Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Expression of a bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (QsuB) reduces lignin and improves biomass saccharification efficiency in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 56 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lignin deposited in plant cell walls negatively affects biomass conversion into advanced bioproducts. There is therefore a strong interest in developing bioenergy crops with reduced lignin content or altered lignin structures. Another desired trait for bioenergy crops is the ability to accumulate novel bioproducts, which would enhance the development of economically sustainable biorefineries. As previously demonstrated in the model plant Arabidopsis, expression of a 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase in plants offers the potential for decreasing lignin content and overproducing a value-added metabolic coproduct (i.e., protocatechuate) suitable for biological upgrading.

Results

The 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase QsuB from Corynebacterium glutamicum was expressed in the bioenergy crop switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) using the stem-specific promoter of an O-methyltransferase gene (pShOMT) from sugarcane. The activity of pShOMT was validated in switchgrass after observation in-situ of beta-glucuronidase (GUS) activity in stem nodes of plants carrying a pShOMT::GUS fusion construct. Under controlled growth conditions, engineered switchgrass lines containing a pShOMT::QsuB construct showed reductions of lignin content, improvements of biomass saccharification efficiency, and accumulated higher amount of protocatechuate compared to control plants. Attempts to generate transgenic switchgrass lines carrying the QsuB gene under the control of the constitutive promoter pZmUbi-1 were unsuccessful, suggesting possible toxicity issues associated with ectopic QsuB expression during the plant regeneration process.

Conclusion

This study validates the transfer of the QsuB engineering approach from a model plant to switchgrass. We have demonstrated altered expression of two important traits: lignin content and accumulation of a co-product. We found that the choice of promoter to drive QsuB expression should be carefully considered when deploying this strategy to other bioenergy crops. Field-testing of engineered QsuB switchgrass are in progress to assess the performance of the introduced traits and agronomic performances of the transgenic plants.

Background

The development of biorefineries to reduce our dependence on nonrenewable fossil fuel resources requires production of dedicated bioenergy crops that can be grown with few inputs on marginal lands. Other desired traits for bioenergy crops include high biomass yields, stress resilience, reduced recalcitrance to conversion into biofuels and bioproducts, and the accumulation of valuable co-products [1, 2]. Switchgrass has long been recognized as an ideal crop for bioenergy purposes considering its pest and disease resistance, high biomass yields, growth performance on poor soils due to relatively low requirements for added fertilizers, carbon sequestration capacity via its extensive root system, drought tolerance, and efficient water use [3]. As a consequence, significant efforts have been implemented for the improvement of switchgrass via breeding and genetic transformation [4, 5].

Lignin is a major polymer in plant biomass that negatively impacts the conversion of cell wall polysaccharides into advanced bioproducts, and several engineering approaches have been established to modify lignin content and its monomeric composition [6, 7]. For example, the heterologous expression of a bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (QsuB) targeted to plastids resulted in strong lignin reductions (up to 50%) in Arabidopsis [8]. One explanation for this observation is the possible reduction of the cytosolic shikimate pool needed for the synthesis of p-coumaroyl-shikimate catalyzed by hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) during lignin biosynthesis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of lignin biosynthesis and the conversion of 3-dehydroshikimate into protocatchuate (PCA) catalyzed by plastid-targeted QsuB. Grey and blue circles indicate a phenylalanine transporter and a putative shikimate transporter, respectively. Dashed arrows represent multiple enzymatic steps. E4P: Erythrose 4-phosphate; HCT: hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase; PEP: Phosphoenolpyruvate; PHE: Phenylalanine

Full size image

In switchgrass, several HCT gene candidates have been proposed to have a role in lignin biosynthesis based on the HCT activity measured with the corresponding recombinant enzymes and their expression profile in lignifying cell suspension cultures [9, 10]. In fact, more than 90% reduction in transcript levels of either PvHCT1 or PvHCT2 had no effect on lignin content, but simultaneous downregulation of both genes resulted in slight decreases of lignin content (5–8%) based on the yield of lignin monomers released after thioacidolysis [11]. These results not only indicate a role for HCT in lignin biosynthesis in switchgrass, with PvHCT1 and PvHCT2 being redundant, but also suggest the involvement of additional HCTs with similar functions.

