Skip to main content

Table 5 Leaf relative water content and leaf electrolytes leakage of wheat as influenced by mulch treatments, varieties and their interactions under water stress

From: Evaluation of Jatropha curcas L. leaves mulching on wheat growth and biochemical attributes under water stress

Treatments

Leaf relative water content (%)

Leaf electrolytes leakage (%)

Wadan-17

Pirsabaq-2013

Mean

Wadan-17

Pirsabaq-2013

Mean

Control (unmulched and irrigated)

70.733 ± 0.74ab

62.267 ± 1.27d

66.500b

99.27 ± 2de

119.70 ± 2b

109.48b

Mulch 1 Mg ha−1 + water

72.157 ± 1.11ab

64.260 ± 1.64 cd

68.208ab

92.85 ± 3ef

112.38 ± 2c

102.62c

Mulch 3 Mg ha−1 + water

72.403 ± 2.83ab

66.913 ± 1.42b−d

69.658ab

91.00 ± 2f−h

104.96 ± 2d

97.98 cd

Mulch 5 Mg ha−1 + water

74.117 ± 1.22a

69.037 ± 0.08a−c

71.577a

84.37 ± 3hi

91.37 ± 3 fg

87.87f

Water stress (40% soil field capacity)

68.773 ± 2.88a−c

55.827 ± 1.13e

62.300c

99.59 ± 2de

136.84 ± 1a

118.21a

Mulch (1 Mg ha−1) + water stress

70.200 ± 3.01ab

62.410 ± 3.88d

66.305bc

90.00 ± 3f−h

102.70 ± 0d

96.35de

Mulch (3 Mg ha−1) + water stress

70.413 ± 0.22ab

62.660 ± 0.09d

66.537b

85.26 ± 3 g−i

100.66 ± 1d

92.96e

Mulch (5 Mg ha−1) + water stress

71.337 ± 0.09ab

63.553 ± 3.66 cd

67.445b

81.08 ± 3i

90.58 ± 3f−h

85.83f

Mean

71.267a

63.366b

 

90.43b

107.40a

 
  1. Values of means presented in the same column for different treatments followed by similar English letters don’t differ significantly at p < 0.05. Data of two years is pooled due to non-significant variations. Least Significant Difference (LSD) values for leaf relative water content: Treatments = 4.0994, Varieties = 2.0497, T × V = 5.7975: LSD values for leaf electrolyte leakage: Treatments = 4.8954, Varieties = 2.4477, T × V = 6.9232