Skip to main content
Download PDF

Coordination of leaf functional traits under climatic warming in an arid ecosystem

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 439 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Climatic warming is increasing regionally and globally, and results concerning warming and its consequent drought impacts have been reported extensively. However, due to a lack of quantitative analysis of warming severities, it is still unclear how warming and warming-induced drought influence leaf functional traits, particularly how the traits coordinate with each other to cope with climatic change. To address these uncertainties, we performed a field experiment with ambient, moderate and severe warming regimes in an arid ecosystem over 4 years.

Results

Severe warming significantly reduced the specific leaf area and net photosynthetic rate with a relatively stable change and even enhancement under moderate warming, especially showing species-specific performance. The current results largely indicate that a coordinated trade-off can exist between plant functional traits in plant communities in a dryland ecosystem under ambient temperature conditions, which is strongly amplified by moderate warming but diminished or even eliminated by severe warming. Based on the present findings and recent results in the relevant literature, we advance the ecological conceptual models (e.g., LES and CSR) in the response to climatic warming in arid grassland communities, where the few key species play a crucial role by balancing their functional performances to cope with environmental change.

Conclusion

Our results highlight the importance of coordination and/or trade-off between leaf functional traits for understanding patterns of climatic change-induced vegetation degradation and suggest that the plant community composition in these drylands could be shifted under future climate change.

Peer Review reports

Background

Climatic warming is continually accelerating, profoundly impacting terrestrial ecosystems, particularly in arid areas [1,2,3]. The degradation of ecosystem functioning is exaggerated in drylands such as the desert steppe due to the high vulnerability to climate change [2, 4, 5]. As plant responses are heavily dependent on local meteorological variables, the field experimental simulation of climatic warming, particularly with regional heat wave features and/or various warming regimes, is a prerequisite for assessing and projecting the impacts of global environmental change on terrestrial ecosystems [6,7,8]. Further evaluating their cumulative effects on plants can provide a more fundamental view of ecosystem vulnerability to climate change, which can better inform policy decisions aimed at protecting natural vegetation and promoting sustainable development of terrestrial ecosystems [9,10,11,12,13].

High temperatures above the optimum for plant growth could negatively affect photosynthetic activity [14], carbohydrate distribution [15], nutrition stoichiometry [16], nutrient uptake, water use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) [17]. Both rising temperature and drought could increase the nitrogen (N) concentration by reducing carbon accumulation in plants alone [18]; however, their combination may constrain the N level by reducing the N-absorbing capacity through root systems and N-translocating capacity in plants [14, 19, 20]. For plants in mesic and cold environments, moreover, the potential benefits of climate warming on photosynthesis can be reversed by water deficit [21], consequently exacerbating the adverse effects of high temperature [12, 14]. Nevertheless, the plant ecophysiological responses of the dominant species with different functional traits to a combination of high temperature and warming-induced drought have not been well reported, especially with regard to the underlying mechanism under field climatic warming conditions.

Leaf functional traits of the leaf economics spectrum (LES) mainly include three components: leaf structural property (e.g., SLA), leaf nutrition status (e.g., N concentration), and leaf physiological activity (e.g., light-saturated photosynthetic rate, Asat) [22]. LES reflects trade-offs between plant growth rate/leaf photosynthetic rate, construction costs, resource conservation/acquisition, and leaf longevity in plants under evolutionary and environmental drivers [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Plant species with higher SLA often have low-density leaves, higher Nmass and PNUE, and shorter leaf lifespans, hence contributing to faster growth rates given ample availabilities of resources [22, 31,32,33,34]. Responses to warming depend on the functional traits of different species in different biomes (e.g., [35,36,37]). Across global biomes, tree species with greater leaf size and higher SLA have been found to be more susceptible to drought-induced mortality than those with lower SLA [36, 38]. Many studies have also reported results regarding the relationships between plant functional traits (e.g., [22, 33, 37]). For instance, SLA is often positively correlated with Asat and N concentrations and is strongly dependent on species, leaf types, and soil conditions [14, 22, 37]. Onoda et al. (2004) indicated that PNUE has a negative relationship with SLA [39]. However, studies concerning the relationships between plant functional traits under diverse climatic warming scenarios are relatively scant, particularly in drylands (e.g., [2, 8, 40]).

Desert steppe, an arid ecosystem, covers 23% of the total grasslands of China. More than 50% of the ecosystem is facing severe degradation characterized by decreased vegetation productivity and depleted soil nutrients [4]. Climatic warming may have a beneficial effect on C4 plants [41], but drought may eliminate this benefit (e.g., [14, 42]). Relative to C3 plants, C4 plants may remain at higher photosynthetic levels with higher WUE under drought and warming conditions [41, 42], suggesting that C4 species may have the acquisitive traits of LES [25, 41]. However, it is unknown whether and how different warming regimes and the consequent drought affect the relationships between functional traits of different species and plant functional types (PFTs) differently and how LES is involved (e.g., [42,43,44,45]). Here, we used a field infrared heating facility to simulate three climatic warming regimes in the desert steppe ecosystem to explore the effects of warming on the leaf functional traits of the key plant species, especially their relationships. We especially aimed to determine whether and how the trade-off between plant functional traits following LES in plant communities in the dryland ecosystem occurs under ambient temperature conditions, which may be strongly amplified by moderate warming but diminished or even eliminated by severe warming.

Results

Effects of climatic warming on leaf functional traits

Based on ANOVA, warming treatments exerted significant effects on most of the leaf functional traits except Nmass and Fv’/Fm (Table 1; Table S1). Compared to ambient temperature (AM), only severe warming (SW) significantly reduced SLA, Aarea, Amass, and PNUE (P < 0.05). However, significant increases in Narea and ΦPSII were observed under moderate warming (MW).

