Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of salinity stress and surfactant treatment with zinc and boron on morpho-physiological and biochemical indices of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum)

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 138 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Micronutrient application has a crucial role in mitigating salinity stress in crop plants. This study was carried out to investigate the effect of zinc (Zn) and boron (B) as foliar applications on fenugreek growth and physiology under salt stress (0 and 120 mM). After 35 days of salt treatments, three levels of zinc (0, 50, and 100 ppm) and two levels of boron (0 and 2 ppm) were applied as a foliar application. Salinity significantly reduced root length (72.7%) and shoot length (33.9%), plant height (36%), leaf area (37%), root fresh weight (48%) and shoot fresh weight (75%), root dry weight (80%) and shoot dry weight (67%), photosynthetic pigments (78%), number of branches (50%), and seeds per pod (56%). Fenugreek’s growth and physiology were improved by foliar spray of zinc and boron, which increased the length of the shoot (6%) and root length (2%), fresh root weight (18%), and dry root weight (8%), and chlorophyll a (1%), chlorophyll b (25%), total soluble protein content (3%), shoot calcium (9%) and potassium (5%) contents by significantly decreasing sodium ion (11%) content. Moreover, 100 ppm of Zn and 2 ppm of B enhanced the growth and physiology of fenugreek by reducing the effect of salt stress. Overall, boron and zinc foliar spray is suggested for improvement in fenugreek growth under salinity stress.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The world’s oldest medicinal plant is fenugreek, and it belongs to the legume family. It was originally grown as a pasture crop; however, fenugreek is mostly grown as a spice crop [1]. Fenugreek has pharmacological importance because of secondary metabolites such as flavonoid, terpenoids, pyridine-type alkaloids (trigonelline and choline) and protein (arginine, histidine, and lysine) [2]. It is cultivated mostly in China, Pakistan, India, and Canada. In India, fenugreek production is about 55 thousand tons per year. Due to these secondary metabolites’ fenugreek plant is used as anti-diabetic, digestive stimulant, cardio, and gastro protective. It has proteins (26%), fats (7%), and carbohydrates (58%) [3].

In Pakistan fenugreek also known as Methi and its production is mainly affected by salt stress because it belongs to leguminous family as higher concentration of salts in soil causes reduction in root hairs and rhizobia formation on roots [4]. Plants are affected by several types of environmental conditions like biotic and abiotic stresses [5,6,7]. These conditions have negative effects on morphology, physiology as well as production of plants [8, 9].

Salt stress is global issue which affects about 20% of agricultural area and reduce crop yield [10]. Among the many salts found in the soil, NaCl is the most common [10, 11]. This stress can be represented as oxidative stress in plants due to the production of reactive species of oxygen or nitrogen in higher concentration [12]. Salinity has negative impacts on physiology and metabolic activities of plants [13]. Symptoms of these changes include decreased leaf area, maximum leaf thickness and succulence, abscission of leaves, root and shoot necrosis, and shorter internode length [14, 15]. Salinity currently affects 7% of land, and it is expected that by 2050, salinity will affect 50% of soil [16, 17]. Salt stress have negative effect on growth and yield of plants []. Plant roots, shoots, leaves, flowers, and all other parts can be used as a medicine. Fenugreek has secondary metabolic properties which are present in these parts, but growth of these plant parts is retarded when they face any kind of stress like salinity. Similarly, saline soil cause reduction in active chemical contents of fenugreek plant [18, 19].

To cope with oxidative stress different types of micronutrients are used as foliar [] or soil application in plants [20]. Generally, several types of approaches have been made to mitigate salinity stress and nutrient application is one of them. Micronutrients application can be helpful for the improvement of plants under stressed condition [21, 22]. These nutrients include iron, manganese, zinc, cobalt, boron, nitrogen [23] and their foliar spray improves the physiology, growth, and production of plant [24]. Zinc is colorless micronutrient and it act as a synthetic antioxidant as well as it has key role in the development of structure and enzyme catalysis [25]. Zinc plays a vital role in the formation of auxin in plants which is helpful in promoting growth. It is involved in controlling water absorption in plants [26]. Zinc nano oxides foliar application is used to enhance secondary metabolites production in plants [27].

