Skip to main content

Table 6 Colchicine content in the G. superba collected from 32 different populations in India

From: Screening the elite chemotypes of Gloriosa superba L. in India for the production of anticancer colchicine: simultaneous microwave-assisted extraction and HPTLC studies

Samples

Region, state and population type

Colchicine content (mg g−1)

GS −1

Darjeeling (West Bengal) (wild) (West Bengal)

7.57 ± 0.48

GS −2

Gangtok (Sikkim) (wild)

7.37 ± 0.26

GS −3

Kalimpong (West Bengal)

7.58 ± 0.63

GS −4

Siliguri (West Bengal)

4.32 ± 0.30

GS −5

Kolkata (West Bengal) (wild)

3.67 ± 0.27

GS −6

Bhubaneswar (Orissa) (wild)

5.90 ± 0.24

GS −7

Koraput (Orissa) (wild)

5.43 ± 0.21

GS-8

Chilika (Orissa) (wild)

6.68 ± 0.04

GS-9

Puri (Orissa) (wild)

4.12 ± 0.19

GS-10

Konark (Orissa) (wild)

4.57 ± 0.48

GS −11

Ranchi (Jharkhand) (wild)

2.37 ± 0.26

GS −12

Gaya (Bihar) (wild)

4.58 ± 0.63

GS −13

Sitamarhi (Bihar) (wild)

3.32 ± 0.30

GS −14

Sonbhadra (Uttar Pradesh) (wild)

5.67 ± 0.27

GS −15

Chandauli (Uttar Pradesh) (wild)

4.90 ± 0.24

GS −16

Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh) (wild)

4.43 ± 0.21

GS −17

Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) (cultivated)

5.18 ± 0.04

GS-18

Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) (cultivated)

5.12 ± 0.19

GS-19

Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh) (wild)

4.57 ± 0.48

GS-20

Dehradun (Uttarakhand) (wild)

4.37 ± 0.26

GS −21

Haridwar (Uttarakhand) (wild)

4.58 ± 0.63

GS −22

Pantnagar (Uttarakhand) (wild)

4.32 ± 0.30

GS −23

Hisar (Haryana) (wild)

4.67 ± 0.27

GS −24

Kurukshetra (Haryana) (wild)

4.90 ± 0.24

GS −25

Chandigarh (wild)

3.43 ± 0.21

GS −26

Patiala (Punjab) (wild)

2.68 ± 0.04

GS −27

Phagwara (Punjab) (wild)

2.12 ± 0.19

GS-28

Ludhiana (Punjab) (wild)

2.67 ± 0.27

GS-29

Amritsar (Punjab) (wild)

3.90 ± 0.24

GS-30

Palampur (Himachal Pradesh) (wild)

6.43 ± 0.21

GS-31

Solan (Himachal Pradesh) (wild)

5.68 ± 0.04

GS-32

Jammu (Jammu and Kashmir) (wild)

5.12 ± 0.19

  1. Results (% of dry weight) are given as mean value ± standard deviation (N = 3)
  2. The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different using Tukey test (P ≤ 0.05)