In this work, we report on the expression of QsuB in switchgrass using the promoter of a sugarcane O-methyltransferase gene (pShOMT) [12]. Several switchgrass QsuB transformation events show reduction of lignin content and decreased cell wall recalcitrance. A significant increase in the content of protocatechuate accumulated in biomass was also observed.

Results

Molecular characterization of the pShOMT::QsuB switchgrass lines

A total of eight independent transformation events were regenerated after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switchgrass using a DNA construct that contains the plastid-targeted QsuB coding sequence fused downstream of the pShOMT promoter. The QsuB transgene was detected by PCR using gDNA from each transformant (Fig. 2a), and QsuB expression was validated by qPCR performed on cDNA synthesized from RNAs obtained from the first internode of each line at the E2 stage (Fig. 2b). A DNA construct consisting of pShOMT fused upstream of the GUS reporter gene was also transferred to switchgrass. Analysis of internodes and nodes from switchgrass plants harboring the pShOMT::GUS construct at the E4 stage suggested that pShOMT is mainly active in the nodes, whereas little activity was observed in the internodes (Figure S1). Under controlled growth conditions, all transgenic lines did not show any particular phenotype nor growth defect and were visually indistinguishable from each other or compared to non-transformed wild-type plants.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Molecular characterization of eight independent switchgrass lines containing the pShOMT::QsuB construct. a Detection of the QsuB gene by PCR. ‘A4’ is a gDNA sample from wild-type switchgrass and ‘Plasmid’ is the pShOMT::QsuB construct used for plant transformation. b Detection of QsuB transcripts by RT-qPCR. QsuB expression levels relative to that of PvUBQ6 are shown. cDNA obtained from a line containing the pShOMT::GUS construct were used as negative control. Values are means ±SD of two biological replicates (n = 2)

Full size image

Protocatechuate content in pShOMT::QsuB switchgrass

Protocatechuate (PCA), the product of QsuB activity, was extracted from the total aboveground biomass of switchgrass plants at the E5 stage and quantified. Compared to control plants carrying the pShOMT::GUS construct, PCA was significantly increased by ~ 2–3-fold in four independent pShOMT::QsuB lines, reaching up to 380 μg/g dry weight (Fig. 3). This data shows that expression of plastid-targeted QsuB in transgenic switchgrass enabled the conversion of endogenous 3-dehydroshikimate into PCA.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Protocatechuate (PCA) content measured in the biomass of switchgrass pShOMT::QsuB transgenic lines. Values are means ±SE of three biological replicates (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences from a line containing the pShOMT::GUS construct using the unpaired Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05)

Full size image

Lignin content and biomass saccharification efficiency in pShOMT::QsuB switchgrass

Total lignin content in the biomass from the pShOMT::QsuB switchgrass lines was measured using the Klason method. Compared to control lines containing the pShOMT::GUS construct, several pShOMT::QsuB lines showed significant reductions of lignin content ranging from 12 to 21% (Fig. 4a). Inspection of stem sections treated with phloroglucinol-HCl for the staining of lignin did not reveal any differences between the different pShOMT::QsuB lines and the control pShOMT::GUS lines (data not shown). However, on leaf blade sections, reductions in the intensity of the typical red staining were observed in the case of the pShOMT::QsuB lines compared to controls, especially in thick fibers located in the abaxial zone (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Klason lignin content measured in cell wall residues (CWR) obtained from biomass of switchgrass lines containing the pShOMT::QsuB construct. A line containing the pShOMT::GUS construct was used as control and analyzed thrice since measurements were carried out in three separate batches. Values are means ±SE of four biological replicates (n = 4). Asterisks indicate significant differences from the line containing the pShOMT::GUS construct using the unpaired Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05). b Representative pictures of leaf blade cross-sections stained with phloroglucinol-HCl from lines containing either the pShOMT::GUS or the pShOMT::QsuB construct. Note the reduction of the staining specifically in thick fibers located in the leaf abaxial zone for the pShOMT::QsuB line (red arrows). Scale: black bar = 200 μm

