Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptome analysis of Pará rubber tree (H. brasiliensis) seedlings under ethylene stimulation

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 420 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Natural rubber (cis-1,4-polyioprene, NR) is an indispensable industrial raw material obtained from the Pará rubber tree (H. brasiliensis). Natural rubber cannot be replaced by synthetic rubber compounds because of the superior resilience, elasticity, abrasion resistance, efficient heat dispersion, and impact resistance of NR. In NR production, latex is harvested by periodical tapping of the trunk bark. Ethylene enhances and prolongs latex flow and latex regeneration. Ethephon, which is an ethylene-releasing compound, applied to the trunk before tapping usually results in a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in latex yield. However, intense mechanical damage to bark tissues by excessive tapping and/or over-stimulation with ethephon induces severe oxidative stress in laticifer cells, which often causes tapping panel dryness (TPD) syndrome. To enhance NR production without causing TPD, an improved understanding of the molecular mechanism of the ethylene response in the Pará rubber tree is required. Therefore, we investigated gene expression in response to ethephon treatment using Pará rubber tree seedlings as a model system.

Results

After ethephon treatment, 3270 genes showed significant differences in expression compared with the mock treatment. Genes associated with carotenoids, flavonoids, and abscisic acid biosynthesis were significantly upregulated by ethephon treatment, which might contribute to an increase in latex flow. Genes associated with secondary cell wall formation were downregulated, which might be because of the reduced sugar supply. Given that sucrose is an important molecule for NR production, a trade-off may arise between NR production and cell wall formation for plant growth and for wound healing at the tapping panel.

Conclusions

Dynamic changes in gene expression occur specifically in response to ethephon treatment. Certain genes identified may potentially contribute to latex production or TPD suppression. These data provide valuable information to understand the mechanism of ethylene stimulation, and will contribute to improved management practices and/or molecular breeding to attain higher yields of latex from Pará rubber trees.

Peer Review reports

Background

Natural rubber (cis-1,4-polyioprene; NR) is a vitally important industrial raw material because it cannot be replaced by synthetic rubbers on account of the superior resilience, elasticity, abrasion resistance, efficient heat dispersion, and impact resistance of NR [1]. NR accounted for 47.2% of the world rubber production in 2019 (more than 13.6 million tonnes, from Statista web site [2]). Virtually all commercial NR is derived from the Pará rubber tree (H. brasiliensis), which is cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide but predominantly in Southeast Asia. Increased production of NR has been prompted by the increasing global demand for rubber. Given that it is difficult to expand the cultivation area because of competition with production of other important crops and conservation of natural rainforests, further improvement in NR yield per area is desired.

Latex, a rubber-containing cytoplasmic component, is produced in laticifers, which are highly differentiated cells that synthesize and store latex in the inner bark of Pará rubber trees. In NR production, latex is harvested by periodical tapping of the trunk bark. Wounding of the bark caused by tapping induces endogenous ethylene production. Ethylene is a gaseous plant hormone involved in the regulation of diverse biochemical, physiological, and developmental processes in plants. The role of ethylene in defense responses to wounding, herbivory, and pathogen infection has been widely studied in plants [3, 4]. Ethephon, an ethylene releaser, effectively increases the latex yield in Pará rubber trees and ethylene stimulation is commonly practiced in rubber tree plantations worldwide [5]. Ethephon application to the bark enhances and prolongs latex flow and latex regeneration, usually resulting in a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in latex yield [5]. However, intense mechanical damage to bark tissues by excessive tapping and/or over-stimulation with ethephon induces severe oxidative stress in laticifer cells, which often causes the tapping panel dryness (TPD) syndrome in Pará rubber tree. Under TPD, latex flow ceases and in situ coagulation of rubber particles or deep degeneration of tissues are observed [6,7,8,9]. The TPD syndrome is characterized by two types of physiological symptoms: a temporary halt in latex flow and histological deformation of the bark. The halt in latex flow is induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in laticifer cells and is mitigated during a resting period [10]. Deformation of the bark severely impairs latex flow [11]. Ethylene stimulation is certainly effective to enhance latex production, whereas TPD is undesirable because it leads to severe reduction in latex yield. Susceptibility to TPD is variable and clone dependent; clones that show low latex production may be effectively stimulated by ethylene application and are TPD tolerant, whereas clones that show high latex metabolism are more susceptible to TPD [11]. Therefore, a means of tapping and ethylene stimulation for maximal induction of latex yield without causing TPD is desired. To this end, further studies are required to improve knowledge of the molecular mechanism of the ethylene response in Pará rubber tree.

Several types of approaches, including transcriptome analyses, have been conducted previously to explore the molecular mechanisms involved in responses to ethylene of the Pará rubber tree [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Transcriptome analysis is a powerful approach to understand gene regulatory mechanisms. However, previous studies have provided only limited information on ethylene-specific events in Pará rubber trees because ethephon was applied to tapping panels of mature trees in a plantation before or after tapping and, therefore, the effects of wounding were not excluded [15, 19]. Thus, an experimental system suitable for analysis of the ethylene-specific response must be established. In the present study, we used young seedlings of Pará rubber tree for ethephon and mock treatments to obtain a time-dependent gene expression profile as a model system. A large number of seedlings of Pará rubber tree can be readily cultivated in a greenhouse and an experimental garden, and can be uniformly treated, in contrast to mature trees in plantations. Dynamic and specific changes in gene expression profiles were revealed in response to ethephon treatment. The study provides valuable information on the biochemical and metabolic responses to ethylene in Pará rubber trees, in addition to the establishment of a model experimental system useful for studying latex biology and rubber biosynthesis.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Pará rubber tree (H. brasiliensis clone PB260) seeds were collected in the field of PT. Bridgestone Sumatra Rubber Estate, Serbalawan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. These seeds were germinated and the seedlings cultivated in the experimental greenhouse of the Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT), Serpong, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia. Approximately 6-week-old seedlings, which were about 50 cm in height, were used for experiments. The stem region 2–5 cm below the shoot apex was swabbed with either 2.5% Ethrel® (containing 24% ethephon; Bayer CropScience, Inc.) or distilled water (mock control) using small brushes at around 09:00 in the greenhouse. At three time points (6, 24, and 48 h) after treatment, the treated stem region (3 cm long) was collected and placed in small plastic bags, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80 °C until used for RNA extraction.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription (RT), and quantitative RT-PCR