Numerous metabolic activities in plants, including lignification, transport of sugar, structure of cell wall, membrane permeability, protein and carbohydrate metabolism, and nucleic acid synthesis are regulated by boron application [28]. Boron reduces the IAA oxidase activity resulting in increased auxin content. It is involved in the nucleic acid formation in plants [29]. It has been reported that foliar application of zinc with boron is helpful in enhancing the growth of plant [30]. Boron is also a micronutrient in plants which is required in narrow range for proper growth, but its higher concentration can be toxic. It not only enhances the yield but also improves the quality of crops. Pollen tube germination and growth is increased through boron application which enhances the reproductive process of plants [31]. Under low temperature conditions, when there is deficiency of boron then nutrients uptake by plant roots is decreased which results in retarded growth [32]. As a result, there isn’t a single study that examines how different micronutrients respond in comparison as a fenugreek limiting factor [33]. Therefore, this experiment was conducted to examine the impact of zinc and boron as foliar spray to mitigate the effect of salinity on fenugreek plant growth, yield, physiology, and ions.

Materials and methods

Experimental site and plant materials

This research was performed at UAF Postgraduate Agricultural Research Station (Latitude: 31.383721 and Longitude: 72.989998) in plastic pots [width (24 cm) and depth (30 cm)] separately containing 10 kg dry river sand, which was thoroughly washed. Plant seeds of one variety of fenugreek known as “Desi Methi” were collected from the Ayub Agricultural Research Center, Faisalabad.

Experimental design and treatments

Sand-filled plastic pots 30 cm diameter and 25 cm height in dimension were laid in a completely randomized design (CRD) in a factorial arrangement with three replications for each treatment. At equal depth and distance, seeds were sown. Plants were applied with Hoagland solution at three week old plant stage and two levels of salt (0, 120mM NaCl), were applied to each pot. The salt concentration of 120 mM was maintained in aliquot parts of 60 mM to prevent salt shock. Sand was watered with saline water regularly twice a week till the termination of experiment and NaCl applications (0, 120 mM) were given together with water. Plants were irrigated until saturated, with the excess solution allowed to drain into collection pots. Foliar application of zinc (0, 50ppm, 100ppm) and boron (0, 2ppm) concentration was sprayed on three weeks old plants. Tween-20 (0.1%) was applied as a surfactant to enhance the absorbance of the solution. The fenugreek plants in each pot provided 20 ml of each level of zinc concentration (0, 50ppm, 100ppm) and boron (0, 2ppm) soon after sunset to prevent solution evaporation. After 21 days of foliar spray, three plants were carefully uprooted from each pot for data collection of shoots and roots.

Growth

Three plants from each treatment were harvested to evaluate morphological parameters, including height of plant, length of shoot, fresh weight of shoot, dry weight of shoot, length of root, fresh weight of root, dry weight of root, leaf area, no. of branches, no. of seeds, no. of leaves and weight of 100 seeds.

Physiology

Chlorophyll content

Chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments were determined by [34] and [35] methods in leaves. A 0.5 g of fresh leaves was powdered and 5 ml of acetone (80%) was added in it. The extract was centrifuged and absorbance at different wavelength (645 and 663 nm) was measured by spectrophotometer. Values were calculated by these formulas.

$$\eqalign{{\rm{Chl}}{\rm{.}}\,a\,\left( {{\rm{mg}}\,{{\rm{g}}^{ - {\rm{1}}}}\,{\rm{FW}}} \right)\,{\rm{ = }} & \,\left[ {{\rm{12}}{\rm{.7}}\,\left( {{\rm{OD663}}} \right)\, - \,{\rm{2}}{\rm{.69}}\,\left( {{\rm{OD645}}} \right)} \right] \cr & {\rm{ \times }}\,{\rm{V}}\,{\rm{/}}\,{\rm{1000}}\,{\rm{ \times }}\,{\rm{W}} \cr}$$
$$\eqalign{{\rm{Chl}}{\rm{.}}\,b\,\left( {{\rm{mg}}\,{{\rm{g}}^{ - {\rm{1}}}}\,{\rm{FW}}} \right)\,{\rm{ = }} & \,\left[ {{\rm{22}}{\rm{.9}}\,\left( {{\rm{OD645}}} \right)\, - \,{\rm{4}}{\rm{.68}}\,\left( {{\rm{OD663}}} \right)} \right] \cr & {\rm{ \times }}\,{\rm{V}}\,{\rm{/}}\,{\rm{1000}}\,{\rm{ \times }}\,{\rm{W}} \cr}$$
$$\eqalign{{\rm{Carotenoids}}\,\left( {{\rm{mg}}\,{{\rm{g}}^{ - {\rm{1}}}}\,{\rm{FW}}} \right)\,{\rm{ = }} & \,\left[ {{\rm{4}}{\rm{.16}}\,\left( {{\rm{OD480}}} \right)\, - \,{\rm{0}}{\rm{.89}}\,\left( {{\rm{OD663}}} \right)} \right] \cr & {\rm{ \times }}\,{\rm{V}}\,{\rm{/}}\,{\rm{1000}}\,{\rm{ \times }}\,{\rm{W}} \cr}$$

Total protein content (mg g− 1 FW)

Proteins were estimated using [36] method. Leaf sample 0.5 g was grinded and phosphate buffer 10mL of 0.02 M having pH 7 was added and extract was filtered. 1mL of plant sample and 1mL of extract was taken in test tubes and kept at room temperature for 30 min. Then, Folin reagent 0.5mL was added. Again, these materials were stored at ambient temperature and 5mL distilled water was added. Absorbance was taken at 620 nm. Buffer (1mL) and Brad Ford (2 mL) was taken as a blank.