Full size image

The recalcitrance towards enzymatic degradation of the biomass of the engineered switchgrass was evaluated by measuring the amount of sugars released from cell wall residues after pretreatment with hot water followed by a 72-h hydrolysis using a commercial cellulase cocktail (CTec2). As shown in Fig. 5, higher amount of reducing sugars was obtained for several pShOMT::QsuB lines compared to the pShOMT::GUS control lines, with significant increases ranging between 21 and 30%.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Saccharification of cell wall residues (CWR) obtained from biomass of switchgrass lines containing the pShOMT::QsuB construct. A line containing the pShOMT::GUS construct was used as control. Amounts of sugars released from CWR after a hot water pretreatment and 72 h of enzymatic digestion with cellulase are shown. Values are means ±SE of four biological replicates (n = 4). Asterisks indicate significant differences from the control using the unpaired Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Here, we describe the successful expression of the bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase QsuB gene under the control of pShOMT in switchgrass. We show that the resulting plants display 12–21% reduction in lignin, a 2–3-fold increase in the bioaccumulation of PCA and a 5–30% increase in saccharification efficiency.

pShOMT was previously shown to be preferentially active in stem vascular tissues in sugarcane, rice, maize, and sorghum [12], making it a good promoter candidate to express QsuB specifically in lignifying tissues within vascular bundles. Similar to previous observations made in sugarcane, we were able to detect GUS activity in stem nodes from switchgrass lines carrying a pShOMT::GUS construct. Nevertheless, an apparent reduction of lignin content observed in some discrete regions of leaf blades (i.e., fibers on the adaxial zone) from plants carrying the pShOMT::QsuB construct indicate that pShOMT is also active in leaf cells with secondary wall accumulation (Fig. 4b). In addition to pShOMT, attempts to generate transgenic switchgrass lines with constructs containing QsuB under the control of the constitutive promoter of the maize ubiquitin1 gene (pZmUbi-1) was unsuccessful, whereas only a single event was obtained with a pZmCesa10::QsuB construct containing the promoter of the maize cellulose synthase gene CESA10 involved in secondary cell wall formation [13] (Figures S2, S3). This is possibly the result of toxicity occurring during the plant regeneration process when using these two pZmUbi-1::QsuB and pZmCesa10::QsuB constructs. Considering that QsuB diverts lignin biosynthesis, using the promoter of a lignin biosynthetic gene to drive QsuB expression may be more suited spatial-temporally during plant development. Interestingly, the single pZmCesa10::QsuB line showed a reduction of total lignin content as well as reduced phloroglucinol staining in leaf fibers (Figure S2E, F). Obtaining more switchgrass transgenic events with the pZmCesa10::QsuB construct will be essential to validate the effectiveness of pZmCesa10 in driving QsuB expression to reduce lignin content.

The exact mechanism by which QsuB expression reduces lignin in switchgrass is still unresolved; in particular, whether the cytosolic pools of shikimate —required for HCT activity— and p-coumaroyl-shikimate are reduced remain to be demonstrated. Similarly, it would be interesting to determine the lignin monomeric composition in the different QsuB switchgrass lines, especially the relative amount of p-hydroxyphenyl (H) units, which is known to be higher in Arabidopsis QsuB plants and typically increases in HCT down-regulated dicot species [8, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Furthermore, the recent discovery in several plant species —including switchgrass— of genes encoding putative 3-hydroxylases (C3H) that convert p-coumarate to caffeate, as well as genetic evidence of their role in lignin formation in Brachypodium distachyon, question the exclusive role of HCT and the involvement of p-coumarate esters during lignin biosynthesis in monocots [21].