Table 1 Effects of warming on leaf functional traits (mean ± SE) at plant community level, Damao Banner, Nei Mongol, China (n = 3)
Full size table

Elevating temperature tended to reduce Aarea and PNUE for the typical species except N. pectinate (Table 2). For C. squarrosa, warming did not affect Aarea but significantly reduced SLA and PNUE (P < 0.05). There was an increase in leaf N concentration on the basis of either area (Narea) or mass (Nmass) (P < 0.05). SW increased both ΦPSII and Fv’/Fm’ (P < 0.05). For T. terrestris, warming markedly reduced SLA, Aarea, and PNUE. An increase in Narea was observed with no significant effects on Nmass, ΦPSII, and Fv’/Fm’. For S. tianschanica, dramatic declines in Aarea and PNUE occurred under SW; no significant effects on other functional traits were found from either MW or SW (P > 0.05). No significant effects on any functional trait were observed in N. pectinate. Species significantly affected all the functional traits across all warming treatments (Table S1).

Table 2 Effects of warming on leaf functional traits (mean ± SE) in the four key species, Damao Banner, Nei Mongol, China (n = 9)
Full size table

Divergent relationships between functional traits under different warming scenarios

At the ecosystem level, a significant relationship occurred between Nmass and SLA across all three warming regimes (R2 = 0.46, P < 0.01 at AM; R2 = 0.55, P < 0.01 at MW; R2 = 0.23, P < 0.05 at SW; Fig. 1A). The strength of the correlation indicated that the relationship was weakened with severe warming. However, Narea significantly linearly decreased with SLA under AM and MW but not under SW (Fig. 1B). Moreover, significant and strong linear relationships between Amass and Nmass occurred under both AM (R2 = 0.59, P < 0.01) and MW (R2 = 0.64, P < 0.01), but the relationship was weakened at SW (R2 = 0.21, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1C). Significant relationships between PNUE and SLA were also observed under both AM (R2 = 0.58, P < 0.01) and MW (R2 = 0.44, P < 0.01) but not under SW (R2 = 0.05, P = 0.32; Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of warming on relationships between Nmass and SLA (A), Narea and SLA (B), Amass and Nmass (C), PNUE and SLA (D). AM, MW, and SW represent ambient temperature as control, moderate warming, and severe warming, respectively

Full size image

Both Amass and Aarea significantly linearly increased with SLA under AM and MW but not under SW (Fig. 2AB). There were relatively weak positive relationships of both chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (i.e., ΦPSII and Fv’/Fm’) with SLA under AM and MW but not under SW (Fig. 2CD). Under MW, the relationships between the leaf functional traits generally had higher R2 values at higher significance levels.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of warming on relationships between Amass and SLA (A), Aarea and SLA (B), Fv'/Fm' and SLA (C), ΦPSII and SLA (D). AM, MW, and SW represent ambient temperature as control, moderate warming and severe warming, respectively

Full size image

Principal component analysis of multiple functional traits

The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) represented 55.0% and 22.0%, respectively, of the total inertia, and they could jointly explain the changes in SLA, Nmass, Aarea, and PNUE by 71.5, 76.4, 87.2 and 90.6%, respectively (Fig. 3A). The loadings of N concentration representing nutrient status and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters denoting PSII functioning were located in quadrant I, with the marker (SLA) representing leaf structure and net photosynthetic rate indicating gas exchange capacity in quadrant II (Fig. 3A; Table S2). The projections of the three warming regimes (Fig. 3A) and the four species (Fig. 3B) are also represented on the first two axes. Although the PC factors of AW and MW were almost scattered, the PC factors of SW were relatively contributed in the center, farther from the loadings of the leaf structure and photosynthetic rates, indicating the strong effects from SW (Fig. 3A). The PC factors of the dominant species were distinctly distributed (Fig. 3B). The PC factors of S. tianschanica and N. pectinate were relatively convergent and clustered with those of C. squarrosa; they were all far from the loadings of the functional traits (Fig. 3B). However, T. terrestris demonstrated different patterns—its PC factors seemed relatively scattered and alone but were near or across the loadings of functional traits.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Principal component analysis on plant functional traits under the three warming regimes [ambient warming (AM), moderate warming (MW) and severe warming (SW)]. The traits’ loadings on the first two principal components (PCs) are shown, and their projections are sorted by the three warming regimes (A) and the four dominant species (B). Loadings of leaf functional traits (see abbr. list) adjacent to solid symbols are shown. In upper panel (A), blue open, black open, and red open triangles represent AM, MW, and SW, respectively; while the blue, black, and red ellipses indicate the range of each treatment, accordingly. In bottom panel (b), blue open, green open, red open, and yellow open circles represent C. squarrosa (Cs), S. tianschanica (St), N. pectinate (Np), T. terrestris (Tt), respectively; while the blue, green, red, and yellow ellipses indicate the range of each species accordingly

Full size image

Structural equation modeling for the causal relationships among functional traits

Under climatic warming and soil water content (SWC) drivers separately, SLA directly positively affected Aarea, while it negatively affected Narea. PNUE was strongly positively affected by Aarea but weakly affected by Narea. Warming and SWC did not significantly directly affect the functional traits alone (Fig. S1AB). However, when considering warming and SWC jointly, we found that warming had significant direct effects on SWC, Aarea, and Narea (P < 0.05). In particular, Aarea and Narea were also indirectly affected by warming by affecting SWC (Fig. S1C). The SEM results demonstrated that SLA had significant positive relationships with Aarea, which further strongly positively affected PNUE across warming treatments (Fig. 4A) under AM (Fig. 4B) and MW (Fig. 4C). SLA significantly negatively affected Narea, and the latter weakly negatively affected PNUE; SLA effects on ΦPSII also occurred across all data and under AM and MW (Fig. 4A-C). However, under SW, these significant effects almost disappeared, and the explanations of Aarea, Narea, and PNUE from the multiple traits were also diminished (Fig. 4D-G).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Structural equation modeling (SEM) concerning the effects of climatic warming on key leaf functional traits and their relationships across the 4-year field warming experiment (A, across all warming treatments; B, AM; C, MW; D, SW). Solid black and red arrows represent significant positive (black) or negative (red) relationships at P < 0.05 levels, whereas dashed black and red arrows represent no significance (P > 0.05). Values above arrows indicate the standard path coefficients, and their significances at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels are marked by *, **, and ***, respectively. Arrow widths are proportional to the size of the standardized path coefficient. Percentages on rectangles or ellipses indicate the variance explained by the models. Goodness-of-fit statistics are: A χ2 = 1.64; df = 3; P = 0.44; goodness of fit index (GFI) = 1.00; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) < 0.001; Akaike information criterion (AIC) = 39.64; N = 124. B χ2 = 0.89; df = 2; P = 0.65; GFI = 1.00; RMSEA < 0.001; AIC = 38.89. N = 68. C χ2 = 7.39; df = 2; P = 0.25; GFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.29; AIC = 45.39. N = 33. D χ2 = 3.62; df = 2; P = 0.163; GFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.19; AIC = 41.62. N = 23. Leaf economics spectrum (LES) driven by climatic warming is shown in E–F panels. Under AM, Aarea increases, but Narea decreases with SLA, finally increasing PNUE (E). Under MW, the positive relationship of Aarea with SLA is amplified, but that of Narea with SLA is weakened, hence enhancing PNUE (F). However, under SW, the entire relationships between the leaf functional traits were largely weakened, even decoupled, consequently terminating the LES (G). Blue single arrow indicates the positive response, while red single arrow indicates the negative response. Blue double arrow indicates the positive interaction, and dotted arrow represent the decreased/cancelled relationships. The + and – signs denote the amplification and reduction, respectively