For RNA extraction, the stem segment was ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. The ground sample was homogenized in cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) reagent containing 2% (w/v) CTAB, 2.5% (w/v) PVP-40, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 25 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 2 M NaCl, and 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, then treated with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v). The aqueous phase was incubated with 3 M LiCl at 4 °C overnight, then RNA was precipitated and the solution was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The pellet was purified with the Plant RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. To degrade genomic DNA, the RNA was treated with recombinant DNase I (TAKARA Bio). The quality of the RNA was analyzed with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using the RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent). One microgram of RNA and 2.5 μM oligo(dT) primer were used for reverse transcription with the PrimeScript® RT Reagent Kit (TAKARA Bio). The cDNA was appropriately diluted and used for quantitative RT-PCR analysis with the Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix and Applied Biosystems 7300 Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Primer sets used for each gene are listed in Table S1.

Microarray and data analysis

Two hundred nanograms of RNA was used for microarray analysis using the custom microarray for H. brasiliensis clone PB260 (8 × 60 K) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent). Three biological replicates of each sample were analyzed using the one-color method. The total signal value was divided by the median value of all probes for global normalization of the microarray data. The statistical significance of the difference between the ethephon and mock treatments was examined using Welch’s t-test. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected as the genes induced more than 10-fold in the ethephon-treated sample with P < 0.01 at either time point. The corresponding Q value [20] for each time point was 0.0279, 0.0155, and 0.0506; therefore, we consider the false discovery rate to have been adequately controlled. The collected 3270 genes were classified into 6 groups by k-means clustering of Cluster3 software with default setting [21]. For the enrichment analysis, the collected 3270 genes were mapped to non-redundant 1775 Arabidopsis loci by BLASTX search against Arabidopsis TAIR10 coding sequence dataset with the cut-off E-value = 0.00001 (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) because gene annotation information in rubber tree is not sufficient. Then, enrichment of particular Arabidopsis gene ontology term was assessed one by one with a self-made program installed within an in-house database system, which uses the binomial test function of R software (https://www.r-project.org/). The P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All custom microarray data including platform data has been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus of NCBI under the accession number GSE174832.

Results and discussion

Sample preparation

Gene expression in response to ethylene or ethephon, an ethylene-releasing compound, has been analyzed previously in latex or bark of mature Pará rubber trees subject to tapping [11, 13, 14]. However, ethylene- or ethephon-specific gene expression in virginal mature trees has not been reported. By contrast, Duan et al. (2010) treated 3-month-old young trees with ethylene gas without wounding to analyze the expression of a set of 25 selected genes [12]. In the present study, we used approximately 6-week-old seedlings to examine changes in gene expression profiles in response to ethylene treatment by means of microarray analysis. Rubber tree stems were swabbed with ethephon or water (mock control). At 6 and 24 h after treatment, no visible change was observed between the treatments, whereas some leaves had become yellow and abscised at 48 h after ethephon treatment. This response was interpreted as ethephon-induced senescence and is a typical ethylene response in plants [22]. At 6, 24, and 48 h after treatment, the treated stem segments were harvested for microarray analysis. The amount of latex exudate from the ethephon-treated stems was much higher than that of the mock control (data not shown). Taken together, these results suggested that the experimental system successfully mimicked, at least in part, the physiological and biochemical responses to ethylene stimulation.

Differentially expressed gene set

In this study, we used a custom microarray that contained 61,657 probes corresponding to each transcript, of which 41,656 showed sequence homology to Arabidopsis genes. We compared the expression level between the ethephon and mock treatments at each sampling time point to assess changes in the gene expression profile in response to ethephon treatment. As a result, 3270 genes showed a significant difference in expression between the ethephon and mock treatments (|fold change| ≥ 10 at any time point; p < 0.01). To characterize the DEGs, we categorized the genes into six groups (groups G0 to G5) using K-means clustering and performed enrichment analysis using gene ontology terms (Fig. 1, Table S2). Approximately one-third of the DEGs were upregulated after ethephon treatment and were categorized as groups G0 or G1. Genes in G0 showed continuous upregulation from 6 or 24 h to 48 h after ethephon treatment, whereas genes in G1 showed upregulation from 6 h but expression subsequently declined almost to the control level at 48 h. Genes for protein kinases, stress responses, and transcription factors were enriched in these groups. Genes that showed continuous downregulation until the end of the experimental period were categorized as G2 or G3. These groups contained many genes associated with chloroplasts and involved in cell growth. Genes that showed striking downregulation at 48 h after treatment were categorized as G4. Genes involved in secondary cell wall biosynthesis or cuticle development were enriched in this group. The smallest group was G5. Genes in this group showed downregulation immediately after ethephon treatment, and thereafter expression declined almost to the control level at 24 or 48 h after treatment. Genes involved in amino acid transport and metabolic processes were enriched in G5. We examined the expression of the DEGs more extensively in the following analyses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Heat map for K-means-clustered differentially expressed genes (DEG). Genes that showed a significant difference in expression after ethephon treatment (6, 24, and 48 h), compared with that of the mock control, were selected and classified into six groups (G0 to G5) by K-means classification. Each gene set was characterized by enrichment analysis using gene ontology terms and representative over-represented terms are listed in the right side of each heat map. Fold change in gene expression induced by ethephon treatment compared with that of the mock control is indicated as natural logarithm (ln)

