Skip to main content

Table 4 Description and coding of the assessed Malus floral phenotypic traits

From: Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance

No.

Phenotypic trait

Trait description (grade) and coding

1

Flower density

Dense (0); Medium (1); Sparse (2)

2

Inflorescence type

Corymbiform (0); Umbellate (1)

3

Buds adhered per inflorescence

No (0); Yes (1)

4

Flower type

Single (0); Semi-double (1); Double (2)

5

Flower shape

Flat (0); Shallow cup (1); Deep cup (2)

6

Flower diameter

Assessed in mm

7

Petal color at the balloon stage

Yellow green (0); White (1); Pinkish White (2); Light pink (3); Deep pink (4); Rose (5); Light red-purple (6); Deep red-purple (7); Deep red (8); Dark red-purple (9)

8

Petal outside color

White (0); Pinkish white (1); Light pink (2); Deep pink (3); Rose (4); Light red-purple (5); Deep red-purple (6); Dark red-purple (7)

9

Petal margin inside color

White (0); Pinkish white (1); Light pink (2); Light red-purple (3); Deep red-purple (4); Dark red-purple (5)

10

Petal center inside color

White (0); Pinkish white (1); Light pink (2); Light red-purple (3); Deep red-purple (4); Dark red-purple (5)

11

Petal base inside color

White (0); Pinkish white (1); Light pink (2); Light red-purple (3); Deep red-purple (4); Dark red-purple (5)

12

Petal relative position

Separated (0); Touching (1); Overlapping (2)

13

Petal number per flower

Counted

14

Petal shape

Circular (0); Oval (1); Ovate (2); Obovate (3); Elliptic (4); Narrow elliptic (5)

15

Petal surface wrinkle

No (0); Yes (1)

16

Petal with prominent veins

No (0); Yes (1)

17

Petal margin with incisions

No (0); Yes (1)

18

Petal length

Assessed in mm

19

Petal width

Assessed in mm

20

Petal length / Petal width

Calculated

21

Claw length

Assessed in mm

22

Sepal color

Green (0); Reddish green (1); Red-purple (2)

23

Sepal apex shape

Acuminate (0); Acute (1)

24

Sepal deflexed

No (0); Yes (1)

25

Sepal pubescence

Dense (0); Sparse (1); None (2)

26

Sepal length

Assessed in mm

27

Sepal width

Assessed in mm

28

Sepal length / Sepal width

Calculated

29

Receptacle color

Green (0); Reddish green (1); Red-purple (2)

30

Receptacle pubescence

Dense (0); Sparse (1); None (2)

31

Relative length of sepals and receptacle

Longer (0); Same length (1); Shorter (2)

32

Peduncle habit

Upright (0); Drooping (1); Weeping (2)

33

Peduncle color

Green (0); Reddish green (1); Red-purple (2)

34

Peduncle pubescence

Dense (0); Sparse (1); None (2)

35

Peduncle length

Assessed in mm

36

Peduncle thickness

Assessed in mm

37

Pistil number per flower

Counted

38

Style color

Light green (0); Yellow green (1); Light red-purple (2); Deep red-purple (3)

39

Style base with pubescence

No (0); Yes (1)

40

Stamen number per flower

Counted

41

Anther with red-purple membrane

No (0); Yes (1)

42

Anther color

White (0); Light yellow (1); Yellow (2); Orange (3)

43

Filament color

White (0); Light red-purple (1); Deep red-purple (2)

44

Relative position of stigmas and anthers

Below (0); Same level (1); Above (2)

  1. Qualitative traits were directly observed in the field, and the final values of quantitative traits were calculated as the mean value of 30 replicates. Hierarchical number coding system was applied for the qualitative traits following the order from ancestral to evolutionary as far as possible. Consecutively arranged non-negative integers 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., were taken for expression. The dimorphic traits with an evolutionary relationship that was difficult to determine were generally coded as 1 (Yes) and 0 (No). No coding was applied for the quantitative traits and the mean values of the 30 replicates were directly used for further analysis