Full size image

When considering the four dominant species separately, different patterns of SEM were observed among the species (Fig. 5A-D). For C. squarrosa, warming significantly negatively affected SLA, SLA similarly affected Narea, and Narea similarly affected PNUE. Warming significantly negatively affected SLA, and SLA similarly affected Narea, but Narea did not affect PNUE for S. tianschanica. Warming had no significant effects on the functional traits of either N. pectinate or T. terrestris. Significant relationships between Aarea and PNUE occurred for both C. squarrosa and T. terrestris. However, a significant relationship between Aarea and Narea was observed only for S. tianschanica, and SLA significantly affected PNUE only for N. pectinate.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Structural equation modeling (SEM) concerning the effects of climatic warming on key leaf functional traits and their relationships across the 4-year field warming experiment for the four dominant species (A, C. squarrosa; B, S. tianschanica; C, N. pectinate; D, T. terrestris). Solid black and red arrows represent significant positive (black) or negative (red) relationships at P < 0.05 levels, whereas dashed black and red arrows represent no significance (P > 0.05). Values above arrows indicate the standard path coefficients, and their significances at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels are marked by *, **, and ***, respectively. Percentages on rectangles or ellipses indicate the variance explained by the models. Modification indices were conducted when adding paths would improve the model. The model fit is suitable: A χ2 = 2.29; df = 2; P = 0.27; goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.98; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.009; Akaike information criterion (AIC) = 40.59; N = 39. B χ2 = 1.42; df = 2; P = 0.93; GFI = 0.99; RMSEA < 0.001; AIC = 39.42. N = 39. C χ2 = 0.58; df = 2; P = 0.75; GFI = 0.99; RMSEA < 0.001; AIC = 38.58. N = 23. D χ2 = 0.44; df = 2; P = 0.80; GFI = 0.99; RMSEA < 0.001; AIC = 38.44. N = 23

Full size image

Discussion

In the field warming experiment, we found that compared with ambient temperature, severe warming significantly affected most of the leaf functional traits with highly species-specific performance. The current results indicate that a trade-off can occur between plant functional traits in plant communities in a dryland ecosystem under ambient temperature conditions, which can be enhanced by moderate warming but weakened or even canceled by severe warming. Finally, several conventional ecological models have been updated largely in response to climatic warming, where the few key species play a crucial role by mediating their functional relationships to cope with environmental change (e.g., [37, 46, 47]). The current findings suggest that using species with high resistance and resilience to high temperature and drought could address future climatic change [12, 48].

Responses to warming and warming-induced drought

Specific leaf area (SLA) decreased under more than moderate drought stress [49, 50], while an SLA decline was observed at an elevated temperature [51]. However, SLA was also observed to increase with increasing temperature [14, 42]. It tended to decrease when plants were exposed to a combination of highly rising temperature and water deficit [42]. In the present study, a general decline with warming occurred for all four species measured (Tables 1 and 2). Moreover, the SLA declines were found to be more severe warming than moderate warming, implying that the regulatory response of SLA could be warming severity specific. In addition, high SLA variance likely reflects its functional relationship with leaf lifespan, and these perennial rather than annual plants may have large leaves with low SLA [23]. In the present study, the annual C4 species T. terrestris had the highest SLA relative to the other three perennial species, again highlighting this phenomenon.

Climatic warming could have positive [52], neutral [53], and negative [17, 54] impacts on plant nutrition status, which strongly depend on water status (e.g., [17, 53]) and ecosystem/biome types [52, 54, 55]. The present results showed no warming effect on Nmass across all dominant species (Table 1), indicating a neutral effect [53]. Warming may reduce the N concentration due to dilution under amply watered conditions; however, warming with drought may cancel the dilution due to inhibited plant growth [14, 56]. Thus, the current results on the N level may also complicate a trade-off strategy between warming dilution and drought denseness.

Climatic warming has also been found to have positive, neutral, and negative effects on the photosynthetic performance of plants [42, 57,58,59], strongly depending on species and warming regimes. In particular, both C3 and C4 species may have different photosynthetic responses to climatic warming (e.g., [57, 60]). C4 plants often dominate warm environments and have been suggested to have a high resistance to high temperature relative to C3 plants (e.g., [61, 62]). Positive responses of C4 species to warming have been observed in many studies (e.g., [58, 61]). However, both C3 and C4 plants have been found to have similar photosynthetic responses to warming [63, 64], and inhibition of C4 plants may appear with a high temperature or a combination of warming and water deficit [42, 58]. Thus, a concurrence of warming and drought jointly presenting severe abiotic stress could largely constrain the photosynthetic performance of either C3 or C4 species, especially in a xeric area [42, 58]. This was completely confirmed by the present warming experiment, where warming-induced drought stress occurred (Table 2; [5]). At higher temperatures, an increase in Aarea but a decrease in Narea occurred in two C4 grasses, thus leading to a large PNUE increase [62]. In the current experiment, however, a slight increase in Narea in the two C4 plants was not observed (also see [14]); thus, a sharp decline in Aarea led to a dramatic reduction in PNUE (Tables 1 and 2). The PNUE changes may also reflect the trade-off between carbon requirements and N conservation when facing climatic warming and consequently water deficits.