The overproduction of PCA in switchgrass lines expressing QsuB probably results from a partial conversion of the endogenous pool of 3-dehydroshikimate catalyzed by QsuB activity. Notably, increases in PCA titers (2–3-fold compared to control switchgrass) are smaller than those previously reported in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants containing the QsuB gene under the control of the promoter of the Arabidopsis cinnamate 4-hydroxylase gene (pAtC4H), which were at least two orders of magnitude higher compared to controls plants [8, 22]. In connection with these observations, it has been demonstrated in vitro that PCA acts as a competitive inhibitor of at least one HCT isoform from switchgrass (i.e., PvHCT2) [23]. Therefore, it would be informative to attempt to identify putative p-coumaroyl-protocatechuate conjugates in metabolite extracts from pShOMT::QsuB switchgrass to determine if such HCT promiscuous activity —and possibly HCT inhibition— also occurs in vivo. Finally, it is promising to observe that the QsuB engineering strategy has the potential to enhance PCA titers in switchgrass biomass because several techno-economic analyses demonstrated the benefits of producing co-products in planta to render bioenergy crops economically sustainable [1, 24, 25]. In fact, several studies have already reported on the use of PCA as carbon source or pathway intermediate for the biological synthesis of diverse valuable products such as beta-ketoadipic acid, muconolactone, muconic acid, 2-pyrone-4,6-dicarboxylic acid, bisabolene, and methyl ketones [22, 26,27,28,29,30].

Conclusion

The QsuB engineering approach has been established in switchgrass. This work highlights the fact that selecting an adequate promoter to drive QsuB expression should be an important parameter for successful engineering of other crops with this gene via tissue culture-dependent transformation methods. Considering that pShOMT activity is induced in the leaf and root by key regulators of biotic and abiotic stress responses such as salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and methyl jasmonate [12], it will be essential to field test our engineered pShOMT::QsuB switchgrass to assess its agronomic performance and resilience to environmental stress.

Methods

Vector construction and plant transformation

The promoters pShOMT [12], pZmCesa10 (2.6 kb located upstream the start codon of the maize CESA10 gene - GenBank: AY372244.1), and pZmUbi-1 [31] were synthesized with the following flanking restriction sites: 5′-AscI / 3′-AvrII for pShOMT and 5′-HindIII / 3′-AvrII for pZmCesa10 and pZmUbi-1 (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ). Promoter sequences were released by enzyme digest and ligated into the binary vector pA6-GW [32] pre-digested with either AscI/AvrII or HindII/AvrII to generate respectively the pA6-pShOMT-GW, pZmCesa10-GW, and pA6-pZmUbi-1-GW binary vectors. The entry vector pDONR221-schl::QsuB containing the gene encoding the 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase QsuB from Corynebacterium glutamicum preceded with the nucleotide sequence of a chloroplast transit peptide [8] was LR recombined with the pA6-pShOMT-GW, pA6-pZmCesa10-GW, and pA6-pZmUbi-1-GW vectors using the Gateway cloning technology (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) to generate the constructs pA6-pShOMT-schl::QsuB, pA6-pZmCesa10-GW-schl::QsuB, and pA6-pZmUbi-1-GW-schl::QsuB, respectively. A nucleotide sequence encoding the beta-glucuronidase gene (GUS) from E. coli was amplified from pCAMBIA1301 using primers flanked with attB1 (5′) and attB2 (3′) Gateway recombination sites, and inserted into the pA6-pShOMT-GW and pA6-pZmCesa10-GW vectors by Gateway cloning to generate the constructs pA6-pShOMT::GUS and pA6-pZmCesa10::GUS, respectively. Cloning primers are listed in Table S1. The binary vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1 for switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.,) transformation which was performed at the University of Missouri’s Plant Transformation Core Facility as previously described [33], where embryogenic calli used for transformation were induced from mature seeds of switchgrass cultivar Alamo-A4 (Hancock Farm & Seed Company, Dade City, FL). Hygromycin B (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA) was added to the selection medium at 50 mg/L.