Nutrients analysis for shoot

Acid digestion is used for the determination of mineral ions by following [37]. Dried shoot material (0.1 g) was powdered and mixed with 2 ml of conc. H2SO4 in digestion flasks for digestion. Then 4ml H2O2 was added in it and heated at 350 °C. Heating process is continued until the fumes produce. Then again 1mL of 35% H2O2 was added and continued the process until mixture be-comes colorless. Then mixture is diluted by adding distilled water up to 50 ml and filtered. Mineral ions like Na+, K+, and Ca2+ were identified using a flame photometer.

Salt tolerance index

The salt tolerance index (STI) was determined by comparing the total dry weight of plants obtained from 100 seeds grown under varying salt concentrations to the total dry weight of plants obtained under normal conditions (control). The formula for calculating the STI is as follows.,

Salt Tolerance Index = (Total Dry Weight at salinity / Total Dry Weight in control) x 100.

Statistical analysis

Data of all parameters was analyzed using factorial completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications by using software COSTAT [38] and means of treatment were compared by using Tukey test at 5% level of significance. Pearson correlation analysis was performed using R Studio Version 4.1.2.

Results

Growth

According to the analysis of variance salinity interaction with zinc and zinc with boron showed non-significant results while significant (P ≤ 0.05) results were obtained from salinity interaction with zinc and boron in combination and salinity with boron regarding shoot length (Table 1; Fig. 1A). A significant reduction in shoot length was observed under salinity level of 120mM. However, foliar application of zinc at 50 ppm and 100ppm level under un-saline and saline condition improved shoot length. Similarly, foliar application of boron (2ppm) significantly increased shoot length in both un-saline and saline condition. Foliar application of zinc (100ppm) and boron (2ppm) enhanced shoot length to maximum value under un-saline conditions. Similarly, maximum reduction was noted under saline conditions at 0 ppm level of boron and zinc.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on shoot length (A), shoot fresh weight (B) and shoot dry weight (C) of fenugreek grown under salinity stress Values represent means ± S.E

Full size image
Table 1 Mean square values for morphological and yield parameters of fenugreek grown under salinity stress with foliar application of zinc and boron
Full size table

Similar trend was observed for shoot fresh and dry weight. Significant results (P ≤ 0.05) were obtained for parameters on foliar application of zinc and boron under salinity. Salinity decreased fresh and dry weight of fenugreek shoot while foliar application of zinc with boron increased shoot dry weight non significantly under salt condition (120mM NaCl). Similarly, foliar application of zinc with boron enhanced shoot fresh weight significantly (Table 1; Fig. 1B and C). Maximum fresh and dry weight was noted at 100ppm of zinc and 2 ppm of boron under un-saline conditions. However, minimum fresh and dry weight of fenugreek shoot were recorded at boron (0ppm) and zinc (0ppm) under saline condition.

According to the analysis of variance root length showed non-significant results under salinity and foliar application of zinc with boron (Table 1; Fig. 2A). However, significant results were obtained from foliar application of zinc and boron singly with salinity (P ≤ 0.05). Salinity significantly reduced root length which was increased by foliar application of zinc and boron. It was noted that 100 ppm of zinc application without boron resulted in reduction of root length under saline condition. Maximum root length was followed by the foliar application of zinc (100 ppm) with boron (2 ppm) under un-saline conditions. Similarly, minimum root length was observed at 0ppm zinc and 0ppm boron under saline conditions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on root length (A), root fresh weight (B) and root dry weight (C) of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E

Full size image

Non-significant results were obtained for root fresh weight, plant height and number of leaves under saline condition and foliar application of zinc with boron. However, salinity and foliar application of zinc with boron showed significant results for root dry weight and leaf area. Maximum reduction in root fresh and dry weight was observed at 0 ppm zinc and 0ppm boron under saline condition. The foliar application of zinc and boron together under saline and un-saline conditions increased root fresh weight non significantly while significant results were obtained for root dry weight. Same trend was recorded for plant height, number of leaves and leaf area. Salinity reduced plant height and number of leaves of fenugreek plant non significantly while leaf area was significantly reduced. Similarly, maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf area were recorded in foliar application of zinc and boron together under un-saline conditions (Table 1; Figs. 2B and C and 3A and C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on plant height (A), leaf area (B) and number of leaves (C) of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E