A high temperature above the optimum can result in a decline in Aarea, as reported by a body of previous results and the present study (e.g., [14, 42, 58]; Tables 1 and 2). However, the function of PSII, using both Fv’/Fm’ and ΦPSII as the proxies [65], remained almost stable (e.g., [14, 66, 67]), and a slight promotion might even occur (Tables 1 and 2). The thermostability of PSII is strongly enhanced in drought-stressed plants [68]. Thus, compared with these gas exchange parameters, a relatively stable change or a slight decrease in Fv’/Fm’ and ΦPSII in plants exposed to climatic warming may imply that the thermostability of PSII can be improved by warming-induced drought.

Functional trait relationships

SLA is closely related to resource availability, such as nutrients, water, heat, and light (e.g., [69,70,71]). The relationship between SLA and nitrogen concentration depends on soil nutrition status, environmental factors, and plant species (e.g., [14, 72, 73]). In the current study, we found strong associations of SLA with Nmass rather than Narea (Fig. 1), meaning that larger and thinner leaves had a lower N concentration at the base of the leaf area than smaller and thicker leaves. This reflects the trade-off between leaf growth and N investment [39, 73]. Lower SLA is generally associated with higher natural resource efficiency, such as WUE and NUE, under stressful conditions and thus can be recognized as a strategy of phenotypic regulation [38, 74]. A decline in SLA with water deficit and an increase with rising temperature suggests that warming may shrink the leaf structural adaptative response to drought, which may be linked to PNUE involvement [14]. Onoda et al. [39] found that PNUE is significantly and negatively related to SLA. However, the present findings indicated close relationships between functional traits under AM and MW conditions, but this relationship almost disappeared under SW, implying a shift in the relationship direction under a more stressful environment. The underlying mechanisms can be explained as follows: i) severe drought induced by SW could constrain the change in the photosynthetic rate at a low level by damaging mesophyll cell ultrastructure and enhancing lipid peroxidation, consequently weakening the relationship (e.g., less change in Asat with SLA [75]; ii) plant growth and carbon allocation could be severely affected by severe stress, inhibiting leaf carbon investment and slowing the change in SLA [e.g., [42]]; and iii) plant N absorption, transport and allocation could also be constrained [14, 76], lessening flexible changes in leaf N concentration. Together, this may explain why severe warming diminishes the trade-off between plant functional traits. This finding implies that plant adaptative capacity will be weakened by decoupling the relationship between functional traits if climatic warming is accelerated further. Enhancing the coordination among functional traits by selecting the key species in response to climatic change may improve the sustainable management of arid ecosystems.

Compared with coastal plant species, desert species with high heat and drought tolerance and higher Fv/Fm had lower SLA and smaller leaf areas [70]. However, the present results indicated that Asat rather than Fv/Fm positively correlated with SLA, again indicating the different performances between the two traits (i.e., Asat and Fv/Fm) representing the photosynthetic potentials (also see [67]), highlighting the need for caution when using different functional traits in response to environmental change.

Leaf economics spectrum (LES) under climatic warming

The current results suggest that plants can cope well with the impacts of climatic warming in terms of LES theory but only when undergoing moderate climatic stress; the positive effect of the synergistic coordination between the traits is likely to attenuate, collapse, and even reverse under severe climatic harshness [40]. In addition, the current results from PCA illustrated that AM and MW had a similar pattern affecting the leaf functional traits (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, we found that the four key dominant species—each of which can be used as a proxy for PFTs—play crucial roles in forming LES plane patterns in response to climatic warming. For instance, on PCA plane B, the dimension (upper left to lower right, ‘Nmass–SLA’, the former is more strongly associated with PC2 than PC1, whereas the latter reverses the trend) ranges from species with conservative leaves (low-SLA, nitrogen-poor) to species with acquisitive leaves (nitrogen-rich, high-SLA, high-Aarea) that would have a shorter leaf lifespan and lower survival when facing environmental stress [22, 28, 46, 47, 77]. The two species, N. pectinate and T. terrestris, may be proxies of the two contrasting species, conservative and acquisitive, and which one can prosper more may strongly depend on different climate change scenarios [73, 74]. The coordination and trade-offs between traits—whether and how the LES performs—may strongly depend on plant species, PFTs, ecosystems, and environmental conditions (e.g., [36, 69, 78,79,80]).

Competitors-stress-ruderals theory (CSR) under climatic warming

The distribution feature on the responses of the key species from PCA may inform the CSR, a theory related to ecological and evolutionary aspects, which projects that ruderal species will prosper under more favorable conditions, such as with richer climatic and soil nutrient resources [81,82,83]. As previously reported, these ruderal species with easily growing and cheaply constructed traits could rapidly respond to precipitation change and nutrient status [48], but stress-tolerant species with slow growth and expensively constructed traits may remain stable, leading to a shift in plant community composition [48, 77, 84]. In the present study, the four dominant species were grouped into four ecological strategy types—N. pectinate (a native species prospering casually in some years) as the competitor, S. tianschanica (a unique and native species that appears every year) as the stress-tolerator, T. terrestris (a common species that appears casually in some years) as the ruderal species, and C. squarrosa (a native species that can be found every year) as an intermediate ecological strategist. This is because 1) each species has functional traits representing its specific ecological strategy type (Table 2); 2) as illustrated in the PCA planes, N. pectinate is at distant points, but T. terrestris appears in the cheaply constructed traits (e.g., Aarea and SLA). However, S. tianschanica is consistently far away, and C. squarrosa crossed almost all functional traits. This layout sorted by species can be compared with that by the warming treatments (Fig. 3). These findings may provide updated insight into CSR schemes for natural ecology, particularly in the global warming context.