Full size image

Rubber biosynthesis genes

Natural rubber is predominantly composed of cis-1,4-polyisoprene, which is a polymer of an isoprenyl unit derived from isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP). IPP is synthesized by the cytosolic mevalonate (MVA) pathway and the plastidic 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway in plants [23]. The former pathway is considered to mainly supply IPP for rubber biosynthesis in Pará rubber tree [18, 24, 25]. Ethephon treatment is reported not to stimulate the MVA pathway and therefore the contribution of this pathway to the increase in yield in response to ethephon treatment would be minimal [5, 26]. As expected, no gene encoding an enzyme involved in the MVA pathway was included among the DEGs. Certain genes, including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase reductase, were slightly decreased by ethephon treatment, which is consistent with a previous report [16]. In the MEP pathway, however, genes encoding 1-deoxy-D-xylolose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS) and 4-(cytidine 5′-diphospho)-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase (CMEK) were significantly upregulated by ethephon treatment (Fig. 2). The MEP pathway is considered to contribute to the supply of IPP for carotenoids biosynthesis [24, 27] and DXS plays an important role in this process [28]. Upregulation of DXS and CMEK was observed in rubber trees suffering from TPD, under which ROS are accumulated [17]. Carotenoids are believed to act as antioxidants and have been proposed to be sensors or signals of oxidative stress induced by ROS [27]. The upregulation of genes in the MEP pathway in response to ethephon treatment may be for production of carotenoids to scavenge ROS. In addition, plants produce other antioxidants and control the ROS-scavenging system to maintain redox homeostasis [29]. The present microarray data revealed the downregulation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), and the phi and theta families of glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes (Table 1). To overcome oxidative stress, GSTs are important and should be abundant. Thus, genes that encode members of the plant-specific tau family of GSTs were highly induced in response to ethephon treatment (Table 1). The tau family of GSTs is considered to be involved in abiotic stress responses and overexpression of these genes confers salt and osmotic tolerance [30, 31]. These results suggest that specific pathways for oxidative stress tolerance were induced in response to ethephon treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in the MEP pathway and ABA biosynthesis. Fold change in gene expression for DEGs involved in the MEP pathway and ABA biosynthesis is displayed as color bars (from left to right; 6, 24, and 48 h after ethephon treatment). Graphs show actual gene expression for these genes, which was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Gray and black bars represent the expression level in mock and ethephon samples, respectively

Full size image
Table 1 DEGs of SOD and GST family
Full size table

Polymerization of IPP derived from MVA into cis-1,4-polyisoprene is catalyzed by cis-prenyltransferases (CPTs). It has been demonstrated that CPTs are localized on the surface of rubber particles [32]. In addition, two important protein groups for rubber biosynthesis are localized on the surface of rubber particles: small rubber particle proteins (SRPPs) and rubber elongation factors (REFs) [33]. Two rubber tree genomes have been sequenced to date (Reyan7–33-97 in Tang et al. 2016; RRIM 600 in Lau et al. 2016) [18, 25], and all members of each protein group have been revealed [18, 25]. We first confirmed that the probe sets corresponding to these genes were included in the present microarray because we designed the probe sets based on the comprehensive cDNA sequencing data derived from rubber tree clone PB260, which differs from the clones used for genome-sequencing projects. In our probe set, probes corresponding to CPT1, CPT2, CPT9, CPT11, REF2, REF4, REF6, and SRPP10 were not included because the expression levels of these genes were relatively low [25]. We observed that only one gene for SRPP4 [25] was induced by ethephon treatment, whereas no other genes that encode CPT, SRPP, or REF proteins were detected among the DEGs (Table S3). The basal expression level of SRPP4 was low and laticifer-specific genes (REF1, REF3, REF7, and SRPP1), for which transcripts were abundant in latex and accounted for 96.8% of the expression of REF/SRPP genes in latex [25], were not induced by ethephon treatment. Taken together, the results suggested that ethephon treatment might have little direct effect on rubber biosynthesis, which is consistent with previous reports [5, 19, 25].

Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling

In plants, ethylene induces expression of genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis. For instance, expression of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase gene is reported to be regulated by a positive feedback mechanism [34]. The present microarray data revealed the upregulation of genes for S-adenosyl-methionine synthetase and ACC synthase after ethephon treatment, and that expression of these genes returned to the control level at 48 h after treatment. The present data supported the claim for positive feedback regulation in ethylene biosynthesis after ethephon treatment (Table 2).

Table 2 DEGs of ERF family and ethylene biosynthesis
Full size table

ABA biosynthesis

The present results indicated that the MEP pathway is activated and supplied IPP for carotenoids biosynthesis in response to ethephon treatment, and that these carotenoids may contribute to protection from ROS. Abscisic acid (ABA) is derived from carotenoids [27]. We observed that ethephon treatment induced the expression of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and repressed expression of genes that participate in ABA catabolism (Fig. 2), which suggests de novo ABA biosynthesis and accumulation. Previous studies have demonstrated the induction of ABA biosynthesis by ethylene [35, 36]. Thus, carotenoids production induced by ethephon treatment would supply not only antioxidants but also precursors of ABA. It is well known that ABA induces leaf abscission and ethylene accelerates this process in the presence of ABA [37, 38]. We observed that some leaves abscised at 48 h after ethephon treatment (data not shown), which might be initiated by the induced ABA.

Transporters

Abscisic acid is synthesized in response to drought stress and can induce stomatal closure to prevent water loss by transpiration. Previous experiments have shown that ABA signaling induces certain aquaporins, which results in increased hydraulic conductivity and water potential [39,40,41,42]. A remarkable response to ethephon treatment is the prolonged flow of latex. The prolonged latex flow may be because water influx into laticifer cells mediated by aquaporins is increased [14, 43,44,45]. In the present study, expression of genes that encode plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) 1;2 and 1;5 is induced, whereas the expression of PIP2;7 and tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP) 1;1 is decreased by ethephon treatment (Table 3). PIPs import water into laticifer cells, thus the turgor pressure is increased in laticifer cells [44], whereas TIPs maintain the stability of lutoid membranes and/or cell osmotic balance [46]. The present findings suggested that water status may be dramatically changed in the cells in response to ethephon treatment.