Full size image

Yield

According to the analysis of variance salinity and micronutrients (zinc and boron) application showed significant results for number of branches. Salinity reduced number of branches of fenugreek plants treated with zinc and boron (0ppm) application. However, foliar application of zinc with boron (2ppm) increased the number of branches under saline and un-saline condition. Application of zinc (100ppm) and boron (2ppm) increased number of branches to maximum value under un-saline conditions (Table 1; Fig. 4A). Non-significant results were obtained for the number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weight on zinc and boron (0ppm) application under salinity. Salinity decreased the number of seeds and seed weight which was improved by foliar application of zinc and boron. Maximum number of seeds and seed weight was recorded at 100ppm of zinc and 2ppm of boron application under un-saline conditions. Foliar application of zinc (100ppm) and boron (0ppm) under saline condition resulted in reduction of seed weight and number of seeds (Table 1; Fig. 4B-C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on chlorophyll a(A), chlorophyll b(B) and carotenoids (C) of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E. Significant differences among row spacing were measured by the least significant difference (LSD) at p > 0.05 and indicated by different letters

Full size image

Physiology

Chlorophyll content

According to analysis of variance chlorophyll a showed non-significant result on micronutrients application under salinity. Foliar application of zinc (100 ppm) and boron (2ppm) enhanced chlorophyll a under saline and un-saline condition. Similarly, zinc and boron (0ppm) improved chlorophyll a value under salinity. However, salinity and foliar application of micronutrient (zinc and boron) showed significant results for chlorophyll b. Application of zinc (100ppm) and boron (0ppm) decreased chlorophyll b content under saline conditions. Maximum chl. a, and chl. b values were recorded at zinc (100ppm) and boron (2ppm) application. Minimum chlorophyll concentration was recorded at 0ppm zinc and 0ppm boron under saline conditions (Table 2; Fig. 5A-B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on total soluble proteins of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E. Significant differences among row spacing were measured by the least significant difference (LSD) at p > 0.05 and indicated by different letters

Full size image
Table 2 Mean square values for physiological and biochemical parameters of fenugreek grown under salinity stress with foliar application of zinc and boron
Full size table

Carotenoids content

Analysis of variance revealed non-significant results for carotenoids under salinity and foliar application of zinc with boron. Maximum carotenoids content was observed in plants treated with zinc (100 ppm) and boron (2ppm) under salinity. However, zinc and boron under un-saline conditions showed a little effect on carotenoids content. Minimum carotenoids value was observed at 0ppm zinc and 0ppm boron under un-saline conditions (Table 2; Fig. 5C).

Total soluble protein content (TSP)

According to analysis of variance salinity and foliar application of micronutrients showed significant results in total soluble protein content. Salinity highly reduced total soluble protein content. Application of zinc (100ppm) and boron (2ppm) maximized total soluble proteins under un-saline condition. Minimum proteins content was recorded at 0ppm of zinc and 0ppm of boron under saline conditions (Table 2; Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on shoot Na+(A), shoot K+(B), and shoot Ca2+ content of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E. Significant differences among row spacing were measured by the least significant difference (LSD) at p > 0.05 and indicated by different letters

Full size image

Nutrients analysis for shoot

According to analysis of variance nutrient analysis for shoot sodium, potassium and calcium ions showed non-significant results under salinity and micronutrient application (zinc and boron). Salinity increased sodium ions and reduced calcium, potassium ions concentration in shoots. Minimum calcium and potassium ions were noted at zinc (0ppm) and boron (0ppm) under saline condition. Foliar application of zinc (100ppm) and boron (2ppm) increased both calcium and potassium ions under saline and un-saline condition non significantly. Maximum values for calcium and potassium ions were recorded on micronutrients (zinc, boron) application under un-saline conditions. However, zinc and boron application resulted in reduction of sodium ions under saline conditions. Minimum sodium ions concentration was recorded at 0ppm of zinc and 2ppm of boron under un-saline conditions (Table 2; Fig. 7A-C).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on number of branches (A), number of seeds/pod (B) and 100 seed weight (C) of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E. Significant differences among row spacing were measured by the least significant difference (LSD) at p > 0.05 and indicated by different letters

