arrow) of Zm00001eb360200 and all syntenic orthologs for most maize lines hosted by MaizeGDB. Gene model information for syntenic orthologs (“gene model”) and the name of the genome (“assembly”) is provided. Collapsible sections for “Overview” (top) and “Orthologs in other species” (bottom) provide more information on how the pan-gene relationships were derived, and grass syntenic relationships, respectively. Many genomes have more than one representative; for instance, “Zm-CML52-REFERENCE-NAM-1.0” has two gene models in the set: Zm00019ab347600 and Zm00019ab347610; these are tandem duplications. B A partial screen capture of the gene model tab (arrow) with information about gene models that are tandem duplicates of the reference gene model Zm00001eb360200 (2) (Zm00001eb360210 and Zm00001eb360220) for a total of three gene copies, including the reference gene model. C A CoGe ( visualization alignment output of the tandem arrays for B73 and CML52 featured in A) and B). The green cartoons are gene models; the red boxes are blastn alignments of the coding regions between the two genomes. This image supports the MaizeGDB pipeline determination of tandem array copies in both B73 and CML52

We also identified tandem gene arrays via self CDS transcript blastn hits within a 300 kb window (Methods), and report all the other blastn hits that fall within that tandem array besides the represented gene in the gene model page (Fig. 3B C). This provides information on both a gene model’s retention across maize, and its local copy number. Together, these features on the new pan-gene tab allow users to understand the copy number and syntenic relationships of any given gene model to all other gene models in maize.

Compare chromosome-level structural variation across maize genomes with CViTjs

Macro views of genomic features at the whole-genome level can reveal patterns undetectable at close range. MaizeGDB makes use of the tool CViTjs (Chromosome Visualization Tool-javascript; to generate whole-genome views of B73v5 and the NAM founder assemblies. CViTjs is a flexible Javascript application that displays features, categorized as points or ranges, displayed as rectangles, circles or histograms, using a specified color or heat color range on pseudomolecules, linkage groups, or chromosomes. Any type of feature can have an attached label. CViTjs can be used to display genetic maps, genomic features, or cytological features. The CViTjs images layer gene and tandem repeat densities along with centromere and knob regions on whole genome views for B73v5 and the NAM founders. Alternative views show the same features on each of the 10 chromosomes across all 26 genomes. Figure 4 shows an example for the NAM founder line Oh7B which has a translocation from Chromosome 10 to Chromosome 9 that is elegantly displayed in CViTjs.

Fig. 4

CViTjs viewer. A Whole-genome view of NAM founder Oh7B. Chromosome 5 is an example of typical gene density, with the highest density near the ends of each arm. Chromosome 9 is a clear exception with peak gene densities at the end and midway down the proximal arm, whereas Chromosome 10 lacks a clear gene density peak on its proximal arm. The translocation from the proximal arm of Chromosome 10 (arrow) to the distal arm of Chromosome 9 (rectangle) is highlighted. B Display of chromosome 9 across all 26 genomes. Here it is evident that Chromosome 9 is distinctly larger in Oh7B compared Chromosome 9 in the other NAM founders; the rectangle highlights the region of Oh7B Chromosome 10 translocated to Chromosome 9

RNA-seq visualization via qTeller and the NAM founders

qTeller is a program to visualize RNA expression in a given gene, a genomic coordinate, or pair of genes across multiple RNA-seq datasets (manuscript submitted). It allows a user to visually compare gene expression of a selected gene model in different tissues, time points, and conditions, or to compare gene expression between two gene models. It also accepts a list of gene models and outputs a file with each gene model’s expression abundances for each tissue/condition library the user selected.

MaizeGDB has hosted qTeller since 2018 (, and has updated the tool to include a method of comparing protein abundances and studying multiple genomes. Initially, only genes from version 4 of the reference maize genome B73 were represented. Because the NAM founder sequencing project also sequenced RNA-seq data for ten tissues across all the NAM founder lines, we were able to make a NAM founder pan-genome qTeller instance where a user could compare the RNA expression of a gene in one NAM genome to the RNA expression of a gene in another NAM genome. The genomes and the RNA-seq data were all generated exactly the same way by the same sequencing group, allowing a more equal comparison across genomic datasets than would be expected of RNA-seq data between genomes generated by different labs and under different conditions. This qTeller instance thus permits a user to easily compare normalized expression profiles across shared genes within maize (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