Table 3 DEGs of transporters
Full size table

Sucrose is an important molecule for rubber production because it is the unique precursor of IPP and is expected to be imported into laticifer cells from surrounding cells. Previous studies indicate that expression of sugar transporters is induced by ethylene, which contributes to high latex production [47,48,49]. Six genes encoding sucrose transporters (SUTs) have been cloned from Pará rubber tree [47,48,49]. We observed that the probe sets shared high nucleotide sequence identities (~ 99%) with these genes. Although previous studies have reported upregulation of certain SUT genes by ethylene [47,48,49], the present microarray analysis detected downregulation of two such genes (Table 3). Moreover, several genes encoding glucose and/or sucrose efflux transporter family proteins (SWEET) were downregulated (Table 3). In addition to these transporters, genes encoding a sugar transport protein (STP) and one polyol transporter (PLT) were upregulated by ethephon treatment. The STPs are monosaccharide/H+ symporters and uptake hexoses from the apoplastic space into cells through the plasma membrane [50]. Sucrose is the predominant molecule utilized for carbon partitioning between sources and sinks in higher plants, and is transported directly into the sink cells. Sucrose is otherwise cleaved into glucose and fructose by cell wall-type invertases (INVs), and these monosaccharides are transported into the cell by the STPs [51, 52]. The present microarray data revealed the upregulation of a gene that encodes a cell wall-type INV (Table 3), which suggests possible co-upregulation of STPs and INVs for monosaccharide uptake. Substantially higher and continuous induction of a gene encoding a PLT, which is a polyol/H+ symporter localized to the plasma membrane or tonoplast, was observed in response to ethephon treatment (Table 3). Two HbPLT genes (HbPLT1 and HbPLT2) have been identified and their expression pattern in response to ethephon has been demonstrated [53], but the present microarray data detected no significant changes in the expression of these genes. These data suggested the possibility of a tissue- and/or age-dependent mechanism for expression of PLT genes in response to ethylene in Pará rubber tree.

The ABC transporters are among the largest protein families in plants and 130 genes have been predicted in the Arabidopsis genome [54]. Given that ABC transporters translocate diverse types of substances, including inorganic compounds, phytohormones, primary products, and lipids, plant ABC transporters are considered to play an important role in plant growth and development, detoxification, response to abiotic stress, and pathogen resistance [54, 55]. Expression of many members of the ABC transporter family is induced in a rubber tree suffering TPD [17]. We detected 46 genes for ABC transporters in the Pará rubber tree transcriptome, of which four are known to be upregulated by ethephon treatment [56]. Although no significant changes in expression of these genes was observed, the present results revealed that expression of other ABC transporters was highly responsive to ethephon treatment of seedlings (Table 3). Several genes encoding ABCB proteins putatively localized in the plasma membrane were downregulated, whereas genes encoding ABCC proteins putatively localized in the vacuolar membrane were upregulated (Table 3). Transporters belonging to the ABCC group transport chlorophyll catabolites into the tonoplast [57, 58]. The present microarray data revealed strong upregulation of a gene encoding chlorophyllase, which catalyzes the first step of chlorophyll degradation, and downregulation (or no induction) of genes involved in photosystem and chlorophyll biosynthesis (Fig. 3, Table 4). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that transcripts corresponding to those of chlorophyllase in all mock samples were below the limit of detection. These data indicated that chlorophyll degradation and suppression of photosynthesis occurred in response to ethephon treatment (Fig. 3). Increased quantities of these chlorophyll catabolites would be transported into the tonoplast by ABCC proteins. The co-regulation of genes encoding ABCC proteins and chlorophyllase may contribute to efficient degradation of chlorophylls during ethylene-induced senescence.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and encoding members of the ABCC transporter family. Fold change in gene expression for DEGs involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and encoding ABCC transporters is displayed as color bars (from left to right; 6, 24, and 48 h after ethephon treatment). Graphs show actual expression, which was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Gray and black bars represent the expression level in mock and ethephon samples, respectively

Full size image
Table 4 DEGs of photosystem and chlorophyll biosynthesis
Full size table

Several genes encoding ABCG proteins were upregulated or downregulated (Table 3). Arabidopsis ABCG40 (At1g15520), which is involved in ABA uptake [59], is induced by ethylene [60]. Certain rubber genes corresponding to ABCG40 genes were upregulated by ethephon treatment; this response may be correlated with the upregulation of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and accumulation (Fig. 2).

Flavonoid biosynthesis

In the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway, genes for flavonol synthase and dihydroflavonol 4-reductase were downregulated (Fig. 4). To confirm the microarray data, expression of these genes was examined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Expression of flavonol synthase in the mock samples increased with time after the mock treatment, whereas expression was maintained at a low level and showed little increase at 48 h after ethephon treatment. These results suggested that ethephon application may increase dihydroquercetin (DHQ) production. DHQ is a strong antioxidant and increases the stability of the tonoplast membrane, on account of its antioxidant properties, and decreases membrane permeability by suppressing ion channels [61]. Therefore, DHQ may play a role in stabilization of lutoid membranes, which are particularly sensitive to osmotic stress. Water influx into the laticifer cells caused by tapping leads to rupture of lutoids and the release of their contents; subsequently, coagulation of rubber particles and damaged lutoids occurs, which would cause the arrest of latex flow for wound healing and recovery in Pará rubber trees. Thus, lutoid stability influences latex flow [62]. However, inhibition of membrane oxidation by DHQ leads to activation of H+-ATPase [61]. In the present microarray analysis, upregulation of several genes encoding H+-ATPases was observed (Table 5). Given that tonoplast H+-ATPase is activated by ethephon treatment [63], the current results are reasonable. H+-ATPase in the lutoid membrane plays an important role by pumping protons from the cytosol into the lutoid during active carbohydrate metabolism to supply carbon sources for latex biosynthesis by maintaining a cell pH suitable for pH-dependent enzymes, such as INV [63, 64]. High-yielding rubber clones show high activity of H+-ATPase in lutoids [64]. These responses would be natural mechanisms for defense and recovery from wounding caused by tapping. Taken together, ethephon treatment-induced enhancement of DHQ biosynthesis might be involved in enhanced latex yield via activation of the substrate supply for rubber biosynthesis and the extension of latex exudation by stabilizing lutoid membranes and consequent restraint of coagulation. Based on this hypothesis, excess tapping and/or ethylene stimulation may cause catastrophic changes resulting in TPD.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in flavonoids biosynthesis. Fold change in gene expression for DEGs involved in flavonoids biosynthesis is displayed as color bars (from left to right; 6, 24, and 48 h after ethephon treatment). Graphs show actual expression, which was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Gray and black bars represent the expression level in mock and ethephon samples, respectively. Asterisks indicate the pathways catalyzed by flavonoid 3′-monooxygenases

Full size image
Table 5 DEGs of ATPase family
Full size table

Transcription factors

During the ethylene response, dynamic changes in the expression of a diverse array of genes occur in plants [65]. Transcription factors control gene transcription in response to various environmental cues and developmental factors. In the present microarray analysis, 2641 probes detected transcription factor genes, of which 236 were among the DEGs (Table S4). Certain transcription factor families, including the ERF, NAC, and WRKY families, are involved in stress responses and ethephon treatment affected expression of these genes.