Full size image

Salt tolerance index

According to the analysis of variance under un-saline conditions salt tolerance index was maximum with foliar application of zinc and boron. However, under saline conditions salt tolerance index was reduced. Minimum salt tolerance was recorded in plants treated with 120mM level of NaCl and control level of zinc and boron. Application of boron (2ppm) and zinc resulted in improving the salt tolerance index of plants under saline conditions (Table 2; Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron on salt tolerance index of fenugreek grown under salinity stress. Values represent means ± S.E. Significant differences among row spacing were measured by the least significant difference (LSD) at p > 0.05 and indicated by different letters

Full size image

Pearson Correlation analysis

Pearson correlation coefficients for various morpho-physiological attributes are presented in Fig. 9. In this correlation various growth and physiological parameters were correlated under the effect of salinity stress and surfactant treatment with zinc and boron. Root length (RL) strongly correlated with other morphological attributes i.e., shoot height, shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), physiological at-tributes i.e., chlorophyll a, calcium, and potassium. But protein content (PRC) did not show strong positive correlation whereas shoot length (SL) showed strong correlation with root dry weight (RDW), plant height (PH) and number of leaves (NL). All the morphological data did not show any correlation to sodium (Na+) and carotenoids (CAR) content. Calcium (Ca2+) and potassium (K) was not linked to sodium (Na+), but carotenoids (CAR) content show strong positive correlation with sodium content.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Pearson correlation coefficient representing various growth, physiology and ionic parameters of fenugreek grown under salinity stress with foliar application of zinc and boron. Morphological attributes i.e., root length (RL), shoot length (SL), shoot fresh weight (SFW), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), leaf area (LA). Physiological attributes: Pigment contents (Cha, Chb, CAR), total soluble proteins (PRC), ionic contents sodium (Na+), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca2+)

Full size image

Discussion

The findings of this research align with prior studies, illustrating the profound impact of environmental conditions on plants. They demonstrate the plants remarkable ability to respond to both biotic [39] and abiotic stresses [40] when subjected to nutrient applications. Among these stresses, salinity stands out as a significant challenge to plant growth and yield [41]. In this study, the deleterious effects of salinity stress on fenugreek plants were evident. This stress resulted in a reduction in fresh and dry weight, root and shoot length, leaf number, and seed production, ultimately leading to decreased plant growth and yield. Micronutrient application, specifically zinc (Zn) and boron (B), emerged as a promising strategy to alleviate the adverse effects of salinity stress on plants. These essential micronutrients play vital roles in plant growth and development [42]. In our present study foliar application of zinc and boron at various levels significantly improved root length, shoot length, and fresh and dry weights under salinity stress.

It is reported that reduction in yield and growth due to salinity stress is attributed to the high concentration of sodium ions, which block the uptake of other essential growth-promoting nutrients [43]. Previous studies reports that micronutrients application play crucial roles in various physiological and biochemical processes within plants, including ion uptake and transport [44]. In this study, the foliar application of zinc and boron enhanced growth and yield of fenugreek plants by reducing sodium ions concentrations. The plant roots play a key role in improving growth and development because roots are important for uptake of water and minerals [45, 46]. Furthermore, the growth of roots is intrinsically linked to potassium ions, which are essential for supporting plants at different growth stages [47,48,49]. Current study showed that root growth was notably hindered because of elevated salinity stress, resulting in reduced potassium uptake. However, the application of zinc and boron significantly increased the levels of potassium ions, leading to improvement in root growth of plants.

Salinity stress adversely affects photosynthesis, primarily by degrading vital photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids [50]. In this study higher concentration of salinity has reduced the photosynthetic activity which resulted in retarded growth and production of plants. Zinc and boron, being essential for chlorophyll synthesis and efficient photosynthetic activity [51], contributed to mitigating this effect. Their foliar application reduced sodium ions, increased chlorophyll levels, and improved photosynthesis.

Salinity stress is known to disrupt photosynthetic pigments and alter secondary metabolites [52]. In this study, it negatively affected chlorophyll components like chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids. However, the foliar application of zinc and boron counteracted these effects, enhancing chlorophyll components, reducing salinity stress, and improving photosynthesis.

Salinity, often associated with sodium and chlorine ions, can influence the uptake of calcium and potassium ions in plants [53]. However, the application of micronutrients has been documented to have a beneficial impact on the absorption of these ions, especially in situations where plants are exposed to salinity stress [54]. In our study, zinc and boron were found to positively affect the absorption of these ions under salinity stress. Under saline conditions, sodium ions inhibited the uptake of calcium and potassium ions, but foliar spraying of zinc and boron ameliorated this by enhancing ion levels.