MaizeGDB NAM Multi-Genome qTeller instance. A The “Genes in an Interval” feature, with a drop-down menu (arrow) to select the NAM genome of interest. B The “Genes by Name” feature, where gene models from several different genomes (distinguished by the different prefixes: Zm00001eb = B73v5, Zm00018ab = B97, etc.; see Nomenclature section below) can be entered to retrieve expression results across genomes. C Comparison of two syntenic gene models from two different genomes: Zm00001eb412110 (B73) and Zm00042ab431800 (Tzi8). The X and Y coordinates represent the respective FPKM values for each gene model. Three different RNA-seq expression datasets are represented (blue, green, red). The expression values between the two gene models are fairly consistent, which is often true of syntenic loci

Genome nomenclature for multiple genomes

MaizeGDB serves as the clearinghouse for maize nomenclature in collaboration with the Maize Nomenclature Committee, including for genome assemblies and annotations. With multiple genomes hosted at MaizeGDB and especially the set of NAM founder assemblies that require names identifying them as being members of a set, it was necessary to establish consistent naming conventions for the genome assemblies, annotation sets, and gene models that are both human and machine readable. Doing so also assists computational analyses of all NAM assemblies and annotations. The guidelines can be found here

All NAM founder assemblies are named with the pattern: Zm-[cultivar]-REFERENCE-NAM-1.0, for example, Zm-B97-REFERENCE-NAM-1.0. A minor exception is the B73 assembly, which as the 5th version of the representative maize genome, is named Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0.

All NAM assemblies are also assigned numbered identifiers of the form Zm[ddddd][l]. For the NAM assemblies these are Zm00001e (B73v5), and Zm00018a (B97v1) through Zm00042a (Tzi8v1). These identifiers are used as prefixes for the gene model names, with the addition of one more letter indicating the annotation version. As preliminary annotations were released before the official annotations, the official annotations use prefixes Zm00018ab - Zm00042ab, where ‘b’ indicates the second annotation. Gene model numbers are numbered sequentially across the chromosomes, separated by 10. For example: Zm000018ab000100, Zm000018ab000110, Zm000018ab000120, et cetera. Chromosome numbers are not encoded in the names.


Increased efficiency and quality of genome sequencing and assembly, and its exponentially lower cost have accelerated the pace and number of genome assemblies being released. Genomic databases will not only host many more genomes, but also provide resources to integrate and compare across different genomes. MaizeGDB has developed multiple means for harnessing the growing number of maize genomes to explore the diversity and complexity of maize. Using the high-quality NAM founder genomes as a gold standard, we compiled pan-gene sets accessible through each gene model page, made jumping between genome browsers possible, implemented cross-genome structural variant comparisons, and expanded RNA-seq analysis to be tractable across multiple genomes. These recent updates at MaizeGDB can serve as a template for other databases to manage large-scale pan-genomes of any species.


Lifted Annotations: Annotations were lifted across genomes using the tool Liftoff [37] using default parameters.

MaizeGDB Pan-Genome: Scripts for the pan-genome and tandem duplicate relationships can be found in the MaizeGDB GitHub repository The MaizeGDB pan-genome was generated using a pipeline based on Steven Cannon’s pan-genome pipeline structure developed at Soybase [42] and Legume Information System [43]), with a combination of blastn [39], DagChainer [40], and MCL [41]. The CDS genomic fasta files for the primary or canonical transcripts of each genome were selected, and from these, blast databases were generated. Pairwise blastn alignments (including self alignments) were run with the parameters blastn -query ${q} -db ${s%.*} -perc_identity 95 -evalue 1e-10 -outfmt “6 std qlen slen qcovs”. Outputs were merged with the genomic coordinates of each canonical transcript and formatted for DagChainer. DagChainer parameters were perl DAGCHAINER/ -i ${sample} -D 1,000,000 -g 40,000 -A 5. MCL parameters were mcl -I 1.2 -te 20 --abc -o.

Tandem duplicate relationships: Self-self blastn alignments from the above were filtered so that non-self gene models falling within a 300 kb window were selected. These were then run through MCL using the command mcl I 2.0 -te 20 --abc -o.

Availability of data and materials

All data described in this work can be found at Software described can be found in and



Maize Database


Maize Genetics and Genomics Database


Nested Associated Mapping


Markov Cluster Algorithm


Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing


Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin


Structural variant


Chromosome Visualization Tool-javascript


  1. 1.