The ERF family, which is a major constituent of the AP2/ERF superfamily, is a large and plant-specific transcription factor family and members are classified into 10 groups [66]. The microarray data revealed that genes belonging to group IX were highly upregulated by ethephon treatment (Table 2). In addition, genes classified in groups VI, VII, VIII, and X were upregulated, whereas genes of groups III and V were downregulated.

The WRKY transcription factor family is a plant-specific transcription factor family that participates in abiotic/biotic stresses responses, and diverse developmental and physiological processes [67, 68]. Two WRKY transcription factors (WRKY18 and 40) are induced by ABA, and physically and functionally interact under biotic and abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis [69, 70]. In the current study, expression of genes corresponding to WRKY18 and 40 was induced by ethephon treatment (Table 6). This finding is consistent with the gene expression changes suggesting that ABA content might be increased in Pará rubber trees in response to ethephon treatment (Fig. 2). Previous studies of Arabidopsis have shown that several WRKY transcription factors are involved in the promotion (WRKY6, 53, and 75) or delay (WRKY54 and 70) of leaf senescence. WRKY75 expression is induced in senescent leaves and knockout of WRKY75 results in a delayed-senescence phenotype in Arabidopsis, which indicates that WRKY75 is a positive regulator of leaf senescence [71]. The present microarray analysis detected upregulation of genes corresponding to WRKY53, 70, and 75. In particular, expression of the gene corresponding to WRKY75 was highly increased by ethephon treatment and the upregulation was sustained for 48 h (Table 6).

Table 6 DEGs of WRKY family
Full size table

The NAC transcription factor family is a plant-specific transcription factor family that comprises many members. The NAC transcription factors are involved in many developmental processes, including stress response and secondary cell wall formation [72]. Expression of ANAC029 is induced by leaf senescence and the gene directly regulates AAO3 expression in Arabidopsis [73, 74]. Enhanced expression of AAO3 increases ABA content, which may induce chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence [74]. We observed a similar expression profile in response to ethephon treatment (Figs. 2 and 3, Table 7). Genes encoding NST1 and SND2, which regulate secondary cell wall formation [75], were downregulated following ethephon treatment (Table 7). Their downstream genes, including Irregular Xylem (IRX), were also downregulated (Table 8). Thus, ethephon treatment may prevent stem growth, including development of xylem and/or fiber cells.

Table 7 DEGs of NAC family
Full size table
Table 8 DEGs of IRX genes
Full size table

Conclusion

The aim of this study was to assess the molecular mechanism of the response to ethylene stimulation in Pará rubber tree with the goal of improving latex production by inhibition of TPD. We established an experimental system using young seedlings and obtained comprehensive transcriptome data during the treatment response. Based on the present results, we propose a schematic model of the events in response to ethephon treatment (Fig. 5). The ethephon treatment induces changes in gene expression associated with carotenoids production. Carotenoids and a downstream product, ABA, may induce expression of PIP genes [27, 38,39,40], which serve to import water into laticifer cells, resulting in enhanced latex flow. In addition, changes in expression of genes that participate in flavonoids biosynthesis, especially genes associated with DHQ production, were observed. Given that DHQ is believed to contribute to stabilization of lutoid membranes [61], latex exudation would be prolonged, which may suppress coagulation of rubber particles. This series of molecular events may be involved in the increase in latex yield caused by ethylene stimulation. Given that carotenoids and DHQ are known ROS scavengers, ethephon-induced upregulation of genes involved in their biosynthesis may enhance defense responses and contribute to prevention of TPD. It should be noted that ethylene is produced in Pará rubber tree following wounding; therefore, these events may naturally occur during tapping as defense responses or for wound healing.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Schematic representation of the Pará rubber tree response to ethephon treatment. The mechanisms deduced from the present results in response to ethephon treatment are summarized. Responses that are directly deduced from microarray data are enclosed in a red box (upregulated) or blue box (downregulated)

Full size image

Ethephon treatment induced chlorophyll degradation, which is the most typical event of leaf senescence [76]. In the present study, some leaves became yellow and abscised at 48 h after ethylene stimulation; thus, ethephon treatment might induce leaf senescence. The induction of many senescence-associated genes is observed in TPD-affected trees subject to excessive tapping or overstimulation with ethylene [9, 77]. Therefore, upregulation of genes involved in chlorophyll degradation might be an indicator of the TPD syndrome derived from overstimulation with ethylene. To prevent chlorophyll degradation and maintain photosynthesis is important for sucrose production, which influences NR biosynthesis.

The present results indicate that ethephon treatment may affect the growth and/or differentiation of cambium and/or laticifer cells. In this study, we observed that genes associated with secondary cell wall formation were highly downregulated at 48 h after ethephon treatment. In woody plants, secondary cell walls are an important carbon sink [78]. Thus, these results suggest that there is a trade-off in carbon supply between rubber biosynthesis and secondary cell wall synthesis after tapping and ethylene stimulation. Otherwise, secondary cell wall formation or biosynthesis might be aberrantly regulated in the secondary phloem because phloem necrosis and abnormal cell layers in the secondary phloem and parenchyma tissues are also observed as symptoms of irreversible TPD [79, 80].