Furthermore, salinity stress had a detrimental impact on the total soluble protein content of the plants. Previous research has indicated that salinity reduces total protein content by diminishing potassium ion concentrations, as the formation of soluble proteins is followed by the availability of potassium ions [55]. In the present study total soluble protein content was decreased under salinity and foliar application zinc with boron enhanced total soluble proteins formation by increasing the potassium ions concentration and reducing Na+ ions.

In case of salt tolerance index it is reported from previous literature that salinity tolerance index was reduced with increase of salt stress [56]. In our study it is also noted that under saline conditions the salinity tolerance index was reduced in plants. However, foliar application of zinc and boron improved the salt tolerance index in fenugreek plants.

Conclusion

Foliar application of zinc and boron proved effective in improving growth and physiological attributes of fenugreek by mitigating salinity stress. Among treatments applied, foliar spray of Zn (100ppm) and B (2ppm) were more effective and showed improvement in growth by enhancing photosynthetic pigments content, root length and shoot length. Foliar spray of B and Zn is recommended to mitigate salinity stress in other crops. In future, this study can be completed by treatment with ZnO NPs instead of Zinc salt application for control release of Zinc. So, this could be a decent nanofertilizer for fenugreek plant. Moreover, molecular basis of this experiment can be tested in future which is lacked in this research. Zinc and boron can also be applied in root medium for other crops to reduce salinity. These micronutrients application can also be tested on other varieties of fenugreek.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Singh N, Yadav SS, Kumar S, Narashiman B. Ethnopharmacological, phytochemical and clinical studies on Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L). Food Biosci. 2022;:101546.

  2. Yaldiz G, Camlica M. Assessment of secondary metabolites with different uses of Fenugreek. Legum Res 2. 2021.

  3. Syed QA, Rashid Z, Ahmad MH, Shukat R, Ishaq A, Muhammad N, et al. Nutritional and therapeutic properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): a review. Int J Food Prop. 2020;23:1777–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma K, Sharma S, Vaishnav A, Jain R, Singh D, Singh HB, et al. Salt-tolerant PGPR strain Priestia Endophytica SK1 promotes fenugreek growth under salt stress by inducing nitrogen assimilation and secondary metabolites. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;133:2802–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abeed AHA, Salama FM. Attenuating effect of an extract of Cd-Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum on the growth and physio-chemical changes of Datura innoxia under cd stress. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2022;22:4868–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abeed AHA, Mahdy RE, Alshehri D, Hammami I, Eissa MA, Abdel Latef AAH, et al. Induction of resilience strategies against biochemical deteriorations prompted by severe cadmium stress in sunflower plant when Trichoderma and bacterial inoculation were used as biofertilizers. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1004173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Chang Y, Al-Huqail AA, Ding Z, Al-Harbi MS, Ali EF, et al. Effect of manure and compost on the phytostabilization potential of heavy metals by the halophytic plant wavy-leaved saltbush. Plants. 2021;10:2176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ameer A, Mumtaz S, Asghar N, Hameed M, Ahmad F, Mahmood A, et al. Structural and functional attributes of Citrus reticulata Blanco under diverse soil and environmental conditions. Pakistan J Bot. 2023;55:1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaudhry S, Sidhu GPS. Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: a comprehensive review. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41:1–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Imran K, Zafar H, Chattha MU, Mahmood A, Maqbool R, Athar F, et al. Seed priming with different agents mitigate alkalinity induced oxidative damage and improves maize growth. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca. 2022;50:12615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farooq M, Asif S, Jang Y-H, Park J-R, Zhao D-D, Kim E-G et al. Effect of different salts on nutrients Uptake, Gene expression, antioxidant, and growth pattern of selected Rice genotypes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13.

  12. Garcia-Caparros P, De Filippis L, Gul A, Hasanuzzaman M, Ozturk M, Altay V, et al. Oxidative stress and antioxidant metabolism under adverse environmental conditions: a review. Bot Rev. 2021;87:421–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali B, Hafeez A, Afridi MS, Javed MA, Sumaira, Suleman F, et al. Bacterial-mediated salinity stress tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.): a fortunate way toward sustainable agriculture. ACS Omega. 2023. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1021/acsomega.3c00723.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dheeravathu SN, Singh K, Ramteke PW, Dikshit N, Prasad M, Deb D, et al. Physiological response of Bajra-Napier hybrids and Tri-specific Hybrid to salinity stressPhysiological response of Bajra-Napier hybrids and Tri-specific Hybrid to salinity stress. Trop Grasslands-Forrajes Trop. 2021;9:337–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahid MA, Sarkhosh A, Khan N, Balal RM, Ali S, Rossi L, et al. Insights into the physiological and biochemical impacts of salt stress on plant growth and development. Agronomy. 2020;10:938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chele KH, Tinte MM, Piater LA, Dubery IA, Tugizimana F. Soil salinity, a serious environmental issue and plant responses: a metabolomics perspective. Metabolites. 2021;11:724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Naqve M, Wang X, Shahbaz M, Mahmood A, Bibi S, Fiaz S. Alpha tocopherol-induced modulations in the morphophysiological attributes of okra under saline conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2021;:2889.