Conclusions

In this study, a field warming experiment was conducted with ambient, moderate and severe warming regimes in an arid ecosystem over 4 years. We found that severe warming significantly affected most functional traits with species-specific performance. There was a trade-off between plant functional traits in plant communities in the arid ecosystem under ambient temperature conditions, which can be strengthened by moderate warming but weakened or even eliminated by severe warming. Based on the present findings and recent results in the relevant literature, we advanced several conventional ecological theoretical models, e.g., LES and CSR, in arid plant communities when exposed to climatic warming, in which the few key species play a critical role by balancing their functional performances to cope with climatic change. Our results especially highlight the importance of coordination and/or trade-off between leaf functional traits within and/or among the dominant species for understanding patterns of climatic change-induced vegetation degradation and suggest that plant community composition in drylands could be shifted in the future. This could be useful for assessing and projecting vegetation change and thus improving the management practices of vulnerable ecosystems in the face of climatic warming.

Methods and materials

Site expressions

The experiment was located in a desert steppe, Damao Banner (County), Nei Mongol, China (41°38′38.3″N, 110°19′53.3″E, 1409 m a.s.l.). This area is characterized by a typical continental climate. From the long-term climatic record (1954–2019), the mean annual temperature (MAP) was 4.3 ℃, and the mean annual precipitation (MAT) was 259.7 mm, 73% of which precipitated during the growing season (from 1 May to 30 August). The desert steppe sampled at this site was fenced and thus ungrazed since 1980. The soil is a calcic Kastanozem (chestnut) type based on the soil classification system of FAO, with a bulk density of 1.23 g·cm−3. The four dominant species were selected to examine the leaf functional traits: i) Stipa tianschanica var. klemenzii, a C3 perennial grass; ii) Cleistogenes squarrosa (Trin.) Keng, a C4 perennial grass; iii) Neopallasia pectinata (Pall.) Poljakov, a C3 perennial shrub; and iv) Tribulus terrestris L., a C4 annual grass [5].

Experimental design

We conducted a field warming experiment across 4-yr plant growth seasons from early May 2010 to late August 2014. With a randomized complete block design, three treatments were designed: control (ambient temperature) (AM), moderate warming (MW), and severe warming (SW). Moderate warming treatment was imposed during 2011–2014, while SW treatment was imposed only in 2014. Warmed plots were heated 24 h/day by infrared lamps (1.0 m long, 800 W) (GHT220-800; Sanyuan Huahui Electric Light Source Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) during the growing seasons from early June to late August. The infrared lamp heights above the ground surface were 1.5 m and 1.0 m under MW and SW treatments, respectively. To minimize the effects of other environmental factors, such as shading, the control plots were also placed with “dummy” heaters similar to those in the warming plots. A total of 15 experimental plots (2 m × 2 m) were made across three experimental blocks. A 1 m buffer zone in each adjacent plot was established. Field infrared heating is recognized as an appropriate facility for heat wave simulation and has been used extensively (e.g., [6, 7, 85]). Based on the recent IPPC report [1], by the end of the twenty-first century, global surface temperature is expected to increase by 2.1 °C to 3.5 °C in the intermediate scenario and by 3.3 °C to 5.7 °C under the very high greenhouse gas emissions scenario. As expected, compared to ambient temperature (e.g., the control treatment), the soil temperatures at 0–10 cm depth under MW and SW treatments were significantly elevated by 2.6 °C and 3.2 °C, respectively. Soil moisture in the 0–20 cm soil profile was significantly reduced by 14.2% and 33.7% (v/v, P < 0.05) in both moderate and severe warming plots, respectively, relative to control plots (Fig. S2-3).

Soil temperature and moisture

A thermocouple (HOBO S-TMB-M006; Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA) was installed at a depth of 0–10 cm, and a humidity transducer (HOBO S-SMA-M005; Onset Computer Corporation) in a soil profile of 0 to 20 cm was installed to monitor the soil temperature (°C) and soil moisture (v/v) at the center of each plot. Continuous measurement data were recorded every 2 s and averaged at half-hour intervals by a data logger (HOBO H21-002; Onset Computer Corporation).

Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence

Leaf gas exchange parameters were measured using a CIRAS-2 portable photosynthesis system (PP Systems, Hertfordshire, UK) with a Chl fluorescence module (CFM) on clear sky mornings (09:00–11:00 a.m.) with less than gentle wind. The reference CO2 concentration in the leaf chamber was kept at 380–390 μmol·mol−1, with a relative air humidity of 50%–70%. We set a saturated photosynthetic photon flux density of 1500 μmol·m−2 s−1. The fully expanded leaves per plant per species in each plot were placed into the cuvette, and at least three measurements were made for each species in each plot. The light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Asat), stomatal conductance (gs), and transpiration rate (E) were obtained. Leaf Chl fluorescence was measured simultaneously with gas exchange. Briefly, the same leaves were light-adapted at a light intensity of 1500 μmol m−2 s−1 for at least 15 min to measure steady-state fluorescence (Fs) before being given a flash (5100 μmol m−2 s−1, a pulse time of 0.3 s) to measure the maximum fluorescence (Fm’). Then, leaves were exposed to far-red light for 5 s to determine the minimum light fluorescence (Fo’). We calculated two Chl fluorescence parameters: the effective photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv’/Fm’) and the quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII). These calculations were performed using the following equations [86]:

$${F}_{\mathtt{v}}\mathrm{^{\prime}}/{F}_{\mathrm{m}}\mathrm{^{\prime}}=({F}_{\mathrm{m}}\mathrm{^{\prime}} -{F}_{\mathrm{o}}\mathrm{^{\prime}})/{F}_{\mathrm{m}}\mathrm{^{\prime}}$$
(1)
$${\Phi }_{\mathrm{PSII}}=({F}_{\mathrm{m}}\mathrm{^{\prime}} -{F}_{\mathrm{s}})/{F}_{\mathrm{m}}\mathrm{^{\prime}}$$
(2)

Leaf carbon and nitrogen

The dried leaf samples of each kay species for gas exchange measurement in each plot were mixed and ground for 1 min by a mixer mill (Retsch MM400, Germany). The carbon and N concentrations of leaf dried samples were determined by an element analyzer (Elementar Vario EL III, Germany).