    Romero Navarro JA, Willcox M, Burgueño J, Romay C, Swarts K, Trachsel S, et al. A study of allelic diversity underlying flowering-time adaptation in maize landraces. Nat Genet. 2017;49:476–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aguirre-Liguori JA, Gaut BS, Jaramillo-Correa JP, Tenaillon MI, Montes-Hernández S, García-Oliva F, et al. Divergence with gene flow is driven by local adaptation to temperature and soil phosphorus concentration in teosinte subspecies (Zea mays parviglumis and Zea mays mexicana). Mol Ecol. 2019;28:2814–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gonzalez-Segovia E, Pérez-Limon S, Cíntora-Martínez GC, Guerrero-Zavala A, Janzen GM, Hufford MB, et al. Characterization of introgression from the teosinte ssp. to Mexican highland maize. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prasanna BM. Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. J Biosci. 2012;37:843–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Andorf C, Beavis WD, Hufford M, Smith S, Suza WP, Wang K, et al. Technological advances in maize breeding: past, present and future. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:817–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Strable J, Scanlon MJ. Maize (Zea mays): a model organism for basic and applied research in plant biology. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009;2009:db.emo132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Beadle GW. The Relation of Crossing over to Chromosome Association in Zea-Euchlaena Hybrids. Genetics. 1932;17:481–501.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stadler LJ. Genetic Effects of X-Rays in Maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1928;14:69–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rhoades MM. The early years of maize genetics. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:1–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bosch M, Mayer CD, Cookson A, Donnison IS. Identification of genes involved in cell wall biogenesis in grasses by differential gene expression profiling of elongating and non-elongating maize internodes. J Exp Bot. J Exp Bot; 2011;62. Available from: [cited 26 Mar 2021]

  11. 11.

    Carpita NC, McCann MC. Maize and sorghum: genetic resources for bioenergy grasses. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:415–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Coe EH Jr. The origins of maize genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:898–905.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Polacco M, Coe E, Fang Z, Hancock D, Sanchez-Villeda H, Schroeder S. MaizeDB - a functional genomics perspective. Comp Funct Genomics. 2002;3:128–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lawrence CJ, Dong Q, Polacco ML, Seigfried TE, Brendel V. MaizeGDB, the community database for maize genetics and genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D393–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Harper L, Gardiner J, Andorf C, Lawrence CJ. MaizeGDB: The Maize Genetics and Genomics Database. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1374:187–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Portwood JL, Woodhouse MR, Cannon EK, Gardiner JM, Harper LC, Schaeffer ML, et al. MaizeGDB 2018: the maize multi-genome genetics and genomics database. Nucleic Acids Res Oxford Academic. 2018;47:D1146–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hirsch CN, Hirsch CD, Brohammer AB, Bowman MJ, Soifer I, Barad O, et al. Draft Assembly of Elite Inbred Line PH207 Provides Insights into Genomic and Transcriptome Diversity in Maize. Plant Cell. 2016;28:2700–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yang N, Xu X-W, Wang R-R, Peng W-L, Cai L, Song J-M, et al. Contributions of Zea mays subspecies mexicana haplotypes to modern maize. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sun S, Zhou Y, Chen J, Shi J, Zhao H, Zhao H, et al. Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations between Mo17 and other maize genomes. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1289–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Springer NM, Anderson SN, Andorf CM, Ahern KR, Bai F, Barad O, et al. The maize W22 genome provides a foundation for functional genomics and transposon biology. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1282–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Haberer G, Kamal N, Bauer E, Gundlach H, Fischer I, Seidel MA, et al. European maize genomes highlight intraspecies variation in repeat and gene content. Nat Genet. 2020;52:950–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hu Y, Colantonio V, Müller BSF, Leach KA, Nanni A, Finegan C, et al. Genome assembly and population genomic analysis provide insights into the evolution of modern sweet corn. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1227.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hufford MB, Seetharam AS, Woodhouse MR, Chougule KM, Ou S, Liu J, et al. De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. bioRxiv. 2021. Available from:

  24. 24.

    Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics. 2008;178:539–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C, et al. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science. 2009;325:714–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tian F, Bradbury PJ, Brown PJ, Hung H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, et al. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet. 2011;43:159–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Poland JA, Bradbury PJ, Buckler ES, Nelson RJ. Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6893–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wallace JG, Bradbury PJ, Zhang N, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Buckler ES. Association mapping across numerous traits reveals patterns of functional variation in maize. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bayer PE, Golicz AA, Scheben A, Batley J, Edwards D. Plant pan-genomes are the new reference. Nat Plants. 2020;6:914–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sherman RM, Salzberg SL. Pan-genomics in the human genome era. Nat Rev Genet Nature Publishing Group. 2020;21:243–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhao Q, Feng Q, Lu H, Li Y, Wang A, Tian Q, et al. Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic variation in cultivated and wild rice. Nat Genet Nature Publishing Group. 2018;50:278–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhou Y, Chebotarov D, Kudrna D, Llaca V, Lee S, Rajasekar S, et al. A platinum standard pan-genome resource that represents the population structure of Asian rice. Sci Data. 2020;7:113.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gao L, Gonda I, Sun H, Ma Q, Bao K, Tieman DM, et al. The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes and a rare allele regulating fruit flavor. Nat Genet Nature Publishing Group. 2019;51:1044–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mikheenko A, Kolmogorov M. Assembly Graph Browser: interactive visualization of assembly graphs. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:3476–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stein LD, Mungall C, Shu S, Caudy M, Mangone M, Day A, et al. The generic genome browser: a building block for a model organism system database. Genome Res. 2002;12:1599–610.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Buels R, Yao E, Diesh CM, Hayes RD, Munoz-Torres M, Helt G, et al. JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis. Genome Biol. 2016;17:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shumate A, Salzberg SL. Liftoff: an accurate gene annotation mapping tool [Internet]. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 2020. p. 2020.06.24.169680. Available from: [cited 26 Mar 2021]

  38. 38.

    Ricci WA, Lu Z, Ji L, Marand AP, Ethridge CL, Murphy NG, et al. Widespread long-range cis -regulatory elements in the maize genome. Nature Plants Nature Publishing Group. 2019;5:1237–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Wortman JR, Salzberg SL. DAGchainer: a tool for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3643–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1575–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Brown AV, Conners SI, Huang W, Wilkey AP, Grant D, Weeks NT, et al. A new decade and new data at SoyBase, the USDA-ARS soybean genetics and genomics database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1496–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dash S, Campbell JD, Cannon EKS, Cleary AM, Huang W, Kalberer SR, et al. Legume information system ( a key component of a set of federated data resources for the legume family. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1181–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references




This research was supported by the US. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Project Number [5030-21000-068-00-D] through the Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit in Ames, Iowa. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and Employer. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information




MRW wrote the manuscript, designed the framework of the JBrowse cross-genome schema, ran Liftoff for the lifted annotations, mapped the trait data, generated the pan-genome for the pan-gene tab, updated the qTeller tool, and was instrumental in the database reorganization planning. EKC reorganized and reformatted the database, especially the NAM Genomes Page and the pan-gene pages, installed and implemented the CViTjs tool, wrote the CViTjs section, contributed to the nomenclature section, edited the manuscript, and was instrumental in the database reorganization planning. JLP installed the JBrowse instances and uploaded, organized and formatted all the data and metadata. LCH edited the JBrowse metadata, corrected and provided feedback on the JBrowse and database schema, contributed to the Background section, contributed to the nomenclature section, and edited the manuscript. JMG edited the JBrowse metadata, corrected and provided feedback on the JBrowse and database schema, edited the manuscript, and contributed to the nomenclature section. MLS read and edited the manuscript and provided feedback on the JBrowse and database schema. CMA is the Principal Investigator and oversaw the project and its planning, helped direct its design, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret R. Woodhouse.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Figure 1.

SNP data for the NAM founders mapped onto the reference B73 genome. Represented on the browser are a subset of SNPs from non-stiff-stalk NAM lines (blue), the popcorn line HP301 (pink), the sweet corn lines (orange), and the tropical lines. SNPs are color-coded based on trait. 1) SNPs missing from the sweet corn lines IL14h and P39. 2) By clicking on an adjacent SNP in Il14h, a pop-up box opens, where a link 3) will take the user to the SNP on the IL14h browser. This experiment can be replicated at the following link

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodhouse, M.R., Cannon, E.K., Portwood, J.L. et al. A pan-genomic approach to genome databases using maize as a model system. BMC Plant Biol 21, 385 (2021).

Download citation


  • Databases
  • Genomes
  • Maize
  • Pan-genome
  • Nomenclature
  • Browsers
  • NAM founders