Plant growth conditions

Four transgenic switchgrass plants for each event were transferred to 2-gal pots containing Pro-Mix soil and grown in a room at 22 °C and 60% humidity using a light intensity of 250 μmol/m2/s and 16 h of light per day.

PCR genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissue obtained from one of the clones from each event using the Plant DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Carlsbad, CA). PCR primers specific to the QsuB gene were used to detect the transgene, and primers specific to the switchgrass PvUBQ6 gene (GenBank: FE609298.1) were used to assess the quality of the gDNA. All the primers used in this study are listed in Table S1.

RT-qPCR

Total RNAs were extracted from the first internode collected from plants at the E2 stage [34] using the TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and cDNA synthesis was conducted using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [35]. RT-qPCR was performed as described previously using 40 cycles consisting of 5 s at 95 °C for denaturation and 15 s at 60 °C for annealing and amplification [35]. The relative quantification of QsuB transcripts was calculated using the 2-ΔCT method and normalized to the reference gene PvUBQ6 (GenBank: FE609298.1). The results are the average from two biological replicates which were each analyzed in technical replicates. RT-qPCR primers are listed in Table S1.

Lignin assays

The Wiesner histochemical test using phloroglucinol-HCl, a reagent that reacts with coniferaldehyde groups in lignin, was performed on transverse sections of stems and leaf blades from plants at the E2 stage as previously described [36, 37]. For Klason lignin measurements, whole switchgrass plants were cut at the E5 stage (no visible flag leaf) 3 cm from the bottom, and biomass was dried in an oven at 50 °C for 7 days. Dried biomass was grinded with a Model 4 Wiley Mill equipped with a 1-mm mesh (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). Grinded biomass was extracted as previously described [8] and Klason lignin was measured using the standard NREL biomass protocol [38].

Saccharification assays

Grinded and extracted biomass obtained from plants at the E5 stage was ball-milled to a fine powder using a Mixer Mill MM 400 (Retsch Inc., Newtown, PA) and stainless-steel balls. For saccharification assays, four biological replicates of 10 mg of fine biomass powder from each line was pretreated with liquid hot water followed by a 72-h enzymatic hydrolysis using 1% w/w Cellic CTec2 enzyme mixture (Novozymes, Denmark) as previously described [35]. Hydrolysates were used for measurement of reducing sugars using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay [39].

Protocatechuate measurements

Whole switchgrass plants were cut 3 cm from the bottom at the E5 stage (no visible flag leaf), and biomass was dried in an oven at 50 °C for 7 days. Dried biomass was grinded with a Model 4 Wiley Mill equipped with a 1-mm mesh (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). An aliquot of the grinded biomass was ball-milled to a fine powder using a Mixer Mill MM 400 (Retsch Inc., Newtown, PA) and stainless-steel balls. Metabolites were extracted from 200 mg of dried ball-milled biomass using 80% (v/v) methanol:water followed by an acid hydrolysis step as previously described [8]. Protocatechuate was detected in metabolite extracts using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), electrospray ionization (ESI), and time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) as previously described [40]. Quantification was performed using a six-point calibration curve from protocatechuate solutions prepared with an authentic standard (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Histochemical GUS assays

Stem and leaf sections were obtained manually from plants at the E4 stage using a razor blade. GUS assays were conducted on plant sections using 2 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as substrate for 48 h at 37 °C as previously described [41]. After incubation, sections were dehydrated in 95% (v/v) ethanol prior to observation of the GUS staining in 70% (v/v) ethanol.