Specific leaf area

All sampled leaves were scanned for leaf area with a WinFOLIA leaf/root measurement system (Régent Instruments Inc., Canada) and weighed for leaf biomass after drying at 65 °C in an oven until a consistent weight was reached. The SLA of each species was calculated as each leaf area divided by its dry mass. The photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE; μmol CO2 s−1 N g−1) was calculated as Asat divided by the N concentration on a leaf area basis [87].

Statistical analyses

To determine the effects of climatic warming on the plant functional traits of the four dominant species, we used a mixed model ANOVA with temperature treatment as a fixed factor and block as a random factor. Duncan’s post-hoc tests were performed to test significant differences between warming treatments for all leaf functional traits of each species and across the four species and between species across warming treatments during plant growth peaking in the final year. Regressions were performed to test relationships between leaf nutrient (i.e., leaf N concentration) and photosynthetic traits (i.e., net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, ChlF) and the leaf structural trait (i.e., SLA) under each warming treatment across all four species. The comprehensive relationships between leaf functional traits and their responses to climatic warming scenarios and plant species were determined by principal component analysis (PCA). The statistical analyses above were conducted using the statistical software package SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In addition, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the direct and indirect effects of warming and it-induced drought on the key leaf functional traits and their relationships. Maximum likelihood estimation was used to fit the model. Adequate model fits were indicated by a nonsignificant chi-squared test (p > 0.05), goodness-of-fit index (GFI > 0.90); root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA < 0.05), and Akaike information criterion (AIC, less is better) (e.g., [46]). AMOS 21.0 statistical software was used to perform the SEM analysis (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

SLA :

Specific leaf area

A area :

Light-saturated photosynthetic rate per unit area

A mass :

Light-saturated photosynthetic rate per unit mass

N area :

Leaf nitrogen concentration on area basis

N mass :

Leaf nitrogen concentration on mass basis

PNUE :

Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency

F v ’/F m ’ :

Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) in the light

Φ PS II :

Quantum yield of PSII electron transport

References

  1. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai P., et l (eds.)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.

  2. Maestre FT, Salguero-Gómez R, Quero JL. It is getting hotter in here: Determining and projecting the impacts of global environmental change on drylands. Philos T R soc B. 2012;367:3062–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3:52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang L, Han X, Zhang Z, Sun OJ. Grassland ecosystems in China: Review of current knowledge and research advancement. Philos T R Soc B. 2007;362:997–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X, Ma Q, Yu H, Li Y, Li L, Qi M, et al. Climate warming-induced drought constrains vegetation productivity by weakening the temporal stability of the plant community in an arid grassland ecosystem. Agr Forest Meteorol. 2021;307: 108526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimball BA, Conley MM, Wang S, Lin X, Luo C, Morgan J, Smith D. Infrared heater arrays for warming ecosystem field plots. Glob Change Biol. 2008;14(2):309–3320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Boeck HJ, Dreesen FE, Janssens IA, Nijs I. Climatic characteristics of heat waves and their simulation in plant experiments. Glob Change Biol. 2010;16(7):1992–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maestre FT, Benito BM, Berdugo M, Concostrina-Zubiri L, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, et al. Biogeography of global drylands. New Phytol. 2021;231(2):540–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seddon AW, Macias-Fauria M, Long PR, Benz D, Willis KJ. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature. 2016;531:229–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eskelinen A, Elwood E, Harrison S, Beyen E, Gremer JR. Vulnerability of grassland seed banks to resource-enhancing global changes. Ecology. 2021;102(12):e03512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nandintsetseg B, Boldgiv B, Chang J, Ciais P, Davaanyam E, Batbold A, et al. Risk and vulnerability of Mongolian grasslands under climate change. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(3):034035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rivero RM, Mittler R, Blumwald E, Zandalinas SI. Developing climate-resilient crops: improving plant tolerance to stress combination. Plant J. 2022;109:373–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai Y, Han X, Wu J, Chen Z, Li L. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nat. 2004;431:181–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu ZZ, Zhou GS. Combined effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and lipid peroxidation of a perennial grass Leymus chinensis. Planta. 2006;224(5):1080–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu Q, Huang B. Effects of differential air and soil temperature on carbohydrate metabolism in creeping bentgrass. Crop Sci. 2000;40:1368–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stark S, Ylänne H, Tolvanen A. Long-term warming alters soil and enzymatic N: P stoichiometry in subarctic tundra. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;124:184–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Querejeta JI, Ren W, Prieto I. Vertical decoupling of soil nutrients and water under climate warming reduces plant cumulative nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency and productivity. New Phytol. 2021;230(4):1378–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Triboi E, Martre P, Girousse C, Ravel C, Triboi-Blondel A. Unravelling environmental and genetic relationships between grain yield and nitrogen concentration for wheat. Eur J Agron. 2006;25:108–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Girousse C, Bournoville R, Bonnemain JL. Water deficit-induced changes in concentrations in proline and some other amino acids in the phloem sap of alfalfa. Plant Physiol. 1996;111(1):109–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Estiarte M, Ogaya R, Carnicer J, Coll M, et al. Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere. Glob Change Biol. 2013;19(8):2303–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reich PB, Sendall KM, Stefanski A, Rich RL, Hobbie SE, Montgomery RA. Effects of climate warming on photosynthesis in boreal tree species depend on soil moisture. Nat. 2018;562:263–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nat. 2004;428:821–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Osnas JL, Lichstein JW, Reich PB, Pacala SW. Global leaf trait relationships: mass, area, and the leaf economics spectrum. Sci. 2013;340:741–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Asner GP, Knapp DE, Anderson CB, Martin RE, Vaughn N. Large-scale climatic and geophysical controls on the leaf economics spectrum. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(28):E4043–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Montesinos D. Fast invasives fastly become faster: Invasive plants align largely with the fast side of the plant economics spectrum. J Ecol. 2022;105:1010–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Solé-Medina A, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Ramírez-Valiente JA. Multi-trait genetic variation in resource-use strategies and phenotypic plasticity correlates with local climate across the range of a Mediterranean oak (Quercus faginea). New Phytol. 2022;234:462–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawrence EH, Springer CJ, Helliker BR, Scott PR. The carbon economics of vegetative phase change. Plant Cell Environ. 2022;45:1286–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(25):13730–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Poorter H, Evans JR. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia. 1998;116(1):26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bjorkman AD, Myers-Smith IH, Elmendorf SC, Normand S, Rüger N, Beck PS, et al. Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome. Nat. 2018;562:57–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Witkowski E, Lamont BB. Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia. 1991;88:486–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Poorter H, Remkes C, Lambers H. Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Physiol. 1990;94:621–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Onoda Y, Wright IJ, Evans JR, Hikosaka K, Kitajima K, Niinemets Ü, et al. Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum. New Phytol. 2017;214(4):1447–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reich PB. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol. 2014;102:275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. BoeckLemmens HJDeCMHM, Zavalloni C, Gielen B, Bossuyt H, Malchair S, Carnol M, Merckx R, BergeCeulemans JVandenR, Nijs I. Biomass production in experimental grasslands of different species richness during three years of climate warming. Biogeosciences. 2008;5:585–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kunstler G, Falster D, Coomes DA, Hui F, Kooyman RM, Laughlin DC, et al. Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition. Nat. 2016;529:204–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Osnas JL, Katabuchi M, Kitajima K, Wright SJ, Reich PB, Bael SAVan, et al. Divergent drivers of leaf trait variation within species, among species, and among functional groups. P Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(21):5480–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Greenwood S, Ruiz-Benito P, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lloret F, Kitzberger T, Allen CD, et al. Tree mortality across biomes is promoted by drought intensity, lower wood density and higher specific leaf area. Ecol Lett. 2017;20(4):539–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Onoda Y, Hikosaka K, Hirose T. Allocation of nitrogen to cell walls decreases photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency. Funct Ecol. 2004;18:419–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bashirzadeh M, Soliveres S, Farzam M, Ejtehadi H. Plant–plant interactions determine taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in severe ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2022;31:649–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Morgan JA, LeCain DR, Pendall E, et al. C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland. Nature. 2011;476:202–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu ZZ, Shimizu H, Ito S, Yagasaki Y, Zou CJ, Zhou GS, Zheng YR. Effects of elevated CO2, warming and precipitation change on plant growth, photosynthesis and peroxidation in dominant species from North China grassland. Planta. 2014;239(2):421–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Doležal J, Altman J, Jandová V, Chytrý M, Conti L, Méndez-Castro FE, et al. Climate warming and extended droughts drive establishment and growth dynamics in temperate grassland plants. Agr Forest Meteorol. 2022;313:108762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hoover DL, Hajek OL, Smith MD, Wilkins K, Slette IJ, Knapp AK. Compound hydroclimatic extremes in a semi-arid grassland: Drought, deluge, and the carbon cycle. Glob Change Biol. 2022;28:2611–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Catunda KL, Churchill AC, Zhang H, Power SA, Moore BD. Short-term drought is a stronger driver of plant morphology and nutritional composition than warming in two common pasture species. J Agron Crop Sci. 2022; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jac.12531.