In this study, we have demonstrated that ethephon treatment caused dramatic positive and negative changes in expression of a diverse array of genes involved in metabolism, defense responses, growth, and development. It is suggested that ethephon treatment induced the changes negatively associated with rubber production and regulation of the trade-off between rubber production and other events, in addition to the changes positively associated with rubber production. These changes may cause induction of TPD, which can be triggered by excess tapping and/or ethylene stimulation. The results provide valuable information to understand the mechanism of ethylene stimulation, and will contribute to improved management practices and/or molecular breeding to attain higher yields of latex from Pará rubber trees.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed in this study is available upon request. All custom microarray data including platform data has been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus of NCBI under the accession number GSE174832.

Abbreviations

ABA:

Abscisic acid

ACC:

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid

CMEK:

4-(cytidine 5′-diphospho)-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase

CPT:

cis-prenyltransferase

DEG:

Differentially expressed gene

DHQ:

Dihydroquercetin

DSX:

1-deoxy-D-xylolose 5-phosphate synthase

GGPPS:

Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase

GST:

Glutathione S-transferase

INV:

Invertase

IPP:

Isopentenyl diphosphate

MEP:

2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate

MVA:

Mevalonate

NR:

Natural rubber

PIP:

Plasma membrane intrinsic protein

PLT:

Polyol transporter

REF:

Rubber elongation factor

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

SRPP:

Small rubber particle protein

STP:

Sugar transport protein

SUT:

Sucrose transporter

TIP:

Tonoplast intrinsic protein

TPD:

Tapping panel dryness

References

  1. Hayashi Y. Production of natural rubber from Para rubber tree. Plant Biotechnol. 2009;26:67–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Statista. https://0-www-statista-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/statistics/275387/global-natural-rubber-production/. Published jan 27, 2020. Accessed 20 Jan, 2021.

  3. Wang KLC, Li H, Ecker JR. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell. 2004;14:S131–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois M, Van den Broeck L, Inzé D. The pivotal role of ethylene in plant growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23(4):311–23. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu J, Zhang Z. Ethylene stimulation of latex production in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(11):1072–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4161/psb.4.11.9738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrestin H. Biochemical aspects of bark dryness induced by overstimulation of rubber tree with Ethrel. In: d’Auzac J, Jacob JL, Chrestin H, editors. Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex, CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton; 1989. p. 431–440.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krishnakumar R, Sasidhar VR, Sethuraj MR. In fluence of TPD on cytokinin level in Hevea bark. Indian J Nat Rubber Res. 1997;10:107–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sookmark U, Kongsawadworakul P, Narangajavana J, Chrestin H. Studies on oxidative stress in rubber tree latex and its relation to panel dryness. In: Jacob J, Krishnakumar R, Mathew MM, editors. Tapping panel dryness of rubber trees. Kottayam: Rubber Research Institute of India; 2006. p. 106–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatachalam P, Thulaseedharan A, Raghothama K. Identifcation of expression profiles of tapping panel dryness (TPD) associated genes from the latex of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). Planta. 2007;226:499–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacob JL, Prvt JC, Lacrotte R. Tapping panel dryness in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Rech Dev. 1994;2:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Putranto RA, Herlinawati E, Rio M, Leclercq J, Piyatrakul P, Gohet E, et al. Involvement of ethylene in the latex metabolism and tapping panel dryness of Hevea brasiliensis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(8):17885–908. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms160817885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Duan C, Rio M, Leclercq J, Bonnot F, Oliver G, Montoro P. Gene expression pattern in response to wounding, methyl jasmonate and ethylene in the bark of Hevea brasiliensis. Tree Physiol. 2010;30(10):1349–59. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/treephys/tpq066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow KS, Mat-Isa MM, Bahari A, Ghazali AK, Alias H, Mohd-Zainuddin Z, et al. Metabolic routes affecting rubber biosynthesis in Hevea brasiliensis latex. J Exp Bot. 2011;63(5):1863–71. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jxb/err363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. An F, Zou Z, Cai X, Wang J, Rookes J, Lin W, et al. Regulation of HbPIP2;3, a latex-abundant water transporter, is associated with latex dilution and yield in the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). PLoS ONE. 2015. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0125595.

  15. Dai L, Kang G, Nie Z, Li Y, Zeng R. Comparative proteomic analysis of latex from Hevea brasiliensis treatedwith Ethrel and methyl jasmonate using iTRAQ-coupled two-dimensional LC–MS/MS. J Prot, 2016. 132:167–75.

  16. Wang X, Wang D, Sun Y, Yang Q, Chang L, Wang L, et al. Comprehensive proteomics analysis of laticifer latex reveals new insights into ethylene stimulation of natural rubber production. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep13778.

  17. Li D, Wang X, Deng Z, Liu H, Yang H, He G. Transcriptome analyses reveal molecular mechanism underlying tapping panel dryness of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):23540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep23540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lau NS, Makita Y, Kawashima M, Taylor TD, Kondo S, Othman AS, et al. The rubber tree genome shows expansion of gene family associated with rubber biosynthesis. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):28594. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep28594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nie Z, Kang G, Duan C, Li Y, Dai L, Zeng R. Profiling ethylene-responsive genes expressed in the latex of the mature virgin rubber trees using cDNA microarray. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152039. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0152039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(16):9440–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1073/pnas.1530509100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. De Hoon JL, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(9):1453–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lqbal N, Khan NA, Ferrante A, Trivellini A, Francini A, Khan MIR. Ethylene role in plant growth, development and senescence: interaction with other phytohormones. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:475.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Okada K. The biosynthesis of isoprenoids and the mechanisms regulating it in plants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2011;75(7):1219–25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1271/bbb.110228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sando T, Takeno S, Watanabe N, Okumoto H, Kuzuyama T, Yamashita A, et al. Cloning and characterization of the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway genes of a natural-rubber producing plant, Hevea brasiliensis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72(11):2903–17. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1271/bbb.80387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang C, Yang M, Fang Y, Luo Y, Gao S, Xiao X, et al. The rubber tree genome reveals new insights into rubber production and species adaptation. Nat Plants. 2016;2(6):16073. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu JP, Zhuang YF, Guo XL, Li YJ. Molecular mechanism of ethylene stimulation of latex yield in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) revealed by de novo sequencing and transcriptome analysis. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):257. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-016-2587-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nisar N, Li L, Lu S, Khin NC, Pogson BJ. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol Plant. 2015;8(1):68–82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lois LM, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Gallego F, Campos N, Boronat A. Carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit development: regulatory role of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase. Plant J. 2000;22(6):503–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00764.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Leclercq J, Montoro P. Reactive oxygen species in Hevea brasiliensis latex and relevance to tapping panel dryness. Tree Physiol. 2017;37(2):261–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/treephys/tpw106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roxas VP, Smith RK, Allen ER, Allen RD. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15(10):988–91. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/nbt1097-988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma R, Sahoo A, Devendran R, Jain M. Over-expression of a rice tau class glutathione S-transferase gene improves tolerance to salinity and oxidative stresses in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92900. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0092900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Archer BL, Audley BG, Cookbain EG, McSweeney GP. The biosynthesis of rubber: incorporation of mevalonate and isopentenyl pyrophosphate into rubber by Hevea brasiliensis-latex fractions. Biochem J. 1963;89(3):565–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1042/bj0890565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamashita S, Yamaguchi H, Waki T, Aoki Y, Mizuno M, Yanbe F, et al. Identification and reconstitution of the rubber biosynthetic machinery on rubber particles from Hevea brasiliensis. eLIFE. 2016;5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.7554/eLife.19022.