  18. Yaldiz G, Camlica M. Impact of various environmental stress factors on productivity, quality, and secondary metabolites of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L). Fenugreek Biol Appl. 2021;:301–26.

  19. Parwez R, Nabi A, Mukarram M, Aftab T, Khan MMA, Naeem M. Various Mitigation Approaches Applied to Confer Abiotic stress tolerance in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.): a review. Fenugreek Biol Appl. 2021;:137–85.

  20. Siddiqui H, Singh P, Arif Y, Sami F, Naaz R, Hayat S. Role of micronutrients in providing abiotic stress tolerance. Microb Biofertilizers Micronutr Availab Role Zinc Agric Hum Heal. 2022;:115–36.

  21. Umair Hassan M, Aamer M, Umer Chattha M, Haiying T, Shahzad B, Barbanti L, et al. The critical role of zinc in plants facing the drought stress. Agriculture. 2020;10:396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fatemi H, Carvajal M, Rios JJ. Foliar application of Zn alleviates salt stress symptoms of pak choi plants by activating water relations and glucosinolate synthesis. Agronomy. 2020;10:1528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rafiq M, Saqib M, Jawad H, Javed T, Hussain S, Arif M, et al. Improving quantitative and qualitative characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through Nitrogen Application under Semiarid conditions. Phyton (B Aires). 2023;92:1001–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bagale S. Nutrient management for soybean crops. Int J Agron. 2021;2021:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Zahrani HS, Alharby HF, Hakeem KR, Rehman RU. Exogenous application of zinc to mitigate the salt stress in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek—evaluation of physiological and biochemical processes. Plants. 2021;10:1005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cakmak I, Brown P, Colmenero-Flores JM, Husted S, Kutman BY, Nikolic M, et al. Micronutrients. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of plants. Elsevier; 2023. pp. 283–385.

  27. Swaefy HM, Abdallh AM. Mitigation of salinity stress in fenugreek plants using zinc oxide nanoparticles and zinc sulfate. J Plant Prod. 2021;12:1367–74.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yadav MR, Kumar S, Lal MK, Kumar D, Kumar R, Yadav RK, et al. Mechanistic understanding of Leakage and consequences and recent Technological advances in improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Cereals. Agronomy. 2023;13:527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira GL, Siqueira JA, Batista-Silva W, Cardoso FB, Nunes-Nesi A, Araújo WL. Boron: more than an essential element for land plants? Front Plant Sci. 2021;11:610307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zafar M, Ahmed S, Rashid M, Zafar N, Saqib M, Sarwar M, et al. Application of Zinc, Iron and Boron enhances Productivity and Grain Biofortification of Mungbean. Phyton (B Aires). 2023;92:983–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yousefi H, Dalir N, Rahnemaie R, Babaei A. The alleviation of salinity-induced stress by using boron in soilless grown rose. J Plant Nutr. 2020;43:526–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zewide I, Sherefu A. Review Paper on Effect of micronutrients for Crop Production. J Nutr Food Process. 2021;4.

  33. Shams Tabrez K, Malik A. Microbial biofertilizers and micronutrient availability: the role of zinc in agriculture and human health. Springer Nature; 2021.

  34. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Davis K. Social responsibility is inevitable. Calif Manage Rev. 1976;19:14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wolf B. A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1982;13:1035–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd.; 1980.

  39. Solanki MK, Solanki AC, Rai S, Srivastava S, Kashyap BK, Divvela PK et al. Functional interplay between antagonistic bacteria and Rhizoctonia solani in the tomato plant rhizosphere. Front Microbiol. 2022;13.

  40. Ali S, Ullah S, Khan MN, Khan WM, Razak SA, Wahab S, et al. The effects of Osmosis and Thermo-Priming on salinity stress tolerance in Vigna radiata L. Sustain. 2022;14:12924.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jan M, Anwar-Ul-Haq M, Javed T, Hussain S, Ahmad I, Sumrah MA et al. Response of contrasting Rice genotypes to Zinc sources under saline conditions. Phyt. 2023;92.