Availability of data and materials

The authors ensure the availability of supporting data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CWR:

Cell wall residue

GUS:

Beta-glucuronidase

HCT:

hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase

HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS:

High-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization and time-of-flight mass spectrometry

PCA:

Protocatechuate

RT-qPCR:

Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR

References

  1. Baral NR, Sundstrom ER, Das L, Gladden J, Eudes A, Mortimer JC, et al. Approaches for more efficient biological conversion of lignocellulosic feedstocks to biofuels and bioproducts. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:9062–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Markel K, Belcher MS, Shih PM. Defining and engineering bioenergy plant feedstock ideotypes. Curr Opin Biotech. 2020;62:196–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanderson MA, Reed RL, McLaughlin SB, Wullschleger SD, Conger BV, Parrish DJ, et al. Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop. Bioresour Technol. 1996;56:83–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouton J. Improvement of switchgrass as a bioenergy crop. In: Vermerris W, editor. Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 309–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin CY, Donohoe BS, Ahuja N, Garrity DM, Qu R, Tucker MP, et al. Evaluation of parameters affecting switchgrass tissue culture: toward a consolidated procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Plant Methods. 2017;13:113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Eudes A, Liang Y, Mitra P, Loqué D. Lignin bioengineering. Curr Opin Biotech. 2014;26:189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Halpin C. Lignin engineering to improve saccharification and digestibility in grasses. Curr Opin Biotech. 2019;56:223–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eudes A, Sathitsuksanoh N, Baidoo EEK, George A, Liang Y, Yang F, et al. Expression of a bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase reduces lignin content and improves biomass saccharification efficiency. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:1241–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Escamilla-Treviño LL, Shen H, Hernandez T, Yin Y, Xu Y, Dixon RA. Early lignin pathway enzymes and routes to chlorogenic acid in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant Mol Biol. 2014;84:565–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen H, Mazarei M, Hisano H, Escamilla-Trevino L, Fu C, Pu Y, et al. A genomics approach to deciphering lignin biosynthesis in switchgrass. Plant Cell. 2013;25:4342–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson RS, Stewart CN, Gou J, Holladay S, Gallego-Giraldo L, Flanagan A, et al. Development and use of a switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) transformation pipeline by the BioEnergy Science Center to evaluate plants for reduced cell wall recalcitrance. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Damaj MB, Kumpatla SP, Emani C, Beremand PD, Reddy AS, Rathore KS, et al. Sugarcane DIRIGENT and O-METHYLTRANSFERASE promoters confer stem-regulated gene expression in diverse monocots. Planta. 2010;231:1439–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Appenzeller L, Doblin M, Barreiro R, Wang H, Niu X, Kollipara K, et al. Cellulose synthesis in maize: isolation and expression analysis of the cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family. Cellulose. 2004;11:287–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ha CM, Fine D, Bhatia A, Rao X, Martin MZ, Engle NL, et al. Ectopic defense gene expression is associated with growth defects in Medicago truncatula lignin pathway mutants. Plant Physiol. 2019;181:63–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffmann L, Besseau S, Geoffroy P, Ritzenthaler C, Meyer D, Lapierre C, et al. Silencing of hydroxycinnamoyl-coenzyme a shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase affects phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1446–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang Y, Eudes A, Yogiswara S, Jing B, Benites VT, Yamanaka R, et al. A screening method to identify efficient sgRNAs in Arabidopsis, used in conjunction with cell-specific lignin reduction. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng XP, Sun SL, Wen JL, Yin WL, Sun RC. Structural characterization of lignins from hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) down-regulated transgenic poplars. Fuel. 2014;134:485–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shadle G, Chen F, Srinivasa Reddy MS, Jackson L, Nakashima J, Dixon RA. Down-regulation of hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: Shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase in transgenic alfalfa affects lignification, development and forage quality. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:1521–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanholme B, Cesarino I, Goeminne G, Kim H, Marroni F, Van Acker R, et al. Breeding with rare defective alleles (BRDA): a natural Populus nigra HCT mutant with modified lignin as a case study. New Phytol. 