  34. Nakatsuka A, Shiomi S, Kubo Y, Inaba A. Expression and internal feedback regulation of ACC synthase and ACC oxidase genes in ripening tomato fruit. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997;38(10):1103–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grossmann K, Hansen H. Ethylene triggered abscisic acid: a principle in plant growth regulation? Physiol Plant. 2001;113(1):9–14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130102.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chiwocha SDS, Cutler AJ, Abrams SR, Ambrose SJ, Yang J, Ross ARS, et al. The etr1-2 mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana affects the abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin and gibberellin metabolic pathways during maintenance of seed dormancy, moist-chilling and germination. Plant J. 2005;42(1):35–48. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02359.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis LA, Addicott FT. Abscisic acid: correlations with abscission and with development in the cotton fruit. Plant Physiol. 1972;49(4):644–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1104/pp.49.4.644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Aneja M, Gianfagna T, Ng E. The roles of abscisic acid and ethylene in the abscission and senescence of cocoa flowers. Plant Growth Regul. 1999;27(3):149–55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1023/A:1006153502897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jang JY, Kim DG, Kim YO, Kim JS, Kang H. An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;54(5):713–25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040900.61345.a6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Parent B, Hachez C, Redondo E, Simonneau T, Chaumont F, Tardieu F. Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(4):2000–12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1104/pp.108.130682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilkinson S, Davies W. Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(4):510–25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02052.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Tran LSP. ABA control of plant macroelement membrane transport systems in response to water deficit and high salinity. New Phytol. 2014;202(1):35–49. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/nph.12613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tungngoen K, Kongsawadworakul P, Viboonjun U, Katsuhara M, Brunel N, Sakr S, et al. Involvement of HbPIP2;1 and HbTIP1;1 aquaporins in ethylene stimulation of latex yield through regulation of water exchanges between inner liber and latex cells in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol. 2009;2:843–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tungngoen K, Viboonjun U, Kongsawadworakul P, Katsuhara M, Juliene JL, Sakr S, et al. Hormonal treatment of the bark of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) increases latex yield through latex dilution in relation with the differential expression of two aquaporin genes. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168(3):253–62. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zou Z, Gong J, An F, Xie G, Wang J, Mo Y, et al. Genome-wide identification of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) aquaporin genes and their response to ethephon stimulation in the laticifer, a rubber producing tissue. BMC Genomics. 2015. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-015-2152-6.

  46. Wudick MM, Luu DT, Maurel C. A look inside: localization patterns and functions of intracellular plant aquaporins. New Phytol. 2009;184(2):289–302. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02985.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dusotoit-Coucaud A, Brunel N, Kongsawadworakul P, Viboonjun U, Lacointe A, Julien JL, et al. Sucrose importation into laticifers of Hevea brasiliensis, in relation to ethylene stimulation of latex production. Annal Bot. 2009;104(4):635–47. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/aob/mcp150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dusotoit-Coucaud A, Kongsawadworakul P, Maurousset L, Viboonjun U, Brunel N, Pujade-Renaud V, et al. Ethylene stimulation of latex yield depends on the expression of a sucrose transporter (HbSUT1B) in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Tree Physiol. 2010;30(12):1586–98. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/treephys/tpq088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tang C, Huang D, Yang J, Liu S, Sakr S, Li H, et al. The sucrose transporter HbSUT3 plays an active role in sucrose loading to laticifer and rubber productivity in exploited trees of Hevea brasiliensis (Para rubber tree). Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(10):1708–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02175.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Büttner M. The monosaccharide transporter(−like) gene family in Arabidopsis. FEBS Let. 2007;581(12):2318–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sherson SM, Alford HL, Forbes SM, Wallace G, Smith SM. Roles of cell-wall invertases and monosaccharide transporters in the growth and development of Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:523–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Slewinski T. Diverse functional roles of monosaccharide transporters and their homologs in vascular plants: a physiological perspective. Mol Plant. 2011;4(4):641–64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/mp/ssr051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dusotoit-Coucaud A, Porcheron B, Brunel N, Kongsawadworakul P, Franchel J, Viboonjun U, et al. Cloning and characterization of a new polyol transporter (HbPLT2) in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51(11):1878–88. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/pcp/pcq151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kang J, Park J, Choi H, Burla B, Kretzschmar T, Lee Y, Martinoia E. Plant ABC transporters. Arabidopsis Book 2011; e0153. doi: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1199/tab.0153.