  42. Zewail RMY, El-Gmal IS, Khaitov B, El-Desouky HSA. Micronutrients through foliar application enhance growth, yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). J Plant Nutr. 2020;43:2275–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Choudhary M, Chandra P, Dixit B, Nehra V, Choudhary U, Choudhary S. Plant growth-promoting microbes: role and prospective in amelioration of salt stress. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2022;53:1692–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Choudhary S, Zehra A, Wani KI, Naeem M, Hakeem KR, Aftab T. The role of micronutrients in growth and development: transport and signalling pathways from crosstalk perspective. Plant Micronutr Defic Toxic Manag. 2020;:73–81.

  45. Nawaz F, Shehzad MA, Majeed S, Ahmad KS, Aqib M, Usmani MM et al. Role of mineral nutrition in improving drought and salinity tolerance in field crops. Agron Crop Vol 3 Stress Responses Toler. 2020;:129–47.

  46. Yadav B, Jogawat A, Lal SK, Lakra N, Mehta S, Shabek N, et al. Plant mineral transport systems and the potential for crop improvement. Planta. 2021;253:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Goyal V, Jhanghel D, Mehrotra S. Emerging warriors against salinity in plants: nitric oxide and hydrogen sulphide. Physiol Plant. 2021;171:896–908.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Basu S, Kumar A, Benazir I, Kumar G. Reassessing the role of ion homeostasis for improving salinity tolerance in crop plants. Physiol Plant. 2021;171:502–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kumar P, Kumar T, Singh S, Tuteja N, Prasad R, Singh J. Potassium: a key modulator for cell homeostasis. J Biotechnol. 2020;324:198–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ali B, Hafeez A, Javed MA, Afridi MS, Abbasi HA, Qayyum A, et al. Role of endophytic bacteria in salinity stress amelioration by physiological and molecular mechanisms of defense: a comprehensive review. South Afr J Bot. 2022;151:33–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kirkby EA. Introduction, definition, and classification of nutrients. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of plants. Elsevier; 2023. pp. 3–9.

  52. Bakka K, Challabathula D. Amelioration of salt stress tolerance in plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: insights from omics approaches. Plant Microbe Symbiosis. 2020;:303–30.

  53. Ondrasek G, Rengel Z, Maurović N, Kondres N, Filipović V, Savić R, et al. Growth and element uptake by salt-sensitive crops under combined NaCl and cd stresses. Plants. 2021;10:1202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kumari VV, Banerjee P, Verma VC, Sukumaran S, Chandran MAS, Gopinath KA, et al. Plant nutrition: an effective way to alleviate abiotic stress in agricultural crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:8519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Banakar MH, Amiri H, Ardakani MRS, Ranjbar GH. Susceptibility and tolerance of fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum-Graceum L.) to salt stress: physiological and biochemical inspections. Environ Exp Bot. 2022;194:104748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Awasthi P, Karki H, Bargali K, Bargali S. Germination and seedling growth of pulse crop (Vigna spp.) as affected by soil salt stress. Curr Agric Res J. 2016;4(2):159–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2024R410), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Supported by Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2024R410), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan

    Atika Khan, Safura Bibi & Zain Ul Abidin

  2. Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou-571101, China

    Talha Javed

  3. Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan

    Athar Mahmood

  4. Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

    Shahid Mehmood

  5. Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, PK-40100, Pakistan

    Muhammad Mansoor Javaid

  6. Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    Baber Ali

  7. Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Allama Iqbal Open University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Yasin

  8. Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, PO BOX 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammad Khalid Al-Sadoon

  9. Vegetable Section, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Babar Hussain Babar

  10. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan

    Rashid Iqbal

  11. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia, 378

    Tabarak Malik

Authors
  1. Atika Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Safura Bibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Talha Javed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Athar Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shahid Mehmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Mansoor Javaid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Baber Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Muhammad Yasin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zain Ul Abidin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mohammad Khalid Al-Sadoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Babar Hussain Babar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Rashid Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Tabarak Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualizations: A.K, S.B, A.M; Funding acquisition: M.K.A, T.M, R.I; Formal analysis: S.M, M.M.J, M.Y; Data curation: Z.A, B.A, B.H.B, R.I; Writing original draft: A.K, A.M; Review and editing: A.K, S.B, A.M, M.K.A, T.M, R.I, B.A, T.J, S.M, M.M.J, M.Y, Z.A, B.H.B. All authors contributed significantly, have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Athar Mahmood or Tabarak Malik.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Fenugreek seeds were collected from the Ayub Agricultural Research Center, Faisalabad, Pakistan. All the experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations”.

Consent for publication

‘Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A., Bibi, S., Javed, T. et al. Effect of salinity stress and surfactant treatment with zinc and boron on morpho-physiological and biochemical indices of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum). BMC Plant Biol 24, 138 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-024-04800-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12870-024-04800-7

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us