2013;198:765–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou X, Yang S, Lu M, Zhao S, Cai L, Zhang Y, et al. Structure and monomer ratio of lignin in C3H and HCT RNAi transgenic poplar saplings. ChemistrySelect. 2020;5:7164–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barros J, Escamilla-Trevino L, Song L, Rao X, Serrani-Yarce JC, Palacios MD, et al. 4-Coumarate 3-hydroxylase in the lignin biosynthesis pathway is a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1994.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu W, Dutta T, Varman AM, Eudes A, Manalansan B, Loqué D, et al. Lignin valorization: two hybrid biochemical routes for the conversion of polymeric lignin into value-added chemicals. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Eudes A, Pereira JH, Yogiswara S, Wang G, Teixeira Benites V, Baidoo EEK, et al. Exploiting the substrate promiscuity of hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase to reduce lignin. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57:568–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Konda NVSNM, Loqué D, Scown CD. Towards economically sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries. In: Kumar R, Singh S, editors. Valorization of lignocellulosic biomass in a biorefinery: from logistics to environmental and performance impact. Balan V: Nova Publishers; 2016. p. 321–38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang M, Baral NR, Simmons BA, Mortimer JC, Shih PM, Scown CD. Accumulation of high-value bioproducts in planta can improve the economics of advanced biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:8639–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin CY, Eudes A. Strategies for the production of biochemicals in bioenergy crops. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Okamura-Abe Y, Abe T, Nishimura K, Kawata Y, Sato-Izawa K, Otsuka Y, et al. Beta-ketoadipic acid and muconolactone production from a lignin-related aromatic compound through the protocatechuate 3,4-metabolic pathway. J Biosci Bioeng. 2016;121:652–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Otsuka Y, Nakamura M, Shigehara K, Sugimura K, Masai E, Ohara S, et al. Efficient production of 2-pyrone 4,6-dicarboxylic acid as a novel polymer-based material from protocatechuate by microbial function. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;71:608–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez A, Ersig N, Geiselman GM, Seibel K, Simmons BA, Magnuson JK, et al. Conversion of depolymerized sugars and aromatics from engineered feedstocks by two oleaginous red yeasts. Bioresour Technol. 2019;286:121365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dong J, Chen Y, Benites VT, Baidoo EEK, Petzold CJ, Beller HR, et al. Methyl ketone production by Pseudomonas putida is enhanced by plant-derived amino acids. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:1909–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Christensen AH, Quail PH. Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Transgenic Res. 1996;5:213–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang F, Mitra P, Zhang L, Prak L, Verhertbruggen Y, Kim JS, et al. Engineering secondary cell wall deposition in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11:325–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Do PT, De Tar JR, Lee H, Folta MK, Zhang ZJ. Expression of ZmGA20ox cDNA alters plant morphology and increases biomass production of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:1532–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hardin CF, Fu C, Hisano H, Xiao X, Shen H, Stewart CN, et al. Standardization of switchgrass sample collection for cell wall and biomass trait analysis. Bioenergy Res. 2013;6:755–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li G, Jones KC, Eudes A, Pidatala VR, Sun J, Xu F, et al. Overexpression of a rice BAHD acyltransferase gene in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) enhances saccharification. BMC Biotechnol. 2018;18:54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hao, Monhen. A review of xylan and lignin biosynthesis: Foundation for studying Arabidopsis irregular xylem mutants with pleiotropic phenotypes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;49:212–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hao Z, Avci U, Tan L, Zhu X, Glushka J, Pattathil S, et al. Loss of Arabidopsis GAUT12/IRX8 causes anther indehiscence and leads to reduced G lignin associated with altered matrix polysaccharide deposition. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. In: Laboratory Analytical Procedure. Technical Report, NREL /TP-510-42618. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Eudes A, Juminaga D, Baidoo EEK, Collins FW, Keasling JD, Loqué D. Production of hydroxycinnamoyl anthranilates from glucose in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Factories. 2013;12:62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987;6:3901–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Dr. Zhanyuan J. Zhang and the staff of the University of Missouri’s Plant Transformation Core Facility for performing the switchgrass transformation work, and to Novozymes for providing Cellic CTec2.