  55. Lane TS, Rempe CS, Davitt J, Staton ME, Peng Y, Soltis DE, et al. Diversity of ABC transporter genes across the plant kingdom and their potential utility in biotechnology. BMC Biotechnol. 2016;16(1):47. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12896-016-0277-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhiyi N, Guijuan K, Yu L, Longjun D, Rizhong Z. Whole-transcriptome survey of the putative ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family genes in the latex-producing laticifers of Hevea brasiliensis. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116857. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0116857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Lu YP, Li ZS, Drozdowicz YM, Hortensteiner S, Martinoia E, Rea PA. AtMRP2, an Arabidopsis ATP binding cassette transporter able to transport glutathione S-conjugates and chlorophyll catabolites: functional comparisons with Atmrp1. Plant Cell. 1998;10(2):267–82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1105/tpc.10.2.267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Tommasini R, Vogt E, Fromenteau M, Hortensteiner S, Matile P, Amrhein N, et al. An ABC-transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana has both glutathione-conjugate and chlorophyll catabolite transport activity. Plant J. 1998;13(6):773–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00076.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kang J, Hwang JU, Lee M, Kim YY, Assmann SM, Martinoia E, et al. PDR-type ABC transporter mediates cellular uptake of the phytohormone abscisic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(5):2355–60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1073/pnas.0909222107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Campbell EJ, Schenk PM, Kazan K, Penninckx IAMA, Anderson JP, Maclean DJ, et al. Pathogen-responsive expression of a putative ATP-binding cassette transporter gene conferring resistance to the diterpenoid sclareol is regulated by multiple defense signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(3):1272–84. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1104/pp.103.024182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Nurminsky VN, Ozolina NV, Sapega JG, Zheleznykh AO, Pradedova EV, Korzun AM, et al. The effect of dihydroquercetin on active and passive ion transport systems in plant vacuolar membrane. Biol Bull. 2009;36(1):1–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1134/S1062359009010014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. D’Auzac J, Crétin H, Marin B, Lioret C. A plant vacuolar system: the lutoids from Hevea brasiliensis latex. Physiol Vég. 1982;20:311–31.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gidrol X, Chrestin H, Mounoury G, D'Auzac J. Early activation by ethylene of the tonoplast H+-pumping ATPase in the latex from Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol. 1998;86:899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sreelatha S, Simon SP, Mercykutty VC, Mydin KK, Krishnakumar R, Annamalainathan K, et al. Role of lutoid membrane transport and protein synthesis in the regeneration mechanism of latex in different Hevea clones. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38(6):148. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11738-016-2161-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhong GV, Burns JK. Profiling ethylene-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana by microarray analysis. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;53(1/2):117–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1023/B:PLAN.0000009270.81977.ef.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and Rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(2):411–32. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1104/pp.105.073783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen L, Song Y, Li S, Zhang L, Zou C, Yu D. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819(2):120–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Phukan UJ, Jeena GS, Shukla RK. WRKY transcription factors: molecular regulation and stress responses in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Xu X, Chen C, Fan B, Chen Z. Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell. 2006;18(5):1310–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1105/tpc.105.037523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen H, Lai Z, Shi J, Xiao Y, Chen Z, Xu X. Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10(1):281. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1471-2229-10-281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Li Z, Peng J, Wen X, Guo H. Gene network analysis and functional studies of senescence-associated genes reveal novel regulators of Arabidopsis leaf senescence. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012;54(8):526–39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01136.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Olsen AN, Ernst HA, Leggio LL, Skriver K. NAC transcription factors:structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10(2):79–87. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Guo Y, Gan S. AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J. 2006;46(4):601–12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02723.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yang J, Worley E, Udvardi M. A NAP-AAO3 regulatory module promotes chlorophyll degradation via ABA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell. 2014;26(12):4862–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1105/tpc.114.133769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Nakano Y, Yamaguchi M, Endo H, Rejab NA, Ohtani M. NAC-MYB-based transcriptional regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in land plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hörteneteiner S. Chlorophyll degradation during senescence. Annual Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57(1):55–77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Li D, Deng Z, Chen C, Xia Z, Wu M, He P, et al. Identification and characterization of genes associated with tapping panel dryness from Hevea brasiliensis latex using suppression subtractive hybridization. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10(1):140. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1471-2229-10-140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 2008;54(4):559–68. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03463.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. de Faÿ E. Histo- and cytopathology of trunk phloem necrosis, a form of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.) tapping panel dryness. Australian J Bot. 2011;59(6):563–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1071/BT11070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Thomas V, Pramod S, Rao KS. Structural modification of phloic rays in Hevea brasiliensis with reference to tapping panel dryness and stimulation. J Plantation Crops. 2013;41:142–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Y. Takiguchi for technical support with microarray analysis, and the BPPT staff for assistance with the care of plants and technical support. We thank Robert McKenzie, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanz.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8566, Japan

    Yoshimi Nakano, Nobutaka Mitsuda & Kaoru Suzuki

  2. Bridgestone Corporation, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8531, Japan

    Kohei Ide, Teppei Mori & Norie Watanabe

  3. Laboratory for Biotechnology, Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Build. 630, Puspiptek area, Serpong, Tangerang, Selatan, 15314, Indonesia

    Farida Rosana Mira & Syofi Rosmalawati

  4. Computational Bio Big-Data Open Innovation Laboratory (CBBD-OIL), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo, 169-8555, Japan

    Kaoru Suzuki

Authors
  1. Yoshimi Nakano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nobutaka Mitsuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kohei Ide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teppei Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Farida Rosana Mira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Syofi Rosmalawati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Norie Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kaoru Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YN, KI, FRM, SR, NW, and KS designed the study. YN, KI, and FRM performed ethylene treatment and collecting samples. KI, TM, and NW designed the microarray. YN prepared materials and YN and NM performed microarray analysis and data analysis. YN, NM, and KS wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaoru Suzuki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were in compliance with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. Primer sets used for quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

Additional file 2

: Table S2. Probe list and fold change of 3270 genes that showed a significant difference in expression between the ethephon and mock treatments.

Additional file 3

: Table S3. Corresponding probe sets for CPT, REF, and SRPP genes.

Additional file 4

: Table S4. Probe lists for 234 differentially expressed genes encoding transcription factors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakano, Y., Mitsuda, N., Ide, K. et al. Transcriptome analysis of Pará rubber tree (H. brasiliensis) seedlings under ethylene stimulation. BMC Plant Biol 21, 420 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-021-03196-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-021-03196-y

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us