  46. Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E. A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecol. 2006;87(2):504–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Joswig JS, Wirth C, Schuman MC, Kattge J, Reu B, Wright IJ, et al. Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6(1):36–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hoover DL, Knapp AK, Smith MD. Resistance and resilience of a grassland ecosystem to climate extremes. Ecol. 2014;95:2646–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sack L, Grubb PJ. The combined impacts of deep shade and drought on the growth and biomass allocation of shade-tolerant woody seedlings. Oecologia. 2002;131:175–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hamann E, Kesselring H, Stöcklin J. Plant responses to simulated warming and drought: a comparative study of functional plasticity between congeneric mid and high elevation species. J Plant Ecol. 2018;11(3):364–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McDonald GK, Paulsen GM. High temperature effects on photosynthesis and water relations of grain legumes. Plant Soil. 1997;196:47–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Butler SM, Melillo JM, Johnson JE, Mohan J, Steudler PA, Lux H, et al. Soil warming alters nitrogen cycling in a New England forest: implications for ecosystem function and structure. Oecologia. 2012;168(3):819–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Barreto RF, Prado RDM, Habermann E, Viciedo DO, Martinez CA. Warming change nutritional status and improve Stylosanthes capitata Vogel growth only under well-watered conditions. J Soil Sci Plant Nut. 2020;20(4):1838–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rennenberg H, Dannenmann M, Gessler A, Kreuzwieser J, Simon J, Papen H. Nitrogen balance in forest soils: nutritional limitation of plants under climate change stresses. Plant Biol. 2009;11:4–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hobbie SE. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol. 1992;7(10):336–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sinclair TR, Pinter PJ, Kimball BA, Adamsen FJ, LaMorte RL, Wall GW, et al. Leaf nitrogen concentration of wheat subjected to elevated [CO2] and either water or N deficits. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2000;79:53–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith NG, Dukes JS. Short-term acclimation to warmer temperatures accelerates leaf carbon exchange processes across plant types. Glob Change Biol. 2017;23:4840–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Aspinwall MJ, Chieppa J, Gray E, Golden-Ebanks M, Davidson L. Warming impacts on photosynthetic processes in dominant plant species in a subtropical forest. Physiol Plant. 2022;174(2): e13654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wertin TM, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Higher growth temperatures decreased net carbon assimilation and biomass accumulation of northern red oak seedlings near the southern limit of the species range. Tree Physiol. 2011;31:1277–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wertin TM, Reed SC, Belnap J. C3 and C4 plant responses to increased temperatures and altered monsoonal precipitation in a cool desert on the Colorado Plateau. USA Oecologia. 2015;177:997–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Helliker BR. C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate. Oecologia. 1997;112:285–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dwyer SA, Ghannoum O, Nicotra A. von Caemmerer S High temperature acclimation of C4 photosynthesis is linked to changes in photosynthetic biochemistry. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:53–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res. 2014;119:101–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sturchio MA, Chieppa J, Chapman SK, Canas G, Aspinwall MJ. Temperature acclimation of leaf respiration differs between marsh and mangrove vegetation in a coastal wetland ecotone. Glob Change Biol. 2021;28:612–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. van Kooten O, Snel JFH. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res. 1990;25:147–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hamerlynck EP, Huxman TE, Loik ME, Smith SD. Effects of extreme high temperature, drought and elevated CO2 on photosynthesis of Mojave Desert evergreen shrub. Larrea dridentata Plant Ecol. 2000;148:183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Song H, Li Y, Zhou L, Xu Z, Zhou G. Maize leaf functional responses to drought episode and rewatering. Agr Forest Meteorol. 2018;249:57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lu C, Zhang J. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants. J Exp Bot. 1999;50:1199–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Májeková M, Hájek T, Albert AJ, de Bello F, Doležal J, Götzenberger L, et al. Weak coordination between leaf drought tolerance and proxy traits in herbaceous plants. Funct Ecol. 2021;35(6):1299–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Knight CA, Ackerly DD. Evolution and plasticity of photosynthetic thermal tolerance, specific leaf area and leaf size: congeneric species from desert and coastal environments. New Phytol. 2003;160(2):337–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hodgson JG, Montserrat-Martí G, Charles M, Jones G, Wilson P, Shipley B, et al. Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area? Ann Bot. 2011;108(7):1337–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Niinemets Ü. Kull K Leaf structure vs nutrient relationships vary with soil conditions in temperate shrubs and trees. Acta Oecol. 2003;24:209–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sellan G, Thompson J, Majalap N, Brearley FQ. Influence of species functional strategy, on leaf stoichiometric responses to fertilizer in a Bornean heath forest. J Ecol. 2022;110(6):1247–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Navarro J, Powers JM, Paul A, Campbell DR. Phenotypic plasticity and selection on leaf traits in response to snowmelt timing and summer precipitation. New Phytol. 2022;234:1477–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Xu ZZ, Zhou GS, Shimizu H. Effects of soil drought with nocturnal warming on leaf stomatal traits and mesophyll cell ultrastructure of a perennial grass. Crop Sci. 2009;49:1843–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Joseph J, Luster J, Bottero A, Buser N, Baechli L, Sever K, Gessler A. Effects of drought on nitrogen uptake and carbon dynamics in trees. Tree Physiol. 2021;41:927–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JH, Wright IJ, Lavorel S, Dray S, et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nat. 2016;529:167–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Májeková M, Martínková J, Hájek T. Grassland plants show no relationship between leaf drought tolerance and soil moisture affinity, but rapidly adjust to changes in soil moisture. Funct Ecol. 2019;33(5):774–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Gao J, Wang K, Zhang X. Patterns and drivers of community specific leaf area in China. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2022;2022(33):e01971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Richards JH, Damschen EI. Leaf economics in a three-dimensional environment: Testing leaf trait responses in vascular epiphytes to land use, climate and tree zone. Funct Ecol. 2022;36:727–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Grime JP. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat. 1977;111:1169–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Pierce S, Negreiros D, Cerabolini BEL, Kattge J, Díaz S, Kleyer M, et al. A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes worldwide. Funct Ecol. 2017;31:444–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Han X, Huang J, Zang R. Soil nutrients and climate seasonality drive differentiation of ecological strategies of species in forests across four climatic zones. Plant Soil. 2022;473:517–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Westoby M, Gillings MR, Madin JS, Nielsen DA, Paulsen IT, Tetu SG. Trait dimensions in bacteria and archaea compared to vascular plants. Ecol Lett. 2021;24(7):1487–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. De Boeck HJ, Kimball BA, Miglietta F, Nijs I. Quantification of excess water loss in plant canopies warmed with infrared heating. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18(9):2860–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51:659–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Sinclair TR, Horie T. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Sci. 1989;29:90–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr. Xiaomin Lv and Dr. Yaohui Shi for their kind help in conducting the field experiment.