Funding

This work was part of the DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute (http://www.jbei.org) supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, through contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 between Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the U. S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study, data collection, interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA

    Zhangying Hao, Sasha Yogiswara, Tong Wei, Veronica Teixeira Benites, Anagh Sinha, George Wang, Edward E. K. Baidoo, Pamela C. Ronald, Henrik V. Scheller, Dominique Loqué & Aymerick Eudes

  2. Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Zhangying Hao, Sasha Yogiswara, Tong Wei, Veronica Teixeira Benites, Anagh Sinha, Pamela C. Ronald, Henrik V. Scheller, Dominique Loqué & Aymerick Eudes

  3. Department of Plant Pathology and the Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Tong Wei & Pamela C. Ronald

  4. Present address: State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518000, China

    Tong Wei

  5. Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    George Wang & Edward E. K. Baidoo

  6. Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Henrik V. Scheller

Authors
  1. Zhangying Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sasha Yogiswara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tong Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Veronica Teixeira Benites
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anagh Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. George Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Edward E. K. Baidoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pamela C. Ronald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Henrik V. Scheller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dominique Loqué
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Aymerick Eudes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZH and SY grew the plants; ZH, SY, and TW conducted the PCR genotyping and RT-qPCR; ZH and SY conducted GUS and phloroglucinol-HCl staining assays; AS and SY performed Klason lignin measurements; AS conducted metabolite extractions; GW and EEKB performed HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS analyses; VTB designed the plant binary vectors; SY performed saccharification assays; AE wrote the manuscript; ZH, PCR, HVS, and DL edited the manuscript; PCR, HVS, DL, and AE supervised the research. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aymerick Eudes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AE and DL are authors of a patent related to the research (US10415052B2).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Representative pictures showing GUS activities in various tiller sections of switchgrass lines harboring the pShOMT::GUS construct. GUS expression is specifically observed in stem nodes. Scale: White bars = 2 mm, black bar = 400 μ m. N: node; IN: internode, IS: internode transverse section.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Characterization of a switchgrass line harboring the pZmCesa10::QsuB construct. (A) Representative pictures showing GUS activities in various tiller sections of switchgrass lines harboring the pZmCesa10::GUS construct. GUS expression is mostly observed in internodes, especially in developing vascular bundles (red arrows). Scale: White bars = 2 mm, black bar = 400 μ m. N: node; IN: internode, IS: internode transverse section. (B) Detection of the QsuB gene by PCR in line pZmCesa10::QsuB-5. (C) Detection of QsuB transcripts by RT-qPCR. QsuB expression levels relative to that of PvUBQ6 are shown. Values are means ±SD of two biological replicates (n = 2). (D) Protocatechuate (PCA) content measured in the biomass of the switchgrass line pZmCesa10::QsuB-5. A line containing the pZmCesa10::GUS construct was used as control. Values are means ±SE of three biological replicates (n = 3). Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the control using the unpaired Student’s t-test (*P < 0.001). (E) Klason lignin content measured in cell wall residues (CWR) obtained from the biomass of the switchgrass line pZmCesa10::QsuB-5. A line containing the pZmCesa10::GUS construct was used as control. Values are means ±SE of four biological replicates (n = 4). Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the control using the unpaired Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05). (F) Representative pictures of stem and leaf blade cross-sections stained with phloroglucinol-HCl from line pZmCesa10::QsuB-5 and a line containing the pZmCesa10::GUS construct. Note in the leaves the reduction of the staining specifically in thick fibers located in both the adaxial and abaxial zones for the line pZmCesa10::QsuB-5 (red arrows).

Additional file 3: Table S1.

Oligonucleotides used in the study.

Additional file 4: Figure S3.

Full length unprocessed images of PCR gels used for Figs. 2a and S2B. Note that the seven transformants obtained with the pZmUbi-1::QsuB construct were all false positives and did not contain the QsuB gene (see purple rectangle on the PCR gel).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, Z., Yogiswara, S., Wei, T. et al. Expression of a bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (QsuB) reduces lignin and improves biomass saccharification efficiency in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). BMC Plant Biol 21, 56 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-021-02842-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-021-02842-9

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us