Funding

This research was jointly funded by Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA26010103) an China Special Fund for Meteorological Research in the Public Interest (Major projects) (GYHY201506001-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China

    Hongying Yu, Yingting Chen & Zhenzhu Xu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

    Hongying Yu & Guangsheng Zhou

  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Hongying Yu & Yingting Chen

  4. Jiyang College of Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Zhuji, 311800, China

    Yingting Chen

Authors
  1. Hongying Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yingting Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guangsheng Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhenzhu Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZX and GZ planned and designed the experiment. HY, YC, and ZX performed experiments, conducted fieldwork, and analysed data. HY, YC, GZ, and ZX wrote the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guangsheng Zhou or Zhenzhu Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The four species used for this study, i.e., S. tianschanica, C. squarrosa, N. pectinate, and T. terrestris, are distributed broadly in natural grasslands of northern China. Thus, the permission is not required; and the voucher specimen of the plant materials is also not required to be deposited in a publicly available herbarium. There is no transgenic technology or material in this study, therefore the ethics approval is not required. The experimental research on plants performed in this research complied with institutional, national and international guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. A two-way ANOVA test between warming treatments and plant species. Table S2. Correlations between the functional traits and principal component score (PC) 1 and PC 2. Figure S1. Structural equation modeling (SEM) concerning the effects of climatic warming on key leaf functional traits and their relationships across the 4-year field warming experiment across all warming treatments. Figure S2. Warming-induced changes in daily mean soil moisture (0-20 cm, A) and daily mean soil temperature (0-10 cm, B) during the growing season in 2014. Figure S3. Effects of warming on soil temperature (0-10 cm) and soil moisture (0-20 cm) (mean ± SE) during growing season in 2014.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, G. et al. Coordination of leaf functional traits under climatic warming in an arid ecosystem. BMC Plant Biol 22, 439 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-022-03818-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-022-03818-z

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us